Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor:...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor:...
![Page 1: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Psychology 301Social Psychology
Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008
Attraction and Attraction and RelationshipsRelationships
Instructor: Cherisse SeatonInstructor: Cherisse Seaton
![Page 2: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OverviewConcluding Group processes
Cooperation and competitionCommunication and threat
The need for affiliationI. Attraction
PropinquityReciprocal likingSimilarityPhysical attractivenessPhysiological arousal
![Page 3: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Current applications: Broader level
Zimbardo interview“It’s not bad apples, it’s the barrel”Is the situation always that powerful?
http://video.on.nytimes.com/index.jsp?fr_story=d3cee846a166e3b7bad1e51843da3375feecde91
![Page 4: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Roots of ConflictConflict questions:
Who has won (competition)? Who gets what (resource distribution)?Who is in charge (power struggles)? Who decides (decisional conflict)? Who do I like (personal conflict)?
![Page 5: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Who gets what (resource distribution)?
Evolutionary Basis?Are we biologically predispose to monitor the
payoffs we receive relative to others?E.g., Others are benefiting more from the same
activity
![Page 6: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Monkeys reject unequal payBrosnan and de Waal (2003) – Nature, 425
![Page 7: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Using Threat to Resolve Conflicts
When caught in a conflict many of us are tempted to use threats to get the other party to comply.E.g., Threaten children with punishment
Research (Deutsch & Kraus, 1960, 1962) suggest that threats are not an effective means of reducing conflict.
![Page 8: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Deutsch & Krauss Trucking Game
![Page 9: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Effects of CommunicationResearch suggests that communication:
Can resolve conflict, if it fosters trust.Cannot resolve conflict, if it conveys threats.
Negotiation is a form of communication between opposing sides in a conflict in which:Offers and counteroffers are made.A solution occurs only when both parties agree.
An integrative solution is a solution to a conflict whereby:The parties make trade-offs on issues according to their
different interests. Each side concedes the most on issues that are
unimportant to it but important to the other side.
![Page 10: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Summary:Social dilemmas:
Public goodMixed motive situations
Factors that might increase cooperation:Change payoffsGroup identityCommunicate cooperative norms
![Page 11: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Attraction and relationships
![Page 12: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Readings for this sectionAronson et al. Chapter 9
![Page 13: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
History in PsychologyPsychological study of attraction &
relationshipsRelatively new – last 30 yearsPrimary interest in studying individualMany thought it non-scholarly work or
impossible to study scientificallyMost work to date on initial attraction, not long
term relationships
![Page 14: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What are the benefits of social bonds?Emotional benefits
Being around others makes us happyMarried people are happier
Health benefitsPeople who have many relationships live longer
Relationships have a stronger impact on mortality than smoking
Social SupportSpiegel et al. (1989)
Breast cancer patients in support groups lived 18 months longer than women in control groups
![Page 15: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Strength of need for affiliationTop of list of things that lead
to happinessLack of meaningful
relationships leads to feelings of:Loneliness DepressionWorthlessnessAlienation
$6,500+ for hyper-realistic dolls
![Page 16: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
I. Attraction
![Page 17: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
First impressions?Several characteristics have been
found to play a role in “attraction”Some factors that influence
whether friendships or romantic relationships will form are:1.) The propinquity (proximity)
effect2.) Reciprocal liking3.) Similarity4.) Physical attractiveness5.) Physiological arousal
![Page 18: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1.) The propinquity effectDefinition:
“The finding that the more we see and interact with people, the more likely they are to become our friends”
Physical distanceRepeated exposure“For every person, there is a perfectly
matched mate somewhere in the world”?
![Page 19: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1.) The propinquity effectAlphabetical seating
arrangementAdjacent or nearly adjacent
namesSegal (1974)
60 police recruits (strangers)6-week trainingRoommate & class seating
assigned alphabeticallyMore than 50% named ‘best
friends’ with adjacent last names
![Page 20: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
1.) The propinquity effectFestinger,
Schachter & Back (1950)
Couples in apartment complexes65% same building
Within building: 41% next door 22% two doors
apart10% opposite ends
of hall
![Page 21: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Why this effect?Functional distance
Certain aspects of architectural design that make it likely some people will come into contact with each other more often than others
E.g. location of rest room, stairs, elevator, or mailboxes.
