Quality Restrictions in the EU ETS: HFC and N 2 0
description
Transcript of Quality Restrictions in the EU ETS: HFC and N 2 0
Quality Restrictions in the EU ETS:HFC and N20
12th January 2011Fionnuala Walravens – Environmental
Investigation AgencyRob Elsworth – Sandbag Climate Campaign
Introduction
• Sandbag / EIA supports the Commission’s proposal to ban HFC and N2O offset credits from 1st Jan 2013.
• Support based on a number of factors:– Undermining both the Montreal Protocol and the
EU’s international climate objectives– Value for money– Geographical distribution– Limited Sustainable Development benefits
Montreal Protocol
• The Montreal Protocol established the accelerated phase-out of HCFC-22 (an ozone depleting substance)
• However, the lucrative nature of HFC-23 projects discourages producers of HCFC-22 to reduce their production – rather it causes perverse incentives
• Subsidising HCFC-22 production through the CDM prevents uptake of environmentally friendly alternatives
• Carbon leakage production shift to developing countries• EU is financing the phase-out of HCFC-22 through the
Montreal Protocol, at the same time paying for HFC CERs
HFC interactions with EU’s international Climate position
EU position for Cancún – as adopted by EU environment ministers on 14th Oct 2010
Point 9 - Increased global abatement efforts from advanced developing countries
Point 14 - Montreal Protocol may be suited to abating HFCsPoint 21 - CDM reform: improved environmental integrity and
regional distributionUNFCCC has failed to address flaws in AM0001• CDM Methodologies Panel Investigation found AM0001 “may inflate
baseline emissions” and recommends a revision. However unlikely to affect first crediting period
Europe must take the lead and set an example for global carbon markets• Cannot afford to allow minority interests to undermine EU leadership
Value for money
• Technical and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) estimates HFC-23 abatement to cost about €0.17/tonne CO2-eq abated
• Europe is paying €12/tonne to abate HFC-23• To date (2008-2009) Europe has spent €1.2bn on HFC credits
for compliance in the EU ETS.• Real cost of HFC-23 destruction in CDM is €16.5 million-70
times higher • These credits originated from 18 CDM projects. There are
2718 registered CDM projects
• Diverting funds away from vulnerable regions
Geographical distribution
Project distributionCERs surrendered into the EU ETS to date: 160 million = €1.9bn
HFC CERs – 97 million = €1.2bn
Timing of ban
• Article 11.a (9) foresees that "from 1 January 2013, measures may be applied to restrict the use of specific credits from project types.“
• A ban as of the 1st Jan 2013 is consistent with the EU ETS Directive
• Market participants were aware of this date and its implications – strategy should have altered accordingly
• Secondary markets ready to accommodate 1st January ban, only small number of investors may be affected
NO Credit Exchange
• Sandbag / EIA categorically opposes any carryover of credits between phases
• Any carryover would fundamentally undermine this proposal
The ban must be clear and comprehensive – no HFC/N20 credits post 1st Jan 2013
Thank you for your attention!
Fionnuala Walravens - [email protected]
Rob Elsworth - [email protected]