Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018-09-01 · 37 Provincial exam enrolment rates...
Transcript of Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018-09-01 · 37 Provincial exam enrolment rates...
PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss
Department of Education Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch
DDeecceemmbbeerr 22000099
To obtain additional copies of this report or to send your comments, please us the following coordinates:
Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch Department of Education of New Brunswick
P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B.
E3B 5H1
Tel.: 506-453-2157 Fax: 506-462-2201
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1
December 2009 _____________________________________________________________
Une version française de ce document est également disponible.
A similar report on Anglophone school districts is also available in English or in French. Un document analogue présentant les résultats des districts scolaires anglophones est disponible, en anglais ou en français.
Contact/Téléphonez aux Communications 506-444-4714
Fax/Télécopie: 506-457-4810
E-mail: [email protected] Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1
PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss DDeecceemmbbeerr 22000099
ISBN: 978-1-55471-258-8
Francophone School Districts
PPrréésseennttaattiioonn
i
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn
he Department of Education is pleased to present this provincial statistical report to give school staff,
parents, and taxpayers a general idea of how students in New Brunswick’s Francophone school districts did on the provincial examinations administered in the 2008-2009 school year. A similar document is produced for the Anglophone school districts. It should be noted, however, that results for the Francophone and Anglophone sectors cannot be compared given differences in the respective programs and evaluation tools. This document has four chapters. The first is an overview of the learning evaluation program. The second chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the elementary level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 2 Literacy, Grade 5 Sciences et technologie, Grades 5 and 8 Mathématiques, and Grade 8 Français.
The third chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the high school level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 11 Mathématiques and Grade 11 Français, as well as the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment. The fourth chapter contains a brief description of pan-Canadian and international assessments in addition to results showing how New Brunswick matches up against the other Canadian provinces and the OECD member countries on these assessments. Any comments likely to make this report more informative and complete should be sent to the following address. Department of Education Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1
T
ii
Table of Contents
iii
TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn......................................................................................................................... i
CChhaapptteerr 11 PPrroovviinncciiaall EEvvaalluuaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm aatt tthhee EElleemmeennttaarryy aanndd HHiigghh SScchhooooll LLeevveellss
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?............ 1
What subjects were tested? ................................................................................... 1
How are the exams prepared? ............................................................................... 1
How are the exams administered? ......................................................................... 2
How is exam marking coordinated? ....................................................................... 2
How are the exams marked? ................................................................................. 2
Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results? .............. 2
Is the quality of marking checked? ......................................................................... 3
How are the exams followed up? ........................................................................... 3
CChhaapptteerr 22 PPrroovviinncciiaall EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level...................... 5
What is the purpose of these exams? ......................................................... 5
What is tested? ........................................................................................... 5 Charts
1 to 6 Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4 ................................................................................. 7
Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 provincial literacy exam .......................................................................................................... 7
7 to 12 Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province .......................................................... 13
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5 Science et technologies for the province? ................................................................. 13
13 to 18 Provincial exam, Grade 5 Mathématiques, percentage of students at the acceptable level or higher by school, including the districts and province ................................................................................................... 19
Table of Contents
iv
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5 Mathématiques for the province? ...................................................................................... 19
19 to 24 Provincial exam, Grade 8 Mathématiques, percentage of students at the acceptable level or higher by school, including the districts and province ......................................................................... 25
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8 Mathématiques for the province? ...................................................................................... 25
25 to 30 Provincial exam, Grade 8 Français, percentage of students at the acceptable level or higher by school, including the districts and province ............................................................................... 31
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8 Français for the province? ............................................................................................ 31
31 to 36 Elementary school exam results by sex, including the districts and province ............................................................................................. 37
CChhaapptteerr 33 PPrroovviinncciiaall HHiigghh SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level ............................... 41
What is the purpose of these exams? ....................................................... 41
What is the passing grade? ...................................................................... 41 Charts
37 Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex ................................. 42
38 to 41 Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex? ............................ 43
42 to 53 Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average .................................................................................................... 45
Is there an appreciable difference between exam marks and school marks? .......................................................................................... 46
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index for the province? .................. 46
54 to 57 Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques, by school, including the districts and province .......................................................... 53
What is the performance index? ............................................................... 54
58 Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province .......................................................... 58
Second language oral proficiency scale ................................................... 58
59 to 102 Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% or more (competent level), by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006 .................... 61
Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level .................... 85
Grade 11 Français (regular level) ......................................................... 86
Table of Contents
v
Grade 11 Français (modified level) ...................................................... 87
Grade 11 Mathématiques (regular level) .............................................. 88
Grade 11 Mathématiques (modified level) ........................................... 89
Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment (all levels) ....................... 90
CChhaapptteerr 44
RReessuullttss ooff PPaann--CCaannaaddiiaann aanndd IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeennttss
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs ............................................................................................................ 91
What are SAIP and PCAP? ...................................................................... 91
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP? ............................................... 91
Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP? ............................................... 92
What is PISA?........................................................................................... 92
Who participates in PISA? ........................................................................ 92
How are students selected? (PISA) .......................................................... 93
How is the information used? (PISA) ........................................................ 93 Charts
103-109 Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PCAP 2007 domain ......................................................................... 94
110-118 Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country for each PISA domain ................................................................................. 104
CCoonncclluussiioonn ....................................................................................................................... 117
Chapitre 1 ‐ le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire
Chapter 1
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?
For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These are
What subjects were tested?
All the results presented in this document arefrom the ten provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2008-2009 school year. The subjectstested were Grade 2 Literacy, Grade 5Sciences et technologies and Mathématiques,Grade 8 Français and Mathématiques, Grade10 ESL, and Grade 11 Mathématiques
1
Chapter 1
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?
For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These arequestions being asked by parents, othereducation stakeholders, and New Brunswicktaxpayers as a whole.
To answer these questions, a provincialevaluation program was set up to assessstudents’ skills in literacy, mathematics, andscience and technology at key stages in theeducation system.
The provincial evaluations are also used toassess studies for the purpose of awardingthe high school diploma .
What subjects were tested?
All the results presented in this document arefrom the ten provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2008-2009 school year. The subjectstested were Grade 2 Literacy, Grade 5Sciences et technologies and Mathématiques,Grade 8 Français and Mathématiques, Grade10 ESL, and Grade 11 Mathématiques(regular and modified levels) and Français(regular and modified levels) .
How are the exams prepared?
The provincial examinations are developedtogether with teaching staff. Supervision isprovided by provincial evaluation consultantsin association with the provincial and districtcurriculum officers concerned. The theoreticalfoundations and nature of the exams aredefined in the assessment framework for eachsubject .
Le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire ‐ chapitre 1
How are the exams administered?
The rules and procedures to be followed inorder to ensure uniform administration of theexams are set out in an administration guide,which is updated and distributed to theschools for each exam session. TheFrancophone Assessment and EvaluationBranch is responsible for coordinating andadministering the exams .
How is exam marking coordinated?
For each subject tested, head markers aretrained beforehand to oversee the use of themarking grids and ensure uniform scoringprovince-wide. Marking is coordinated byprovincial evaluation consultants incooperation with provincial curriculum officers.
Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results?
When comparing averages for a given subject,we must take into account the measurementerror associated with each score before wecan claim there is a difference between twoaverages. Using the standard error, a range(confidence interval) is established, withinwhich the true value of the average is locatedin 95% of cases. The 95% confidence intervalused in this report is calculated by adding twostandard errors on each side of the average.The difference between the averages of twoschools is said to be significant if theirconfidence intervals do not overlap .
In reviewing the provincial examination resultsat the high school level, it should be noted thatstudents enrolled in regular-level courses write
2
How are the exams marked?
Once the exams have been administered, thehigh school students’ booklets are sent tothree marking centres located in Shediac,Edmundston, and Bathurst. The elementaryschool students’ booklets are sent to a singlemarking centre at either the Moncton orEdmundston campus of the Université deMoncton. The constructed-response questionsare marked by teaching staff under thecoordination of the head markers (teachers ordistrict supervisors), who are trained by theprovincial evaluation consultants. Theselected-response questions are markedelectronically .
gstudents enrolled in regular-level courses writeone set of exams, while those enrolled inmodified-level courses write another.Interestingly, in schools having a largepercentage of students enrolled at the regularlevel, the results are often better than, or atleast comparable with, those of other schoolsfor both the regular- and modified-levelexams. This makes it very important toconsider the percentage of students enrolledat each level.
We must bear in mind as well that provincialexam marks and school marks are only two ofmany factors indicating a school’s overallsituation. Socioeconomic conditions,demographics, what is expected of students,and parental involvement also influencestudent performance. This report does nottake the latter factors into account.
Chapitre 1 ‐ le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire
Is the quality of marking checked?
The 2008-2009 exam results were subject tothe implementation of an inter-rater reliability(IRR) measurement process to determine thequality of marking of theitems that require human involvement(markers), that is: Open-ended questions; Essay-type questions Problem solving; Marking criteria for writing exams; and Oral proficiency assessments.
A sampling of booklets is selected at random(systematic method) from the exam bookletsat the marking centres. A second markingsheet is inserted in the booklets selected andthe booklet is placed in the pile with theothers. When a marker gets a booklet with asecond marking sheet in it, he or she mustmark it on the sheet, not in the booklet. Themarker then gives the booklet to anothermarker, who marks it normally, i.e. in thet d t' b kl t
The inter-rater reliability index makes itpossible to answer the question, "Howaccurate is the marking if it is submitted to twodifferent markers (or marked twice)?" Theinter-rater reliability indices are thereforedisplayed with the exam averages for eachlevel in the report.
How are the exams followed up?
At the high school level, a statistical reportbreaking down the results by skill and contentis published after each exam session. Itcontains a description of the school resultsand the provincial average for each subject..
This statistical report is available in PDFformat at the following Web address:
http://www.gnb.ca/education/francophone-e.asp#1
The school districts, together with the school
3
marker, who marks it normally, i.e. in thestudent's booklet .
In English, a sample of records is given to amarker, and after listening to the interviewagain, a proficiency level is determined.
The school districts, together with the schooladministrators and teaching staff, areresponsible for interpreting the results anddeveloping an education plan. The statisticsare reviewed at the provincial level to aid indecision making regarding curricula.
Le programme provincial d'évaluation au primaire et au secondaire ‐ chapitre 1
4
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chapter 2
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or not
What is tested?
The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for further
5
Chapter 2
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or notstudents have mastered the skills and abilitiesassociated with the curricula being evaluated.
Using the results, teaching staff and schooladministrators can develop and applyappropriate action strategies for correctingweaknesses noted among students, and canguide students in a review of what they havelearned.
The results are also analyzed by the schoolsand school districts and the Department ofEducation.
What is tested?
The exams are developed on the basis of alist of topics drawn up by school districtpersonnel and Department consultants. Thetopics are derived from the provincial curriculaand identify the elements essential for furtherdevelopment of skills in Grade 5 Sciences ettechnologies, in Grades 5 and 8Mathématiques, and in Grade 8 Français .
At the end of Grade 2, reading comprehensionis evaluated at the provincial level. This examconsists of a reading comprehension test andan oral reading test.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
6
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4
Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 provincial literacy exam
Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.
Level 2 – The student will be able to:read and understand straightforward, illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read variousfamiliar words, e.g., cat, dog, happy, give; break down words into their constituent sounds,e.g., teach-er, pa-per; read various words made up of complex sounds, e.g., neighbour,bread; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; read while making mistakesthat do not change the meaning of a text; retell what he/she has read and give additionaldetails when asked questions; identify the main characters and events.
