Qualitative Research
-
Upload
chloe-foley -
Category
Documents
-
view
20 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research• Phenomenological
paradigm• Assumes reality is
socially constructed• Seeks understanding• Ethnography approach• Researcher becomes
“immersed”• Uses an emergent
design
Quantitative Research
• Positivist paradigm• Assumes an objective
reality• Seeks to explain causes
of changes in social facts• Experimental or
correlational designs• Researcher is detached• Uses established set of
procedures and steps
Themes of Qualitative Inquiry
• Naturalistic Inquiry
• Inductive Analysis
• Holistic Perspective
• Qualitative Data
• Personal Contact and Insight
• Dynamic Systems
Themes of Qualitative Inquiry
• Unique Case Orientation
• Context Sensitivity
• Empathic Neutrality
• Design Flexibility
Sources of Data
• Program setting• Human, Social Environment• Planned Activities and Formal Interactions-• Informal interactions and Unplanned
activities• Native Language of the Phenomenon• Nonverbal Communication• Unobtrusive Indicators• Documents• What does not happen
Qualitative Interviewing
• Informal-conversational
• General interview guide
• Standardized open-ended
Purposeful Sampling
• Comprehensive Sampling
• Site Selection
• Maximum Variation Sampling
• Network Sampling
Sampling by Case Type
• Extreme case
• Intense case
• Typical case
• Unique case
• Reputational case
• Critical case
• Concept/theory-based case
Sample Size
• Guidelines related to– Purpose of the study– Research problem– Data collection technique– Availability of information-rich cases
Strategies to Enhance Validity• Prolonged and persistent field work• Multi-method strategies• Participant language• Low-inference descriptors• Multiple researchers• Mechanically recorded data• Participant researcher• Member checking• Participant review• Negative cases or discrepant data
• Introduction– Is there a clear rationale for the study?– Is the literature review pertinent to the focus of
the research?
• Methodology– Are validity issues addressed?– Are limitations of design, data access
addressed?
• Findings and Interpretations– Are perspectives of different participants
clearly presented and is contextual information provided?
– Are multiple perspectives presented?– Are the results well documented and
interpretations linked to the results?– Are personal beliefs kept separate from the
data?– Are the interpretations reasonable?– Were researcher preconceptions and biases
acknowledged?