Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.
-
Upload
marlene-perkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.
![Page 1: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning
systemPeter Colley
![Page 2: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is QA ?
QA - systematic procedures necessary to ensure that a product or process performs to specification
little published data for QA of treatment planning computers
ICRU Report 42
Hardware Softw
are
User/D
ocs Data
Quality System
![Page 4: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Documentation and User Training
Considerations: ICRU 42
» user must be “informed” about procedures implemented by the software and hardware
» users’ ability to enter correct information into the system
Adequate staff training Physicist should validate the performance of the
algorithms Documented System (Dahlin et al)
Actions: Patient Dose Calculations - Experimental Check Absolute Dose Rate for reference conditions
![Page 5: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Software
Considerations: Algorithm Inaccuracy
» complex physical problems = approximations» Implementation Inaccuracies
– dose grid spacing
– interpolation schemes
Actions: Test Algorithm in Routine and Extreme conditions
![Page 6: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Data
Considerations: Inaccuracies in measured data
» measurement of beam parameters» measurement of patient data
Data Consistency» data corruption
– defragmentation / media failure
– virus
» intentional modification
Inaccuracies in data entry» USER TRAINING» HARDWARE
Inaccuracies in data output» HARDWARE
![Page 7: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hardware
Considerations: Input and Output Device Accuracy and Resolution
» Digitizer Calibration– test and recalibration
» Pen Plotters / Printer– accuracy ( > 1mm)
– resolution
» Video Display– distortion free
– consistent with hard copy
Processor and Memory tests
![Page 8: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Acceptability
Additional Uncertainties: • tissue inhomogeneties?• under wedges and attenuators?• small fields?• electronic disequlibrium?
![Page 9: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
QA Systems Initial Testing / Acceptance
Testing» Basis of a Quality System» Provides an operational “bench
mark”» validates data coms and
registration with other equipment
Reproducibility / Regular QA Testing» Uses similar tests to Initial Testing» Stipulates minimum frequency for
testing to be performed» Input to corrective action stage if
equipment does not meet the benchmark standards
Test Min.Frequency
1. Input digitiser, output plot Square Contour
Weekley
2. CT Scan Transfer Quarterly3. Photon Beamsi) Point Doses (d = dmax, 5, 10) rectangular fields (5*30) irregular fieldii) Lateral Profiles Open (d = dmax, 10)(10*10, 35*35) Wedge (d = 10)(large field)iii) Inhomogeneities Single Beam (10*10) Air Slab in Water bone-like slab in water
Semi-annually
Semi-annually
Semi-annually
4. Summation Algorithmsi) Parallel pair-photons equally weighted unequally weighted wedged fieldsii) three field technique 30, 135 and 250 degreesiii) Two adjacent 180 degree arcs
Semi-annually
5. Machine Settings Semi-annually
![Page 10: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Finally...
Quote from the literature:
“No complex computer system can be made completely error free - careful daily examination of the treatment plans should be performed.”
References:Van Dyk et al. Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Treatment
Planning Computers. IJROBP, Vol26. pp261-273
Fraass et al. AAPM, Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med. Phys. (10) 1998.
Mayles et al. Physics Aspects of Quality Control in Radiotherapy. Report 81.
Shaw JE. A Guide to Commissioning and Quality Control of Treatment Planning Systems. IPEM Report 68.
![Page 11: Quality Assurance for a modern treatment planning system Peter Colley.](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032707/56649e2a5503460f94b18158/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)