Level 3* – The student will be able to:read and understand illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read a range of familiar words,e.g., eyes, red, morning, reading; read words made up of complex sounds, e.g., friend, said,would; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; find the meaning of a wordbased on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters the central
7
based on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters, the centralproblem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues contained inthe text.
Level 4 – The student will be able to:read and understand texts geared to his/her level, with or without picture support; explainthe various techniques he/she uses to read words; find the meaning of a word based on thecontext; read fluently and observe punctuation marks so as to read expressively; retell whathe/she has read and describe the main events of the story; describe the characters, thecentral problem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues givenin the text or by drawing on personal experiences or even by making generalizationsextending beyond the content of the text.
* By the end of Grade 2, students are expected to have attained Level 3.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 1
District 01 n= 592
District 03 n= 436
District 05 n= 346
District 09 n= 415
District 11 n= 396
Province n= 2185
Chart 2
Number of students
who wrote the exam
District 01
Grade 2
Literacy
74 7277
7466
7371 7479
74
62
72
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Reading comprehension Oral reading
target
68
78
60
76
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Des Bâtisseurs n= 93
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 29
Saint‐Henri n= 73
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 22
Amirault n= 138
Abbey‐Landry n= 37
Sainte‐Thérèse n= 53
Champlain n= 96
District 01 n= 592
Province n= 2185
n= 51Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
Number of students who
wrote the exam
8
73
74
74
81
70
77
55
75
76
68
72
71
69
68
81
75
73
73
72
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Sainte‐Thérèse
Abbey‐Landry
Amirault
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Percentages
Oral reading Reading comprehension
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 3
Ernest‐Lang n= 9
Sainte‐Anne n= 11
Saint‐Joseph n= 21
Carrefour de la
Jeunesse
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 42
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 13
Centre d'appren‐
tissage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 31
District 03
Régionale
Saint‐Basilen= 23
63
65
78
77
76
87
46
82
78
58
74
79
49
76
88
81
87
62
91
67
52
81
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Saint‐Jacques n= 56
Notre‐Dame n= 50
Grande‐Rivière n= 19
Mgr‐Lang n= 22
Marie‐Immaculée n= 15
Echo Jeunesse n= 30
Mgr‐Martin n= 37
District 03 n= 436
Province n= 2185
n= 37
n= 20
9
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeur
Régional de
Saint‐André
73
72
89
70
73
77
45
63
72
74
81
63
93
86
53
79
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Percentages
Oral reading Reading comprehension
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 4
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 63
Le Tournesol n= 50
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 4
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 13
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur
District 05
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Croisée‐de‐
Robertvillen= 31
Académien= 14
n= 8
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 36
100
76
79
74
81
69
83
100
73
92
78
64
88
65
77
92
63
79
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐Jeunes *
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
Le Tournesol
La Croisée‐de‐Robertville
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Apollo‐XI n= 37
Mgr‐Melanson n= 13
Versant‐Nord n= 15
Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 13
Arthur‐Pinet n= 3
District 05 n= 346
Province n= 2185
10
Assomptionn= 14
Le Rendez‐vous‐
des‐Jeunesn= 2
Académie
Notre‐Damen= 23
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 21
73
77
67
69
87
87
100
72
79
57
77
87
93
92
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet *
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
Oral reading Reading comprehension
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 5
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 9
Centre la fontaine n= 24
René‐Chouinard n= 9
L'Amitié n= 21
La Source n= 35
La Ruche n= 58
La Passerelle n= 21
L'Envolée n= 47
L'Étincelle n= 19
La‐Rivière n= 11
Grade 2
Literacy
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidoren= 22
73
89
83
77
52
72
86
48
67
71
67
82
79
81
77
62
91
74
43
67
75
67
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Litereacy Assessment at Grade 2
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 26
Le Maillon n= 12
Ola‐léger n= 14
Province n= 2185
District 09 n= 415
11
L'Escale‐des‐
Jeunesn= 16
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 29
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 42
73
74
50
69
83
76
81
76
73
72
74
43
69
75
67
77
86
82
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
Oral reading Reading comprehension
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 6
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 31
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 18
Grande‐Digue n= 28
Donat‐Robichaud n= 41
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 19
La Marée‐
Montante
Grade 2
Literacy
District 11
n= 49
Régionale‐de‐
Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 20
Père‐Edgar‐
T.‐LeBlancn= 27
82
65
70
59
86
40
56
84
59
79
70
45
75
59
61
79
55
61
39
51
89
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Mont‐Carmel n= 11
Camille‐Vautour n= 20
Saint‐Paul n= 6
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District 11 n= 396
Province n= 2185
12
Blanche‐
Bourgeoisn= 21
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 25
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 60
73
66
52
62
83
75
83
65
82
72
62
48
76
67
63
50
70
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Percentages
Oral reading Reading comprehension
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences ettechnologies exam, by school, including the districts and province
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5 Scienceset technologies for the province?
The IRR was calculated at 96.7% for a sampling of 133 booklets for the provincial Grade 5Sciences et technologies exam.
13
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 7
District 01 n= 511
District 03 n= 478
District 05 n= 386
District 09 n= 478
District 11 n= 409
Province n= 2262
Chart 8
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
District 01
72
6066 66 63 65
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et
technologies Exam by District, Including the Province
target
77
71
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et
technologies Exam
Des Bâtisseurs n= 71
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 24
Anna‐Malenfant n= 164
Saint‐Henri n= 81
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 18
Abbey‐Landry n= 33
Champlain n= 75
District 01 n= 511
Province n= 2262
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 45
14
Number of students who
wrote the exam
65
72
65
64
83
69
80
29
77
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna‐Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 9
Ernest‐Lang n= 11
Sainte‐Anne n= 18
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 28
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 52
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 16
Régionale n= 22 48
51
48
86
56
61
45
86
79
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐…
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et
technologies Exam
Saint‐Joseph n= 23
Saint‐Jacques n= 41
Notre‐Dame n= 54
Grande‐Rivière n= 25
Mgr‐Lang n= 20
Marie‐Immaculée n= 31
Echo Jeunesse n= 37
Mgr‐Martin n= 44
District 03 n= 60
Province n= 65
Régional de
Saint‐Andrén= 19
15
Saint‐Basilen= 22
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeurn= 37
65
60
86
59
45
30
21
52
62
48
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Percentages
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 10
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié N= 63
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐SauveurN= 7
Le Domaine‐
ÉtudiantN= 50
École Carrefour‐
ÉtudiantN= 36
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
N= 23
District 05
67
71
79
43
47
60
100
62
Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐…
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée‐de‐Robertville
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐…
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Percentage of students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et
technologies Exam
Apollo‐XI N= 41
Versant‐Nord N= 22
Le Coin‐des‐Amis N= 11
Arthur‐Pinet * N= 2
N= 386
Province N= 2262
Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐
Jeunes *N= 1
Mgr‐Melanson N= 16
Académie Notre‐
DameN= 35
N= 7
16
La Croisée‐de‐
RobertvilleN= 39
Séjour‐Jeunesse
Académie
AssomptionN= 12
District 05
Domaine‐des‐
CopainsN= 21
65
66
81
36
80
59
56
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet *
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐…
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 11
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 33
René‐Chouinard n= 19
L'Amitié n= 23
La Source n= 36
La Ruche n= 60
La Passerelle n= 28
L'Envolée n= 45
É
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidoren= 25
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 09
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
64
78
76
54
57
89
70
32
45
65
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et
technologies Exam
L'Étincelle n= 22
La‐Rivière n= 10
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 32
Ola‐léger n= 17
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 13
District 09 n= 478
Province n= 2262
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 55
17
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 10
65
66
85
88
70
75
75
42
50
64
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 12
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 27
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 36
Grande‐Digue n= 27
Donat‐Robichaud n= 40
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 15
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Marée‐
Montanten= 38
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 17
87
36
65
41
71
58
52
53
73
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et
technologies Exam
Mont‐Carmel n= 6
Saint‐Paul * n= 1
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 17
District n= 409
Province n= 2262
18
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 28
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 60
Camille‐Vautour n= 28
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 23
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 38
65
63
58
78
59
75
64
100
87
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul *
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr François Bourgeois
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques exam,by school, including the districts and province
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 5Mathématiques for the province?
The IRR was calculated at 98.5% for a sampling of 127 booklets for the provincial Grade 5Mathématiques exam.
19
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 13
District 01 n= 510
District 03 n= 480
District 05 n= 390
District 09 n= 477
District 11 n= 410
Province n= 2267
Chart 14
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Grade 5
Mathématiques
6963 65 61 60
64
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
by District, Including the Province
target
81Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Des Bâtisseurs n= 73
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 23
Anna‐Malenfant n= 165
Saint‐Henri n= 81
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 17
Abbey‐Landry n= 34
Champlain n= 75
District 01 n= 510
Province n= 2267
20
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 42
64
69
59
56
94
60
81
43
63
81
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna‐Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Percentagestarget
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 15
Ernest‐Lang n= 10
Sainte‐Anne n= 19
Saint‐Joseph n= 23
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 51
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 17
n= 22
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 29
Régionale Saint‐
Basile
Grade 5
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03
50
50
52
52
64
35
53
70
83
78
Élé t i S é C
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Saint‐Jacques n= 42
Notre‐Dame n= 54
Grande‐Rivière n= 24
Mgr‐Lang n= 19
Marie‐Immaculée n= 30
Echo Jeunesse n= 38
Mgr‐Martin n= 44
District 03 n= 480
Province n= 2267
21
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 38
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 20
64
63
86
79
60
68
25
63
50
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 16
n= 63
n= 7
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveurn= 7
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 50
La Croisée‐de‐
Robertville
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 38
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 24
n= 39
Séjour‐Jeunesse
Grade 5
Mathématiques
District 05
31
100
77
33
53
58
100
56
Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐Jeunes *
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée‐de‐Robertville
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Apollo‐XI n= 41
Versant‐Nord n= 22
Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 11
Arthur‐Pinet * n= 2
District 05 n= 390
Province n= 2267
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 35
n= 1
Mgr‐Melanson n= 16
22
n= 21
Le Rendez‐vous‐des‐
Jeunes *
Domaine‐des‐
Copains
Académie
Assomptionn= 13
64
65
95
45
66
77
63
88
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet *
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
e Rende vous des Jeunes
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are
included in the results for the district and province.
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 17
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 32
René‐Chouinard n= 19
L'Amitié n= 23
La Source n= 36
La Ruche n= 60
La Passerelle n= 27
L'Envolée n= 44
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 10
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidore
Grade 5
Mathématiques
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 25
50
82
60
48
57
86
39
58
56
76
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Ola‐léger n= 17
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 13
District 09 n= 477
Province n= 2267
23
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 57
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 31
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 9
64
61
46
76
67
60
84
48
0
50
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 18
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 28
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 36
Donat‐Robichaud n= 40
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 27
n= 17
Grande‐Digue
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 28
Grade 5
Mathématiques
District 11
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 15
La Marée‐
Montanten= 38
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Anne
78
18
63
59
47
39
68
71
87
l
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématique Exam
Mont‐Carmel n= 6
Camille‐Vautour n= 28
Saint‐Paul * n= 1
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 17
District 11 n= 410
Province n= 2267
24
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 24
LeBlancn= 28
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 59
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 38
64
60
37
75
59
63
64
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul *
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable levelor higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam by school, including the districts and province
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8Mathématiques for the province?
The IRR was calculated at 96.4% for a sampling of 122 booklets for the provincial Grade 8Mathématiques exam.
