Public Works, Parks, & Human Services Committee Meeting …Council/Committees/PWPHS/... · Public...
Transcript of Public Works, Parks, & Human Services Committee Meeting …Council/Committees/PWPHS/... · Public...
Public Works, Parks, & Human Services Committee Meeting Minutes Date: July 20, 2018
Attendance: Toby Nixon, Kurt Triplett, Tom Phillips, Lynn Zwaagstra, John Lloyd, John Starbard, Mary Gardocki, Kathy Brown, John MacGillivray, Jon Pascal (on phone), Kyle Butler, Jin Muse
Agenda Item: Action Items:
1. King County Construction Waste Recycling Notes: Seeking joint recommendation before taking back to PED. - Intent to lower to eliminated banned products from KC transfer stations (items that are easily recyclable) and diverted to a recycling station. - Requires that contractor provides a plan or assessment of how much material can be diverted from the landfill. - Required to put two bins on construction site: one for garbage and other for recycling. - Reconciliation of transfer station receipts matches or exceeds plan for sign off. - Concerns from building department is that there is no capacity for the amount of building going on.
Alternatives: 1. Do this at transfer station level rather than City level but King County is opposed (separate at site, policed at transfer station).
Recommends requiring 2 bins and writing some language on exceptions for sites that cannot fit two bins. Initial inspection after bins are placed but not policed. (Materials attached)
What does city have to do beyond informing contractors? 1. Inspectors would have to inspect bins and write correction notice if necessary (then follow up on correction). Section 9 of the presentation is the challenge to the city. - Verification of compliance is the burden that is the greatest concern. Design on incentives rather than enforcement. Have any other cities adopted an ordinance to this? Concerns with threshold? - Shoreline and Issaquah have adopted an ordinance but are not strict enforcement. - 1000 sq. ft. threshold is small enough to not require two bins when recycling can be loaded into the back of a truck (i.e. small remodel). Staff recommendations to be presented again at future committee meeting.
2. State Minimum Wage and Sick Leave Changes Notes: John Lloyd, Deputy Parks and Community Services Director, reviewed the minimum state wage increases along with an estimated impact in 2019 and 2020. Next steps are for the proposed wage chart to be reviewed by HR and the calculations to be reviewed by Finance. The new wages would be considered part of the base budget package. 2018 - $11.50 2019 - $12.00 2020 - $13.50 (Handout attached)
No council committee action is needed. Staff can submit a white paper with the budget submission to provide additional information.
3. Locke Pavilion Signage John Lloyd, Deputy Parks and Community Services Director, provided a concept design of the signage to honor Al Locke and the naming of the Marina Park Pavilion to “Al Locke Pavilion”. Staff are working with Mr. Locke’s family to schedule a sign unveiling for September. (Handout attached)
No council committee action is needed. Councilmembers requested to make sure sign placement does not block access since the pavilion can be accessed by all sides. Staff will pursue making and installing the sign and scheduling the sign unveiling for the fall.
4. Planned Unit Development Chapter of Kirkland Zoning Code Notes: David Barnes, Senior Planner, presented on the Planned Unit Development Chapter of Kirkland Zoning Code.
Briefed subcommittee on Code Amendments for Kirkland Zoning Code Chapter 125 - Planned Unit Developments (PUD)
Verified that Council members need additional financial information that compares the value of the PUD public benefits provided to the value of the benefits received by the applicant
Received feedback on revising list of public benefits which included adding adopted City-Plans to help applicants identify desirable City projects to consider providing as a public benefit
Received confirmation that Council would be supportive of funding a PUD benefits valuation tool that could be used in addition to existing requirement to make decisions on PUDs.
(Presentation attached)
Tentative Next Agenda August meeting is canceled.
CITY OF KIRKLAND Planning and Community Development Department 123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033 425.587-3225 - www.kirklandwa.gov
MEMORANDUM
To: Kurt Triplett, City Manager
From: Eric Shields, Director of Planning and Community Development Tom Phillips, Building Official
Date: January 24, 2018
Subject: Presentation by King County staff regarding the disposal of Construction and Demolition materials.
