QAS 2015 Overview Abbreviated Deck

Use this title slide only with an image

Best Practices for End-to-End Quality Management

Dan Goodstein – SAP Quality Assurance Solutions

© 2015 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. 2Confidential

Agenda

Introductions Customer Background

– SAP landscape– Upcoming Project Roadmap– Quality Vision

Current Testing Process & Tools SAP End to End Testing Roadmap Deep Dive Focus areas Wrap up and next steps


CURRENT TESTING PROCESS


No documented QA processes

Level 1Project Testing

Project Focus

Quality Management Maturity Roadmap

Project based People, Processes & Tech.

Majority Manual Testing

Level 0Manual Testing

Level 2Product Utility

Centralized & Standardized Testing Administration

QA processes but for individual projects

Security, Policy & Compliance Testing

Centralized & Standardized Tech.

Best Practices Adoption

Service Bureau Integrated Testing &

Remediation for Security/Compliance

Level 3Service Utility

Process Standards

Centralized People, Process & Tech.

Process Governancefor Testing & Quality

Thought-leadership for Enterprise Influence

Full-lifecycle approach for security & integration between apps & Ops

Level 4Center of Excellence

Center of ExcellenceReactive to Predictable

Requirements

BusinessProjectsUpdates/Releases

Test Cases Test Execution Defects Reportin

gMANUAL TESTING Manual Testing is very resource intensive

and expensive as every test cycle requires the same level of effort

Minimizing “what to test” is essential

PERFORMANCE TESTING Performance Testing is key for modern

application, especially customer facing applications

Performance Testing is not a viable manual testing process

AUTOMATED TESTING Creation of automated test can be very time

consuming. Many test tools tout ease of test creation but ignore that 80% of test automation effort is test script maintenance

TEST DATA Quality test data is typically the

biggest single cause of testing problems

Refreshing non-production systems is time consuming and expensive

Sensitive data needs to be protected

INTEGRATION TESTING Today’s composite applications

are highly integrated: legacy apps, external services and non-SAP

Access issues to integration points for end-to-end scenario testing results in delays

How do I know what to test?

What has changed since I last tested the system

What are the most critical areas that entail the highest risk to the business?

How do I optimize my testing time and resources?

DEFECTS AND REPORTING How do I correlate the

requirements, test cases, execution history and defects to give me a clear picture of the status of my testing?

Once I have my application quality where I want, how do I ensure hackers don’t mess it up?

Security

Business

Requirements

ProjectsUpdates/Releases

Automated

TestingTestData

Integration

Testing

Test Cases Test Execution Defects Reportin

gRequiremen

ts Test Cases Test Execution Defects Reportin

g

TestTeam

TestLab

Load &Performan

ceTesting

HP LRAnalytics

ManualTesting

DashBoard

sWorkFlow

SOX & Regulated Industry Compliant

Security


SAP Solution Manager

Business Blueprint Business Processes Documented Solution Documentation Assistant

for semi-automatic setup Technical view: involved SAP and

non-SAP systems, Transactions,… Starting point for customizing Linked training material

Quality Assurance Solutions – with updated SolMan

Sprinter Manual Testing Streamline manual testing by reuse and by

simplifying repetitive work

QuickTest Professional Test Automation SAP and non-SAP

Test Acceleration & Optimization

Generation of Test Case and BPT components for the SAP GUI Based Business Processes

Leverages BPCA Analysis for automated maintenance of BPT test component and test cases

Test Data Management Server (TDMS) Reduce SAP data volume of non-production landscape Scramble sensitive data according to your needs

Build & Test Deploy Operate OptimizeDesignRequirements

SAP Quality Center

Quality Center (QC) Test Requirements Test Plans Test Execution Business Process Testing Defect managementSo

lutio

n M

anag

er

Ada

pter

for

Qua

lity

Cen

ter

SAP Solution ManagerBusiness Process Change Analyzer (BPCA) Identification of business

processes affected by code / customizing changes / Support & Enhancement Packages

SAP LoadRunner Application performance validation Virtual User load simulation

8© 2014 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved.

Traceability Reporting Dashboard Governance

• Accurate, filtered requirements based on what you are using in SAP via Sol Man• Requirements traceability of Test cases tied to specific requirements and defects• Workflow allocation of test cases to your testing resources from the developer to the tester and back• Real-time status report of work load, test case execution, pass/fail rates, requirements and project readiness• A shared repository for all your Manual and Automated Test Cases• Sprinter to automate and audit your manual testing effort• Business Impact analysis to determine any changes required to test cases based on changes made to SAP• Ability to test SAP and non-SAP areas with QC, QTP and TAO.• Performance Testing based on load simulation scenarios• Ability to mimic outside calls via Virtualized Stub files for more efficient testing cycles• Security Vulnerability assessment and corrective action.

HP Sprinter

HP ServiceVirtualization

HP UFT

HP LoadRunner

HP PerformanceCenter

Best Practices for End-to-End Quality ManagementValue Statements


SAP Fortify by HP – Components “NEW”including SAP NetWeaver Application Server, add-on for code vulnerability analysis (CVA)

Audit Workbench

QAS 2015 Overview Abbreviated Deck

Documents

Transcript of QAS 2015 Overview Abbreviated Deck