25
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 19
District 01 n= 591
District 03 n= 462
District 05 n= 421
District 09 n= 495
District 11 n= 462
Province n= 2431
Chart 20
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Grade 8
Mathématiques
6560
5649
57 58
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
by District, Including the Province
target
87Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Sainte‐Anne n= 97
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 18
Le Mascaret n= 201
Abbey‐Landry n= 41
District 01 n= 591
Province n= 2431
26
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 39
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 195
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
58
65
59
59
63
56
74
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 21
Ernest‐Lang n= 10
Sainte‐Anne n= 15
n= 34
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 15
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 36
Régionale Saint‐
Basile
District 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 46
Grade 8
Mathématiques
31
46
62
60
20
70
72
83
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐…
Mgr‐Mathieu‐…
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'appren…
Carrefour de la …
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Saint‐Joseph n= 13
Saint‐Jacques n= 42
Notre‐Dame n= 48
Thomas‐Albert n= 102
Grande‐Rivière n= 24
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43
Marie‐Gaétane n= 34
District 03 n= 462
Province n= 2431
27
58
60
68
60
58
57
69
31
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Percentages
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 22
Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 92
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 8
Roland‐Pépin n= 47
Versant‐Nord n= 41
District 05
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Croisée‐de‐
Robertvillen= 28
Grade 8
Mathématiques
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 17
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 82
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 47
51
75
46
53
55
74
35
Roland‐Pépin
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée‐de‐Robertville
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Arthur‐Pinet n= 18
District 05 n= 421
Province n= 2431
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 17
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 24
28
58
56
76
28
71
76
51
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 23
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 18
Centre la fontaine n= 28
René‐Chouinard n= 25
L'Amitié n= 16
La Source n= 40
Le Tremplin n= 62
La Passerelle n= 25
L'Envolée n= 61
L'Étincelle n= 19
La‐Rivière * n= 5
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 27
Grade 8
Mathématiques
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
63
57
33
60
63
23
56
40
50
28
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 29
Ola‐léger n= 12
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 19
District 09 n= 495
Province n= 2431
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 38
29
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 58
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 13
58
49
84
33
69
38
55
37
63
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière *
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 24
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 38
Grande‐Digue n= 37
Donat‐Robichaud n= 39
La Marée‐
Montanten= 24
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 31
Grade 8
Mathématiques
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 23
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 20
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 44
34
77
67
70
30
48
71
29
91
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Mont‐Carmel n= 16
Camille‐Vautour n= 23
Saint‐Paul n= 6
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 12
Notre‐Dame n= 13
District 11 n= 462
Province n= 2431
30
LeBlancn= 44
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 70
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 29
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 37
58
57
46
66
62
33
100
57
69
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Bourgeois
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Français exam by school, including the districts and province
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index of Grade 8 Françaisfor the province?
The IRR was calculated at 95.4% (reading portion) and 58.9% (writing portion) for a sampling of130 booklets for the provincial Grade 8 Français exam.
31
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 25
District 01 n= 579
District 03 n= 442
District 05 n= 408
District 09 n= 480
District 11 n= 454
Province n= 2363
Chart 26
Grade 8
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
6762
7064
5664
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français exam by
District, Including the Province
target
76Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Sainte‐Anne n= 95
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 18
Le Mascaret n= 198
Abbey‐Landry n= 38
District 01 n= 579
Province n= 2363
32
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 38
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 192
64
67
53
61
76
61
65
76
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 27
Ernest‐Lang n= 10
Sainte‐Anne n= 15
n= 33Régionale Saint‐
Basile
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 46
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 33
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 14
Grade 8
Français
District 03
58
64
88
64
47
90
58
70
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐…
Mgr‐Mathieu‐…
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'appren…
Carrefour de la …
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Saint‐Joseph n= 14
Saint‐Jacques n= 38
Notre‐Dame n= 47
Thomas‐Albert n= 96
Grande‐Rivière n= 23
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43
Marie‐Gaétane n= 30
District 03 n= 442
Province n= 2363
33
64
62
53
60
48
52
70
58
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
SaintJacques
Percentages
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 28
Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 91
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 8
Roland‐Pépin n= 45
Versant‐Nord n= 41
n= 77
École Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 44
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
La Croisée‐de‐
Robertvillen= 27
n= 17
Grade 8
Français
District 05
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Le Domaine‐
Étudiant
71
75
74
94
61
86
52
Roland‐Pépin
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée‐de‐Robertville
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
École Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Arthur‐Pinet n= 18
District 05 n= 408
Province n= 2363
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 23
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 17
34
64
70
76
67
78
73
71
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 29
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 27
René‐Chouinard n= 23
L'Amitié n= 16
La Source n= 39
Le Tremplin n= 57
La Passerelle n= 25
L'Envolée n= 59
L'Étincelle n= 19
La‐Rivière * n= 5
Grade 8
Français
District 09
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 27
Number of students who
wrote the exam
68
68
63
56
89
67
44
52
41
59
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 29
Ola‐léger n= 13
District 09 n= 480
Province n= 2363
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 19
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 36
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 56
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 13
35
64
64
53
77
62
66
59
58
68
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière *
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but areincluded in the results for the district and province.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 30
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 36
Grande‐Digue n= 38
Donat‐Robichaud n= 39
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 23
La Marée‐
Montanten= 24
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 31
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 20
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 44
Grade 8
Français
52
66
56
50
65
61
53
38
83
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Mont‐Carmel n= 16
Camille‐Vautour n= 23
Saint‐Paul * n= 5
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 12
Notre‐Dame n= 13
District 11 n= 454
Province n= 2363
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 38
36
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 29
LeBlancn= 44
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 63
64
56
45
72
77
42
39
56
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul *
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
g
Percentages
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Elementary school exam results by sex, including the districts and province
37
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Reading comprehension
Chart 31
District Boys Girls
01 307 285
03 213 223
05 178 168
09 209 206
11 187 209
Province 1094 1091
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 2
Grade 2
Literacy
68 7074
65 6268
8075
81 83
7078
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Silent Reading Test by Sex and by District,
Including the Province
Boys Girls
target
Oral reading
Chart 32
District Boys Girls
01 306 285
03 212 223
05 179 166
09 209 206
11 187 209
Province 1093 1089
38
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
67 6873
67
53
66
7680
86 83
7078
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Oral Reading Test by Sex and by District,
Including the Province
Boys Girls
target
Chapitre 2 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire
Chart 33
District Boys Girls
01 266 255
03 253 236
05 189 213
09 258 229
11 210 203
Province 1176 1136
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologie
72
5966 65 62 65
71
6166 67 63 66
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Science & technologies Exam
by Sex and by District, Including the Province
Boys Girls
target
Chart 34
District Boys Girls
01 263 247
03 249 231
05 183 207
09 253 224
11 209 201
Province 1157 1110
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Mathématiques
39
69
5963 61 63 63
69 66 6662
5664
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by Sex
and by District, Including the Province
Boys Girls
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au primaire ‐ chapitre 2
Chart 35
District Boys Girls
01 290 301
03 246 216
05 237 184
09 238 257
11 269 193
Province 1280 1151
Grade 8i
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
6459 57
45
55 56
6561
54 5261 59
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Pourcentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by Sex
and by District, Including the Province
Boys Girls
target
Français
Chart 36
District Boys Girls
01 284 295
03 230 212
05 228 180
09 228 252
11 260 194
Province 1230 1133
40
Number of students who
wrote the exam
5851
58
48 4552
75 73
8679
7277
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by
District, Including the Province
Boys Girls
target
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chapter 3
Provincial High School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams and
Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.
The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2008-20091 schoolyear by combining the results for both
41
Chapter 3
Provincial High School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams, andthose enrolled in modified courses writeanother.
The provincial exams also assess ESL OralProficiency in Grade 10.
What is the passing grade?
The final passing grade is 55% for Françaisand Mathématiques. The final grade consistsof 60% of the school mark and 40% of theprovincial exam mark.
Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.
The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2008-20091 schoolyear by combining the results for bothsemesters, except in the case of Grade 11Français, which is a full-year course .
__________________1 January and June results are combined on the premise that the exams given in the two semesters are equivalent. The experts who help develop and correct the provincial examinations ensure that the exams given in the two semesters are as parallel as possible.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Chart 37
Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex
Chart 37 clearly shows that boys have atendency to enrol in modified courses. We alsosee that female enrolment rates areconsistently higher in all regular courses.
The gap is especially pronounced in themodified Grade 11 Français course, with boysaccounting for 64% of enrolments and girls for36%. The difference in enrolment rates showsgirls predominant in the following regularcourses: Grade 11 Français (by 12percentage points) and Grade 11Mathématiques (by 8 percentage points) .
64%
44%
36%
56%
M thé ti
Français 11 (mod.)
Français 11 (rég.)
Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex
42
55%
46%
45%
54%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Mathématiques 11 (mod.)
Mathématiques 11 (rég.)
Percentages
Boys Girls
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chart 38
Regular level
% of N.B. students enrolled in
regular courses
Grade 11 Mathématiques: 82%
Grade 11 Français: 89%
58
6364 64
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
F i 11 M hé i 11
Ave
rag
e
Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex -Regular Level
Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex?The provincial results (Charts 38 and 39) show that in the regular courses, girls outperformed boys in Français. Male and female performance was the significantlyequal in Mathématiques. In the modified courses, girls and boys obtained comparable results in Français, whereas the boys outperformed the girls in Mathématiques.
More detailed statistics on the departmentalexam for the regular Grade 11 Françaiscourse were compiled, but do not appear inthis report. They show that girls have beensignificantly outperforming boys for a longtime, with a pass rate of 74%, compared with55% for boys. This poor performance on thepart of boys is a source of concern because itcould considerably affect their performance inother subjects .
Chart 39
Modified level
Grade 11 Mathématiques: 18%
43
% of N.B. students enrolled in
modified courses
Grade 11 Français : 11 % 55
6058
54
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Français 11 Mathématiques 11
Ave
rag
e
Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex -Modified Level
Boys Girls
40Français 11 Mathématiques 11
Boys Girls
The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 61% in Grade 11 Français and 63% in Grade 11 Mathématiques.
The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 56% in Grade 11 Français and
N.B.: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Chart 40
District Boys Girls
01 288 256
03 247 235
05 207 197
09 275 277
11 179 199
Province 1196 1164
Grade 10 English Second Language
Number of students who
were interviewed
96
36
68
37
94
65
97
43
76
32
92
66
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
es
Percentage of Students at Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by Sex
and District, Including the Province
Boys Girls
Chart 41
44
1 17
26
31
27
70 1
6
26
32
27
8
0
10
20
30
40
Exempted Unratable Novice Basic Intermediate Advanced Superior
Per
cen
tag
es
Percentage of Students at Each ESL Oral Proficiency Level , by Sex, for the Province
Boys Girls
Boys Girls
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average
45
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Is there an appreciable difference between exam marks and schoolmarks?
Charts 42 to 53 show that there is often an appreciable difference between provincial exammarks and school marks. This difference is especially pronounced for the regular courses,with school marks being as much as 22 percentage points higher. For a district overall, thegap generally hovers around 7 percentage points. In the modified courses, the differencebetween provincial exam marks and school marks is smaller, hovering around 9 percentagepoints, although it may be as high as 20 percentage points, depending on the course andthe district.
What is the inter-rater reliability (IRR) index for the province?
