Qualität von MOOCs
-
Author
ulf-daniel-ehlers -
Category
Education
-
view
1.349 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of Qualität von MOOCs

www.efquel.org
Qualität von MOOCsUlf-Daniel EhlersDuale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg (www.dhbw.de)European Foundation for Quality in E-Learning (www.efquel.org)
Campus Innovation Hamburg 2013

Digitale (R)Evolutionen in der HS
MOOCs als dritte digitale (R)evolution1. E-Learning Hype Anfang des
Milleniums Lernumgebungen2. OER Peak ab 2007
“Giving away knowledge for free“3. MOOC Peak ab 2010
“Giving away education for free“

Die Qualitätsdebatte
Alle digitalen (R)evolutionen führen zu einer Qualitätsdebatte• Von der digitalen und
technologischen Innovation• Über den Wandel der
Lehr-/Lernkultur• Zu Qualitätsfragen und
Innovations-strategien


Qualität von MOOCs...?!
• (Wie) kann man sie messen?• Was sind Qualitätskriterien?• Gute MOOCs – schlechte MOOC?• Was sind wertvolle MOOCs?• Sind sie besser, je massiver?• Sind sie besser, je niedriger die Dropout-
Quote?• Sind Dropouts eigentlich überhaupt ein
Kriterium für Qualität von MOOCs?

Das „MOOC Quality Project“
12 Wochen, 12 Expertes, 12 Posts, 15.000 Leser, >150 Kommentare m
ooc.e
fqu
el.o
rg

1. „Massive“ Zielgruppen? • „Change from „no target audience“-
thinking to having one in mind, even if it is wide. Take into acount new participation profiles.“
MOOC
Lurkers
Passive Teilnehmer
Aktive Teilnehmer
Drop-ins
HILL, P. (2013) “The Four Student Archetypes Emerging in MOOCs” [Online] e-Literate blog post 02/03/13 [accessed 19/04/13]. Available:
http://mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/

www.efquel.org
2. Gemischte Gruppen?
• „Be aware that inviting the world means to bring in the worlds opinion (existing groups might be disturbed)“
• „Mixing campus and MOOC Students might be challenging: drive in/by learners vs. highly motivated learners who want a masters degree.“
http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

3. Vielfältige Lernkontexte
• „Be aware that the quality paradigm “fitness for purpose” is not working for MOOCs because MOOCs mean learning across contexts and purposes.“
• „Quality measures become individualised, quality methods like self- & peer-assessment and –reflection are suitable.“http://www.teleskop-service.de/Veranstaltungen/ITT2007/Blick_in_die_Berge.jpg

www.efquel.org
4. Selbststeuerung als Qualitätsfaktor
„Be open about your requirements of self-organisation, provide scaffolding for those who lack that self-organisation.“
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Fugle%2C_%C3%B8rns%C3%B8_073.jpg

5. Transparenz schaffen
1. the degree of openness, 2. the scale of participation
(massification), 3. the amount of use of multimedia, 4. the amount of communication, 5. the extent to which collaboration
is included, 6. the type of learner pathway (from
learner centred to teacher-centred and highly structured),
1. the level of quality assurance,
2. the extent to which reflection is encouraged,
3. the level of assessment, 4. how informal or formal it
is, 5. autonomy, 6. and diversity.
„Be precise about the content and purpose of the MOOC (self-declaration) and keep promises!“ (MOOC description Beschreibungsmodell)
(Conole 2013)

6. Pädagogische Prinzipien
• „Use peer-to-peer pedagogy: peer-learning, peer-review, peer-assessment, collaborative learning, multiple learning pathways and exploratory learning.“
• „Understand that teaching is not a prerequsite of learning.“
http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

www.efquel.org
7. MOOCs sind „Choice-Based“
• „Get away from – the notion that „ending a MOOC early“ means
dropping out – looking at MOOCs like (structured, paced,
timebound) courses“
• „Be aware that MOOC learning is an opt-in/out learning model“
• „MOOCs follow voluntary sequencing and are based on choices. The choices they offer make their attractiveness.“
http://www.naset.org/uploads/pics/choice.gif

www.efquel.org
Ausblick: MOOC-lernen anerkennen!
http://www.oer-europe.net

www.efquel.org
Danke!WWW.EFQUEL.ORG
EFQUEL office in BrusselsRue des deux Eglises 35B – 1000 BRUSSELSBELGIUMTel : + 32 2 639 30 32Fax : + 32 2 644 35 83Email : [email protected]
Released under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Belgium License
You are free:• to Share — to copy, distribute and
transmit the work• to Remix — to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.