Quality control for structural and functional MRI
-
Upload
krzysztof-gorgolewski -
Category
Education
-
view
1.624 -
download
0
Transcript of Quality control for structural and functional MRI
How much noise is too much?
Quality control for structural and functional MRI
Why bother?
Goals of quality control
Deciding which data to include in your study and which to reject.
Deciding on using a public dataset (is it appropriate for my design/study?)
Diagnosing fixable problems with data acquisition process:Types of sequences
Scanner malfunctions
Head padding
Participant instructions
When to perform quality control?
Early! As soon as you get data:Helps fix problems with the scanner before the next
subjectAllows to recruit extra subjects if you know some
data needs to be discarded
QC (when done with the right tools) takes very little effort - but can save a lot of
money and time in the long run!
Basics: data consistency
Check if:
Scans for a new subjects have the same (prescribed) parameters:Resolution
Field of view
Number of timepoints (fMRI)
Each subject has all of the scans
Basics: data consistency
MRIQC
Bids-validator (http://incf.github.io/bids-validator):
Motion in structural scans (T1 weighted)
Picture courtesy of @le_feufollet
Motion in structural scans (T1 weighted)
A lot of motion
Some motion
No motion
Gibbs ringing
http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/rg.261055134
Wrap around
https://practicalfmri.blogspot.com/2011/12/common-static-epi-artifacts-aliasing-or.html
Ghosting (Nyquist N/2 Ghosts)
https://practicalfmri.blogspot.com/2011/11/physics-for-understanding-fmri.htmlMean image Stddev image
Ghosting (chemical shift)
Spikes
https://practicalfmri.blogspot.com/2011/11/physics-for-understanding-fmri.html
t=0 t=1 t=2
Air mask
K-space (the final frontier)
K-space (the final frontier)
Spikes
Spin history effects
http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/imaging/CommonArtefacts
Motion and spin history effects
Motion and spin history effects
Motion and spin history effects
Motion and spin history effects
http://www.jonathanpower.net/2016-ni-the-plot.html
Motion and spin history effects
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/16/6058.full.pdf
QC metrics
Noise measurementSignal-to-noise ratio (SNR) - higher is better
Contrast-to-noise ration (CNR) - higher is better
Sharpness (full-width half maximum estimations) - smaller FWHM is better
Goodness of fit of a noise model into the noise in the background (QI2) - lower is better
Coefficient of Joint Variation (CJV) - lower is better
Information theoryForeground-Background Energy Ratio (FBER) - higher is better
Entropy Focus Criterion (EFC) - lower is better
ArtifactsSegmentation using mathematical morphology (QI1) - lower is better
Measurements on the estimated INU (intensity non-uniformity) - values around 1.0
Partial Volume Errors (PVE) - lower is better
Other: summary statistics, intracranial volume fractions (ICV)
QC metrics
Noise measurement: SNR, tSNR, temporal standard deviation
Information theory: EFC, FBER
Confounds and artifacts:Framewise Displacement (FD) - lower is better
(Standardized) DVARS (D referring to temporal derivative of timecourses, VARS referring to RMS variance over voxels) - lower is better
Ghost-to-Signal ratio (GSR) - lower is better
Global correlation (GCOR) - lower is better
Energy of spectrum (ES) - lower is better
AFNI’s outlier detection and quality indexes
More thoughts about QC
There are not strict rules which data to discardSome artefacts and distortions can be recovered by
smart algorithmsQC can help you decide results from which subjects
you should interrogate more closely
Crowdsourcing artefactsWhat happens when you ask Twitter for help...
bit.do/mri_qcExample cases (with and without artifacts) along with QC reports
All reports generated using MRIQC (mriqc.readthedocs.io)