Proximity Ethics: The Limits of Justice
description
Transcript of Proximity Ethics: The Limits of Justice
Proximity Ethics: The Limits of Justice
Brag & Steal 2014Cris Wildermuth, EdD, SPHRDrake Universitywww.drake.edu/[email protected]
2
WELCOME
Cris Wildermuth, EdD, SPHRAssistant ProfessorDrake UniversityMaster of Science in Leadership Developmentwww.drake.edu/leadership [email protected]
3
Are you ethical?
6
Road Map
7
Road Map
Nature of the problem
Ethical paradigms
Circles of Ethics
Evidence
The Study
Slowing down
8
Flexibility
Nature of the Problem
10
What is a moral dilemma?
11
Unclear solution
12
Significant Impact
13
Hard to find “right” or “wrong” answers
14
Whatever you do…
15
Think of a moral dilemma• Think of a moral
dilemma related to your professional role. You may choose a fictional, albeit it possible dilemma faced by someone in your field.
16
Discussion• Share your
fictional moral dilemma with a partner.
17
What is the right thing to do?
• Moral dilemmas • Ethical paradigms
Ethical Paradigms18
Justice“A person’s sense of justice is what is most distinctively and fundamentally moral. One can act morally and question all rules, one may act morally and question the greater good, but one cannot act morally and question the need for justice.”
(Kohlberg, 1981, p. 296)
What is a just society?• “To ask whether a society is just is to
ask how it distributes the things we prize – income and wealth, duties and rights, powers and opportunities, offices and honors. A just society distributes these goods in the right way; it gives each person his or her due”
Sandel, 2009, p. 19
What is a just society?• “To ask whether a society is just is to
ask how it distributes the things we prize – income and wealth, duties and rights, powers and opportunities, offices and honors. A just society distributes these goods in the right way; it gives each person his or her due”
Sandel, 2009, p. 19
22
Sharing our pie
RESOURCESBURDENS
23
Bringing it home• What does justice mean in your
professional field?• What resources and burdens are we
talking about?
24
What is just?
Immanuel Kant:What is right. Your duty.
Always.
25
The Murderer• “John” asks to hide in your
basement to escape the clutches of a murderer. You agree. The murderer knocks at your door and asks: “Is John in your basement?” What do you answer?
26
What is just?
Jeremy Bentham:More happiness
than pain.For more people.
27
The Child• A child is hidden in the
basement of a city, lonely and miserable. If her presence in the basement brings happiness to an entire city, should she be kept in the basement?
Ursula Le Guin, “The Ones who Walk Away From Omelas”
28
What is right?Carol GilliganMaximize love.Minimize hurt.Preserve relationships
The Ethic of Care
29
Women & The Ethic of Care
Circles of Ethics
31
Background: Code of Ethics
32
What would be the first principle of YOUR Code of Ethics?
33
For whom would I violate my own Code?
34
35
36
37
yup, that’s me
38
Circles of Ethics
39
Why does this matter?
CAREEmpathy
relationshipsJUSTICEfairness
40
Proximity• “The feeling of nearness (social,
cultural, psychological, or physical) that the moral agent has for victims (beneficiaries) of the evil (beneficial) act in question”
Jones, 1991, p. 376
41
We may “think differently” about ethics as we move farther away from the center of
our circle
42
“Justice” may require a certain level of “detachment”
43
“Care” may require empathy and proximity
44
Why does proximity matter?
45
Ethics & Rationality
46
Moral Intuition• An ultra fast “gut reaction” when
we are confronted with a moral dilemma.
47
Reach a conclusion, then justify it.
Cheigh, 2004
Millisecond Decisions
How many decisions do you make in a day?
49
Fundamental Attribution Bias
• If you are close to me, situational circumstances explain your behavior
• If you are far from me, your own will and choices explain your behavior
Jones, 1991
50
Fundamental Attribution Bias
• Our own neighbor might murder someone in self defense or out of deep feelings of depression.
• A stranger on the other side of the world is just a murderer.
51
Discussion• How might the
Circles of Ethics impact your Moral Dilemma?
• How might the Circles of Ethics impact your professional role?
Evidence52
53
The Role of Empathy
• When empathy is increased, people make decisions based on Care, rather than Justice.• this is true even if people recognize
that their decision is “unfair.”
Batson et al., 1995
54
How shall I judge you?• Tumasjan, Strobel, &
Welpe, 2011• Participants judged
their leaders more harshly in a “high distance” condition
55
How guilty should I feel?• Ghorbani, Liao, Çaiköylü & Chand,
2013• People feel more guilty and ashamed
the closer they are to a moral dilemma
56
Is this even an ethical issue?
• Carlson, Kacmar & Wadsworth, 2009• When people were closer to a situation
they were more likely to perceive the situation as a moral issue.
Ethical Fading: Seeing a situation as morally neutral
Tenbrunsel & Messick, 2004
The Study58
The Study• 1,300+ members of “Linked:HR”• 3 employee scenarios: Low (friend),
medium (stranger + empathy), and high (stranger) proximity
• Would you report an infraction? (not participating in an employee meeting)
60
The Variables• Proximity • Gender• Managerial Status• Personality• Ease of decision making (how hard?)• Type of reasoning (“care” based or
“rule” based)
The Five Factors
62
Preliminary Results: Proximity
• In general, participants significantly less likely to report a friend than a stranger.
63
Preliminary Results: Gender
• Women more likely to be impartial unless we’re dealing with a friend.
• In close proximity status, women are more likely to partial.
• This effect disappears when the woman is a manager.
64
Preliminary Results: Managers
• Managers more likely to report than non managers
Preliminary Results: Personality
Preliminary Results: Personality
• However, conscientiousness only matters in cases with medium or high proximity.
• When the case is distant, conscientiousness doesn’t matter.
SO WHAT? WHO CARES?
So what?
68
Justice is Messy
69
Your conclusions?
70
A few thoughts• We often try to solve ethical issues by
simple “thou shalt not do x” solutions. • “Honesty” tests strongly correlate with
conscientiousness – but conscientiousness doesn’t always seem to matter.
• Empathy is a powerful influencer of impartial behavior.
• But then… do we always want impartial behavior?
71
Don’t you want people to “Care” and consider the
specifics of the case as they solve moral dilemmas?
72
BOTH Justice and Care may be needed to solve a moral dilemma
73
How can you reconcile CARE and JUSTICE in your professional role?
Slowing Down74
75
Six Steps for Moral Decision Making¹
1. Did you reach your decision freely?2. Did you consider alternative decisions?3. Does your decision feel authentic and
match your personal code of ethics?4. Would you publicly acknowledge this
decision? 5. Would you teach others – your children,
for instance, or those reporting to you – to make the same decision?
6. If the circumstances were different – the case less or more urgent, the people involved closer or farther from you – would you still uphold this decision?
¹Based on Simon, Howe & Kirschenbaum’s Values Clarification Model
76
Think of your moral dilemma…
• How can you apply the “six steps” to help you reach a fair (justice) and compassionate (care) decision?
77
Questions?
78
Are you ethical?
79
THANK YOU!
Dr. Cristina de Mello-e-Souza WildermuthAssistant Professor Master of Science, Leadership DevelopmentDrake [email protected]/leadership www.criswildermuth.com