PSU.tv Social Audit - Winter 2015
-
Upload
ranier-evans -
Category
Documents
-
view
13 -
download
1
Transcript of PSU.tv Social Audit - Winter 2015
Portland State Television Social Media
Audit
Social Media ObjectivesObjective 1:
Increase Membership Leads and Conversions
Audience:PSU students Interested in learning or practicing the
skills involved with anything related to video
production or the resulting content's distribution.
KPI (Key Performance Indicators): - 2X members
- Increased Membership Retention
Objective 2: Increase Content
Viewer Conversion
Audience: Portland State Students,
Portland Community, larger national and international
audience
KPI (Key Performance Indicators):
- 2X YouTube Views- 2X Website Visits
Objective 3: Build Community, Drive Engagement
Audience: PSU.tv Members and
Viewers
KPI (Key Performance Indicators):
-- Increased Member Involvement and Retention
- 2X Subscribers- Increased Engagement
(Shares, Retweets, Comments)
PSU.tv Visual Audit
PSU.tv Audit Scoreboard
Scorecard
Channel Presence 3 Some channels have a strong presence
while others are majorly neglected.
Quality Content
4Content quality is dependent on video which are often very high. Could be more variety of content.
Frequency 2 Facebook is the only one with decent frequency, other need far more posts.
Calls to Action 3 Consistent and to action to visit website, but few to become a new member.
Engagement 3 Engagement is thorough, but often inconsistent. Lacking shares.
Reach 2 Reach is minimal on neglected channels, but decent on consistently updated ones.
Score 17
57%
Frequency Score 2/5
0 Posts
4-6 Posts a Week
2-3 Posts a Week
3-4 Tweets a Week
Whole Lot of Nothing
2-4 Videos a Week
1/5
4/5
3/5
3/5
0/5
5/5
LinkedIn Visual Audit
Duck TV Visual Audit
Duck TV Audit Scoreboard
Scorecard
Channel Presence
3Some channels have a strong presence while others are majorly neglected or non-existent.
Quality Content 3 Instagram, Facebook, Twitter high quality,
but YouTube and Website Lack majorly.
Frequency 4 Frequency on Existing Channels is great, except Google+.
Calls to Action 2Consistent calls to visit their or their sponsor’s websites, but few to entice new members.
Engagement 3 Engagement fair, but often inconsistent.
Reach 3 Reach is decent on most channels.
Score 18
60%
KBVR – OSU Student TV Visual Audit
KBVR Audit Scoreboard
Scorecard
Channel Presence 2 Most channels neglected or non-existent.
Quality Content 2 Facebook content is decent, but others
lack.
Frequency 2 Insufficient frequency for minimal channels.
Calls to Action 3 Decent calls to action when there are posts, website lacks.
Engagement 3 Engagement fair, but often inconsistent.
Reach 3 Reach is decent, considering.
Score 15
50%
Key Insights
• Website should have calls to action on landing page.
• Blogs are only powerful if they feature multimedia and relevant content.
• Social platforms should only be used if they can be kept up.
• Use positions to help empower and categorize members.
• Everything should come back to website to make lead conversions.
Opportunities
• Use Linkedin and Google + effectively• Leverage our great student created
content to drive website traffic.• Create blog with tutorials/video
production based content to generate conversions.
• Call to action for people to join on website.
Tactics
• Build up LinkedIn to create member engagement/professional preparedness. (Community Engagement, Membership Leads and Conversion)
• Create blog content and post weekly. (Viewership, Membership Conversion)
• Increase post frequency on Twitter/Instagram. (Viewership, Membership Conversion, Community Engagement)
• Use Google Plus to improve SEO. (Viewership, Membership Conversion)
• Improve engagement with users. (Community Engagement)