The IRR indices were calculated for the exams from samplings (n) :
IRR n
Grade 10 English Second Language: 75.0% 244 Grade 11 Français (regular), reading: 94.6% 124 Grade 11 Français (regular), writing: 39.5% 115 Grade 11 Français (modified), reading: 94.3% 30 Grade 11 Français (modified), writing: 28.2% 26
46
Grade 11 Français (modified), writing: 28.2% 26 Grade 11 Mathématiques, (regular) : 97.6% 25 (June 2009) Grade 11 Mathématiques, (modified): 99.2% 10 (June 2009)
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chart 42
Regular level
District 01 n= 402
District 03 n= 415
District 05 n= 348
District 09 n= 425
District 11 n= 343
Province n= 1933
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Français 10331 and 10332 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks
The Français curricula are based on a communicative approach,which explains why the Français examination consists of twotests, a reading test and a writing test, each worth 50%. Themark for the writing test includes a “language” component (70%)and a “discourse and communication” component (30%).
7075 73 71 70 72
63 61 62 61 58 61
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
eFrançais 11 Averages, by District, Regular
Level
Chart 43
Modified level
District 01 n= 50
District 03 n= 40
District 05 n= 52
District 09 n= 54
District 11 n= 37
Province n= 233
Number of students who
wrote the exam
47
N.B.: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
School mark Provincial exam
62 62 63 60 60 6155 57 58 57
53 56
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
Français 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level
School mark Provincial exam
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Chart 44
Regular level
Grade 11
Français
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐10.8 percentage
points.
-14,8
-14,8
-14,8
-14,4
-13,8
-13,6
-13,2
-11,6
-10,8
-10,6
-10,0
-9,9
-9,8
-9,8
-9,3
-9,2
-7,4
-6,6
-6,2
-6,0
-4,2
Clément-Cormier
Carrefour Beausoleil
Sainte-Anne
Louis-Mailloux
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Cité-des-Jeunes
Secondaire Assomption
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Province
Marie-Gaétane
Roland-Pépin
Secondaire Népisiguit
Grande-Rivière
A.-J.-Savoie
Centre La fontaine
W.-A.-Losier
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Marie-Esther
Mathieu-Martin
L'Odyssée
Samuel-de-Champlain
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Français 10331
Chart 45
Regular level
48
-20,0
-17,5
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Thomas-Albert
Aux quatre vents
Percentage points
-10,8
-14,3
-11,5
-11,0
-9,9
-7,2
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Province
District 03
District 11
District 05
District 09
District 01
Percentage points
Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Français 10331
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chart 46
Modified level
Grade 11
Français
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐5.4 percentage
points.
-13,2
-10,2
-9,7
-9,1
-8,9
-7,8
-6,1
-5,4
-5,1
-3,4
-3,1
1,2
6,5
Sainte-Anne *
Centre La fontaine *
Secondaire Assomption *
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard *
Samuel-de-Champlain *
Grande-Rivière *
A.-J.-Savoie *
Marie-Gaétane **
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne **
Carrefour Beausoleil **
Aux quatre vents
Thomas-Albert
Mathieu-Martin
Louis-Mailloux
Clément-Cormier
L'Odyssée
Cité-des-Jeunes
Province
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Secondaire Népisiguit
W.-A.-Losier
Roland-Pépin
Marie-Esther
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Français 10332
Chart 47
Modified level
49
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Sainte Anne
Percentage points
-5,4
-8,5
-6,8
-5,2
-4,8
-2,4
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Province
District 01
District 11
District 03
District 05
District 09
Percentage points
Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Français 10332
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province .** These schools had no students who wrote the modified-level exam.
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Chart 48
Regular level
District 01 n= 430
District 03 n= 426
District 05 n= 372
District 09 n= 374
District 11 n= 354
Province n= 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
77 75 75 72 75 7569
60 61 58
6863
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
eMathématiques 11 Averages,
by District, Regular Level
Mathématiques 30311 and 30312 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks
In Mathématiques, more than 80% of students write their exam in January, at the end of the first semester of Grade 11. Generally speaking, students display a satisfactory understanding of mathematical concepts and their decontextualized application. The main challenges lie with the problem-solving component, but students are increasingly demonstrating effective solving strategies
Province n= 1956
Chart 49
Modified level
District 01 n= 56
District 03 n= 79
District 05 n= 96
District 09 n= 136
District 11 n= 50
Province n= 417
50
Number of students who
wrote the exam
School mark Provincial exam
6761
68 65 65 6559 59 56 55
61 57
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Po
urc
enta
ge
Mathématiques 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level
School mark Provincial exam
N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chart 50
Regular level
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐12.0 percentage
points.
-22,2
-19,3
-18,6
-17,5
-17,1
-15,7
-14,7
-14,5
-14,5
-13,3
-13,2
-12,0
-11,7
-11,5
-10,5
-9,3
-9,0
-8,2
-7,5
-6,2
-4,2
-3,7
-3,4
Marie-Gaétane
Marie-Esther
Centre La fontaine
Secondaire Népisiguit
Aux quatre vents
A.-J.-Savoie
Thomas-Albert
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Cité-des-Jeunes
L'Odyssée
W.-A.-Losier
Province
Louis-Mailloux
Secondaire Assomption
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
Grande-Rivière
Sainte-Anne
Clément-Cormier
Roland-Pépin
Carrefour Beausoleil
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Mathieu-Martin
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Mathématiques 30311
Chart 51
Regular level
51
-22,2
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Marie-Gaétane
Percentage points
-12,0
-15,2
-15,1
-14,4
-7,8
-7,6
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Province
District 03
District 09
District 05
District 01
District 11
Percentage points
Différence, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Mathématiques 30311
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Chart 52
Modified level
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐9.1 percentage
points.
-19,9
-16,4
-14,7
-14,6
-11,2
-11,0
-9,9
-9,1
-8,4
-6,0
-3,6
-1,8
0,3
2,5
Marie-Gaétane *
A.-J.-Savoie *
Centre La fontaine *
Grande-Rivière *
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne *
Secondaire Assomption *
Sainte-Anne *
Samuel-de-Champlain *
Louis-Mailloux
Marie-Esther
Secondaire Népisiguit
Roland-Pépin
Mathieu-Martin
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Aux quatre vents
Province
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
W.-A.-Losier
Thomas-Albert
Cité-des-Jeunes
L'Odyssée
Clément-Cormier
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Mathématiques 30312
Chart 53
Modified level
52
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Carrefour Beausoleil **
Percentage points
-9,1
-13,5
-11,3
-8,3
-5,8
-2,4
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Province
District 05
District 09
District 01
District 11
District 03
Percentage points
Différence, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average
in Mathématiques 30312
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** These schools had no students who wrote the modified-level exam .
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques, by school, including the districts and province
53
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
What is the performance index?
The performance index gives the percentage of students in regular and modified courseswho earned a passing mark on the regular-level examinations. Since one objective of theeducation system is to prepare students for post-secondary studies, it is important that theybe able to pass the regular-level exams. This is an excellent indicator of their level ofpreparedness for post-secondary education.
Sample performance index calculation
Say that 75% of all students at school X are enrolled in the regular Mathématiques course.
Now say that 64% of the students who wrote the regular-level Mathématiques exam passed it .
The performance index is then calculated as follows:
(75 64)/100 = 48
Consequently, it can be said that 48% of all students at school X passed the regular-level Mathématiques exam. The performance index for school X is 48 for the Mathématiques
54
q p qcourse.
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chart 54
Grade 11
Français
62
66
48
60
66
44
30
72
69
63
79
67
58
64
Secondaire Népisiguit
Roland-Pépin
Aux-Quatre-Vents
District 03
Cité-des-Jeunes
Thomas-Albert
Grande-Rivière
A.-J.-Savoie
Marie-Gaétane
District 01
Samuel-de-Champlain
Sainte-Anne
L'Odyssée
Mathieu-Martin
Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Français
55
59
51
89
48
32
55
64
39
57
56
56
65
52
61
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Carrefour Beausoleil
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Secondaire Assomption
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Clément-Cormier
District 09
Centre La fontaine
W.-Arthur-Losier
Marie-Esther
Louis-Mailloux
District 05
Percentage points
target
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Chart 55
Grade 11
Mathématiques
47
51
48
48
45
45
43
71
48
68
66
78
59
71
Secondaire Népisiguit *
Roland-Pépin
Aux-Quatre-Vents
District 03
Cite-des-Jeunes
Thomas-Albert
Grande-Rivière
A.-J.-Savoie
Marie-Gaétane
District 01
Samuel-de-Champlain
Sainte-Anne
L'Odyssée
Mathieu-Martin
Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Mathématiques
56
53
65
90
51
73
71
73
60
40
44
39
33
50
49
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Carrefour Beausoleil
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Secondaire Assomption
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Clément-Cormier
District 09
Centre La fontaine
W.-Arthur-Losier
Marie-Esther
Louis-Mailloux
District 05
Percentage points
target
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Chart 56
Grade 11
Français
30
40
50
60
70
80
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Perform
ance index
District and Provincial Performance Indices for Français 11 since 2006
District 01 District 03 District 05
District 09 District 11 Province
Chart 57
57
Grade 11
Mathématiques
30
40
50
60
70
80
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Titre
District and Provincial Performance Indices for Mathématiques 11 since 2006
District 01 District 03 District 05
District 09 District 11 Province
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province
Second language oral proficiency scale
Novice Able to satisfy immediate needs using rehearsed phrases. No real autonomy of expression, flexibility, or spontaneity. Can ask questions or make statements with reasonable accuracy but only with memorized phrases. Vocabulary is very limited.
Basic Able to create with the language by combining and recombining learned elements. Can satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face interaction with native speakers accustomed to dealing with second language learners. Almost every utterance contains fractured syntax and grammatical errors. Vocabulary is adequate to express most elementary needs.
Intermediate* Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in
58
Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in school/work settings. Able to provide autobiographical information in some detail and give explanations with some degree of accuracy, but language is awkward . Able to state facts and narrate, describe, report on and speak of current, past, and future activities. Can give directions from one place to another; can give accurate instructions in a field of personal expertise . Has a speaking vocabulary to converse simply, with some paraphrasing. Accent, though often quite faulty, is intelligible. Uses high-frequency language structures accurately, but does not have a thorough or confident control of grammar . In certain situations, diction would probably distract a native speaker.
* Intermediate is the level expected of students at the end of Grade 10.
Chapitre 3 ‐ résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
AdvancedAble to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and in all informal conversations, on practical, social, and academic or work-related topics . Control of grammar is good and speech is fluent. Can describe in detail and narrate accurately. Can discuss abstract topics and ideas as well as events. Can support opinions and hypothesize. Accent may be obvious but never interferes with understanding. Sporadic errors still occur, but they would not distract a native speaker or interfere with communication.
SuperiorAble to use the language fluently and accurately on all levels normally pertinent to personal situation (academic, social, work-related).Can understand and participate in any conversation with a high degree of fluency and precision of vocabulary.Accent is good, but the speaker would not necessarily be taken for a native speaker.
