QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
-
Upload
ella-agbettor -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
1/33
1
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 1
Gas Explosion Basics
Kees van Wingerden
GexCon ASBergen, Norway
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 2
Contents
General
Basic parameters; explosion properties
Flame propagation and acceleration
mechanisms
Factors affecting explosion
effects/consequences
Explosion loads
Summary
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
2/33
2
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 3
Gas explosions: general course of events
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 4
Definition explosion
“ An explosion is a chemicalprocess which causes a very fast
and considerable pressure
increase”
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
3/33
3
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 5
Fire triangle and explosion pentagon
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 6
Contents
General
Basic parameters; explosion properties
Flame propagation and acceleration
mechanisms
Factors affecting explosion
effects/consequences
Explosion loads
Summary
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
4/33
4
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 7
Explosive part of cloud
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 8
Release - dispersion
Gas concentration in
monitoring point
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
5/33
5
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 9
Explosion limits
LEL/LFL = Lower explosion limit / Lower
flammability limit
UEL/UFL = Upper explosion limit / Upper
flammability limit
These values can be found in literature foratmospheric conditions.
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 10
Explosion limits
Methane 5.0 – 15 %
Propane 2.1 – 10.1 %
Acetone 2.6 – 13 %
Cyclohexane 1.3 – 7.8 %
Heptane 1.1 – 6.7 %
Hexane 1.2 – 7.4 %
Ethanol 3.3 – 19 % (temp. = 13 – 42 ⁰C)
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
6/33
6
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 11
Flashpoint: ethanol
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Temperatur, 0C.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
D a m
p t r y k k [ b a r ]
DamptrykkEtanol
Vapour pressure,
Ethanol
V a p o u r p r e s s u r e [ b a r ]
Temperature [degC]
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 12
Flash point examples
Methane -188 ⁰C
Propane -104 ⁰C
Acetone -19 ⁰C
Ethanol +12 ⁰C
Petrol ca – 45 ⁰C
Diesel > 55 ⁰C
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
7/33
7
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 13
Ignition energy (electric spark)
Hydrocarbons: MIE = 0.1 – 0.3 mJ
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 14
Auto-ignition temperature (hot surfaces)
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
8/33
8
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 15
Auto-ignition temperature The lowest temperature of a hot surface at which
a mixture of fuel and air can ignite
Hydrogen 580 ⁰C
Methane 537 ⁰C
Propane 493 ⁰C
Acetone 535 ⁰C
Ethanol 363 ⁰C
Petrol ca 250⁰C
Diesel ca 220 ⁰C
Main rule; Increasing length of C-chain, - lower ignition
temperature.
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 16
Chemical reaction
CH4+2O2+7.52N2
2H2O+CO2+7.52N2 + heat
Simplified equation:
In reality: ≈100 equations
Product composition depends on
mixture, temperature, pressure
CO, CO2, H2O, H2, OH, CH4, N2
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
9/33
9
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 17
Combustion at constant pressureand volume
Unburnt
gas cloud
P/P0=8
V/V0=8
Combustion at
constant volume
Combustion at
constant pressure
Burnt
gas cloud
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 18
Pressure development in
deflagrations
In closed vessels:
Pmax/Pin=(nexpl/nin)Tmax/Tin (nexpl/nin = ca.1)
In vented vessels: usually: Pin
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
10/33
10
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 19
Explosion loads
Pressure
Drag (1/2u2)
Blast waves in the surroundings
Flames (direct contact)
Flying debris
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 20
Contents
General
Basic parameters; explosion properties
Flame propagation and acceleration
mechanisms
Factors affecting explosion
effects/consequences
Explosion loads
Summary
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
11/33
11
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 21
Flame propagation and accelerationmechanisms
Laminar combustion
Flame instabilities
Explosion generated turbulence dominated flame
propagation
Deflagration-Detonation-Transition (DDT),Detonation
Detonation
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 22
Laminar flame propagation
Slow process (dominated by diffusion)
Typical velocities (burning velocities): 0.5
m/s
Expansion velocity: total velocitybecomes: 3-4 m/s
Sf = Su + Sg
Sf = Su u b
=
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
12/33
12
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 23
Laminar flame propagation
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 24
Laminar combustion
Flame thickness: typically 1 mm
Typical laminar burning velocities
methane: 0.40 m/s
propane: 0.46 m/s ethylene: 0.75 m/s
acetylene: 1.55 m/s
hydrogen: 3.25 m/s
Expansion ratio typically 7-10 (a=n2T2/n1T1)
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
13/33
13
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 25
Laminar burning velocity
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 26
Laminar flame propagation (in real cloud)
Terneuzen 1982: Ignition of vapour clouds resulting from
realistic releases of propane (up to 40 kg/s) into open
area (no congestion) results in low flame speeds and
negligible overpressures
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
14/33
14
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 27
Flame instabilities Flame instabilities will cause laminar flames
to accelerate, especially due to increase of
flame area
Examples:
Intrinsic instability
Chemo-diffusive instability
Acoustically driven flame instabilityTaylor instability
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 28
Intrinsic flame instability
Methane-air
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
15/33
15
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 29
Lind-Whitson,1977, various
gases, max. flamespeed 35.4 m/s
(acetylene)
20m diameter balloon hydrogen (Fh-ICT
1982) resulted i max. 60 mbar overpressure
Intrinsic flame instabilities: DDT?
