PSC/FSI Statistics for May 2017 A. The port state ...€¦ · number of detainable deficiencies per...

1

PSC/FSI Statistics for May 2017

A. The port state inspection of foreign flag vessels in India:

1. Number of inspections: There is a considerable increase in number

of inspections in all districts except Kandla. Total number of

inspections have increased from 39 in April 17 to 57 in May 2017.

2. Inspections based on Risk Profile: There is a continual increase in

number of inspections with IOMOU High risk profile with 77.2% of all

PSC inspections conducted in May 2017 were that of IOMOU High risk

category. However, it is also noted that a number of ships in this

category were High risk not because of age or type or poor inspection

records but because of the fact that these vessels were visiting IOMOU

region for first time.

3. Trends in detentions: There were no detentions in May 2017

compared to 7.7% detentions in April. However, 22.8% of the total

inspections were with nil deficiencies, compared to 20.5% in April

2017. Average deficiencies per ship has come down from 3.2 in April

to 2.9 in May 2017.

4. Performance based on IOMOU Risk Profile: By way of risk posed,

Medium risk vessel performed poorly compared to high and low risk

vessels with an average of 4 deficiencies per ship and 11% ships with

nil deficiencies compared to 25% each of high and low risk vessels

with nil deficiencies.

5. Performance based on ship type: On the basis of ship type, other

cargo vessels and Chemical Tankers performed poorly compared to

other types, with an average deficiency of 4 per inspected vessel.

6. Performance based on Age: Based on age, vessels above 20 years

of age performed poorly with an average of 8.8 deficiencies per ship.

7. Performance of recognized organizations: Based on number of

inspections, DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS) classed vessels with an average of

4.3 deficiencies per inspections had comparatively poor performance

and for recognized organizations with less than 5 inspections, IRS

Classed vessels had 10.3 deficiencies per vessel.

8. Performance of Flags: TOGO Flag had highest number of average

deficiencies, that is, 15 per inspected vessel. On the basis of Flags

with more than 4 inspections, Panama Flag had the highest number,

that is, 3.6 deficiencies per inspected vessel.

9. Areas of concern: The major area of concern was noted to be

working conditions with 33 deficiencies.

B. The Flag state inspections of Indian Flag Vessels

1. Number of inspections: The total number of inspections in May 2017

have reduced by 21.8% compared to that in April 2017. There is an

increase in number FSI inspections conducted by Kolkata, Kochi and

2

Chennai district compared to that in April 2017. For all other districts,

the numbers have come down.

2. The detention statistics: With 3 detentions compared to 2 in April 2017

and decrease in number of inspections in May 17, the detention ratio

has increased from 6.2% in April 17 to 12% in May 17.

3. The Vessel performance statistics: The FSI performance of vessels

inspected in May 17 is noted to below that of vessels inspected in April

2017 with: i) average deficiencies per ship increased from 8.2 to 8.6;

number of ships with nil deficiencies reduced from 2 to 1; number of

detentions increased from 2 to 3. However, the only positive is that

number of detainable deficiencies per detained ship has reduced from

6 in April to 3.7 in May 17.

4. Performance statistics based on ship type: On the basis of number of

detentions, other cargo vessels and bulk carriers had 2 and 1

detentions respectively. However, on the basis on detention rate, both

types had 16.7% detentions each. However, the area of concern is

passenger ship segment with 13 deficiencies per inspection.

5. Performance statistics based on ship size: On the basis of size

grouping vessels less than 500GT, 3000-6000GT & > 6000GT had one

detention each. The vessels between 3000-6000GT had an average of

9.5 deficiencies per ship followed by vessels between 500-3000GT

with 8.5 deficiencies per ship.

6. Performance statistics based on ship age: Vessels between 15-25

years and 5-15 years of age had 2 and 1 detentions respectively in

May 2017. In terms of average number of detainable deficiencies per

detained ship, vessels between 15-25 years of age had 4.5 detainable

deficiencies per detained vessel. However, vessels of more than 25

years of age had an average of 12 deficiencies per inspected ship.

7. Performance of recognized organizations: In terms of number of

detentions, single IRS Class, IRS-DNV dual Class and IRS-LR dual

Class had one detentions each. However, in terms of percentage of

detentions, IRS-DNV had 50% detention ratio, followed by IRS-LR with

25% detention ratio.

8. Breakdown of deficiencies: Life-saving appliances and Safety of

Navigation continue to be an area of concern with high number of

deficiencies including detainable deficiencies.

