Washington DC Kellogg Conference Hotel, A Washington DC Hotel
QM2012, Washington, DC, Aug. 13-Aug. 18, 2012
description
Transcript of QM2012, Washington, DC, Aug. 13-Aug. 18, 2012
QM2012, Washington, DC, Aug. 13-Aug. 18, 2012
Supported by DOE
08/13/2012
QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies
Huichao Song
Thanks for discussions with U. Heinz, M.Luzum, H. Petersen, S.Moreland, L.Pang, Z.Qiu, C.Shen, R. Soltz, X.N. Wang …
QGP-the most perfect fluid in the world?BNL News, 2005
How perfect is the QGP fluid?
0)( xT gpuupeT )()(
u
T
T
2
12
u
T
Tu
2
1)(
viscous hydrodynamics
)( p Input: “EOS”
Shear viscosity: Bulk viscosity:
Assume zero net baryon density & heat conductivity at RHIC and LHC
3+1-d: Mcgill(2011), MSU, Crakow(2012),
2+1-d: OSU, INT, Stony Brook, Pudue, Calcutta (2008), Crakow, Frankfurt(2010)
Nagoya (C. Nonaka , Parallel 3A,Wed).
Generic features of shear & bulk viscosities
acts against the buildup of flow anisotropy
acts against the buildup of radial
flow
Shear viscosity: Bulk viscosity:
acts against the buildup of flow anisotropy
acts against the buildup of radial
flow
Shear viscosity: Bulk viscosity:
The shear viscosity leads to a significant suppression of V2 (Romatsche & Romatsche PRL07; song & Heinz PLB08, PRC08; Dusling & Teaney PRC 08; Molnar & Huovinen JPG 08 … …)
Bulk viscous effects are much smaller than shear ones due to the critical slowing down near phase transition (Song & Heinz PRC09)
One can extract the QGP shear viscosity from exp data without large contamination from bulk viscosity
Visc. suppressionof elliptic flow
shear visc. shear+ bulk visc.
ideal
Song & Heinz PRC09
The shear viscosity tends to smear out the inhomogeneous structures, leading to a suppression of V3 (Schenke, Jeon & Gale PRL2011, PRC2012; Qiu & Heinz PRC2011; also see talks by B.Schenke; F. Gardim; Poster of Z. Qiu )
Viscous suppressionof triangular flow
viscous hydro evolution
ideal hydro evolution initial profile
Qiu & Heinz 2011
(B.Schenke)
-early attempts from viscous hydrodynamics
QGP viscosity at RHIC energies (2008)
Luzum & Romatschke, PRC 2008 Glauber KLN
Viscous hydro & QGP viscosity (2008)
)4/1(5/ s
-non-equilibrium chemical composition of HRG : (PCE vs. CE) ~100%
-transport properties of HRG (or equil. HRG vs. non-equil. HRG) : ~100-150%-bulk viscosity: ?%
Effects that are not included in this viscous hydro calculations
Glauber & KLN initializations lead to 100% uncertainties for the QGP shear viscosity
-later results from the VISHNU hybrid model
QGP viscosity at RHIC energies (2011)
VISHNU hybrid approach
Initial conditions viscous hydro (2+1d) hadron cascade
H. Song, S. Bass, U. Heinz, PRC2011
Tsw=165MeV
-3+1 d viscous hydro+ hadron cascade: S. Jeon , Parallel 2A ,Tue.
Other related developments
-EoS: (s95p-PCE) (Huovinen & Petreczky10)
-initial conditions
-chemical composition of HRG
-transport properties of HRG
-switching temperature:
Tsw=165MeV
HadronCascade
VISHNU:
-2+1 d vs 3+1 d viscous hydro: Shen, Schenke & Heinz on going work; Vredevoogd &Pratt, PRC85,044908(2012)
MC-KLN MC-Glauber
H. Song, S. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano, and C. Shen, PRL2011
VISHNU hybrid model & QGP viscosity (2011)
-corrected exp. V2 data that remove non-flow & fluc. effects
-integrated V2 for all charged hadrons: In contrast to V2(PT), it is less sensitive to
)41(5.2)/()41(1 QGPs
bulk viscosity, corrections, radial flow & chemical composition of HRG f
The analysis uses:
MC-KLN MC-Glauber
H. Song, S. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano, and C. Shen, PRL2011
VISHNU hybrid model & QGP viscosity (2011)
-Initial flow, bulk viscosity, single shot vs. e-b-e calculations
-Other uncertainties (much smaller)
)41(5.2)/()41(1 QGPs
(each of them shift V2 by a few percent, partial cancellation among them)
-Main uncertainties come from initial conditions
H.Song, S. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano, and C. Shen, PRC2011
further tests: for identified hadrons )(2 TpV
5-10%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
5-10%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
08.0/ s
16.0/ s
Glauber Glauber
KLN KLN
Initialization models, pre-equilibrium dynamics & QGP viscosity
MC-KLN MC-Glauber
H. Song, S. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano, and C. Shen, PRL2011
VISHNU hybrid model & QGP viscosity (2011)
Main uncertainties come from initial conditions
)41(5.2)/()41(1 QGPs
MC-KLN, larger HIGHER value of QGP viscosity
MC-Glauber, smaller LOWER value of QGP viscosity 22
MC-KLN & MC-Glauber initializations & V3
-triangular flow is sensitive to QGP shear viscosity, but NOT sensitive to MC-KLN or MC-Glauber initializations
Qiu & Heinz,2011
2
3
MC-KLN
MC-Glauber
see poster of Z. Qiu
Zhi & Heinz 2011
Viscous Hydro
MC-KLN & MC-Glauber initializations & V3 see poster of Z. Qiu Qiu, Shen & Heinz 2011Pure viscous hydro simulations :
V3 prefer lower value of QGPviscosity
22 / v 22 / v
33 / v 33 / v20.0/ KLN,MC s
20.0/ KLN,MC s 08.0/ Glb,MC s
08.0/ Glb,MC s
Initialization Models
-fluctuations of color charges (in the framework of CGC):
IP-Glasma: B. Schenke et al., arXiv:1202.6646; 1206.6805 [nucl-th] B. Schenke, Parallel 3A, Wed.