More likely to ‘run into each other’Familiarity The Mere Exposure Effect or the Frequency
of Exposure effect (Zajonc, 1970)“The finding that the more exposure we have
to a stimulus, the more apt we are to like it”
![Page 22: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Frequency of ExposureFaces previously
viewed rated higherMore attractive More trustworthy Etc
Infants smiled more at repeatedly exposed faces (Brooks-Gunn & Lewis, 1981)
Exceptions: Neg. initial reaction Simple stimulus
![Page 23: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Proximity in the computer ageOnline dating
New field of studyOverall, online dating
seems to be very similar to traditional dating
Positives: People feel more
comfortable disclosing information & self-disclosure promotes closeness
![Page 24: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The problem with online datingFrost et al. (2008) Goal: establish exactly how
people use currently well-established online dating systems
Surveyed of 132 internet daters Users of a profile-based online dating
site spent seven times as long screening other people's profiles and sending emails than they did actually interacting face-to-face on real dates.
As a result participants reported finding online dating unsatisfying and aversive.
![Page 25: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Internet use & Affiliation (outside of virtual dating)
The Internet connects us with people we might otherwise never meet, but….
Kraut et al. (2008)Longitudinal study:
As use of the Internet increased: Feelings of social support decreased Number of social activities decreased Feelings of depression and loneliness increased
National survey data: Only 22 percent of people made a new friend on the
Internet, and those friendships tend to be of low quality.
Isolation increases with Internet use
![Page 26: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2.) Reciprocal-LikingDefinition:
“When you like someone and that person also likes you”
Discovery of another’s attractionWe like those who like usLimitation:
Must be sincere
![Page 27: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
3.) SimilarityDefinition:
“Attraction to people who are like us”
Match between:Interests/ActivitiesBackgroundValuesAttitudesPhysical attractivenessPersonalityLife style (smoking, morning / evening person)Age, race, education, religion, IQ, skills
Most research indicates that similarity, not complimentarity, that draws people together
![Page 28: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Attitude similarity and attraction
13.00
12.00
11.00
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
.00 .20 .40 .60 .80 1.00
Attraction
toward
other p
erson (ran
ge = 2-
14)
Proportion of similar attitudes held by other person
Byrne and Nelson (1965)The greater the proportion of attitudes subjects shared with the stranger, the more subjects liked him.
![Page 29: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
WHY SUCH A POWERFUL EFFECT OF SIMILARITY?
A) Cognitive Consistency We like ourselves, therefore we like those who are like
us
B) Social ComparisonValidation of one’s beliefs
C) Anticipate/predict Other’s behaviour (e.g., likes/dislikes, interests)
D) They will like us also (reciprocal)
![Page 30: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Matching of admirable characteristics
Most desirable personality traits in a romantic partner listed by both men and women:Confidence, integrity, warmth, kindness, intelligence,
dependability, emotional stability, good sense of humor, loyalty, and being affectionate
However….Although people insist again and again these types of
traits are the most important to them, their actions don’t always indicate this is the truth.
Instead, physical attractiveness appears to be the single most important predictor of ‘likeability’
![Page 31: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
4.) Physical attractivenessWalster (Hatfield) et al. (1966)
Randomly matched 752 incoming students for blind dates to a dance
Students’ rated partner’s physical attractiveness and desire to see their date again
Only physical attractiveness predicted the desire to date again (not intelligence, sincerity, sensitivity, etc.)
![Page 32: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
4.) Physical attractivenessInternet dating:
Profiles & ‘click what you are looking for’e harmony – matched according to ‘personality’Yet creator of Plenty of Fish Markus Frind says
“actions speak louder than words” “For example, Susie says she wants a solid, stable
man who earns $100,000-plus but keeps clicking on profiles of muscle-bound bad boys.”