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hear a presentation by King County staff regarding regulating the disposal of Construction and Demolition (C&D) materials through a model ordinance and discuss whether such an ordinance would be fitting for Kirkland.
BACKGROUND DISCUSSION King County Solid Waste has been meeting with City building officials, permitting staff, recycling coordinators and any other applicable staff to discuss King County’s C&D materials diversion model ordinance.
King County Ordinance 18166 (effective January 1, 2016) banned C&D materials of value from disposal in a landfill and established a system of designated facilities to which all C&D materials from jobsites in King County (outside of Seattle) should be going. However, while the city where a jobsite is located has authority over materials at that site, King County has authority over them once the materials leave the jobsite. King County has developed model C&D code language (attached) that cities in King County can adopt to ensure that permitting requirements are consistent and expectations around C&D materials are clear throughout the County.
Kinley Deller, King County’s C&D Materials Diversion Specialist, met with Kirkland staff on August 2, 2017 to explain the proposed model ordinance. Staff took the issue to the Planning and Economic Development Committee (PED) on October 9, 2017 for discussion. During the PED committee meeting staff identified two concerns. First, the proposed model ordinance would require additional staff to ensure compliance through field inspections, monitoring disposal activity and reviewing and approving required reports. Second, many of the building sites in Kirkland are too small to accommodate separate garbage and recycle containers. Therefore staff suggested that it would be more appropriate to regulate the disposal of C&D materials at the transfer station instead of the job site.
Alternate formats available 206-477-4466, TTY Relay: 711 Printed on recycled paper – Jan18-AR
Department of Natural Resources and ParksSolid Waste Division
Building in King County?Here’s what you need to know about recycling and
disposal of construction and demolition (C&D) materials
(Clean, Untreated, Unpainted)
(Clean, Untreated,
Unpainted)
(New)
(New)
Wood Cardboard Metal
BricksAsphalt Paving
Concrete
Gypsum Scrap
Garbage
Additional information:
•• Readily recyclable materials from construction and demolition (C&D) projects are required to be
recycled. See the “Director’s List” of readily recyclable C&D materials at www.greentools.us
(search Director’s List”)
• Non-recyclable C&D waste and mixed C&D (recyclable material mixed with non-recyclable waste),
when generated in King County (outside of the cities of Seattle and Milton) must be sent to King
County designated C&D recycling and disposal facilities
• Single commodity recyclables (e.g. metal) from job sites can go directly to appropriate recycling
facilities (not required to go to designated C&D facilities)
• Abatement paperwork is required for all demolition loads at all facilities
• Bulk shipping containers can no longer be used to transport C&D waste from job sites to landfills
(Enforcement is currently being deferred under certain conditions - additional info available
at www.greentools.us - search “direct disposal”)
• Washington State regulations (WAC 173-345-040) require a separate collection container be
provided for waste at job sites that conduct recycling
• These requirements are detailed under King County Ordinance 18166 which became effective
January 1, 2016
For more informationContact the King County Solid Waste Division at 206-477-4466
711 (TTY Relay) or visit www.greentools.us
Recyclable materials
from construction and
demolition projects are
required to be recycled.
These readily recyclable
materials should be
separated at the job site
from garbage and
other waste. C&D waste cannot be
taken in dump vehicles
or dump trailers to King
County-owned transfer
stations.
See other side for designated C&D recycling and disposal facilities.
Construction & Demolition (C&D) Recycling and Disposal FacilitiesThese facilities have agreements with King County to properly manage C&D materials.
