PROPOSITION 1 B FINAL DELIVERY REPORT Program CMIA D SR99 0 STIP D

SHOPP D TCIF D SLPP D 0 Final Delivery Rpt D Supplemental Final Delivery Report Date 02/13/17

EA . PPNO District County Route PM Bk PMAhd OE610 7634 10 San Joaquin 99 4.9 15 OE611 7634A 10 San Joaquin 99 4.9 14.2 OE612 7634B 10 San Joaquin 99 10.6 15 OE613 7634C 10 San Joaquin 99 8.9 15 OE614 76340 10 San Joaquin 99 8.6 12 Project Title

OE61 0 - SR 99 Widening in Manteca and San Joaquin OE611 - SR 99 Widening in Manteca and San Joaquin Phase 1 OE612 - SR 99 Widening in Manteca and San Joaquin Phase 2 OE613- SR 99 Widening in Manteca and San Joaquin Phase 3 OE614- SR 99 Widenin~ in Manteca and San Joaquin Mitigation Planting Project Sponsor Caltrans and San Joaquin Council of Governments

Contact Name: Jes Padda Agency: Caltrans E-mail: jes. Qadda @dot. ca .gov Phone: (209) 948-7765

Current Approved Scope of Work:

OE61 0 -The project will widen the State Route (SR) 99 from 4 to 6 lanes. The other features include: reconstruction of the Main Street/Lathrop Road Interchange, replacement of the Cottage and Louise Avenue Overcrossing, extension of frontage roads from French Camp Road to Little John's Creek, closure of the frontage road freeway access near Litle John's Creek, construct soundwalls, and construction of concrete median barrier. OE611 -The project will widen the State Route (SR) 99 from 4 to 6 lanes. The other features include: construct soundwalls, and construction of concrete median barrier. OE612- The project will reconstruct the French Camp Road Interchange and closure of the frontage road freeway access near Litle John's Creek. OE613- The project will reconstruct the Main St!Lathrop Road interchange and extension of frontage roads from French Camp Road. OE614- The project will perform mitigation and landscape planting. Does the completed project match the approved scope of work? Yes No If no, please describe changes to scope of work: . 0 D

If this project is a segment to the overall bond programmed project identify # of total.

5- OE61 0 is parent project was split into child projects are OE611, OE612, OE613, OE614.

Note that OE610 has split into OE611, OE612, OE613, OE614 and so financial information for OE61 0 has not been provided. Also, M600 has not been achieved for OE614 and so the financial information has not been provided. OE614 will use federal and local funds.

PROPOSITION 1 B FINAL DELIVERY REPORT- ON SYSTEM PROJECTS Pg 2

FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OE611 (all numbers in thousands)· Original Current

by Phase Baseline Approved Actual Expended Net Difference Environmental $ 828 $ 828 $ -Design $ 5,456 $ 5,456 $ -ROW SUfl~Ort $ -CON Support $ 5,250 $ 5,117 $ 133 ROW Capital $ -CON Capital $ 31,644 $ 29,523 $ 2,121 TOTAL $ - $ 43,178 $ 40,924 $ 2,254

Original Current by Fund Type Baseline Approved Actual Expended Net Difference

Route 99 $ 36,894 $ 34,640 $ 2,254 Local $ 6,284 $ 6,284 $ -Select. .. $ -Select... $ -TOTAL $ - $ . 43,178 $ 40,924 $ 2,254

If actual expenditures are greater tha~ approved, please explain/ /(savings were they captured:

Note that PA&ED was completed with the parent project OE610 (PPNO 7634) and this project's share was $828,000. Construction support overran the programmed budget but it represents a 5% increase and the project, as a whole, was delivered under-budget. There are $2,254,000 in savings from the approved budget FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OE612 (all numbers in thousands)

Original Current by Phase Baseline Approved Actual Expended Net Difference

Environmental $ 1,116 $ 1,116 $ -Design $ 5,697 $ 5,697 $ -ROW Support $ 800 $ 228 $ 572 CON Support $ 7,000 $ 6,471 $ 529 ROW Capital $ 1,410 $ 1,372 $ 38 CON Capital $ 31,543 $ 27,392 $ 4,151 TOTAL $ - $ 47,566 $

.

42,276 $ 5,290

Original Current by Fund Type Baseline Approved Actual Expended Net Difference

Route 99 $ 40,753 $ 35,463 $ 5,290 Local $ 6,813 $ 6,813 $ -Select. .. $ -Select... $ -TOTAL $ - $ 47,566 $ 42,276 $ 5,290

If actual expenditures are greater than approved, please explain/ If savings were they captured:

Note that PA&ED was completed with the parent project 10-0E610 (PPNO 7634) and this project's share was $1,116,000 from Local funds. Final expenditures are pendinq the closeout process.

