QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

download QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

of 33

Transcript of QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    1/33

    1

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   1

    Gas Explosion Basics

    Kees van Wingerden

    GexCon ASBergen, Norway

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   2

    Contents

    General

    Basic parameters; explosion properties

    Flame propagation and acceleration

    mechanisms

    Factors affecting explosion

    effects/consequences

    Explosion loads

    Summary

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    2/33

    2

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   3

    Gas explosions: general course of events

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   4

    Definition explosion

    “ An explosion is a chemicalprocess which causes a very fast

    and considerable pressure

    increase”

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    3/33

    3

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   5

    Fire triangle and explosion pentagon

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   6

    Contents

    General

    Basic parameters; explosion properties

    Flame propagation and acceleration

    mechanisms

    Factors affecting explosion

    effects/consequences

    Explosion loads

    Summary

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    4/33

    4

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   7

    Explosive part of cloud

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   8

    Release - dispersion

    Gas concentration in

    monitoring point

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    5/33

    5

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   9

    Explosion limits

    LEL/LFL = Lower explosion limit / Lower

    flammability limit

    UEL/UFL = Upper explosion limit / Upper

    flammability limit

    These values can be found in literature foratmospheric conditions.

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   10

    Explosion limits

    Methane 5.0 – 15 %

    Propane 2.1 – 10.1 %

     Acetone 2.6 – 13 %

    Cyclohexane 1.3 – 7.8 %

    Heptane 1.1 – 6.7 %

    Hexane 1.2 – 7.4 %

    Ethanol 3.3 – 19 % (temp. = 13 – 42 ⁰C)

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    6/33

    6

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   11

    Flashpoint: ethanol

    -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80

    Temperatur, 0C.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

       D  a  m

      p   t  r  y   k   k   [   b  a  r   ]

    DamptrykkEtanol

    Vapour pressure,

    Ethanol

       V  a  p  o  u  r  p  r  e  s  s  u  r  e   [   b  a  r   ]

    Temperature [degC]

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   12

    Flash point examples

    Methane -188 ⁰C

    Propane -104 ⁰C

     Acetone -19 ⁰C

    Ethanol +12 ⁰C

    Petrol ca – 45 ⁰C

    Diesel > 55 ⁰C

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    7/33

    7

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   13

    Ignition energy (electric spark)

    Hydrocarbons: MIE = 0.1 – 0.3 mJ

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   14

     Auto-ignition temperature (hot surfaces)

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    8/33

    8

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   15

     Auto-ignition temperature The lowest temperature of a hot surface at which

    a mixture of fuel and air can ignite

    Hydrogen 580 ⁰C

    Methane 537 ⁰C

    Propane 493 ⁰C

     Acetone 535 ⁰C

    Ethanol 363 ⁰C

    Petrol ca 250⁰C

    Diesel ca 220 ⁰C

    Main rule; Increasing length of C-chain, - lower ignition

    temperature.

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   16

    Chemical reaction

    CH4+2O2+7.52N2

    2H2O+CO2+7.52N2 + heat

    Simplified equation:

    In reality: ≈100 equations

    Product composition depends on

    mixture, temperature, pressure

    CO, CO2, H2O, H2, OH, CH4, N2

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    9/33

    9

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   17

    Combustion at constant pressureand volume

    Unburnt

    gas cloud

    P/P0=8

    V/V0=8

    Combustion at

    constant volume

    Combustion at

    constant pressure

    Burnt

    gas cloud

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   18

    Pressure development in

    deflagrations

    In closed vessels:

    Pmax/Pin=(nexpl/nin)Tmax/Tin (nexpl/nin = ca.1)

    In vented vessels: usually: Pin

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    10/33

    10

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   19

    Explosion loads

    Pressure

    Drag (1/2u2)

    Blast waves in the surroundings

    Flames (direct contact)

    Flying debris

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   20

    Contents

    General

    Basic parameters; explosion properties

    Flame propagation and acceleration

    mechanisms

    Factors affecting explosion

    effects/consequences

    Explosion loads

    Summary

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    11/33

    11

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   21

    Flame propagation and accelerationmechanisms

    Laminar combustion

    Flame instabilities

    Explosion generated turbulence dominated flame

    propagation

    Deflagration-Detonation-Transition (DDT),Detonation

    Detonation

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   22

    Laminar flame propagation

    Slow process (dominated by diffusion)