C. The performance of Indian Flag Vessels in Port State Inspections:

1. Number of inspections: There were a total of 21 inspections in May

2017 spreading to five different Port State regimes. About 67% of the

vessels inspected were bulk carriers and also about 67% of vessels

between 5-15 Years of age were inspected.

3

2. Key performance indicators: There were two detentions in May

2017, one each in TOKYO & USCG. There were six vessels inspected

in Paris MOOU and five passed the inspection with nil deficiencies.

Both the vessels detained were in the age bracket 5-15 years. This

age bracket also has an average deficiency of 2.2 per ship. Both the

vessel detained were Bulk Carriers.

3. Key performance parameters recognized organizations: The

recognized organizations of the vessels detained in May 2017 were

dual IRS-LR Class and single IRS Class. The performance of dual

ABS-IRS Class vessels with 8 inspections and out of these 5 with nil

deficiencies were better than other recognized organizations.

4. The break-up of deficiencies: The detainable deficiencies pertained

to Life saving appliances, Emergency systems, Fire safety and the ISM

code.

Graphical Representation

1. Graphical representation of Port State Inspections in India

Figure 1: Port State Inspections in India: Number of inspections

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Kolkata Mumbai Chennai Kochi Kandla Total

January 6 10 13 15 0 44

February 13 10 9 12 0 44

March 12 9 12 11 0 44

April 8 7 4 15 5 39

May 10 15 10 19 4 57

6

1013 15

0

44

1310 9

12

0

44

12

912 11

0

44

8 74

15

5

39

1015

10

19

4

57

Number of inspections: Jan -May 17

January February March April May

4

Figure 2: Port State Inspections in India: Trend Inspection number based on Risk

Profile.

Figure 3: Port State Inspections in India: Trends in Inspection Percentage based

on Risk Profile


Low 19 14 5 6 4

Medium 17 10 9 4 9

High 8 20 30 29 44

820

30 29

441710

94 9

19 14 56

4

0102030405060

Number of inspections based on IOMOU Risk Profile

High Medium Low


Low 43.20% 31.80% 11.40% 15.40% 7.00%

Medium 38.60% 22.70% 20.50% 10.30% 15.80%

High 18.20% 45.50% 68.10% 74.30% 77.20%

18.20%

45.50%

68.10% 74.30%77.20%38.60%

22.70%20.50% 10.30%

15.80%

43.20% 31.80% 11.40% 15.40% 7.00%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%

Risk based inspection trends: Jan- May 17

High Medium Low

5

Figure 4: Port State Inspections in India: Key performances of Vessels

Figure 5: Port State Inspections in India: Key Performance of vessels based on

Risk


Number of vessels with nodef.

10 8 15 8 13

Average def per vessel 4.2 3.5 3.7 3.2 2.9

Number of detentions 4 1 3 3 0

4 1 3 3 0

4.2 3.53.7 3.2

2.9

108

15

8 13

05

10152025

Performance trends: Jan-May2017

Number of detentions Average def per vessel

Number of vessels with no def.

High Medium Low

Average Def/Ship inspected 2.7 4 1.8

Percentage nil deficiencies 25% 11% 25%

25% 11% 25%

2.7

4

1.8

Performance based on IOMOU Risk profile

Percentage nil deficiencies Average Def/Ship inspected

6

Fig 6: Port State Inspections in India: Key Performance statistics based on ship

type.

Fig 7: Port State Inspections in India: Key Performance statistics based on ship

age.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

BulkCarrier

ChemicalTanker

GasCarrier

OilTanker

OtherCargoShips

Total number of inspections 26 7 6 3 15

Number of inspections with nil def. 3 3 4 2 1

Avg Def./Ship 2.7 4 0.8 0.7 4

26

7 63

15

33

42 12.7 4 0.8

0.74

Performance based on Ship Type

Total number of inspections Number of inspections with nil def. Avg Def./Ship

05

101520253035

Total number ofinspections

Number ofinspections with nil

def.