PROPOSITION 18 FINAL DELIVERY REPORT- ON SYSTEM PROJECTS Pg 3 ' FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR OE613 (all numbers in thousands)

Original Current by Phase Baseline Approved Actual Expended Net Difference

Environmental $ 1,620 $ 1,620 $ -Desiqn $ 6,757 $ 6,757 $ -ROW Support $ 2,185 $ 774 $ 1,411

CON Support $ 7,500 $ 6,676 $ 824

ROW Capital $ 17,807 $ 17,309 $ 498

CON Capital $ 29,481 $ 27,150 $ 2,331 TOTAL $ - $ 65,350 $ 60,286 $ 5,064

Original Current by Fund Type Baseline Approved Actual Expended Net Difference

Route 99 $ 12,143 $ 10,696 $ 1,447

Local $ 20,438 $ 19,875 $ 563

STIP (non bond) $ 32,769 $ 29,715 $ 3,054

Select. .. $ -TOTAL $ - $ 65,350 $ 60,286 $ 5,064

If actual expenditures are greater than approved, please explain/ If savings were they captured:

Note that PA&ED was completed with the parent project 10-0E610 (PPNO 7634) and this project's share was $1,620,000 from Local funds. Final expenditures are pendinq the closeout process.

SCHEDULE FOR OE611

Original Current Net Difference Baseline Approved Actual Schedule (months)

Begin ENV 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 0

End ENV (PAED) 03/18/10 03/18/10 03/18/10 0

Begin Design 01/04/10 01/04/10 01/04/10 0 End Design (RTL) 05/06/11 05/06/11 12/07/11 7 Begin ROW 03/15/10 03/15/10 03/18/10 0 End ROW 04/01/11 04/01/11 06/01/11 2 Beqin CON (Award) 11/09/11 11/09/11 04/19/12 5 End CON 07/01/14 07/01/14 01/07/15 6 Begin Closeout 07/01/14 07/01/14 01/07/15 6 End Closeout 07/01/15 07/01/15 07/31/16 13

If actual schedule is later than approved, please provide corrective action:

Delays to the project were the result of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board permit and utility conflicts.

PROPOSITION 1B FINAL DELIVERY REPORT ON SYSTEM PROJECTS Pg 4 ' SCHEDULE FOROE612 .

Original Current Net Difference Baseline Approved Actual Schedule (months)

Begin ENV 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 0 End ENV (PAED) 02/28/10 03/18/10 03/18/10 0 Begin Design 01/04/10 01/04/10 01/04/10 0 End Design (RTL) 10/31/11 09/01/11 01/13/12 4 Begin ROW 12/31/10 03/15/10 03/18/10 0 End ROW 09/01/11 09/01/11 12/23/11 4 Begin CON (Award) 03/07/12 03/07/12 07/20/12 4 End CON 07/30/15 10/01/14 10/12/15 12 Begin Closeout 02/29/16 07/01/15 10/13/15 3 End Closeout 06/30/17 06/30/17

lfactu~/ ;bhedule is later than approved, please provide co~rective action:.

The Begin Construction milestone was delayed by four months due to the difficulty obtaining the final railroad Construction and Maintenance Agreement. The End Construction milestone was delayed 171 non-working days due to weather that meant the Contractor could not work on critical path items. There were 67 non-working day delays as a result of traffic handling conflicts between Phase 1 and Phase 2 projects.

SCHEDULE FOR OE613 Original Current Net Difference Baseline Approved Actual Schedule (months)

Begin ENV 07/01/07 07/01/07 07/01/07 0 End ENV (PAED) 02/28/10 03/18/10 03/18/10 0 Beqin Design 01/04/10 01/04/10 01/04/10 0 End Design (RTL) 06/01/15 09/01/11 06/12/12 9 Begin ROW 12/31/10 03/15/10 03/19/10 0 End Row· 09/01/11 03/01/12 03/01/12 0 Begin CON (Award) 03/07/12 01/02/13 10/11/12 -3 End CON 07/30/15 10/01/15 12/15/15 2 Begin Closeout 02/29/16 07/01/16 12/16/15 -7 End Closeout 06/30/17 06/30/17

If actual schedule is later than approved, please provide corrective action: The Closeout process has started ahead of schedule to correct the delay in end construction.

PROPOSITION 18 FINAL DELIVERY REPORT- ON SYSTEM PROJECTS, Pg 5

AMENDMENTS List approved amendments:

Amendment# CTC Meeting ·Summary of changes (Scope, Cost, Schedule) 108-013 1/19/2010 Split parent project into 5 projects to deliver Phase 1

early;

PERFORMANCE OUTCOME Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP)

Original Current Baseline Approved

Plan Adoption Plan Implementation

Actual Schedule Net Difference

(months) 0 0

This project is currently in Phase 4 of the overall project (1 O-OE610). The overall project was originally base lined (programmed) for $250 million and currently has an approved (combined) budget of $156,094. Phase 1 has more than $2 million in actual savings from the approved budget. Phases 2 and 3 are anticipated to have savings from the approved budgets that will be documented in the Supplemental Final Delivery Report. Travel Savings are less than anticipated because traffic is not as high as it was projected when the Baseline Agreement was approved.

PROPOSITION 1B FINAL DELIVERY REPORT- ON SYSTEM PROJECTS, Pg 6

Certification Signature Page

Local Agency

I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge the information in this report is a true and accurate.

The work was performed in accordance with the CTC approved scope, cost, schedules, and benefit

information in the baseline agreement or amendment.

Jes Padda

(Print name) Project Manager

k/./d zfo;/7 (~gnature) Project Manager

~I

Date

Cal trans

The Program Coordinator from the California Department of Transportation has reviewed the information contained in this report and has verified the information presented is correct.

(Signature) Program Coordinator

Note1: Final Delivery Report for OE611 submitted on 1/29/16

Note2: Final Delivery Report for OE612 submitted on 4/18/16

Note3: Final Delivery Report for OE613 submitted on 5/24/16

Date