    Typical velocities (burning velocities): 0.5

    m/s

    Expansion velocity: total velocitybecomes: 3-4 m/s

    Sf    = Su   + Sg

    Sf  = Su u  b

    =

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    12/33

    12

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   23

    Laminar flame propagation

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   24

    Laminar combustion

    Flame thickness: typically 1 mm

    Typical laminar burning velocities

    methane: 0.40 m/s

    propane: 0.46 m/s ethylene: 0.75 m/s

    acetylene: 1.55 m/s

    hydrogen: 3.25 m/s

    Expansion ratio typically 7-10 (a=n2T2/n1T1)

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    13/33

    13

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   25

    Laminar burning velocity

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   26

    Laminar flame propagation (in real cloud)

    Terneuzen 1982: Ignition of vapour clouds resulting from

    realistic releases of propane (up to 40 kg/s) into open

    area (no congestion) results in low flame speeds and

    negligible overpressures

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    14/33

    14

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   27

    Flame instabilities Flame instabilities will cause laminar flames

    to accelerate, especially due to increase of

    flame area

    Examples:

    Intrinsic instability

    Chemo-diffusive instability

     Acoustically driven flame instabilityTaylor instability

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   28

    Intrinsic flame instability

    Methane-air 

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    15/33

    15

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   29

    Lind-Whitson,1977, various

    gases, max. flamespeed 35.4 m/s

    (acetylene)

    20m diameter balloon hydrogen (Fh-ICT

    1982) resulted i max. 60 mbar overpressure

    Intrinsic flame instabilities: DDT?

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   30

    Taylor instability

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    16/33

    16

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   31

    Turbulent combustion

    Turbulence causes an increase ofburning velocities due to mixing ofcombustion products and reactants anddue to an increase of the flame surfacearea

    Flame speeds (expansion + combustion)can vary from 5-600 m/s

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   32

    Turbulent combustion

    Flame thickness: dependent onturbulence length scale

    Turbulent burning velocity dependent on

    turbulence properties

    Flame quenching in case of intensiveturbulence and/or low reactivity mixtures

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    17/33

    17

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   3333

    < lt   > lt

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   34

    Explosion generated turbulence

    Expansion  Flow

    interaction

    Increasedpressure

    Combustion

    Turbulence

    Positive feedback mechanism of explosion

    generated flow and combustion

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    18/33

    18

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   35

    Explosion generated turbulence

    Positive feedback

    mechanism of explosion

    generated flow and

    combustion

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   36

    Flame acceleration Pressure

    1.00.80.60.40.20.0

    0

    100

    200

    300

    Flame speedMean flow velocity

    Distance (m)

       V  e   l  o  c   i   t  y   (  m   /  s   )

    Front elevation of test vessel

    10001001010

    .01

    .1

    1

    10

    Maximum Flame Speed [m/s]

       M  a  x   i  m  u  m    P

      r  e  s  s  u  r  e

       [   b  a  r  g   ]

    Planar 

    Spherical

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    19/33

    19

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   37

    Experiments in a 50 m3

    pipe

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   38

    Experiments – “3-D corner”

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    20/33

    20

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   39

    Experiments in 3-Dcorner 

    P = 0.025 bar 

    P > 4.0 bar 

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   40

    Experiments – 45 m long array of cross

    flow obstructions; no confinement

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    21/33

    21

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   41

    Experiments – obstructed vs. non-obstructed

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   42

    Experiments – obstructed vs. non-obstructed

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    22/33

    22

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   43

    Detonation propagation process High pressure (~20 bar) and high propagation

    velocity (~2 km/s)

    ZND-theory: shock wave followed by reactionzone

     Actual detonation: 3-D shock wave followed byreaction zone

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   44

    Deflagration to Detonation

    Transition (DDT)

