Public Law & Crime 2 ( Nov07)

19
PUBLIC LAW & CRIME Rose Moore, Teck Chon, Robert Simpson, Christopher Dalziel LEGAL NEWS

Transcript of Public Law & Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Page 1: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

PUBLIC LAW & CRIME

Rose Moore, Teck Chon, Robert Simpson, Christopher Dalziel

LEGAL NEWS

Page 2: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Discrimination against ethnic lawyers?

Article title: ‘Black and Muslim Lawyers Plan Breakaway Regulator’

Date of article: 16th October 2007

Article source: The Times Online

[http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article2666856.ece]

Page 3: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Who is accusing who?

• The Association of Muslim Lawyers (AML) and the Society of Black Lawyers accusing the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) of racial discrimination

• SRA is regulatory arm of the Law Society, and is Britain’s legal watchdog

Page 4: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

How row was ignited• White employee investigated on grounds of

fraud and making racist comments – but case dropped by SRA because she was pregnant

• Asian lawyer investigated for overcharging client by £18 – accusation proved to be false, firm spent £14,000 on his defence

• Keith Vaz asked SRA for figures

Page 5: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

The accusation• Racial discrimination – ethnic solicitors are more

than twice as likely to be investigated on grounds of misconduct than white counterparts

• SRA figures show that, in 2006, 62% of investigations related to non-white lawyers

• Non-white lawyers represent just 22% of total population of solicitors

Page 6: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Furthermore…• Rebellion

AML and the Society of Black Lawyers want to break away from SRA and form own watchdog body

• From next year, the Law Society will no longer be able to compel particular interest groups to sign up to it as their representative body

Page 7: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

SRA’s defence• Figures in question were published last year

• Large due to part of wider category which included mixed race or “other”

• Black and ethnic solicitors tend to be disproportionately concentrated in small/sole-practitioner firms, which are more likely to receive misconduct allegations

Page 8: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Furthermore…• SRA reiterated that it is the statutory regulatory

body for all solicitors, and it is not possible to be regulated by anyone else

Page 9: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Guilty or not guilty….. of hiding?!

JL (a Youth) v Director of Public Prosecutions (2007) High Court Queens Bench Division.

Case source:October 8 2007, The Times: www.times-online.co.uk)

Page 10: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

The Charge…

• Our ‘Dwane’ (the youth) was charged and convicted with being a:

• “person being found in ….. any enclosed yard, for any unlawful purpose.” Under the 1824 Vagrancy Act.

Page 11: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

The Facts…• Once upon a time (16 June 2006)flat 4, of

number 13 Claremont Terrace was broken into and someone chored some keys.

• Two days later a Community Support Officer, behind the block of flats heard glass smashing. She saw ‘Kevin’, climb from the rear yard of number 13 into number 14.

Page 12: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

And then…• When police arrived they found ‘Dwane’, ‘Kevin’

and their mate ‘Tezza’ hiding in the back yard of number 14, with the stolen keys.

Page 13: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

‘ello, ‘ello, ello ….

…….. “What are you doing?”

…. “Err, nowt, I’ve dun nowt”

Page 14: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

A Rogue and a Vagabond• Dwane appealed against his conviction on the

grounds that;• 1 - hiding from the police as such is not an

unlawful purpose within the section. • 2 – even if he were involved in the burglary he

still did not have unlawful purpose at the time of being discovered – it would have been just before discovery.

Page 15: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

The Verdict:

• The High Court allowed the appeal and quashed the conviction, stating:

• “Section 4 was preventive in nature and was intended to prevent conduct escalating into mainstream criminal conduct. It should be resorted to with caution.”

Page 16: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Protecting the elderly

Article title: ‘Elderly witnesses to testify from home’

Date of article: 8th November 2007

Article source: The Times Online[http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/

law/article2834015.ece]

Page 17: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

The worrying facts• Up to 500,000 elderly people could be victims of

street crime, bogus traders or abuse in their own or care homes – but many crimes go unreported

• King’s College London found that 342,000 people aged 66 and over experienced mistreatment in 2006 (figure doesn’t include street crime)

• Old people often reluctant or fearful of testifying

Page 18: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

The proposal• To enable frail and vulnerable elderly people to

testify from their own homes via video link

• DPP has launched draft policy, and says that CPS is determined to bring perpetrators to justice

• CPS will work together with police, health and social care agencies, and voluntary and community organisations

Page 19: Public  Law &  Crime 2 ( Nov07)

Key crimes targeted by CPS

• Abuse or neglect by family members/care workers

• Those based on vulnerability, eg. muggings, doorstep theft, rogue traders

• Those motivated by hostility/hatred towards people because of their age and infirmity