Avg Def./Ship

0-12 Years 35 12 1.8

12-20 Years 16 1 3

>20 Years 6 0 8.8

35

12

1.8

16

1 360

8.8

Performance based on age

0-12 Years 12-20 Years >20 Years

7

Fig 8: PSC inspections: Performance of recognized organizations

Fig 9: Performance of recognized organizations

11

6

8

18

2

2

2

3

4.3

1.5

2.6

3.1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS)

KRS

LR

NK

Performance Recognized Organization with > 5 inspections

Number of inspections Number of inspections with nil deficiencies

Avergae deficiencies per vessel

3

4

3

2

1

1

1

1

2

0

0

0

1

1.7

1.3

10.5

1

2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

ABS

BV

CCS

IRS

RINA

BKI

Performance of Recognized Organizations with <= 5 inspections.


Avergae deficiencies per vessel

8

Fig 10: PSC Inspections: Flag performance with >= 4 inspections

Fig 11: PSC Inspections: Flag performance with < 4 inspections

67

4

7

12

7

23

2 21 1

2.5 2.61.5 1.4

3.62.8

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

HONGKONG LIBERIA MALTA MARSHALLISLAND

PANAMA SINGAPORE

Perdormance of Flags with >= 4 inspections


Average deficiencies per ship

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 02 3 2 2

12

42

15

002468

10121416

Performance of Flags with < 4 inspections

Number of inspections

Number of inspections with nil deficiencies

Average deficiencies per ship

9

Fig 12: PSC inspections: Deficiencies distribution

2. Graphical representation of Flag State Inspections of Indian Flag Vessels

Fig 13: Break-up in number of inspections in various districts

Safety of Navigation, 12,

11%Life saving

appliances, 15, 14%

Propulsion & Auxiliary M/C,

16, 15%Ship

Documentation, 18, 17%

Fire Safety, 14, 13%

Working Conditions, 33,

30%

AREAS WITH >= 10 DEFICIENCIES

05

101520253035


January 7 8 3 0 4 23

February 2 6 3 2 9 23

March 8 8 6 4 8 34

April 6 13 6 1 6 32

May 9 4 7 4 1 25

7 83

04

23

26

32 9

23

8 8 6 48

34

6 13 61 6

32

94

74

1

25

Inspections


10

Fig 14: FSI Inspection trends: January -May 2017

Fig 15: Trends in detention rate: January-May 2017


Total 23 23 34 32 25

Kandla 4 9 8 6 1

Kochi 0 2 4 1 4

Chennai 3 3 6 6 7

Mumbai 8 6 8 13 4

Kolkata 7 2 8 6 9

23 23

34 32

25

01020304050607080

Trends: Number of FSI Inspections Jan-May 17



Series1 0% 4.30% 3.00% 6.20% 12.00%

0%

4.30%3.00%

6.20%

12.00%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Detention trends

11

Fig 16: Performance parameter trends: January-May 2017

Fig 17: FSI: Performance based on type of vessel


Average deficiencies/Ship 5.8 5.6 7.2 8.2 8.6

Number of ships with nodeficiencies

2 2 1 2 1


Number of detainabledef/detained ship

0 2 6 6 3.7

5.8 5.6

7.2

8.28.6

2 2

1

2

10

11

2 3

0

2

6 6

3.7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Performance Parameters trend

Average deficiencies/Ship Number of ships with no deficiencies

Number of detentions Number of detainable def/detained ship

02468

101214

BulkCarrier

Oil tanker OCV PassengerShip

GasCarrier

Number of type inspected 6 5 12 1 1


Average deficiencies/ship 7.1 11 8.1 13 12

Number of type with nodeficiencies

0 1 0 0 0

65

12

1 110

20 0

7.1

11

8.1

1312

01 0 0 0

Performance: Vessel type

Number of type inspected Number of detentions

Average deficiencies/ship Number of type with no deficiencies

12

Fig 18: FSI Performance based on vessel size.

Fig 19: FSI performance based on vessel age

02468

101214

0-500GT 500-3000GT 3000-6000GT >6000GT

Number of size inspected 5 4 2 14

Number of detentions 1 0 1 1

Average deficiencies/ship 7 8.5 9.5 8

Number of type with nodeficiencies

0 0 0 1

54

2

14

10

1 1

78.5

9.58

0 0 01

Performance based on ship size

Number of size inspected Number of detentions

Average deficiencies/ship Number of type with no deficiencies

0-5Years5-15Years

15-25Years>25Years

05

1015

1 0 06

0

9

1 06.3

2

9

2 1

9.34.5

60 0

12

0

Age based performance

0-5Years 5-15Years 15-25Years >25Years

13

Fig 20: FSI Performance of Recognized Organizations

Fig 21: FSI Areas of concern.

