P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS N OVEMBER 2010 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons,...
-
Upload
conner-lusty -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS N OVEMBER 2010 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons,...
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS
NOVEMBER 2010
Arman Hemmati , Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver
Class Presentation #1
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
2
Overview
• Introduction (Katie)
• Wind Tunnel Tests (Chaneel)
• Computational Analysis (Arman)
• What’s Next (Arman)
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
3
Introduction – ENMAX Frames
Renusol ConSole
DIY Frame
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
4
Introduction – Problem
• Most efficient sun capture at 51°
• Higher angle means greater aerodynamic forces
• More ballast required to hold the panel down
• Too much weight for the roof?
• Want to better understand wind loads on PV panels:
▫ Wind Tunnel Testing▫ Computational (CFD) Analysis
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
5
Wind Tunnel – Model Scaling/Building
1. Constructing a suitable model (6 linear panel array)▫ The size of the model must correspond to the
dimensions of the wind tunnel▫ What material should be used as a PV panel substitute▫ Require a base frame for the model to rest upon
2. Methods for analyzing the force on the panel▫ Force Receiving Base▫ Pressure Distribution is not a concern▫ Force transducers or load cells considered
(although potentially expensive)
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
6
Wind Tunnel – Testing (conceptual)
1. Height of the panel from the roof (Frame Bottom Opening)▫ Least Loads: Test the model at various heights
2. Variation of wind speed▫ Wind Speed Effect: The relationship between wind
speed, drag/lift forces, and additional load on the roof
3. Wind angle of attack▫ Flexible Model: The model is angled to represent
varying wind angle of attack▫ Methods for model force Analysis
▫ Methods for model force Analysis
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
7
Computational – 2D vs. 3D Modeling
Courtesy of COMSOL Multiphysics
1. Two-Dimensional (2D) Models▫ Easier to develop, evaluate, and understand▫ Typically the start of an analysis▫ Provides a general overview to the forces expected in the
wind tunnel
2. Three-Dimensional (3D) Models▫ More Difficult to set-up, and develop▫ More powerful computers required▫ More realistic model of the actual phenomena▫ Typically used to compare to the wind tunnel testing
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
8
What’s Next – Conclusion
1. Current Stage in the Design Process▫ Direction is set, details required
2. Plan on Wind Tunnel Test▫ Model design details▫ Method of measurement: Literature research
3. Plan on CFD▫ Program and computer availability▫ Starting with a 2D Model
4. Revised Frame Design▫ Only if current design fails
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
9
References
• Renusol ConSole Manual 9/2009
• COMSOL Multiphysics Website
• ANSYS Website
NOVEMBER - 2010Design Review #1: DeLoPREC
www.ucalgary.ca/deloprec