King County Designated C&D Recycling and Disposal Facilities
Designated C&D recycling facilities (for mixed recyclable C&D materials)•• Alpine Recycling
(note: no drop-offs, call for info)253-531-2127
• DRS Renton 701 SW 34th St. Renton, WA 98057 425-245-8015
• DRS Woodinville 5906 238th St SE, Suite B Woodinville, WA 98072 425-245-8015
• DTG Enterprises 22014 W Bostian Rd Woodinville, WA 98072 425-549-3012
• Maltby Container & Recycling (note: no drop-offs, call for info) 425-778-3688
• Recovery 1 1805 Stewart St. Tacoma, WA 98421 253-627-1180 / 800-949-5852
• United Recycling Seattle 74 S. Hudson St.Seattle, WA 98134206-209-1300
• United Recycling Woodinville
18827 Yew Way
Snohomish, WA 98296
360-668-4300
Designated C&D waste disposal facilities (for non-recyclable C&D waste)• 3rd & Lander Transfer Station
(owned by Republic Services) 2733 3rd Ave S Seattle, WA 98134 206-336-1365
• Black River (owned by Republic Services)501 Monster Road Renton, WA 98059 425-235-0269
• CRC/Cascade Recycle Center (owned by Waste Management) 425-419-7015 This facility is not open to public drive-in customers but is open to commercial customers.
• Eastmont (owned by Waste Management) 7201 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106 425-419-7015
• RNW/Recycle Northwest (owned by Waste Management) 355 H St. NW Auburn, WA 98001 425-419-7015
!(
")
!(
!(
!(
!(
")
")
")")
")
")
§̈¦90
§̈¦405§̈¦5
§̈¦5
UV520 UV202
UV167
UV518
UV522
§̈¦405
DRS Renton
Recovery 1
DTG Enterprises
DRS Woodinville
United Recycling Woodinville
United Recycling Seattle
Eastmont
Maltby Container & Recycling (No drop-off service)
Black River
RNW/Recycle Northwest
CRC/Cascade Recycle Center
3rd & Lander Transfer Station
Bothell
Lynnwood
Edmonds
MountlakeTerrace
Brier
Auburn
Tacoma
Seattle
Kent
Bellevue
Auburn
Renton
Kirkland
Federal Way
Sammamish
Redmond
Burien
SeaTac
Issaquah
Tukwila
Shoreline
Bothell
Kenmore
Covington
Newcastle
Pacific
Des Moines
Woodinville
Maple Valley
Mercer Island
Black Diamond
Medina
Lake Forest Park
Algona
Normandy Park
Milton
") Material Recovery Facility
!( Waste Transfer Facility
«
The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited ex cept by w ritten permission of King County.
Map Document: (Q:\SWD\working\projects\recycling_facilities\apps
\c&d_dropoff_facilities_july17.mxd
0 21Miles
September 12, 2017
Background for C&D Permitting Ordinance Proposal
Through the established Interlocal Agreements (ILAs) between King County Solid Waste and each of the incorporated jurisdictions within King County (excluding Seattle and Milton), King County Solid Waste has the responsibility to ensure that solid waste generated within the ILA contracted jurisdictions is managed in such a way as to protect human health and the environment.
In order to uphold King County Solid Waste’s commitment to this responsibility, with regard to materials generated through construction and demolition activities, King County adopted Ordinance 18166 which became effective January 1, 2016. This ordinance made amendments to King County Code Chapters 4A and 10.
The primary effects of this ordinance were to: 1) ban readily recyclable C&D materials of value from disposal in a landfill,2) establish and maintain a C&D facility designation/certification system for C&D material recovery
facilities and C&D waste transfer facilities, and3) establish and maintain an enforcement mechanism
While King County Solid Waste is charged with ensuring the safe disposal of the waste once it is transported from jobsites, authority over the jobsites and thus how C&D materials are collected, managed, and prepared for delivery off-site, falls under the purview of the building code permitting department for each incorporated jurisdiction.
For this reason, we are asking each of the building permitting jurisdictions within King County to encourage their elected officials to codify language which dovetails with King County Ordinance 18166 and requires building permit applicants to comply with the requirements which pertain to the materials generated on their jobsites once they leave the site. To facilitate this process, participants in the Regional Code Collaboration have developed the attached code language template.
Please direct questions to Kinley Deller at [email protected] or 206-477-5272.
KING COUNTY DOCUMENT
CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION MATERIALS DIVERSION (Model Ordinance)
Code Proposal:
16.xx DIVERSION OF BUILDING MATERIALS FROM LANDFILLS
Sec. 1. Title
This article shall be known as the Diversion of Building Materials From Landfills Ordinance of
______ (City/Town/County).
Sec. 2. Purpose
The purpose of this ordinance is to increase the reuse and recycling of construction and
demolition materials.