Correlated Fluctuation: B. Muller & A. Schafer, arXiv:1111.3347 [hep-ph] S. Moreland, Parallel 4D, Wed.
-fluctuations of local gluon numbers (in the famework of MC-KLN):
Multiplicity fluctuations: A. Dumitru and Y. Nara, Phys. Rev. C 85, (2012) 034907 A. Dumitru, plenary IC, Mon.
-fluctuations of nucleon positions:
MC-Glauber: MC-KLN:
T. Hirano & Y. Nara, Phys. Rev. C 79 064904 (2009) (used in the VISHNU hybrid model)
IP-GlasmaMultiplicity fluctuations
3
2
3
2
3
2
IP-GlasmaCorrelated fluctuations
Please also refer to talk of B. Schenke, S. Moreland & A. Dumitru
Schenke, et al. Moreland+ Heinz Dumitru +Nara
Multiplicity fluctuations
Correlated fluctuations
-early flow & fluctuations from dynamical models:
URQMD initialization: H.Petersen & M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C81, 044906,2010 H.Petersen, Plenary VA, Fri.
AMPT initialization: L. Pang, Q.Wang & X.Wang, arXiv:1205.5019[nucl-th] L. Pang, Parallel 4D, Wed.
EPOS/NEXUS initialization: K. Werner et al., Phys. Rev. C83:044915,2011; H. J. Drescher et, al., Phys.Rev. C65 , 054902 (2002) M. Nahrgang , poster section .
IP-Glasma: B. Schenke, et.al, arXiv:1202.6646; 1206.6805 [nucl-th] B. Schenke, Parallel 3A , Wed.
Free Streaming limit: G. Qin, et. al., Phys. Rev. C82 064903 (2010); OSU, on-going work
Pre-equilibrium dynamics
Hydro limit: OSU group, on-going work
Pre-equilibrium dynamics smoothes out fluctuations, reducing , but building radial flow 32 ,
-early flow & fluctuations from dynamical models:
URQMD initialization: H.Petersen & M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C81, 044906,2010 also refer to talk of H.Petersen on 17 Aug., Plenary VA
AMPT initialization: L. Pang, Q.Wang & X.Wang, arXiv:1205.5019[nucl-th] also refer to talk of L. Pang on 15 Aug., Parallel 4D
EPOS/NEXUS initialization: K. Werner et al., Phys. Rev. C83:044915,2011; H. J. Drescher ,et al., Phys.Rev. C65 , 054902 (2002) also refer to poster of M. Nahrgang on 16 Aug
IP-Glasma: B. Schenke, et.al, arXiv:1202.6646; 1206.6805 [nucl-th] B. Schenke , Parallel 3A
Pre-equilibrium dynamics
Petersen & Qiu, unpublished notes;please also refer to Phys.Rev. C82 041901 (2010)
Fluctuations in energy deposition slightly increase
3
32 ,
2
-early flow & fluctuations from dynamical models:
URQMD initialization: H.Petersen & M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C81, 044906,2010 also refer to talk of H.Petersen on 17 Aug., Plenary VA
AMPT initialization: L. Pang, Q.Wang & X.Wang, arXiv:1205.5019[nucl-th] also refer to talk of L. Pang on 15 Aug., Parallel 4D
EPOS/NEXUS initialization: K. Werner et al., Phys. Rev. C83:044915,2011; H. J. Drescher ,et al., Phys.Rev. C65 , 054902 (2002) also refer to poster of M. Nahrgang on 16 Aug
IP-Plasma: B. Schenke, et.al, arXiv:1202.6646; 1206.6805 [nucl-th] B. Schenke on 15 Aug., Parallel 3A
Pre-equilibrium dynamics
Early longitudinal flow fluctuations reduce V2
L. Pang, Q.Wang & X.Wang, arXiv:1205.5019[nucl-th]
-early flow & fluctuations from dynamical models:
URQMD initialization: H.Petersen & M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C81, 044906,2010 H.Petersen, Plenary VA, Fri.