14

10

9.3

6

3

0 0

8.3

0

21

0

12

34

1 1

8.3

22

0 0

3.5

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Number ofinspections

Number ofdetentions

Number ofinspected ships

with nil def.

Avg. Def./Ship Avg. Detainabledef./detained ship

Performance of recognized organizations

IRS IRS-BV IRS-DNV IRS-LR IRS-NK

0

5

10

15

20

25

8

3

9

4

2022

8

32

11

12

1

Nu

mb

er

Type of deficiencies

Detainable deficiencies breakup

Total number of deficiencies Number of detainable deficiencies

14

Name/IMO No. Type/GT/Age Last Survey ISM Company Class

TAG20 9126039

OCV 3603GT 21 Years

20.07.2016 TAG Offshore Limited

IRS/DNV

Vishva Vijaya 9533505

Bulk Carrier 44010GT 5 Years

17.10.2016 Shipping Corporation Ltd.

IRS/LR

Kumar Tarini 9146493

OCV 290GT 19Years

18.01.2017 GOL Offshore Ltd.

IRS

Table 1: The vessels detained under FSI

3. Graphical representation of performance of Indian Flag vessels in Port

State Inspections

Fig 22: PSC inspections Indian Ships: Number of inspections in various

regional PSC Regimes

02468

1012

TOKYO PARIS USCG Vina-Del-Mer

IOMOU

Total no. of inspections 11 6 2 1 1


Number with nil deficiencies 5 5 1 0 0

11

6

2 1 11 0 1 0 0

5 5

1 0 0

Nu

mb

er

Port State Regime/MOU

Performance in various Port State Regimes

Total no. of inspections Number of detentions Number with nil deficiencies

15

Fig 23: Age based PSC performance of Indian Vessels:

Fig 24: Type based PSC performance of Indian Vessels

Fig 25: PSC performance of Recognized Organizations of Indian Flag Vessels

Total numberof inspections

Number ofdetentions

Number withno deficiencies

Averagedef/Ship

0-5years 4 0 2 1.5

5-15Years 14 2 9 2.2

15-25 Years 3 0 0 1.7

4

0

2 1.5

14

2

9

2.23

0 0

1.7

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Age based performance

02468

101214

BulkCarrier

OffshoreVessels

ChemicalTanker

Oil Tanker

Number of inspections 14 1 1 5


Number with no deficiencies 6 0 1 4

14

1 1

5

20 0 0

6

0 1

4

Performance based on Ship Type

Number of inspections Number of detentions Number with no deficiencies

0510

ABS/IRS LR/IRS NK/IRS IRS

Number of inspections 8 4 1 8


Number with nil deficiencies 5 2 1 3

8 4 1 80 1 0 15 2 1 3

Performance of Recognized Organizations

Number of inspections Number of detentions Number with nil deficiencies

16

Fig 26: Areas of concern of Indian Flag vessels in terms of number of deficiencies

Name of Vessel IMO No. Type/Age Detained by

Seamac Galliant 9599004 Bulk Carrier/6 Years USCG

Last Surveys/Org. conducting last Survey

Last FSI/Place Last ISM Audit/Org. conducting the Audit

Managers

LR conducted Change of Flag Surveys on 1.4.2017

Vessel came into India Flag in 04/2017

Interim SMC Audit by IRS on 3.4.2017

Seavie Ltd.

Vessel was issued a Condition of Class on 13/04/2017 after failure of Main Engine. Vessel is between 5-15 years age bracket with FSI every 2 years as per MS 4/2017

Name of Vessel IMO No. Type/Age Detained by

VISHVA NIDHI 9464742 Bulk Carrier/6 Years MSA of China on 17 May 2017

Last Surveys/Org. conducting last Survey

Last FSI/Place Last ISM Audit/Org. conducting the Audit

Managers

09.09.2016 by IRS

29.12.2016 at Paradip

26-01-2017 by IRS SCI Ltd.

MS Notice 4/2017:

Prior detention, vessel was inspected in OMAN (Riyadh MOU) on 11/2016 & Indonesia(Asia-Pacific MOU) on 07/2016 with nil deficiencies in both inspections. Vessel is less than 15 years with FSI every 2 years as per MS 4/2017.