Sec. 3. Definitions
Unless otherwise expressly stated, the following words and terms shall, for the purposes of this
code, have the meanings shown in this section:
A. “Demolition” means the process of razing, relocation, or removal of an existing
building or structure, or a portion thereof.
B. “Divert”, “Diverted” and “Diversion” mean the reuse, recycling, or beneficial use of
construction and demolition materials.
C. “Reuse” means the diversion of a material, product, component, module, or a
building from entering the waste stream in order to use it again.
D. “Beneficial Use” means the use of solid waste as an ingredient in a manufacturing
process, or as an effective substitute for natural or commercial products in a manner
that does not pose a threat to human health or the environment.
E. “Deconstruction and salvage assessment” means a report which summarizes the
building components within an existing building (prior to demolition) that have the
potential to be reused after removal.
F. “Recycling” means transforming or remanufacturing waste materials into useable or
marketable materials for use other than landfill disposal or incineration. “Recycling”
does not include combustion of solid waste or preparation of a fuel from solid waste.
Sec. 4. Applicability
All projects that require a building permit and meet the following thresholds are subject to this
article:
A. Area of construction or demolition greater than 1,000 gross square feet floor area
[note: if permitting system does not track square feet make minimum threshold
$30,000] , or
B. Commercial tenant improvements with an area of construction greater than 2500
gross square feet.
Sec. 5. Diversion Requirement
A. Projects meeting the applicability thresholds outlined in Section 4 must divert all
banned materials from disposal.
B. (Optional) Projects meeting the applicability thresholds outlined in Section 4 must
also divert, by weight, a minimum of 50% of construction and demolition materials
removed from a building site.
Sec. 6. Exemptions
A. The code official may exempt the following:
1. Emergency work or disaster response performed in conjunction with an
emergency. [Reference local code provisions defining emergencies or disaster
response.]; and
2. Removal of buildings or structures determined to be hazardous or
dangerous.
Sec. 7. Documents to be Submitted with Application
A. The applicant shall submit the following:
1. A Waste Diversion statement of intent for projects that include new
construction, alterations, and whole building removal. The waste diversion
statement of intent shall clearly state that the project will comply with King
County disposal bans on readily recyclable materials (KCC 10.30.020. Statement
may be included as a check box on the demolition permit application form.
2. A deconstruction and salvage assessment for projects that include alterations
and whole building removal.
a. Projects that include whole building removal shall be prepared by a
third party approved by King County, prior to permit issuance;
3. Asbestos/Demolition project notification number from the Puget Sound Clean
Air Agency (PSCAA). Notifications are required for all demolitions with a roof
area greater than 120 square feet regardless of whether or not the building
contains any asbestos and any project involving 10 linear feet and/or 48 square
feet or more of friable asbestos containing material. Notifications are obtained at
www.pscleanair.org and a printed copy is required to be kept on site during the
asbestos/ demolition project.
Sec. 8. Additional Requirements
A. All construction and demolition loads that contain more than a single commodity
shall be sent to a facility designated under King County Code 10.30.020.
B. All jobsites shall have at least one clearly identified bin for recyclable materials that
will be sent to a designated processing facility for recycling or beneficial use, and a
separate bin for waste destined for a landfill.
C. For demolitions, an asbestos survey must be conducted by an AHERA certified
building inspector. These professionals can be found on the web or in phone books
under “Asbestos Consulting and Testing”. The results of the survey must either be
posted at the work site or communicated in writing to anyone who may come into
contact with the material. The only exception is if this is a single-family, owner-
occupied home, where owners may conduct their own survey for suspect
asbestos-containing materials (ACM).
D. When disposing of asbestos containing material at a disposal site authorized
to accept asbestos waste, a waste shipment record form must be completed.
Keep or request a copy for your records. This form can be downloaded at
www.pscleanair.org.
Sec. 9. Compliance with diversion requirements
A. Inspection Authority. During construction or building removal, [City/Town] and King
County may inspect project sites to determine compliance with this code.