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 30
Taylor instability
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
16/33
16
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 31
Turbulent combustion
Turbulence causes an increase ofburning velocities due to mixing ofcombustion products and reactants anddue to an increase of the flame surfacearea
Flame speeds (expansion + combustion)can vary from 5-600 m/s
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 32
Turbulent combustion
Flame thickness: dependent onturbulence length scale
Turbulent burning velocity dependent on
turbulence properties
Flame quenching in case of intensiveturbulence and/or low reactivity mixtures
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
17/33
17
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 3333
< lt > lt
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 34
Explosion generated turbulence
Expansion Flow
interaction
Increasedpressure
Combustion
Turbulence
Positive feedback mechanism of explosion
generated flow and combustion
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
18/33
18
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 35
Explosion generated turbulence
Positive feedback
mechanism of explosion
generated flow and
combustion
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 36
Flame acceleration Pressure
1.00.80.60.40.20.0
0
100
200
300
Flame speedMean flow velocity
Distance (m)
V e l o c i t y ( m / s )
Front elevation of test vessel
10001001010
.01
.1
1
10
Maximum Flame Speed [m/s]
M a x i m u m P
r e s s u r e
[ b a r g ]
Planar
Spherical
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
19/33
19
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 37
Experiments in a 50 m3
pipe
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 38
Experiments – “3-D corner”
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
20/33
20
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 39
Experiments in 3-Dcorner
P = 0.025 bar
P > 4.0 bar
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 40
Experiments – 45 m long array of cross
flow obstructions; no confinement
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
21/33
21
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 41
Experiments – obstructed vs. non-obstructed
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 42
Experiments – obstructed vs. non-obstructed
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
22/33
22
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 43
Detonation propagation process High pressure (~20 bar) and high propagation
velocity (~2 km/s)
ZND-theory: shock wave followed by reactionzone
Actual detonation: 3-D shock wave followed byreaction zone
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 44
Deflagration to Detonation
Transition (DDT)
Strong deflagrations cantransit into a detonation
Pipes: explosion
generated turbulence atwalls results in flameaccelerations and possiblyDDT
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
23/33
23
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 45
Experiments in congested area –
DDT and detonation
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 46
Experiments – DDT and detonation
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
24/33
24
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 47
Experiments – DDT and detonation
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 48
Contents
General
Basic parameters; explosion properties
Flame propagation and acceleration
mechanisms
Factors affecting explosion
effects/consequences
Explosion loads
Summary
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
25/33
25
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 49
Obstructions
The strength of gas explosions is strongly related to
the degree of congestion: confinement and presence
of obstructions
Important obstruction parameters are:
Obstruction diameter (Volume)blockage
Dimensions obstructed area (length of flame path in
obstructed area); number of obstructions along flame path
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 50
Confinement: flow field divergence
(5 obstacles, BR = 0.5)
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
26/33
26
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 51
Effect of confinement (venting):50 m3 representation of separation module
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels
Confinement
Gas explosions often occur in semi-
confined geometries (mezzanines)
Confinement directs flow
Max. pressure is determined bypressure developed by combustion
and pressure release through
openings
52
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
27/33
27
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 53
Type of Fuel(Wedge-shaped
vessel)
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 54
Fuel Concentration(wedge-shaped vessel)
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
28/33
28
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 55
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 56
Overpressure – ignition source location
43210
0
100
200
300
400
500
edge ignited
centrally ignited
Distance (m)
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
29/33
29
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 57
Effect of ignition source position(length of flame path)
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 58
Effect of gas cloud size
5 5
611
30
11
20
2084
28
54 20
1826
10
18
9
78
6
5 5
178
86
48 26
9137
39
35 63
2218
12
1518
87
8
385
395
405
415
425
435
445
455
465
475
485
75 85 95 105 115 12538575
Scenario 9 Process deck
38 33
3537
206
91
185
216467
505
546 197
446836
189
436
152
122165
43
44 39
4861
427
539 168
470492
543
333 568
788324
302
355558
172142
32
385
395
405
415
425
435
445
455
465
475
485
75 85 95 105 115 12538575
Scenario 6 Process deck
57
62 61
6357
321
138
304
360683
826
902 288
10581424
631
1465
468
388524
72
75 65
59100
628
795 253
689774
1071
553 805
1144951
1292
21081811
548596
385
395
405
415
425
435
445
455
465
475
485
75 85 95 105 115 125385
75
Scenario 4 Process deck
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
30/33
30
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels
Gas explosions in industrial installations
Main parameters affecting the courseof an explosion:
Number / orientation / location ofequipment, pipes & structuralcomponents ”Degree of congestion”
Vent openings / panels (size andlocation) ”Degree of confinement”
Gas cloud size and location uponignition
Gas concentration, inhomogenieties Gas type (reactivity)
Moment of ignition
Active mitigation measures
59
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 60
Contents
General
Basic parameters; explosion properties
Flame propagation and acceleration
mechanisms
Factors affecting explosion
effects/consequences
Explosion loads
Summary
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
31/33
31
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 61
Explosion loads: pressure Pressure affects in general walls / decks / big objects
where a pressure difference can be maintained duringa while
The pressures are highly dynamic and may varystrongly in space (very complicated loading pattern)
P = 0.10 bargP = 10 barg
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 62
Explosion loads: drag
Explosion wind (”drag”) = 1/2u2 affects especiallyslender objects (e.g. pipes) where pressuredifferences across the object are quickly diminished.
Also drag pressures andresulting drag forces(1/2u2CD A) are highlydynamic
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
32/33
32
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 63
Explosion loads: blast ”Far field effects”: pressure- or shock wave generated
by initial explosion propagating into surroundings
Maybe important for loads on LQ or fire-screens one.g. neighbouring platform
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 64
Contents
General
Basic parameters; explosion properties
Flame propagation and acceleration
mechanisms
Factors affecting explosion
effects/consequences
Explosion loads
Summary
-
8/17/2019 QRA Model is Made Up of These Workbooks
33/33
www.gexcon.com © GexCon AS
Total Raffinage Chemie Explosion Loading and Response Seminar, 26 September 2012, Brussels 65
Thank you very much for yourattention!!