Table 2; Vessels detained under PSC

LifeSaving

Appliances

ISM Emergency

Systems

FireSafety

Total Number of deficiencies 6 3 7 9

Number of detainabledeficiencies

1 2 1 1

63

79

1 2 1 1

Detainable deficiencies

Total Number of deficiencies Number of detainable deficiencies

17

LIST OF AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS AND NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS IN MAY 2017

S.No. Name of Surveyor

Place of Posting

Authorized for FSI/PSC

Require Re-authorization for FSI/PSC

No. of FSI/PSC Conducted

1. Capt S.K.Das DYNA

Chennai YES/YES NA/NA 2/0

2. Shri A.K.Choudhury


3. Shri Sirish Kumar


4. Captain Tapesh Ghosh NS

Chennai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

5. Shri S.S.Murty E&SS

Vizag YES/YES NA/NA 4/3

6. Shri Gopikrishna C e&SS

Tuticorin YES/YES NA/NA 1/5

7. Shri Ravi Moka SS

Chennai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

8. Shri Sajendra Oraon E&SS

Jamnagar YES/YES NA/NA 2/4

9. Captain A.K.Patel

Kandla YES/NO NA/NA 0/0

10. Shri Y Jaisinghania SS

Kandla NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

11. Shri A.K.Sinha Port Blair YES/NO NA/NA 3/NA

12. Captain R.Sagar, DYNA

Kolkata YES/NO NA/NA 1/NA

13. Shri K.M.Rao E&SS

Kolkata YES/NO NA/NA 2/NA

14. Shri S.K.Das, E&SS

Kolkata YES/YES NA/NA 0/4

15. Shri U.Rehman

Kolkata YES/YES NA/NA 0/0

16. Captain N.Mandal

Paradip NO/NA NA/NA NA/NA

17. Shri A.Chaki E&SS

Haldia YES/YES NA/NA 2/6

18. Shri R.R.Subbarao E&SS

Paradip YES/NO NA/NA 3/NA

19. Shri Nishant SS

Kolkata NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

18

LIST OF AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS AND NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS


Place of Posting




20. Shri L.Natarajan SS

Kochi YES/YES NA/NA 0/0

21. Shri P.Nair Kochi YES/NO NA/NA 0/NA

22. Shri C.S.Kiran E&SS

Kochi YES/YES NA/NA 0/6

23. Shri V.V.Paul E&SS

New Mangalore

YES/YES NA/NA 4/13

24. Captain S.K.Nair NS

Kochi NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

25. Captain A.K.Azad DYNA

Mumbai YES/YES NA/NA 0/3

26. Shri J.Mukhopadhaya E&SS


27. Shri S.K.Shrivastava E&SS


28. Shri J.Senthilkumar E&SS


29. Captain V. Manhas NS

Mumbai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

30. Shri A. Srinivasa E&SS

Mumbai YES/NO NA/NA 0/NA

31. Captain Nitin Mukesh NS

Mumbai YES/NO NA/NA 0/NA

32. Shri N.Oommen SS

Mumbai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

33. Shri Bodhraj E&SS

Marmugao YES/YES NA/NA 0/5

34. Shri S.S.Gadkar DYCS

Delhi YES/YES NA/NA NA/NA

35. Captain K.R.Sundaram NS

Delhi NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA

36. Shri G.L.Meena E&SS

Delhi NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA

37. Captain R.Poswal NS

Delhi NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

19

LIST OF AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS AND NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS


Place of Posting




38. Captain Jayakumar DYNA

DGS YES/YES NA/NA NA/NA

39. Captain Muduli DYNA

DGS YES/YES NA/NA NA/NA

40. Captain Darokar NS

DGS NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA

41. Shri A.B.Dutta E&SS


42. Shri S.Kamath E&SS


43. Shri A.Wankhade E&SS


44. Shri Gopinandan E&SS

DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA

45. Shri Vikrant Rai E&SS


46. Captain Mohit Behl NS


47. Captain A.Joseph NS


48. Captain P.C.Meena NS


49. Captain D.Joseph NS


50. Shri S. Pradeep SS


Note: If re-authorization is marked ‘Yes’, it means that the Surveyor was earlier authorized and now

require re-authorization due to non-conduct of any PSC/FSI in last one year.

Prepared By: Shri Vikrant Rai E&SS

Approved By: Shri B.R.Sekhar, Chief Surveyor

PSC/FSI Statistics for May 2017 A. The port state ...€¦ · number of detainable deficiencies per...

Documents

Transcript of PSC/FSI Statistics for May 2017 A. The port state ...€¦ · number of detainable deficiencies per...