B. Waste Diversion Report. A Waste Diversion Report shall be submitted prior to
permit finalization or issuance of a certificate of occupancy. A partial or temporary
certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to submittal of the Waste Diversion Report.
In instances where shared construction and demolition collection containers are used by
2 or more projects, periodic Waste Reports may be submitted in place of a final Waste
Diversion Report, as determined by the Code Official. The Waste Diversion Report shall
identify the weight of generated construction and demolition material removed from a
project site (documented by facility tip receipts); the hauler; and the receiving facility or
location for each commodity.
C. Proof of Diversion. The permitee shall provide proof of compliance, to be submitted
with the Waste Diversion Report:
1. For C&D recycled or disposed, the owner must provide receipts from the
designated facility which received each material for processing or transfer,
showing the actual weight of the material and whether the material has been
disposed in a landfill or diverted for reuse, recycling, or beneficial use. Each
receipt must clearly state the project title, the date materials were accepted and
whether the materials were disposed or diverted. All materials taken to a C&D
transfer station shall be counted as disposed (unless documentation is provided
that the materials were transferred to, and processed at, a C&D material
recovery facility). If the receipt provides information for multiple projects, the
project names and the amounts of material for each project must be clearly
identified.
2. For materials salvaged for reuse, the applicant must provide documentation
of the weights or a numerical inventory of material salvaged for reuse. Each
piece of documentation must clearly state the project name and the date
materials were accepted. If the receipt provides information for multiple
projects, the project titles and the amount of material for each project must be
clearly identified. A signed statement from the receiving location or photo
documentation must be included for salvaged materials for which a tip receipt
cannot be obtained.
3. Any additional information needed to support claims of compliance.
4. [Optional] When required documentation is not able to be provided a
notarized affidavit of compliance may be allowed as proof of diversion.
D. [Optional] [The Department] shall not take enforcement actions under this section
for one year after the effective date of this section.
Sec. 10. Determination of compliance [Optional]
[The Department] shall review the Waste Management Report and determine whether the
applicant has complied with the diversion requirement.
Sec. 11. Rules and regulations [Optional]
[The Department] is authorized to make all necessary and reasonable rules and regulations with
respect to the enforcement of this article. All such rules and regulations shall be consistent with
the provisions of this article.
Division Wages Benefits Wages Benefits Wages BenefitsMaintenance & Operations $0 $0 $56,019 $15,864 $101,349 $28,733
Admin $22,620 $4,864 $0 $0 $0 $0
Event Services $14,391 $3,075 $0 $0 $0 $0
Peter Kirk CC $114,507 $25,621 $0 $0 $0 $0
Recreation Services $31,546 $8,201 $0 $0 $0 $0
North Kirkland CC $195,759 $45,851 $0 $0 $0 $0
Aquatics $173,012 $51,187 $0 $0 $81,761 $23,898
Total $551,835 $138,799 $56,019 $15,864 $183,110 $52,631
Division Wages Benefits Wages Benefits Wages BenefitsMaintenance & Operations $0 $0 $56,986 $16,061 $103,363 $29,144
Admin $22,620 $4,864 $0 $0 $0 $0
Event Services $14,391 $3,075 $0 $0 $0 $0
Peter Kirk CC $123,737 $27,507 $0 $0 $0 $0
Recreation Services $33,215 $8,542 $0 $0 $0 $0
North Kirkland CC $203,697 $47,474 $0 $0 $0 $0
Aquatics $197,286 $56,147 $0 $0 $97,331 $27,081
Total $594,946 $147,609 $56,986 $16,061 $200,694 $56,225Increase $43,111 $8,810 $967 $197 $17,584 $3,594
Total Increase by Fund
Division Wages Benefits Wages Benefits Wages BenefitsMaintenance & Operations $0 $0 $58,909 $16,738 $105,439 $30,082
Admin $22,620 $4,891 $0 $0 $0 $0
Event Services $15,150 $3,247 $0 $0 $0 $0