59
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ chapitre 3
69
Chart 58
Sainte‐Anne n=98
L'Odyssée n=182
Mathieu‐Martin n=227
District 01 n=544
Cité‐des‐Jeunes n=273
Thomas‐Albert n=109
Grande‐Rivière n=17
A.‐J.‐Savoie n=49
Marie‐Gaétane n=34
District 03 n=482
n=37
Number of students
interviewed:
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
Grade 10
English Second
Language
78
65
73
40
12
16
76
72
32
97
98
98
93
95
Aux quatre vents
Roland-Pépin
Secondaire Népisiguit
District 03
Marie-Gaétane
A.-J.-Savoie
Grande-Rivière
Thomas-Albert
Cité-des-Jeunes
District 01
Mathieu-Martin
L'Odyssée
Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral
Proficiency Assessment, at Grade 10, by School
Secondaire Népisigu n=227
Aux quatre vents n=81
District 05 n=404
Centre La Fontaine n=41
W.‐A.‐Losier n=199
Marie‐Esther n=163
Louis‐Mailloux n=149
District 09 n=552
Carrefour Beausoleil n=13
Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard n=58
Rég. de Baie‐Sainte‐An=13
Clément‐Cormier n=125
District 11 n=378
Province n=2360
60
Roland‐Pépin
Secondaire
Assomption
n=96
n=19
n=150Louis‐J.‐Robichaud
66
93
92
97
92
95
88
85
34
33
26
32
88
72
78
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Clément-Cormier
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Carrefour Beausoleil
District 09
Louis-Mailloux
Marie-Esther
W.-A.-Losier
Centre La Fontaine
District 05
Aux quatre vents
Percentage
target
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006
61
Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 59
2006 2007 2008
Schoool 164 173 173
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 188
District 414
Province 1961
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
District 01 École Mathieu‐Martin
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 60
2006 2007 2008
School 147 183 186
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 189
District 430
Province 1956
62
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 61
2006 2007 2008
School 144 151 147
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 137
District 414
Province 1961
District 01 École L'Odyssée
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 62
2006 2007 2008
School 121 137 160
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 137
District 430
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
63
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 63
2006 2007 2008
School 57 59 97
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 58
District 414
Province 1961
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 École Sainte‐Anne
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 10331 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 64
2006 2007 2008
School 57 60 87
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 68
District 430
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
64
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 65
2006 2007 2008
School 33 21 34
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 31
District 414
Province 1961
District 01 École Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 66
2006 2007 2008
School 35 23 31
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 36
District 430
Province 1956
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Mathématiques
65
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 01 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 01 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 67
2006 2007 2008
School 19 28 41
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 30
District 418
Province 1961
District 03 École Marie‐Gaétane
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 68
2006 2007 2008
School 21 22 38
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 37
District 426
Province 1956
66
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Mathématiques
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 69
2006 2007 2008
School 51 51 43
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 49
District 418
Province 1961
District 03 Polyvalente A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 70
2006 2007 2008
School 42 45 52
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 53
District 426
Province 1956
67
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 71
2006 2007 2008
School 14 26 24
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 17
District 418
Province 1961
District 03 École Grande‐Rivière
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 72
2006 2007 2008
School 13 31 24
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 16
District 426
Province 1956
68
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 73
2006 2007 2008
School 74 98 106
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 98
District 418
Province 1961
Polyvalente Thomas‐AlbertDistrict 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 74
2006 2007 2008
School 63 99 93
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 95
District 426
Province 1956
Number of students who
wrote the exam
69
Grade 11
Mathématiques
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 75
2006 2007 2008
School 252 230 241
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 224
District 418
Province 1961
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 Cité‐des‐Jeunes A.‐M.‐Sormany
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 76
2006 2007 2008
School 233 220 246
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 225
District 426
Province 1956
70
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 03 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 03 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 77
2006 2007 2008
School 89 66 72
District 414 375 348
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 49
District 348
Province 1961
District 05 École Aux quatre vents
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Françcais
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 78
2006 2007 2008
School 108 78 74
District 423 395 218
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 55
District 372
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
71
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 79
2006 2007 2008
School 91 72 93
District 414 375 348
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 85
District 348
Province 1961
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05 Polyvalente Roland‐Pépin
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 80
2006 2007 2008
School 76 83 109
District 423 395 218
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 99
District 372
Province 1956
Mathématiques
11e année
Number of students who
wrote the exam
72
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 81
2006 2007 2008
School 234 237 183
District 414 375 348
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 214
District 348
Province 1961
District 05 École Secondaire Népisiguit *
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 82
2006 2007 2008
School 239 234 35
District 423 395 218
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 218
District 372
Province 1956
* The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.
Number of students who
wrote the exam
73
Grade 11
Mathématiques
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 05 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 05 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 83
2006 2007 2008
School 126 124 110
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 120
District 435
Province 1961
District 09 Polyvalente Louis‐Mailloux
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 84
2006 2007 2008
School 109 111 117
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 108
District 374
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
74
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 85
2006 2007 2008
School 101 122 120
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 114
District 435
Province 1961
District 09 École Marie‐Esther
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 86
2006 2007 2008
School 75 102 111
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 110
District 374
Province 1956
75
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 87
2006 2007 2008
School 171 179 196
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 165
District 435
Province 1961
District 09 Polyvalente W.‐Arthur‐Losier
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 88
2006 2007 2008
School 152 158 149
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 116
District 374
Province 1956
Number of students who
wrote the exam
76
Grade 11
Mathématiques
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 89
2006 2007 2008
School 41 43 34
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 36
District 435
Province 1961
District 09 Centre scolaire‐communautaire La Fontaine
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 90
2006 2007 2008
School 53 44 31
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 40
District 374
Province 1956
77
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 09 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 09 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 91
2006 2007 2008
School 124 115 96
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 105
District 346
Province 1961
Number of students who
wrote the exame
District 11 École Clément‐Cormier
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 92
2006 2007 2008
School 138 117 99
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 112
District 354
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
78
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 93
2006 2007 2008
School 120 137 120
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 134
District 346
Province 1961
Grade 11
Français
District 11 École Louis‐J.‐Robichaud
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 94
2006 2007 2008
School 138 141 127
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 134
District 354
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
79
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 95
2006 2007 2008
School 13 9 12
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 9
District 346
Province 1961
District 11 École Régionale de Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 96
2006 2007 2008
School 15 11 10
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 9
District 354
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
80
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 97
2006 2007 2008
School 17 21 23
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 23
District 346
Province 1961
Grade 11
Français
District 11 École Secondaire Assomption
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 98
2006 2007 2008
School 29 24 26
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 28
District 354
Province 1956
81
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
Regular level
Chart 99
2006 2007 2008
School 65 57 51
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 65
District 346
Province 1961
Grade 11
Français
District 11 École Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 100
2006 2007 2008
School 92 65 57
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 61
District 354
Province 1956
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
82
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Regular level
Chart 101
2006 2007 2008
School 11 8 10
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 10
District 346
Province 1961
District 11 École Carrefour Beausoleil
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Regular level
Chart 102
2006 2007 2008
School 13 11 12
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 10
District 354
Province 1956
83
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since
2006
School (55 % +) District 11 (55 % +) Province (55 % +)
School (70 % +) District 11 (70 % +) Province (70 % +)
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
84
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level
85
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 20 178 87 70 65 76 68 94 64 14 173 82 71 70 87 70 94 70
L'Odyssée 6 136 89 66 60 67 64 86 58 7 147 90 65 65 81 65 88 72
Sainte-Anne 3 57 93 78 63 72 72 97 67 0 97 93 75 67 75 72 98 70
Samuel-de-Champlain 1 31 94 71 66 84 69 94 79 0 34 100 73 70 94 72 97 94
District 01 30 402 89 70 63 73 67 92 63 21 451 88 70 68 83 69 93 72
Marie-Gaétane 2 30 100 75 64 73 70 100 69 1 41 100 78 65 67 73 98 67
A.-J.-Savoie 0 49 92 75 65 78 71 94 72 0 43 78 71 71 88 71 93 69
Grande-Rivière 0 17 85 64 54 35 60 77 30 1 24 96 71 68 79 70 91 76
Thomas-Albert 3 97 88 75 55 50 67 94 44 2 106 87 74 64 70 70 97 61
Cité-des-Jeunes 11 222 92 76 62 73 71 97 66 7 241 89 75 69 83 73 94 74
District 03 16 415 91 75 61 67 69 96 60 11 455 89 75 68 79 72 95 70