AMPT initialization: L. Pang, Q.Wang & X.Wang, arXiv:1205.5019[nucl-th] L. Pang, Parallel 4D, Wed.
EPOS/NEXUS initialization: K. Werner et al., Phys. Rev. C83:044915,2011; H. J. Drescher ,et al., Phys.Rev. C65 , 054902 (2002) M. Nahrgang , Thur.
IP-Glasma: B. Schenke, et.al, arXiv:1202.6646; 1206.6805 [nucl-th] B. Schenke , Parallel 3A , Wed.
Free Streaming limit: G. Qin, et. al., Phys. Rev. C82 064903 (2010); OSU, on-going work
Pre-equilibrium dynamics
Hydro limit: OSU group, on-going work
Pre-equilibrium dynamics smooth out fluctuations, reducing , but building radial flow 32 ,
Mostly, the effects of pre-equilibrium dynamics was studied with ideal hydro. Their quantitative influences on are still unknown.QGPs)/(
QGP viscosity at LHC energies
V2 at RHIC and LHCSong, Bass & Heinz, PRC 2011
The average QGP viscosity is roughly the same at RHIC and LHC
for pions, kaons & protons at LHC
Nicely reproduce V2(PT) for all centrality bins at LHC byVISHNU hybrid model
20.0)/( QGPs
Heinz, Shen & Song, 2011VISHNU
)(2 TpV
for pions, kaons & protons at LHC
Results from pure viscous hydrodynamics (WITHOUT hadron cascade), results shown at QM2011
20.0/ s
Heinz, Shen & Song, 2011Viscous Hydro
)(2 TpV
for pions, kaons & protons at LHC
Viscous Hydro
VISHNU
A comparison between viscous hydrodynamics and VISHNU
Heinz, Shen & Song, 2011
)(2 TpV
))(/( TsTemperature dependent
V2(PT) at RHIC and LHC
Assuming const. s/
16.0/ s24.020.0/ s
RHIC: LHC:
Song, Bass & Heinz, PRC2011
Is QGP fluid more viscous for the temperature region covered by LHC?
One needs to investigate the temperature dependence of ))(/( Ts
Is QGP fluid more viscous at LHC ?
We can not constrain from v2 and spectra
Song, Bass & Heinz, PRC2011
)()/( Ts QGP
Results from Frankfurt group:
Elliptic flow is dominated by the hadronic viscosity at RHIC energies
H. Niemi, G.S. Denicol, P. Huovinen, E. Molnar, and D.H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 011901(2011);arXiv:1203.2452[nucl-th]
))(/( Ts
Investigations from viscous hydro: C. Shen, U. Heinz, P. Huovinen, H.Song PRC2011
V2 is not only sensitive to but also sensitive to initialization of
))(/( Ts
Extra complications:
It is not an easy task to extract from experimental data
))(/( Ts
LHC
Current Developments
Extracting from Vn in ultra-central collisionssee talk of M. Luzum
s/
-In most central collisions, fluctuation effects are dominant (Geometry effects are suppressed)
-Additional features: fitting 2
Viscous Hydro
Higher Order Event Plane Correlations
qualitatively reproduce the measured event plane correlationsPure e-b-e viscous hydro simulations :
Qiu & Heinz, arXiv:1208.1200[nucl-th]
EXP. data:[ATLAS Collaboration], CERN preprint ATLAS-CONF-2012-049
spectra
HBT
elliptic flow
see poster of I. Garishvili
Spectra
R. Soltz, et al., arXiv:1208.0897[nucl-th]
Constraining initial temperature & shear viscosity from pion spectra, elliptic flow & HBT radii at 0-20% centrality with evolution. 2
Early CHIMERA Results(Comprehesive Heavy Ion Model
Evaluation and Reporting Algorithm)
Summary
(visc. hydro)V2
(visc. hydro)V2,V3
(VISHNU)V2
Uncertainties from initial quantum
fluc.
2008 early 2011 late2011 2012 year
?
QGPs)/(
)4/(1 )4/(2 )4/(3 )4/(4 )4/(5
Recent developments on initialization models:
color charge fluctuations; multiplicity fluctuations; initial flow fluctuations … …
This is a rapidly evolving area, much more at QM2014!
Recent developments on initialization models:
color charge fluctuations; multiplicity fluctuations; initial flow fluctuations … …
to implement e-b-e VISHNU to further study: triangular flow & higher order flow harmonics, higher-order event plane correlations … ...
This will help us to constrain initialization models, tightening the limit on
(visc. hydro)V2
(visc. hydro)V2,V3
(VISHNU)V2
Uncertainties from initial quantum
fluc.
2008 early 2011 late2011 2012 year
?
QGPs)/(
)4/(1 )4/(2 )4/(3 )4/(4 )4/(5
QGPs)/(
Thank you
Results from Frankfurt group:
H. Niemi, G.S. Denicol, P. Huovinen, E. Molnar, and D.H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 011901(2011);arXiv:1203.2452[nucl-th]
))(/( Ts
Effective Hadronic viscosity from VISHNU
Song, Bass & Heinz PRC2011
e-b-e hydro vs. single shot hydro
see talk of M. Luzum