Qualification / Validation Qualification / Validation - °KEV

28
GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 1 Andreas Brutsche Novartis Switzerland GMP Conference, 11.06.04, Istanbul Qualification / Validation Quality Risk Assessment in the Pharmaceutical Industry - Challenges and Opportunities -

Transcript of Qualification / Validation Qualification / Validation - °KEV

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 1

Andreas BrutscheNovartis Switzerland

GMP Conference, 11.06.04, Istanbul

Qualification / ValidationQuality Risk Assessment in the

Pharmaceutical Industry- Challenges and Opportunities -

Qualification / ValidationQuality Risk Assessment in the

Pharmaceutical Industry- Challenges and Opportunities -

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 2

Qualification, Validation, CalibrationQualification, Validation, Calibration

Visible Process

UnvalidatedProcess

New System

Validation/Qualification Iceberg

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 3

Validation / Qualification Approach

User RequirementSpecifications

Functional Specifications

DesignSpecifications

System Build

InstallationQualification

OperationalQualificaton

PerformanceQualificationrelated to

related to

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 4

Quality Risk Assessment in the Pharmaceutical IndustryQuality Risk Assessment in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Risk Assessment has become a key concept in the decision making process of today’s pharmaceutical industry. Its impact affects many disciplines including:

EngineeringManufacturingProject ManagementQualitySafetyEnvironmental

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 5

Quality Risk AssessmentQuality Risk Assessment

Product Quality

Associated Systems

Utilities

Analytical Testing

EquipmentManufacturingProcess

EquipmentQualification

Qualification /Validation

Part 11Water / Air /Process gases

Validation

Validation ofthe analytical method

Validation

Qualification

People

Computer

Training

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 6

Risk Assessment:Risk Assessment:

Each step in a process is assessed on its influence on product quality.

• Critical steps have to be validated/qualified

• Uncritical steps no activities are required

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 7

Equipment QualificationEquipment Qualification

• User Requirement Specifications (URS)• Design Qualification

• Conceptual Design• Basic Design• Detail Design

• Installation Qualification

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 8

Equipment QualificationEquipment Qualification

• Operational Qualification

• Performance Qualification

Calibration and Maintenance Programs

Retrospective Qualification

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 9

Equipment QualificationEquipment Qualification

Design Qualification

“Defining the quality parameters required of the equipment and manufacturer”

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 10

Equipment QualificationEquipment Qualification

Installation Qualification

“Assurance that the intended equipment is received as designed and specified.”

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 11

Equipment QualificationEquipment Qualification

Operational Qualification

“Confirmation that the equipment functions as specified and operates correctly.”

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 12

Equipment QualificationEquipment Qualification

Performance Qualification

“Confirmation that the equipment consistently continues to perform as required”.

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 13

Validation

To prove that a process works is, in a nutshell, what we mean by the verb to

validate.

E. Frey, FDA

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 14

Validation

Process ValidationCleaning Validation Computer system ValidationValidation of Analytical MethodsPart 11 Compliance

Risk based approach is key !!!Focus on Product, not only on technology

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 15

Link between Validation/ Qualification

Risk Analysis Equipment Qualification

Risk Analysis Process Validation

Product

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 16

Quality Risk AnalysisFlow Chart for a Solid Dosage Form ProcessQuality Risk AnalysisFlow Chart for a Solid Dosage Form Process

Weigh Active Agents

Weigh Excipients Add Binder Water / Solvent

Weigh Lubricant Add Lubricant

Solution Preparation

Weigh Excipients

Dry Mix

Wet Mix / Granulate

Dry

Dry Granulate

Blend

Compress

Coat (optional)

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 17

Quality Risk AnalysisKey ParametersQuality Risk AnalysisKey ParametersProcess Stage Parameter Worst Case Values___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________

Raw materials Particle size Min-Max valuesActive agent Surface areaWet mixing Binder temperature Target +/- x°C