![Page 33: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What is attractive? Widespread consensus
Media influence Evolutionary?
i. The “Mature” Baby Face ii. The Average Face iii. Your Style iv. Age
![Page 34: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
i. The “Mature” Baby Face
Cunnigham (1986)Women Men
Large eyes Large eyesProminent cheekbones Prominent
cheekbonesSmall chin Large chinBig smile Big smileSmall noseNarrow cheeksHigh eyebrows
![Page 35: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
ii. The ‘Average’ FaceComputer-digitized photos – technology ‘morphs’
photographs of facesWhy are averaged faces attractive?
Symmetrical – extreme featuresEvolutionary theory (Etcoff, 99):
“Survival of the Prettiest” Symmetry = health (parasite resistance)
Averaged face looks typical, or familiar
![Page 36: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Face of Tomorrow
![Page 37: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
iii. Your styleYear book studies Cultural and ‘Style’
differences over timePreference for faces that
resemble our ownMorphed own face preferred
![Page 38: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
iv. AgeBaize and Schroeder (1995): Personal Ads
researchCoded ads (age, education, income)Correlated with # of responsesFemale Ads:
AgeMen:
AgeEducationHeightIncome
![Page 39: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Physical Attractiveness“What’s beautiful is good” StereotypeAdvantages:Greater overall liking (best predictor of desire
to date)More desirable character traits (e.g., sensitive,
warm, intelligent)Higher incomeHigher evaluation of work performanceMore lenient treatment in the legal systemBetter mental health
![Page 40: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
5. Arousal & AttractionAronson et al (2007) suggest:
Take date to scary movie, orOver a high bridge
Misattribution of arousalDefinition:
“The process whereby people make mistaken inferences about what is causing them to feel the way they do”
![Page 41: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Arousal & Romantic Attraction
Dutton & Aron (1974) Conditions:
Capilano suspension bridge “Experimental bridge”
Low bridge “Control bridge”
Researcher approached single men
![Page 42: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Arousal & Romantic AttractionAs they crossed:
QuestionnaireGave phone number
Male or female researcher
![Page 43: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Arousal & Romantic Attraction
![Page 44: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Arousal & Romantic Attraction
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Low Bridge Capilano Bridge
Where Done
% o
f S
ub
jects
Ca
llin
g
Ex
pe
rim
en
ter
![Page 45: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Arousal & Romantic AttractionMeston &Frohlich (2003)
Conceptual replicationRoller coaster vs. non-threatening rideSame results
![Page 46: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Problem?Can we really conclude from this study that
arousal lead to increased attraction?Correlation research
Not likely that attraction lead to increased arousal, but…
Could be some third variable contributing to the relationship
What are some possible third variables?
![Page 47: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Evidence for Misattribution of arousal
Schachter and Singer (1962) - two factor theory of emotion
Provoked physiological arousal with a shot of adrenaline. Some were told that there would be a physical reaction
and others told nothing. While they were waiting they had to fill out a
questionnaire that asks increasingly insulting questions. Confederate in the room acts angry or euphoricParticipants who did not know what to expect mistakenly
assigned arousal to being angry or euphoric and they too became angry or euphoric.
![Page 48: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
But does physiological arousal increase attraction?
Need for AffiliationFear arouses temporary ‘attraction’ to othersSchachter (1959)Manipulated anxiety level:
Strong, painful shockWeak, innocuous shock
Participants could chose to wait with another, or wait alone
![Page 49: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Results of Schachter’s “Dr. Zilstein study”
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Nonanxious subjects
Anxious subjects
# of S
ub
jects
Choose to wait alone
Choose to wait with others
The results indicated that anxious subjects chose to wait with others more than non-anxious subjects.
Also, a follow-up study found that anxious people preferred to wait with other anxious people rather than those who were not anxious
![Page 50: Psychology 301 Social Psychology Lecture 19, Nov 6, 2008 Attraction and Relationships Instructor: Cherisse Seaton.](https://reader037.fdocuments.net/reader037/viewer/2022110207/56649d555503460f94a323eb/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Next class…**NO CLASS Tuesday Nov 11 (Remembrance
Day)**First impression exerciseII. Relationships
Similarity Self-disclosure Satisfaction Breaking up
e harmony or Plenty of Fish??