Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

29
Qualitative Research Techniques

Transcript of Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Page 1: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Qualitative Research Techniques

Page 2: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

2

Qualitative Research...

Is any research conducted using an observational technique or unstructured questioning.

Often viewed as a “Soft-approach.” Conducted:– when structured research is not possible,– when true response may not be available

[embarrassing “touchy questions”]– To know about things that cannot be directly

observed and measured– to explain quantitative research results.

Should not be viewed as conclusive research. Qualitative and Quantitative research are

complementary to each other.

Page 3: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

3

A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Research

Qualitative Research Quantitative Research

Basic researchobjective

To gain a broad qualitativeunderstanding of theunderlying reasons andmotivations;As a first step inmultistage research

To quantify the data andgeneralize the resultsform the sample to thepopulation of interest;Recommend a finalcourse of action

Type of sampleused

Small numbers of non-representative cases

Large number ofrepresentative cases

Data collectionMethod

Unstructured Structured

Nature of dataanalysis

Non-statistical Statistical

Page 4: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

4

Classification of Qualitative Research Procedures

Fo cus G ro ups D epth Interv iews

D irect(N o ndisguised)

A sso c iatio nT echniques

C o m pletio nT echniques

C o nstructio nT echniques

E xpressiveT echniques

P ro jectiveT echniques

Indirect(D isguised)

Q ualita tive R esearchP ro cedures

Page 5: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Methods

Observation Individual In-depth Interview Group Discussion Projective Techniques Case Studies

Page 6: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

6

Qualitative research = Observation technique

Direct vs indirect: – Direct>> observing

behavior as it occurs– Indirect >> observing

the effects of behavior Disguised vs

nondisguised– Nondisguised>>Direct – Disguised >> Indirect

Structured vs unstructured– Structured>>predeterm

ine what to observe– Unstructured>>monitor

all behavior Human vs Mechanical

– Human>>observation done by human beings

– Mechanical>>observation by machine

Classification of Observation

Page 7: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

7

Observation

Appropriate Conditions– The event must occur in a short time interval,

• avoid lag affect

– Must occur in a setting where the researcher can observe the behavior

Page 8: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

8

Observation:Advantages and Limitations

Advantages– Greater data accuracy than direct questioning, in natural

settings people behave naturally,– Problems of refusal, not at home, false response, non-

cooperation etc. are absent,– In some situations, only way

• Number of customers visiting a store• Studying children’s behavior

Limitations– time consuming, – too many things to observe, – may not be representative, – difficulty in determining root cause of the behavior.

Page 9: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Individual In-depth Interview

Non-directive Semi-structured

Difference lie in the amount of guidance the interviewer provides

Page 10: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Individual In-depth Interview

Advantages (Non-directive) More Quality More Quantity More depth More representation More efficiency More value

Page 11: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Individual In-depth Interview

Advantages (Semi structured) Attempts to cover a specific list of topics Effective with busy executives Laddering technique Hidden issues – sore pt Symbolic analysis

Page 12: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

12

Focus Group discussion

An interview conducted by a trained moderator in a non-structured and natural manner with a small group of respondents.

Group size 8-12Group composition Homogenous, respondents

prescreenedPhysical setting Relaxed, informal settingTime duration 1 - 3 hoursRecording Use of audio and video

cassettesModerator Observational, interpersonal,

good communication skills needed.

Page 13: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

13

Focus Group discussion

Objectives:– Generate new product or service ideas– Understand consumer vocabulary

• Useful for ad campaigns

– Reveal consumer needs, motives, perceptions and attitudes,

• Generating future research objectives

– Facilitate understanding of the quantitative studies

Page 14: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

14

Focus Group Procedure

Determine the objectives of the Marketing Research Project and define the problem

Specify the objective of qualitative research

State the objectives/questions to be answered by the focus group

Planning the agenda

Recruitment & Moderator

Conduct the focus group interview

Review tapes and analyze data

Summarize the findings and plan follow-up research

Page 15: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

15

The Focus Group Moderator

The person who conducts the focus group session. – Success of focus groups depend on him/her,– He/she must strive for generating a stimulating

natural discussion without losing sight of the focus,– Must take initiative, but should not dominate the

discussion unduly,

– Should have feeling of urgency, – Should participate in the research from the

beginning,– Must add value beyond just conducting the session.

Page 16: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

16

Traits of a Good Focus Group Moderator

A Good Focus Group Moderator…1. must have experienced in conducting focus group research;2. should participate in conceptualizing the focus group research design, rather than simply executing the groups exactly as asked and take personal and take responsibility for the recruitment, screening, and selecting of participants.3. must engage in advance preparation to improve overall knowledge of the area being discussed and prepare a detailed guide to moderate the focus group..4. must demonstrate the enthusiasm and exhibit the energy necessary to keep the group interested yet maintain control of the group without leading or influencing the participants;5. should be open to modern techniques (e.g., attitude scaling, conceptual mapping, visual stimulation, or role-playing) which can be used to delve deeper into the minds of participants;6. must share in the feeling of urgency to complete the focus group while desiring to achieve an excellent total research project; and7. must provide some “added value” to the project beyond just conducting the session.

Page 17: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

17

Seven advantages of Focus Group

1. Synergism. When a group of people with similar interestsdiscuss an issue together, they are likely to produce a richerinsight, wider range of information, and innovative ideas thanwill individual responses obtained privately.

2. Snowballing. In a group discussion, one person’s comment oftentriggers a chain reaction from the other participants andgenerates more views.

3. Stimulation. Once the focus group discussion is underway,general level of excitement over the topic increases, and a largenumber of respondents want to express their ideas and exposetheir feelings.