Binder volume Min-Max used in Pilot ScaleMixing time Normal time +/- x minutes

Drying Granule moisture Upper-lower in process specBlending Granule particle size Upper-lower in process specCompression Compressor speed Normal production range

(e.g. 100000/hr-150000/hr)Pre-compressionpressure Min-Max

Coating Inlet air temperature Target + / - xSpray rate target rate + / - x

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 18

Quality Risk AnalysisCritical Process ParameterQuality Risk AnalysisCritical Process Parameter

Parameters: Colette gral mixerAgitator - Speed 2Chopper - offMixing time - 5 minutes

Sampling After mixing take 12 samples from the mixing bowl using a Regimen: sample thief. Samples to be taken 4 top, 4 middle, 4

bottom. Sample to be 300 mg approx.

Testing: Analyse each sample for active agent content

Acceptance All individual values to be within + 7 - 10 % of the group Critemean RSD to be less than 6 %. The mean to be within + 7 - 5 % of the theoretical value

______________________________________________________________________

Solid dosage form

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 19

Tool boxRisk AssessmentTool boxRisk Assessment

• FMEA (= Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)

• HACCP (= Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points)

• FTA (= Failure Tree Analysis)

• System Kepner-Tregoe• Analysis of the situation• Analysis of the problem • Analysis of the decisions• Analysis of potential problems

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 20

Tool boxRisk AssessmentTool boxRisk Assessment

• FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)

→ Define the “Risk Priority number” ( - RPN)Example: Steam sterilisation Process

- Steampressure / Temperature in the autoclave- Sterilisation Time- Measures to avoid air in the autoclave- Treatment of the product before and after the

process

Risk

decreasing

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 21

FTA (Failure Tree Analysis)FTA (Failure Tree Analysis)

BasicIncident 1

BasicIncident 2

BasicIncident 3

BasicIncident 4

UndesiredIncident

Basic Concept:

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 22

Key Success Factor:

Training and Skills of people

• Scientific skills

• Broad - Experience in pharmaceutical Industry

• Leadership, Responsibilities

Risk AssessmentRisk Assessment

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 23

Change / DeviationChange / Deviation

“Change” usually refers to a planned alteration which is documented and considered before implementation. Normally, changes are either permanent or have a fixed period of validity.

“Deviation” represents a change which may occur for a variety of reasons during operations, or may be observed to have happened after the operation.

Normally, deviations are not permanent and represent single events“Planned Deviations” ??

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 24

Documentation

Validation Master PlanQualification Master PlanGMP Risk AnalysisValidation ProtocolTest protocol (including specification)Validation ReportSummary of Deviations / Issues

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 25

Change ManagementChange Management

Who made the changeWhy was the change necessary

When was the change implementedWhat international consequences arise:- Risk / benefit assessments- Cost / benefit assessments- Regulatory impact

Who gave approvals__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Changes are necessary - Uncontrolled changes are dangerous

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 26

Computer Simulations in Conventional Clean Rooms (Sterile Manuf.)

To be in compliance with all microbiological and particulate requirements, the design of the sterile facilities plays the most important role.Computer simulation studies of air flows should be used to analyse the most critical areas.Detailed analysis was made with regard to conflicting areas of class 10`000 and critical class 100 areas in order to prevent any possible contamination of the product.Detailed qualification of the balance is a prerequisite for a successful implementation of these design concepts.

5

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 27

Initial Air Handling DesignPicture shows air inlets (units) and air exhaust systems

Loading buffer

Transfer cart withhorizontal laminar flow

Freezedryer 1

Freezedryer 2

Unloading buffer

Formatting table

Filling station

Unformatting table

Laminar flow unitsExhaust

GMP-Conference / 10.-11. June 2004 / Istanbul 28

Improved Air Handling Design Picture shows new and modified air inlets (LF units) and air exhaust systems

New exhaust

New exhaustson cart

New exhaust

Modified exhaust

New exhaust

New exhaust

New exhaust

New exhaust

Modified inlet on cart

Additional laminar flow units

Modified exhaust

New inlets (background area)