Aux quatre vents 0 49 79 78 60 61 71 98 48 1 72 80 74 65 81 70 96 64
Roland-Pépin 4 85 88 75 64 75 71 94 66 1 93 82 73 70 91 72 98 73
Secondaire Népisiguit 8 214 89 71 62 71 67 91 62 11 183 73 75 69 84 72 96 61
District 05 12 348 87 73 62 70 69 93 61 12 348 77 74 68 85 72 97 64
Louis-Mailloux 4 117 87 74 60 62 68 98 52 7 110 80 73 62 66 69 92 52
Marie-Esther 6 110 87 70 64 76 68 94 65 4 120 83 71 68 86 70 95 70
W.-A.-Losier 8 162 91 69 60 65 65 84 56 8 196 89 73 62 71 69 91 63
Centre La Fontaine 0 36 92 69 60 61 66 86 56 1 34 83 69 61 62 66 86 51
District 09 18 425 89 71 61 67 67 90 57 20 460 85 72 64 73 69 92 61
Clément-Cormier 8 105 87 70 55 45 64 81 39 3 96 91 71 62 69 67 93 63
Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 134 89 69 62 72 66 92 64 8 120 87 68 65 81 67 89 70
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 9 100 74 62 67 69 100 55 0 12 86 67 62 83 65 92 71
Secondaire Assomption 0 22 88 67 54 36 61 77 32 0 23 88 67 65 78 66 87 69
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 3 64 97 71 57 58 65 94 48 2 51 81 69 61 73 66 90 58
Carrefour Beausoleil 1 9 100 80 65 89 74 100 89 0 10 91 84 77 100 81 100 91
District 11 14 343 90 70 58 59 65 89 51 13 312 87 69 64 76 67 91 66
Province 90 1933 89 72 61 67 68 92 59 77 2026 85 72 66 79 70 94 67
* Passing grade: 55 %
86
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
Français grade 11 (Regular Level)2008-2009
Français grade 11 (Regular Level)2007-2008
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No. of Absentees
% of Students in This Level
% Pass Exam
No. of Attendees
No. ofAbsentees
No. ofAttendees
% of Students in This Level
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
Perfor-mance Index
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
SchoolsMathieu-Martin 7 27 13 63 54 41 59 85 7 37 18 60 53 43 58 85
L'Odyssée 4 17 11 63 56 59 60 95 3 16 10 55 59 81 56 78
Sainte-Anne ** 0 4 - - - - - - 0 7 7 59 46 29 54 86
Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -
District 01 11 50 11 63 55 46 60 89 10 60 12 58 54 52 57 83
Marie-Gaétane ** 0 0 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -
A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 4 - - - - - - 0 12 22 53 58 50 55 67
Grande-Rivière ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 1 - - - - - -
Thomas-Albert 0 13 12 63 53 39 59 100 0 16 13 62 55 50 59 88
Cité-des-Jeunes 0 20 8 64 58 65 62 95 1 29 11 61 58 62 60 86
District 03 0 40 9 62 57 58 60 95 1 58 11 60 57 57 59 83
Aux quatre vents 0 13 21 68 55 46 63 92 0 18 20 63 55 44 60 83
Roland-Pépin 0 12 12 61 62 83 62 100 3 21 18 65 61 71 63 96
Secondaire Népisiguit 2 27 11 62 58 59 60 93 5 66 27 64 56 55 61 94
District 05 2 52 13 63 58 62 61 94 8 105 23 64 57 56 61 93
Louis-Mailloux 6 18 13 68 60 72 65 100 4 27 20 64 56 52 61 93
Marie-Esther 2 16 13 53 59 63 55 69 3 24 17 55 62 75 58 78
W.-A.-Losier 5 17 9 56 54 47 54 65 3 23 11 58 54 44 56 74
Centre La Fontaine ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 7 17 63 58 71 61 100
District 09 13 54 11 60 57 59 58 79 10 81 15 59 57 58 59 83
Clément-Cormier 1 16 13 59 50 31 56 75 0 9 9 58 49 33 54 67
Louis-J.-Robichaud 1 16 11 60 55 56 58 88 1 18 13 59 55 39 57 89
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 2 0 - - ‐ - - - 0 2 - - - - - -
Secondaire Assomption ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard ** 11 2 - - - - - - 1 12 19 56 58 58 57 77
Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 - - - - - - 0 1 - - - - - -
District 11 15 37 10 60 53 49 58 86 2 45 13 58 56 51 57 83
Province 41 233 11 61 56 55 59 88 31 349 15 61 56 55 59 86
* Passing grade: 55 %
No. Of Attendees
Français Grade 11 (Modified Level)2007-2008
Français grade 11 (Modified Level)2008-2009
87
** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
% Pass Final Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
% of Students in This Level
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
Final Mark*
School Mark
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% of Students in This Level
Schoot Mark
No. of Absentees
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 5 189 83 75 72 86 74 97 71 1 186 87 74 71 86 73 98 74
L'Odyssée 3 137 93 77 63 64 72 93 59 2 160 93 76 65 66 71 93 60
Sainte-Anne 1 68 97 80 72 81 77 99 78 1 87 94 78 70 84 75 99 78
Samuel-de-Champlain 0 36 88 80 71 75 78 94 66 1 31 91 72 71 87 72 87 79
District 01 9 430 88 77 69 77 74 96 68 4 464 91 75 69 78 73 96 70
Marie-Gaétane 0 37 88 78 56 54 69 92 48 0 38 83 77 59 63 69 76 52
A.-J.-Savoie 0 53 96 78 62 74 72 96 71 2 52 84 75 54 39 66 77 32
Grande-Rivière 1 16 80 68 59 56 65 94 43 0 24 77 73 60 71 68 88 55
Thomas-Albert 0 95 82 75 61 56 69 95 45 1 93 80 75 59 53 68 96 42
Cité-des-Jeunes 6 225 83 75 60 54 69 88 45 3 246 84 74 64 67 70 91 55
District 03 7 426 84 75 60 57 69 91 48 6 453 83 75 61 61 69 89 50
Aux quatre vents 1 55 71 81 63 69 75 98 48 5 74 89 77 62 65 71 88 58
Roland-Pépin 4 99 80 68 62 64 66 77 51 3 109 82 69 66 70 68 82 57
Secondaire Népisiguit ** 5 218 82 78 60 60 72 94 47 167 35 63 78 49 40 77 97
District 05 10 372 79 76 61 62 71 90 49 175 218 80 75 62 63 73 91 51
Louis-Mailloux 7 108 81 73 62 64 70 92 50 4 117 77 73 57 50 66 88 37
Marie-Esther 2 110 74 74 55 46 68 87 33 6 111 66 73 57 50 66 88 32
W.-A.-Losier 4 116 63 71 57 63 66 83 39 4 149 69 72 61 53 67 91 36
Centre La Fontaine 0 40 89 75 57 50 70 85 44 1 31 86 74 54 42 67 72 36
District 09 13 374 73 73 58 57 68 87 40 15 408 71 73 58 50 67 88 35
Clément-Cormier 3 112 89 73 65 68 70 89 60 4 99 90 70 70 77 70 88 68
Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 134 88 78 74 84 76 96 73 2 127 86 75 72 83 74 98 71
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 1 9 90 75 65 78 72 89 71 0 10 67 79 70 80 76 100 53
Secondaire Assomption 0 28 93 74 63 79 71 100 73 0 26 87 69 50 39 62 63 33
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 61 80 75 61 66 70 84 51 1 57 84 73 60 58 68 88 49
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 10 100 80 75 90 78 100 90 0 12 100 77 78 92 77 92 85
District 11 8 354 88 75 68 75 73 92 65 7 331 86 73 68 73 71 91 63
Province 47 1956 82 75 63 66 71 91 53 207 1874 82 74 64 65 71 91 53
* Passing grade: 55 % ** The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.
No. of Absentees
% of Students
in this Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Final Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No. of Attendees
88
Final Mark*
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% of Students in This Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Mathématiques grade 11 (Regular Level)2008-2009
Mathématiques grade 11 (Regular Level)2007-2008
% Pass Final Mark
Perfor-mance Index
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire ‐ Chapitre 3
SchoolsMathieu-Martin 2 38 17 70 59 66 67 87 2 27 13 68 58 63 64 82
L'Odyssée 0 11 7 60 61 82 60 73 3 12 7 57 61 75 58 75
Sainte-Anne ** 1 2 - - - - - - 0 6 6 55 54 67 55 67
Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -
District 01 3 56 12 68 59 68 65 86 5 48 9 62 58 67 60 77
Marie-Gaétane ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 8 17 65 54 38 60 100
A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 10 16 60 51 40 57 80
Grande-Rivière ** 1 4 - - - - - - 0 7 23 55 55 43 55 71
Thomas-Albert 3 21 18 59 55 48 58 81 0 23 20 61 60 78 61 91
Cité-des-Jeunes 0 47 17 62 60 64 61 81 2 48 16 68 64 79 66 90
District 03 4 79 16 61 59 61 60 82 2 96 17 64 60 69 63 89
Aux quatre vents 1 23 29 72 63 74 69 96 0 9 11 58 58 56 58 56
Roland-Pépin 0 25 20 66 51 44 62 68 0 24 18 68 58 54 64 83
Secondaire Népisiguit 7 48 18 69 55 54 65 83 58 21 38 68 49 43 66 92
District 05 8 96 21 69 56 56 65 82 58 54 20 67 55 50 65 87
Louis-Mailloux 6 25 19 72 52 28 65 89 5 35 23 70 52 40 64 92
Marie-Esther 5 38 26 70 54 40 65 92 4 57 34 60 49 37 56 61
W.-A.-Losier 4 68 37 63 57 57 61 83 4 66 31 65 55 49 61 87
Centre La Fontaine ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -
District 09 15 136 27 66 55 47 63 86 13 163 29 65 52 44 60 79
Clément-Cormier 1 14 11 68 71 93 69 100 1 11 10 63 60 64 62 91
Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 18 12 67 58 56 64 95 0 21 14 62 64 71 63 86
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -
Secondaire Assomption ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 4 - - - - - -
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 2 15 20 62 53 47 59 87 0 11 16 57 49 27 54 64
Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 0 - - - - - 1 0 - - - - - -
District 11 5 50 12 66 61 66 64 94 2 52 14 63 60 62 62 81
Province 35 417 18 66 57 57 63 86 80 413 18 65 56 55 62 83* Passing grade: 55 %
% Pass Final Mark
% Pass Exam
No. of Attendees
Mathématiques Grade 11 (Modified Level)2007-2008
Mathématiques grade 11 (Modified Level)2008-2009
89
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Final Mark
No. of Absentees
% of Students in This Level
% Pass Exam
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% of Students in This Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
Final Mark*
Final Mark*
Chapitre 3 ‐ Résultats des examens provinciaux au secondaire
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 8 227 0,4 0,0 0,0 1,8 35,7 48,5 13,7 3 247 0,8 0,0 0,0 4,5 25,5 57,5 11,7
L'Odyssée 2 182 0,0 0,5 1,6 0,0 15,9 55,5 26,4 4 166 0,0 0,0 1,2 4,2 24,1 54,2 16,3
Sainte-Anne 6 98 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,1 10,2 45,9 36,7 2 76 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,6 19,7 31,6 42,1
Samuel-de-Champlain 0 37 5,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,7 43,2 48,6 0 38 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,6 10,5 44,7 42,1
District 01 16 544 0,6 0,2 0,6 2,0 22,2 50,0 24,4 9 527 0,4 0,0 0,4 4,6 23,1 51,8 19,7
Marie-Gaétane 1 34 0,0 0,0 20,6 67,6 8,8 2,9 0,0 0 33 0,0 0,0 21,2 66,7 12,1 0,0 0,0
A.-J.-Savoie 1 49 4,1 0,0 26,5 53,1 16,3 0,0 0,0 0 62 0,0 0,0 29,0 61,3 8,1 1,6 0,0
Grande-Rivière 0 17 0,0 0,0 0,0 23,5 47,1 29,4 0,0 0 24 0,0 0,0 4,2 33,3 41,7 20,8 0,0
Thomas-Albert 10 109 0,0 0,0 0,0 27,5 49,5 19,3 3,7 6 132 0,0 0,0 2,3 22,0 39,4 33,3 3,0
Cité-des-Jeunes 4 273 0,0 1,1 13,6 53,1 22,0 10,3 0,0 5 305 0,3 1,6 14,1 46,9 23,3 11,8 2,0
District 03 16 482 0,4 0,6 11,8 47,3 27,6 11,4 0,8 11 556 0,2 0,9 12,9 43,2 25,5 15,5 1,8
Aux quatre vents 1 81 0,0 0,0 7,4 14,8 39,5 30,9 7,4 1 63 0,0 0,0 6,3 17,5 39,7 31,7 4,8
Roland-Pépin 5 96 0,0 1,0 6,3 28,1 46,9 15,6 2,1 1 127 3,9 0,0 3,9 28,3 43,3 18,9 1,6
Secondaire Népisiguit 10 227 0,0 0,9 4,0 22,0 41,9 27,3 4,0 5 281 0,7 1,8 5,0 23,1 35,9 24,2 9,3
District 05 16 404 0,0 0,7 5,2 22,0 42,6 25,2 4,2 7 471 1,5 1,1 4,9 23,8 38,4 23,8 6,6
Louis-Mailloux 3 149 0,7 0,7 17,4 48,3 26,8 6,0 0,0 11 171 0,0 1,2 22,8 52,6 16,4 7,0 0,0
Marie-Esther 10 163 1,2 3,1 16,6 53,4 15,3 9,8 0,6 5 150 0,0 9,3 28,0 42,0 15,3 4,7 0,7
W.-A.-Losier 7 199 1,0 3,0 10,6 53,8 26,1 5,5 0,0 7 208 8,7 1,0 15,4 52,9 15,4 6,3 0,5
Centre La Fontaine 0 41 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,2 43,9 34,1 9,8 0 47 6,4 0,0 0,0 17,0 46,8 14,9 14,9
District 09 20 552 0,9 2,2 13,4 49,1 24,5 9,1 0,9 23 576 3,6 3,1 19,6 47,0 18,2 6,8 1,6
Clément-Cormier 3 125 0,0 0,0 0,8 7,2 51,2 40,0 0,8 1 145 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,4 63,4 34,5 0,7
Louis-J.-Robichaud 5 150 0,0 0,0 1,3 2,0 48,7 41,3 6,7 3 179 0,6 0,0 1,1 7,3 51,4 34,6 5,0
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 13 7,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 46,2 46,2 0,0 1 11 0,0 0,0 0,0 9,1 0,0 81,8 9,1
Secondaire Assomption 1 19 5,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 47,4 42,1 5,3 0 31 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,2 19,4 71,0 6,5
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 1 58 3,4 0,0 0,0 8,6 48,3 39,7 0,0 1 93 0,0 1,1 2,2 9,7 37,6 39,8 9,7
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 13 0,0 0,0 0,0 15,4 23,1 46,2 15,4 0 12 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,7 25,0 58,3
District 11 10 378 1,1 0,0 0,8 5,0 48,4 41,0 3,7 6 471 0,2 0,2 0,8 5,5 48,2 38,9 6,2
Province 78 2360 0,6 0,8 6,7 26,2 31,5 26,9 7,3 56 2601 1,2 1,1 8,2 25,9 29,9 26,6 7,0
No. of Attendees
ESL Oral Proficiency AssessmentGrade 10 (All Levels) 2007-2008
UnratableExempted SuperiorAdvancedInter-
mediaryExempted Unratable
90
BasicNoviceNo. of
AbsenteesAdvanced SuperiorNovice BasicInter-
mediaryNo. of
AttendeesNo. of
Absentees
ESL Oral Proficiency AssessmentGrade 10 (All Levels) 2008-2009
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chapter 4
Results of Pan-Canadian and International AssessmentsPan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International
(PISA) Assessment Programs
What are SAIP and PCAP?1
The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education Canada
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?
Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories through CMEC developed SAIP
91
Chapter 4
Results of Pan-Canadian and International AssessmentsPan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International
(PISA) Assessment Programs
What are SAIP and PCAP?1
The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education, Canada(CMEC) between 1993 and 2004. The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) hassince then replaced SAIP. The first PCAPassessment took place in the spring of 2007.PCAP will continue to assess performance inthe same three core subjects as SAIP but willhave room for other subjects to be added asthe need arises.
_______________1 CMEC (2006). The Pan-Canadian AssessmentProgram (PCAP) and the School AchievementIndicators Program (SAIP). Taken on December 11,2006 from http://www.cmec.ca/pcap/indexe.stm .
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?
Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories, through CMEC, developed SAIPand then PCAP to assess the performance ofstudents in mathematics, reading, andscience. Three cycles of pan-Canadianassessments have been conducted since1993. The information revealed in eachassessment, together with the reviewmechanisms of individual jurisdictions, hasgiven ministers of education a basis forexamining their curriculum and other aspectsof their school system.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP?
At its 83rd meeting (held on April 2, 2003, inLondon, Ontario), CMEC approved thedevelopment of PCAP to replace SAIP. Theneed for a new pan-Canadian program thatwould reflect changes made in jurisdictionalcurricula within the past decade had becomeapparent in Canadian provinces andterritories. PCAP also recognizes theincreased jurisdictional emphasis now placedon international assessments. It assessesperformance in reading, science, andmathematics, and will have room for othersubjects as the need arises. PCAP assesses13-year-old students and enables provincesand territories to improve their ownassessments and validate their results againstnational and international results.
What is PISA?2
The Program for International Student
The assessment covers three domains:reading, mathematics, and science. Althougheach assessment has questions from all threedomains, the focus shifts with eachassessment. In 2000 the focus was onreading, in 2003 on mathematics, and in 2006on science. In 2003, an assessment ofproblem-solving skills was also conducted.
In Canada, the first PISA assessment tookplace in April and May 2000 at the same timeas the Youth in Transition Survey (YITS) foryouth aged 15. The second assessment wasconducted in 2003.
Who participates in PISA?
Although the samples in most countries arebetween 4,000 and 10,000 students, inCanada, over 22,000 students are tested,which allows results to be produced at theprovincial level.
The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading
92
The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) is an internationalassessment of the skills and knowledge of 15-year-olds. The study is being directed by theOrganization for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD) and involves over 69countries. As the study will be repeated inother years, it will continue to produce resultsthat can be compared internationally .
_______________2CMEC (2006). The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). Taken on December 11, 2006 fromhttp://www.cmec.ca/pisa/indexe.stm .
The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading,mathematics, and science, as well as variousquestionnaires to gather general informationabout the students and their schools.
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
How are students selected? (PISA)
About 1,000 schools across Canada arerandomly selected to participate in PISA andYITS. In these schools, a random selection ismade of 15-year-old students to determinewho will participate.
How is the information used? (PISA)
Because PISA is an international studyinvolving over 69 countries, it provides aunique examination of the levels ofachievement of 15-year-olds around theworld. It gives a clear indication of thepreparedness of these students as theycontinue in their studies and enter the workforce. It is able to address questions such as :
How well are young adults prepared tomeet the challenges of the future?
Results from PISA are invaluable toeducators, social policy analysts, and humanrights advocacy groups. These researchersand analysts have access to importantinformation that can be used in developingprograms to deal with both short-term andlong-term problems or barriers that youngadults may face in their pursuit of highereducation or in gaining work experience.Information from the survey helps to evaluatethe effectiveness of existing programs andpractices, to determine the most appropriateage at which to introduce new programs, andto better target programs to those most inneed .
Young adults themselves are able to see howtheir own experiences compare with those ofother young adults.
93
meet the challenges of the future?
Are they able to analyze, reasonand communicate their ideaseffectively?
Are some kinds of school policiesand practices more effective thanothers?
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PCAP 2007 domain
Reading as primary domain
Curricula across Canada identify comprehension, interpretation, and response andreflection as major organizing aspects of reading literacy. In this assessment, threesubdomains of the integrated process of reading are assessed: comprehension,interpretation, and response to the text (which includes response and reflection).
Comprehension
Students understand the explicit and implicit information provided by the text. In particular,they understand the vocabulary, parts, elements, and events of the text.
Interpretation
Students make meaning by analyzing and synthesizing the parts/elements/events todevelop a broader perspective and/or meaning for the text. They may identify thetheme/thesis and support that with references to details, events, symbols, patterns, and/ortext features.
Response to text
94
p
In responding, the readers engage with the text in a number of possible ways :
making personal connections between aspects of the text and their own real/vicariousprior experiences, knowledge, values and/or point of view;
responding emotionally to central ideas or aspects of the text; taking an evaluative stance about the quality or value of the text,
possibly in relation to other texts or social or cultural factors.
The curricula across Canada in reading generally distinguish between personal and criticalresponses.
Performance descriptors for scores at each level of the general scale
Level 1 scores (379 and below)The student demonstrates a partial understanding of some fiction and non-fiction texts. Thestudent understands directly stated information, relying on familiar vocabulary, concretedetails, and explicit statements. In interpreting texts, the student provides a simplified orgeneral perspective, often relying on directly stated conclusions or connecting someaspects of the text to one another. The student demonstrates understanding of how somecontent and text features are used to accomplish particular purposes. In respondingpersonally a.d critically to texts, the student’s responses are often vague or general
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Level 2 scores (380 to 575)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a clear andreasonable manner. The student understands both directly stated information andinformation implied by the text. The student connects general statements and supportingdetails, draws conclusions about the broader meaning and intent of the text, and interpretsspecific parts of the text based on inferences and figurative language. The studentdemonstrates knowledge of how texts are structured and organized to accomplish a varietyof purposes. The student’s personal and critical responses are supported with references tothe text and other sources.
Level 3 scores (576 and above)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a thoughtful andelaborated manner. The student understands directly stated information and informationimplied by the text, including implications arising from subtle aspects of style and tone. Thestudent demonstrates insightful interpretation of the text by synthesizing several elementsor by making a thoughtful analysis of one or more significant elements, often relying onsubtle relationships among elements and ideas. The student demonstrates knowledge andinsight of how writers structure texts and use other elements of style to accomplish a varietyof purposes. The student provides extended personal and critical responses, sometimesincluding social and cultural implications or literary evaluation.
Mathematics assessment
The mathematics component in PCAP 2007 is aligned with the jurisdictions’ own curriculaas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The
95
p g jas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Theoverriding principle of the assessment is that the application of mathematics is an integratedact in which the skills and concepts of various content areas are inherently linked.
Organization of the domain
For the purposes of PCAP, the domain of mathematics was divided into four subdomainsand three processes. The four subdomains are :
numbers and operations (percentages, equivalent representations, rates, ratio and proportionality);
geometry and measurement (properties of 2-D figures and 3-D shapes,relative position, transformations and measurement);
patterns and relationships (patterns and algebraic expressions, linear relations and equations);
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
data management and probability (data collection and analysis, experimental andtheoretical probability. The three processes are:
problem solving; communication and representation; reasoning connections.
The subdomains are traditional groupings of skills and knowledge, while the processes areused in the application of all subdomains. The PCAP 2007 mathematics componentincluded test items drawing from the specifications of all four subdomains and related to thecompetencies (processes) of problem solving, communication/representations, andreasoning/connections. In addition, an attempt was made to ensure that the contexts of thevarious scenarios were drawn from situations that were relevant, appropriate, and sensiblefor Canadian 13-year-olds.
The scope of this assessment was limited to those concepts and skills encountered andused by most 13-year-olds in their courses of study in Canada. However, it was not acomprehensive assessment of all the concepts and skills that a particular system expects13-year-olds to master.
Science assessment
The PCAP science assessment is founded on a definition of scientific literacy thatadvocates that students’ evolving competencies in using science-related attitudes, skills,and knowledge as well as an understanding of the nature of science enable them to conductinquiries, solve problems, and make evidence-based decisions about science-relatedissues Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students have
96
issues. Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students haveknowledge of the life sciences, physical sciences (chemistry and physics), and earth andspace sciences, as well as an understanding of the nature of science as a humanendeavour.
Like the mathematics assessment, the science assessment comprises items associatedwith the competencies and subdomains that provide opportunities for students todemonstrate their use of science-related attitudes, skills, and knowledge. Thecompetencies and the combination of the five interrelated subdomains as defined bycurricula across Canada, as well as the statements in the CMEC's Common Framework ofScience Learning Outcomes , provided the foundation for the development of test items.
Reporting scales for the minor domains
As was the case for reading, one mean scale score for each of the minor domains has beenused for reporting the achievement results. The pan-Canadian mean score was set at 500with a standard deviation of 100.
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chart 103
PCAP (2007)Reading
476
477
478
479
486
486
491
492
503
505
524
532
Manitoba (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Ontario (F)
Quebec (A)
British Columbia (A)
Yukon (A)
Alberta (A)
Canada (A)
Ontario (A)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Pan- Canadian Results in Reading by Language
Ranking of jurisdictions on PCAP (2007) ReadingAssessment
97
N.B. Averages are statistically signigicant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
436
458
459
464
466
471
471
473
476
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
New Brunswick (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Newfoundland and …
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
British Columbia (F)
Manitoba (A)
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Chart 104
PCAP (2007)Reading
19
17
17
17
16
16
15
14
14
13
12
11
11
10
9
62
72
67
65
72
70
72
77
58
71
70
73
55
67
54
19
11
16
18
12
14
13
9
28
16
18
16
34
23
37
O t i (F)
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Yukon (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
Quebec (A)
Manitoba (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Alberta (F)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (A)
Canada (F)
Ontario (A)
Quebec (F)
Distribution (%) of Performance Levels in Reading by Language
Percentage of Students by Performance Level on PCAP(2007)
98
31
24
22
19
19
19
17
58
62
55
70
69
62
72
11
14
23
11
12
19
11
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Manitoba (F)
New Brunswick (F)
British Columbia (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
Ontario (F)
New Brunswick (A)
Level 1 (%) Level 2 (%) Level 3 (%)
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chart 105
PCAP (2007)Reading
480
480
482
483
483
489
492
493
499
503
524
531
Saskatchewan (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Nova Scotia (A)
Manitoba (A)
Quebec (A)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (A)
Ontario (A)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Comprehension
Ranking in reading (comprehension) on PCAP (2007)Reading
99
445
466
472
473
475
477
479
479
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
New Brunswick (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Ontario (F)
Yukon (A)
British Columbia (F)
( )
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PCAP (2007)Reading
Chart 106
477
482
482
483
486
489
491
492
503
509
525
532
Quebec (A)
Ontario (F)
Nova Scotia (F)
British Columbia (F)
British Columbia (A)
Yukon (A)
Alberta (A)
Canada (A)
Ontario (A)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Interpretation
Ranking in Reading (interpretation) on PCAP 2007
100
444
457
459
463
467
469
469
475
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
New Brunswick (F)
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador …
Manitoba (A)
( )
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically signigicant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
Chart 107
PCAP (2007)Reading
476
480
482
484
489
493
494
495
499
506
516
522
Manitoba (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Quebec (A)
Ontario (F)
British Columbia (A)
Alberta (A)
Yukon (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (F)
Ontario (A)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Response to Text
Ranking in Reading (response to text) on PCAP (2007)
101
445
458
462
467
469
470
470
471
476
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
Princ Edward Island (A)
New Brunswick (F)
New Brunswick (A)
British Columbia (F)
Nova Scotia (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Manitoba (A)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically signigicant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PCAP (2007)Mathématiques
Chart 108
471
474
478
478
479
484
496
500
508
510
512
518
Ontario (F)
Manitoba (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador …
Alberta (F)
Manitoba (A)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (A)
Ontario (A)
Quebec (A)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Pan-Canadian Results in Mathematicsby Language
Ranking of Jurisdictions in Mathematics on PCAP (2007)
102
448
449
457
460
461
462
464
467
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Yukon (A)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
New Brunswick (F)
Saskatchewan (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
British Columbia (F)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically signigicant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PCAP (2007)Science
Chart 109
479
480
485
485
488
496
499
503
512
514
516
524
Nova Scotia (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Ontario (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Ontario (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Canada (F)
Alberta (F)
Quebec (F)
Alberta (A)
Pan-Canadian Results in Scienceby Language
Ranking of Jurisdictions in Science on PCAP 2007
103
458
460
464
467
468
470
475
477
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Yukon (A)
New Brunswick (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Quebec (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Manitoba (F)
British Columbia (F)
Manitoba (A)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically signigicant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PISA domain
104
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2000Reading
Chart 110
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
507
507
516
517
517
521
522
523
525
527
528
529
529
529
533
534
536
538
546
550
BelgiumAustria
SwedenNewfoundland and Lab.
