Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New...

15
Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times

Transcript of Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New...

Page 1: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times

Page 2: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

EconomicFocus

Economic Focus

Ecological Focus

Ecological Focus

Article Frequency and Content Shifts 1986 - 2001

Page 3: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Proportion of Articles Directly Addressing Population or Migration

Page 4: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Proportions of Articles Addressing Business, Agriculture, Environment and Inequality.

Page 5: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Sources of Problems Identified

Page 6: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Major Types of Losses Discussed

Page 7: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Solutions Proposed

Page 8: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Sentiments Expressed

Page 9: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Proportions of Articles That Mention the Buffalo Commons, and Favor the Idea.

Page 10: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Articles Taking an Economic or Ecological Point of View

Page 11: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Level of Interests at Stake

Page 12: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Human Interest Articles

Page 13: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Summary of Major Points

• Waxing and waning interest.

• Repeated Shifts from economic to ecological focus

• Population and migration most prominent in periods of ecological focus

• Concern with environment steadily increasing

• Concern with inequality steadily decreasing

• Focus on government policy as problem of solution decreasing

• Increasing focus on environmental and cultural causes

• Job creation stressed more, government intervention less

• Resignation growing, optimism falls off.

Page 14: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Major Points

• Discussion of Buffalo Commons idea emerges after 1989 and re-emerges after 1998

• Buffalo Commons idea increasingly viewed favorably

• Ecological view of Great Plains issues becoming more prominent

• Interests at stake increasingly viewed as local only – human interest stories more frequent

Page 15: Publications Reviewed: Star Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times.

Implications• View of trends as a local problem only will make

it more difficult to attract outside resources.• Increasing resignation to inevitability of declining

population and communities will make it harder to attract and develop resources.

• Ecological issues likely to increasingly be the focus of national interest in the Great Plains.

• Effective long term solutions must address and resolve apparent conflicts between environmental and economic concerns.

• The potential for dramatic reforms of rural policy may be increasing – may be driven by suburban interests.