Page 18: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

18

Seven advantages of Focus Group

4. Security. Because of homogeneity of composition, focus groupparticipants have similar feelings. This enables them to feelcomfortable and uninhibited to express their ideas/feelings.

5. Spontaneity. In focus groups participants are not required toanswer specific questions. Their responses can be spontaneousand unconventional reflecting an accurate idea of their views

6. Speed. Because people discuss issues simultaneously, datacollection and analysis in focus group proceed relatively quickly.

7. Inexpensive. Considering the richness of output, it is arelatively inexpensive method of data collection.

Page 19: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

19

Five Disadvantages of Focus Group

1. Lack of representativeness. Focus groups are not representative of thegeneral population. Hence, results of focus group discussions are notprojectable and should not be the only basis for decision making.

2. Misjudgement. Focus groups are generally susceptible to client andresearcher biases. As such, compared to the results of other datacollection techniques, focus group results could be easily misjudged.

3. Misuse. Focus groups can be misused and abused by considering theresults as conclusive rather than exploratory.

4. Moderation. Skills of the moderator is a major determinant of focusgroup success and the quality of their results. But moderators withdesirable skills are rare.

5. Difficult to analyze. The unstructured nature of the responses in focusgroup discussions makes coding, analysis, and interpretation difficult.

Page 20: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Trends in Focus GroupOnline – Advantages Potentially sensitive or confidential areas where

anonymity is essential Useful in B2C widely dispersed audience Not economical and feasible to bring respondents

together Studies related to IT and involves feedback on

website evaluation B2B- professions are involved and time is constraint More candid and comfortable to give negative or

controversial feedback

Page 21: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Trends in Focus Group

Online – not feasible in Capturing body language or facial expressions is vital Need to show prototypes or 3 dimensional models Hands on usage is critical, touching/feeling Taste testing, commercial testing, testing of ads with

extensive copy When the client material or the topic is highly

confidential

Page 22: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

22

Projective Techniques

These are indirect interviewing methods which enable sampled respondents to project their views, beliefs and feelings onto a third-party or into some task situation.

The researcher sets up a situation for the respondents asking them to express their own views, or to complete/ interpret some ambiguous stimulus presented to them.

Various types. More common ones are:– Free Word Association– Sentence Completion– Unfinished scenario/story completion– Cartoon completion test

Page 23: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

23

Stimulus Word ResponsePostman __________Bank Teller* __________Networking __________Automatic teller machine*Persian Carpet __________Driver __________Bank by Phone* __________Transitlink _________

FREE WORD ASSOCIATIONFREE WORD ASSOCIATION

In this technique, a list of carefully selected stimulus words or phrases related to the topic of research are read out, one at a time, to a respondent. The respondent is asked to respond with the first word or phrase that comes to his/her mind. The list of words should contain a mixture of test words and neutral words.

In the example shown here, the researchers seems to be interested in studying high-tech banking (words with *).

However, analyzing and interpreting test results are rather difficult.

Page 24: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

24

Automatic teller machine users are______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Automatic teller machines may be convenient, but they______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

My major concern about automatic teller machines is______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SENTENCE COMPLETIONSENTENCE COMPLETION

This technique is an extension of the free-word association This technique is an extension of the free-word association test. In this technique, the respondent is presented with some test. In this technique, the respondent is presented with some sentences containing incomplete stimuli and is asked to sentences containing incomplete stimuli and is asked to complete them. Like the free-word association method, complete them. Like the free-word association method, interpreting and analyzing data obtained from this technique interpreting and analyzing data obtained from this technique is also difficult.is also difficult.

Page 25: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

25

Since Mr. Albert Lee had received a large commission by check justbefore leaving home for a holiday trip, he wanted to deposit it in anautomatic teller machine, because ___________, but his friend Mr.Wong told him that he should _____________, because_____________.

UNFINISHED SCENARIO COMPLETIONUNFINISHED SCENARIO COMPLETION

This technique is similar to the sentence completion test. This technique is similar to the sentence completion test. However, in this technique, the respondent is presented with However, in this technique, the respondent is presented with a specific scenario containing incomplete stimuli [a specific scenario containing incomplete stimuli [see example see example

belowbelow] and is asked to complete the scenario. Interpreting ] and is asked to complete the scenario. Interpreting and analyzing data obtained from this technique is also and analyzing data obtained from this technique is also difficult.difficult.

Page 26: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

26

DepositthischequenearestATM inthe

CARTOON COMPLETION TESTCARTOON COMPLETION TEST

In the cartoon technique, the respondent is shown a comic-strip like cartoon with two characters in a conversation. While the speech of one character is shown in his/her balloon,the other balloon is empty.The respondent is asked to assume the role of the other person and fill the empty balloon with a speech.

Page 27: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Case Study MethodA case study is an intensive study of a specific

individual or specific context. Freud developed case studies of several individuals

as the basis for the theory of psychoanalysis.Piaget did case studies of children to study

developmental phases. There is no single way to conduct a case study, and

a combination of methods (e.g., unstructured interviewing, direct observation) can be used.

Page 28: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

28

Suitability in Asia-Pacific Region

Theoretically, qualitative research techniques should be suitable in the Asia-Pacific countries. However, in reality conducting qualitative research in Asia does not seem to be easy.

In most Asian countries techniques such as focus group research constitutes about 10% of all research works carried out by companies mainly due to cultural reasons.– People feel more confident with numbers than with mere

opinions.– In some Asian societies, people hesitate to express opinion

on sensitive issues.– Groups in Singapore are less willingly to talk than those in

Hong Kong. – While expressing views, Hong Kongers are more impatient,

while Thais and Filipinos have an in-built “courtesy bias”.

Page 29: Qualititive Research_tools,Techniques and Methods

Thank You!