Prince Edward IslandNova Scotia
JapanUnited Kingdom
KoreaIreland
AustraliaNew Zealand
SaskatchewanManitoba
OntarioCANADA
QuebecBritish Columbia
FinlandAlberta
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
105
396
422
441
458
462
470
474
479
480
483
484
487
492
493
494
497
500
501
504
505
505
507
507
375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgLatvia
Russian FederationPortugalGreecePoland
HungaryLichtenstein
GemanyItaly
Czech RepublicSpain
SwitzerlandDenmark
OECD AverageNew BrunswickUnited States
FranceNorwayIceland
Belgium
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2000Mathematics
Chart 111
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
514
514
514
515
517
520
524
525
529
529
533
533
533
534
536
537
547
547
550
557
LichtensteinIceland
DenmarkAustriaFrance
BelgiumOntario
SaskatchewanUnited Kingdom
SwitzerlandCANADAManitobaAustralia
British ColumbiaFinland
New ZealandKorea
AlbertaQuebec
Japan
Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country: MATHEMATICS
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 mathematics assignment
106
334
387
446
447
454
457
463
470
476
478
488
490
493
498
499
500
503
506
509
510
512
513
514
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgGreece
PortugalItaly
LatviaPolandSpain
Russian FederationHungary
GermanyUnited States
Czech RepublicNorway
OECD AverageIreland
New BrunswickNewfoundland and Lab.
SwedenPrince Edward Island
Nova ScotiaLichtenstein
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2000Science
Chart 112
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
508
511
512
513
516
516
519
522
522
527
528
528
529
532
533
538
541
546
550
552
Prince Edward IslandCzech Republic
SwedenIreland
Nova ScotiaNewfoundland and Lab.
AustriaSaskatchewan
OntarioManitobaAustralia
New ZealandCANADA
United KingdomBritish Columbia
FinlandQuebecAlbertaJapanKorea
Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country: SCIENCE
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2000 science assessment
107
375
422
443
459
460
460
461
476
478
481
483
487
491
496
496
496
496
497
499
500
500
500
508
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgPortugal
LatviaRussian Federation
GreeceLichtenstein
ItalyDenmark
PolandGermany
SpainSwitzerland
BelgiumIceland
HungaryNew Brunswick
United StatesOECD Average
NorwayFrance
Prince Edward Island
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2003Reading
Chart 113
498499500500503507510512513513514515520521522525525525528530534535543543
JapanSwitzerland
OECD AverageNorway
New BrunswickBelgium
Hong Kong-ChinaSaskatchewan
NetherlandsNova Scotia
SwedenIreland
ManitobaNewfoundland and Lab.
New ZealandLichtenstein
AustraliaQuebec
CANADAOntario
KoreaBritish Columbia
AlbertaFinland
Average scores and confidence intervals by province and country: READING
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2003 reading assessment
108
375
382400403
412420
434441442
469472476478479481482489491491491492492495495496497498498
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
TunisiaIndonesia
MexicoBrazil
Serbia and MontenegroThailandUruguay
TurkeyRussian Federation
SlovakiaGreece
ItalyPortugal
LuxembourgSpain
HungaryCzech Republic
LatviaAustria
GermanyIceland
DenmarkPrince Edward Island
United StatesFrancePoland
Macao-ChinaJapan
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2003Mathematics
Chart 114
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
512514515515516516517523524527527528529530532534536537538538542544549550
New BrunswickDenmark
IcelandNova Scotia
Czech RepublicSaskatchewan
Newfoundland and Lab.New Zealand
AustraliaSwitzerland
Macao-ChinaManitobaBelgiumOntario
CANADAJapan
LichtensteinQuebec
NetherlandsBritish Columbia
KoreaFinlandAlberta
Hong Kong-China
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: MATHEMATICS
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2003 mathematics assessment
N.B. . Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
109
356
359360
385417422423
437445
466466468
483483485490490493495498500500503503506509511512
325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilTunisia
IndonesiaMexico
ThailandUruguay
TurkeySerbia and Montenegro
GreeceItaly
PortugalRussian Federation
United StatesLatviaSpain
HungaryPoland
LuxembourgNorway
SlovakiaOECD Average
Prince Edward IslandIreland
GermanyAustria
SwedenFrance
New Brunswick
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2003Science
Chart 115
505505506506509511512513514515519520521523524525525525527
538539539
548548
IrelandNova Scotia
SaskatchewanSwedenBelgiumFrance
ManitobaSwitzerland
Newfoundland and Lab.Ontario
CANADAQuebec
New ZealandCzech Republic
NetherlandsMacao-China
AustraliaLichtenstein
British ColumbiaCorée
AlbertaHong Kong-China
JapanFinland
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: SCIENCE
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2003 science assessment
110
385
390395
405429434436438
468475481483484486487489489489491491494495495498498502503505
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
TunisiaBrazil
IndonesiaMexico
ThailandTurkey
Serbia and MontenegroUruguayPortugal
DenmarkGreece
LuxembourgNorway
ItalySpain
Prince Edward IslandLatvia
Russian FederationAustria
United StatesOECD Average
IcelandSlovakia
New BrunswickPoland
GermanyHungary
Ireland
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2006Reading
Chart 116
507
508
510
513
514
516
517
521
522
527
528
534
535
536
547
556
Netherlands
Poland
Lichtenstein
Australia
Newfoundland and …
Manitoba
Ireland
New Zealand
Quebec
Canada
British Columbia
Ontario
Alberta
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Korea
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: READING
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
111
488
490
491
492
494
494
495
495
496
497
497
498
499
501
501
505
507
507
507
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
Austria
OECD Average
China-Macao
Slovenia
Denmark
United Kingdom
Germany
Chinese Taipei
Prince Edward Island
New Brunswick
Japan
Switzerland
Estonia
Belgium
Nova Scotia
Sweden
Saskatchewan
Netherlands
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Chart 116 (continued)
PISA 2006Reading
442
447
460
461
466
469
470
472
477
479
479
482
483
484
484
R i F d i
Chile
Turkey
Greece
Spain
Slovakia
Italy
Lithuania
Portugal
Croatia
Luxemburg
Latvia
Hungary
Czech Republic
Norway
Iceland
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: READING (continued)
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
112
285
312
353
374
380
385
392
393
393
396
401
401
402
410
413
417
439
440
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzstan
Qatar
Azerbaijan
Argentina
Tunisia
Colombia
Montenegro
Indonesia
Brazil
Romania
Serbia
Jordan
Bulgaria
Mexico
Uruguay
Thailand
Israel
Russian Federation
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
PISA 2006Mathematics
Chart 117
521
522
523
523
525
525
526
527
530
530
531
540
547
547
548
549
Manitoba
New Zealand
Japan
British Columbia
Lichtenstein
China-Macao
Ontario
Canada
Switzerland
Alberta
Netherlands
Quebec
Korea
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Chinese Taipei
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: MATHEMATICS
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
113
496
498
501
501
502
504
504
505
506
506
506
507
507
510
513
515
520
520
521
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
OECD Average
Prince Edward Island
Ireland
Sweden
Slovenia
Germany
Austria
Nova Scotia
New Brunswick
Iceland
Saskatchewan
Newfoundland and …
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Australia
Belgium
Manitoba
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
Chart 117 (continued)
PISA 2006Mathematics
459
462
466
467
474
476
476
480
486
486
490
490
491
492
495
495
Greece
Italy
Portugal
Croatia
United States
Russian Federation
Azerbaijan
Spain
Lithuania
Latvia
Norway
Luxemburg
Hongrie
Slovakia
United Kingdom
Poland
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: MATHEMATICS (continued)
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intevals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 mathematics assessment
114
311
318
365
370
370
381
384
391
399
406
411
413
415
417
424
427
435
442
459
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzistan
Qatar
Tunisia
Colombia
Brazil
Argentina
Jordan
Indonesia
Montenegro
Mexico
Chile
Bulgaria
Romania
Thailand
Turkey
Uruguay
Serbia
Israel
Greece
Scores
Chapitre 4 ‐ résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
Chart 118
PISA 2006Science
522
522
523
525
526
527
530
531
531
531
532
534
537
539
542
550
563
Lichtenstein
Korea
Manitoba
Netherlands
Newfoundland and Labrador
Australia
New Zealand
Quebec
Japan
Estonia
Chinese Taipei
Canada
Ontario
British Columbia
China - Hong Kong
Alberta
Finland
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries: SCIENCE
N.B.Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 science assessment
115
495
496
498
500
503
504
506
508
509
510
511
511
512
513
515
516
517
519
520
522
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
Denmark
Poland
OECD Average
Sweden
Hungary
New Brunswick
Ireland
Prince Edward Island
Belgium
China-Macao
Austria
Switzerland
Czech Republic
United Kingdom
Germany
Saskatchewan
Slovenia
Nova Scotia
Lichtenstein
Scores
Résultats aux évaluations pancanadienne et internationnale ‐ chapitre 4
PISA 2006Science
Chart 118 (continued)
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
438
454
473
474
475
479
486
487
488
488
488
489
490
491
493
Chile
Israel
Greece
Portugal
Italy
Russian Federation
Luxemburg
Norway
Spain
Slovakia
Lithuania
United States
Latvia
Iceland
Croatia
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals for Provinces and Countries : SCIENCE (continued)
N.B. N.B.Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals by province andcountry for the PISA 2006 science assessment
116
322
349
382
386
388
390
391
393
410
412
418
421
422
424
428
434
436
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzstan
Qatar
Azerbaijan
Tunisia
Colombia
Brazil
Argentina
Indonesia
Mexico
Montenegro
Romania
Thailand
Jordan
Turkey
Uruguay
Bulgaria
Serbia
Scores
Conclusion
Conclusion
This marks the fifteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.
The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2008-2009 school year. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.
These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .
We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have d thi t ith b il il Pl d th t th dd
117
Conclusion
This marks the fifteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.
The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2008-2009 school year. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.
These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .
We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have read this report, either by mail or e-mail. Please send them to the addresses indicated at the beginning . The Department will examine your questionnaire responses and comments with great care.
Note, too, that school principals and district superintendents, as well as appropriate departmental staff, are available to answer any further questions you may have.