    Strong deflagrations cantransit into a detonation

    Pipes: explosion

    generated turbulence atwalls results in flameaccelerations and possiblyDDT

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    23/33

    23

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   45

    Experiments in congested area –

    DDT and detonation

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   46

    Experiments – DDT and detonation

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    24/33

    24

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   47

    Experiments – DDT and detonation

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   48

    Contents

    General

    Basic parameters; explosion properties

    Flame propagation and acceleration

    mechanisms

    Factors affecting explosion

    effects/consequences

    Explosion loads

    Summary

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    25/33

    25

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   49

    Obstructions

    The strength of gas explosions is strongly related to

    the degree of congestion: confinement and presence

    of obstructions

    Important obstruction parameters are:

    Obstruction diameter  (Volume)blockage

    Dimensions obstructed area (length of flame path in

    obstructed area); number of obstructions along flame path

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   50

    Confinement: flow field divergence

    (5 obstacles, BR = 0.5)

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    26/33

    26

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   51

    Effect of confinement (venting):50 m3 representation of separation module

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels

    Confinement

    Gas explosions often occur in semi-

    confined geometries (mezzanines)

    Confinement directs flow

    Max. pressure is determined bypressure developed by combustion

    and pressure release through

    openings

    52

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    27/33

    27

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   53

    Type of Fuel(Wedge-shaped

    vessel)

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   54

    Fuel Concentration(wedge-shaped vessel)

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    28/33

    28

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   55

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   56

    Overpressure – ignition source location

    43210

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    edge ignited

    centrally ignited

    Distance (m)

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    29/33

    29

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   57

    Effect of ignition source position(length of flame path)

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   58

    Effect of gas cloud size

    5 5

    611

    30

    11

    20

    2084

    28

    54 20

    1826

    10

    18

    9

    78

    6

    5 5

    178

    86

    48 26

    9137

    39

    35 63

    2218

    12

    1518

    87

    8

    385

    395

    405

    415

    425

    435

    445

    455

    465

    475

    485

    75 85 95 105 115 12538575

    Scenario 9   Process deck

    38 33

    3537

    206

    91

    185

    216467

    505

    546 197

    446836

    189

    436

    152

    122165

    43

    44 39

    4861

    427

    539 168

    470492

    543

    333 568

    788324

    302

    355558

    172142

    32

    385

    395

    405

    415

    425

    435

    445

    455

    465

    475

    485

    75 85 95 105 115 12538575

    Scenario 6   Process deck

    57

    62 61

    6357

    321

    138

    304

    360683

    826

    902 288

    10581424

    631

    1465

    468

    388524

    72

    75 65

    59100

    628

    795 253

    689774

    1071

    553 805

    1144951

    1292

    21081811

    548596

    385

    395

    405

    415

    425

    435

    445

    455

    465

    475

    485

    75 85 95 105 115 125385

    75

    Scenario 4   Process deck

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    30/33

    30

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels

    Gas explosions in industrial installations

    Main parameters affecting the courseof an explosion:

    Number / orientation / location ofequipment, pipes & structuralcomponents  ”Degree of congestion”

    Vent openings / panels (size andlocation)  ”Degree of confinement”

    Gas cloud size and location uponignition

    Gas concentration, inhomogenieties Gas type (reactivity)

    Moment of ignition

     Active mitigation measures

    59

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   60

    Contents

    General

    Basic parameters; explosion properties

    Flame propagation and acceleration

    mechanisms

    Factors affecting explosion

    effects/consequences

    Explosion loads

    Summary

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    31/33

    31

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   61

    Explosion loads: pressure Pressure affects in general walls / decks / big objects

    where a pressure difference can be maintained duringa while

    The pressures are highly dynamic and may varystrongly in space (very complicated loading pattern)

    P = 0.10 bargP = 10 barg

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   62

    Explosion loads: drag

    Explosion wind (”drag”) = 1/2u2 affects especiallyslender objects (e.g. pipes) where pressuredifferences across the object are quickly diminished.

     Also drag pressures andresulting drag forces(1/2u2CD A) are highlydynamic

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    32/33

    32

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   63

    Explosion loads: blast ”Far field effects”: pressure- or shock wave generated

    by initial explosion propagating into surroundings

    Maybe important for loads on LQ or fire-screens one.g. neighbouring platform

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   64

    Contents

    General

    Basic parameters; explosion properties

    Flame propagation and acceleration

    mechanisms

    Factors affecting explosion

    effects/consequences

    Explosion loads

    Summary

  • 8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks

    33/33

    www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS

    Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels   65

    Thank you very much for yourattention!!

    [email protected]