Peter Kirk CC $141,289 $31,284 $0 $0 $0 $0
Recreation Services $36,979 $9,430 $0 $0 $0 $0
North Kirkland CC $229,968 $53,127 $0 $0 $0 $0
Aquatics $222,560 $62,335 $0 $0 $107,888 $29,710
Total $668,566 $164,314 $58,909 $16,738 $213,327 $59,792Increase $116,731 $25,515 $2,890 $874 $30,217 $7,161
Total Increase by Fund
Biennial Increase $159,842 $34,325 $3,857 $1,071 $47,801 $10,755Biennial Increase by Fund
$21,178$1,164$51,921
$194,167 $4,928 $58,556
$142,246 $3,764 $37,378
Parks & Community Services Personnel Recaps
2020 Summary - Updated Wages010 General Fund
010 General Fund 125 Parks Maint Fund 128 Park Levy
125 Parks Maint Fund 128 Park Levy
2019 Summary - Base Wages (before wage corrections)
125 Parks Maint Fund 128 Park Levy
010 General Fund2019 Summary - Updated Wages
Inspiration:
Proposed Layout:
Al Locke Pavilion
The residents of Kirkland owe a debt of gratitude to the city’s first City Manager, Al Locke, serving in this role from 1965-1985. Mr. Locke was known as a champion of waterfront parks and a watchful steward of city finances. Among the many projects during his career with the City of Kirkland, Marina Park and Pavilion stands out as a symbol of his desire to provide a place for families while enhancing and protecting the shoreline. Upon completion, the pavilion
ultimately became the logo of the City of Kirkland. By naming the pavilion after Locke, his legacy will forever be remembered by future generations. Locke retired from the City of Kirkland on July 1, 1985 after serving in his role for
20 years and six mayors, a feat he attributed to a good sense of humor and being left handed.
Career Highlights and Accomplishments
• Developed the first Parks Master Plan in 1965 • Oversaw the merger of Houghton and Kirkland in 1968 • Expanded the Parks system from 35 acres to over 70 acres by 1980 including 12 acres of waterfront parks • Played a key role in convincing Costco to locate its corporate headquarters in Kirkland • Worked behind the scenes to convince the Seahawks to locate their original practice facility in Kirkland
Planned Unit Development (PUD)KZC Chapter 125 Code Update
CAM18-00380
PW-PK-HS Committee
July 20, 2018
Agenda
• Background
• Review key issues
• Discuss and provide staff direction on key issues
What is a PUD?
A PUD is a mechanism that allows an applicant to propose a development that is beneficial to the City, but may not strictly comply with all code requirements (although some code requirements, such as those pertaining to critical areas such as wetlands and streams may not be modified using a PUD).
How Have PUD’s Been Used Recently?
• Residential subdivision
Public Benefit:
-Rapid Rectangular Flashing Traffic Beacon
-Open Space over detention vault
Value to developer
-Reduced lot sizes, measuring height from finished grade, averaging lot coverage and floor area over entire site, increased density
How Have PUD’s Been Used Recently?
• Commercial development
Public Benefit-
-Extra 100’ buffer between development and adjacent residential zone
-810’ of sidewalk across street from development
Value to developer
-Land encumbered by wetland and streams is now
developable (approximately 3.74 acres)
Trigger for PUD Code Amendments
• City Council’s desire to identify dollar value of public benefits provided to the City compared to benefits received by the applicant
Key Issue - 1
• Establishing method to value the public benefits vsthe value of the PUD to the applicant
- Applicant provides a report overseen by City
- Applicant provides their own report
- City contracts with economic firm to develop valuation tools for City use (Staff surveyed 2 local Economic Development firms)
Feedback on Key Issue 1
• Discuss and provide direction to staff
1. Is the comparison between developer value and public benefits the needed financial information required to make informed decisions?
2. Rough cost to produce a valuation tool $30-40K
Key Issue - 2
• Revising criteria in KZC 125.25(3) to update list of beneficial public benefits
- Update list based on Comprehensive Plan and other adopted city-wide plans
Staff recommends updating the list
Next Steps
• Return to Planning Commission on August 9th 2018