QTF_Template edited

2
Quality Teaching Framework (QTF) Review of Class Lesson and occurrence of QTF elements QTF Dimensions Occurring (Yes/No) QTF Elements observed. Justify Intellectual Quality 1. Deep knowledge Is new knowledge being related to the old? Is new material continually being fitted into a framework? Are past knowledge and concepts used to clarify new concepts? 2. Deep understanding Are students given the opportunity to make new knowledge "their own" by expressing it in their own words and relating it to other situations? 3. Knowledge as problematic Is time given to look at how knowledge has been constructed and encoded through language? Is there discussion on how the construction of knowledge relates to power and who has constructed the knowledge? Is there an awareness that knowledge changes according to various cultural and social influences? 4. Higher-order thinking Is higher-order thinking occurring, such as analysis, evaluation, design, synthesis and decision-making? 5. Metalanguage To what extent does the teacher talk about or discuss explicitly how language works, aspects and characteristics of language and text? 6. Substantive conversation Are student questions and input valued? Is time set aside for questions and discussion? Are students encouraged to build on each other's ideas? Does the teacher make efforts not to monopolise talk? Does the teacher give credit to all other insights?

description

· Is time given to look at how knowledge has been constructed and encoded through language? · Is there discussion on how the construction of knowledge relates to power and who has constructed the knowledge? · Is there an awareness that knowledge changes according to various cultural and social influences? · Is new knowledge being related to the old? · Is new material continually being fitted into a framework? · Are past knowledge and concepts used to clarify new concepts? QTF Dimensions

Transcript of QTF_Template edited

Quality Teaching Framework (QTF)

Review of Class Lesson and occurrence of QTF elements

QTF Dimensions

Occurring (Yes/No)

QTF Elements observed. Justify

Intellectual Quality

1. Deep knowledge · Is new knowledge being related to the old?

· Is new material continually being fitted into a framework?

· Are past knowledge and concepts used to clarify new concepts?

2. Deep understanding · Are students given the opportunity to make

new knowledge "their own" by expressing it in their own words and relating it to other situations?

3. Knowledge as problematic

· Is time given to look at how knowledge has been constructed and encoded through language?

· Is there discussion on how the construction of knowledge relates to power and who has constructed the knowledge?

· Is there an awareness that knowledge changes according to various cultural and social influences?

4. Higher-order thinking · Is higher-order thinking occurring, such as

analysis, evaluation, design, synthesis and decision-making?

5. Metalanguage · To what extent does the teacher talk about or

discuss explicitly how language works, aspects and characteristics of language and text?

6. Substantive conversation · Are student questions and input valued?

· Is time set aside for questions and discussion?

· Are students encouraged to build on each other's ideas?

· Does the teacher make efforts not to monopolise talk?

· Does the teacher give credit to all other insights?

QTF Dimensions

Occurring (Yes/No)

QTF Elements observed. Justify

Significance

7. Background knowledge · Are links with students' background

knowledge made explicit?

8. Cultural knowledge · Does the lesson acknowledge and value sub-

group cultures?

9. Knowledge integration · Does the lesson integrate a range of subject

areas?

10. Inclusivity · Are deliberate attempts made to increase the

participation of the range of students?

11. Connectedness · Is the lesson connected to competencies or

concerns beyond the classroom?

12. Narrative · Does the lesson include personal experiences,

biographies or historical accounts?

Quality Learning Environment

13. Explicit quality criteria · Are the objectives of the lessons made

explicit? · Are the criteria for judging student

performance made explicit?

· Are students made aware of expectations and standards?

14. Engagement

· Are students engaged and on task during the lesson?

15. High Expectations · Are students encourages to take intellectual

risks?

16. Social support · Is the classroom characterised by an

atmosphere of mutual respect and support among teacher and students?

17. Student’s self – regulation · Are the students engaged with the activity so

that the teacher does NOT make explicit comments on student behaviour?

18. Student direction · Do students determine specific activities or

outcomes of the lesson?