Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

12
Public reporting, expert standards and indicators – different routes to improve quality in German long-term care London, 21 May 2009 Dr. Andreas Büscher Institute of Nursing Science at the University of Bielefeld

description

Public reporting, expert standards and indicators – different routes to improve quality in German long-term care London, 21 May 2009 Dr. Andreas Büscher Institute of Nursing Science at the University of Bielefeld. Overview. Long-term care in Germany - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Page 1: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

different routes to improve quality in German long-term care

London, 21 May 2009

Dr. Andreas BüscherInstitute of Nursing Science at the University of Bielefeld

Page 2: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Overview

• Long-term care in Germany

• Principles for quality development and assurance

• LTC reform in 2008

• Expert standards

• External quality control

• Public reporting

Page 3: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Social insurance and security in Germany

Sic

kn

ess In

su

ran

ce

Pen

sio

n In

su

ran

ce

Five Pillars of Social Security

Accid

en

tal In

su

ran

ce

Un

em

plo

ym

en

t Insu

ran

ce

Lon

g-te

rm c

are

Insu

ran

ce

Social Assistance

Obligatory Insurance Scheme

Principle: 50% employer/Employee

Appr. 20% of employee‘s salary

Universal insurance coverage

Page 4: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Key data on long term care system

Page 5: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Joint agreement on quality principles

• Negotiated and agreed by stakeholders (self-regulation)

• Basis for external quality control by Medical Boards

• Guidelines and recommendations for internal quality development

• Structure, process and outcome criteria

• Results of quality tests by Medical Boards reveal problems in direct care (pressure sore prevention, food and fluid intake, incontinence care and gerontopsychiatric care)

Page 6: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

LTC reform in 2008

• Concerns about quality

• Three different measures on quality of services: – National expert standards– Expansion of external quality control– Introduction of public reporting system

• Implementation of an arbitration board

Page 7: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

LTC reform in 2008

• Procedure developed by German Network for quality development in Nursing

• Existing National Expert Standards:– Pressure sore prevention– Discharge management– Pain management– Fall prevention– Promotion of urinary continence– Care for people with chronic wounds– Nutrition management for ensuring and

promoting oral nutrition in nursing

Page 8: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

LTC reform in 2008

• External quality control on a yearly basis and without announcement

• Refinement of control guideline

• Development of public reporting system based on control guideline covering the areas of:

– Nursing and medical care, care of residents with dementia, social and everyday life support and housing, food and domestic aspects in nursing homes

– Nursing care, activities prescribed by a physician, quality of the organisation an grade of service

Page 9: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –
Page 10: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

First results of public reporting (May 2010)

• More than 7.000 reports

• 4.700 reports published

• Appr. 1.000 reports under review

• Appr. 1.000 reports awaiting additions from providers

• Appr. 280 reports with blocked publication, awaiting court decision

Page 11: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Conclusions

• Development of indicators has been commissioned for institutional long-term care

• Development of indicators also needed with regard to home care

• Attention needs to be given to recipients of cash payments and quality of care in the lifeworld setting

• Improvements and refinement of public reporting system to be expected

• LTC quality meanwhile involves different stakeholders and the public debate is ongoing

Page 12: Public reporting, expert standards and indicators –

Institute of Nursing ScienceInstitute of Nursing ScienceAt the University of BielefeldAt the University of BielefeldPost Box 10 01 31Post Box 10 01 31D - 33501 BielefeldD - 33501 BielefeldTel. +49 521 106 - 6880Tel. +49 521 106 - 6880Fax +49 521 106 - 6437Fax +49 521 106 - 6437

[email protected]@uni-bielefeld.de

http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/IPWhttp://www.uni-bielefeld.de/IPW