Proposed Section 6055 and 6056 Reporting Requirements · 2013-10-29 · 10/29/2013 1 Proposed...
Transcript of Proposed Section 6055 and 6056 Reporting Requirements · 2013-10-29 · 10/29/2013 1 Proposed...
10/29/2013
1
Proposed Section 6055 and 6056
Reporting Requirements
Presented by Ashley Gillihan, Alston & Bird, LLP
On behalf of the Society of Professional Benefit
Administrators
October 28, 2013
10/29/2013
2
Statutory Reporting Requirements
• 6055—Reporting related to the individual mandate
– Who? Providers of MEC
– What? Identity of all individuals covered under the MEC and
the duration covered
• 6056—Reporting related to 4980H
– Who? Employers
– What? Information related to coverage offered to full-time
employees
• Notice 2013-45: Reporting requirements delayed until
2015 (i.e. reporting not required until 2016 for 2015
year)
10/29/2013
3
Proposed 6055 Reporting
Regulations
• Who is required to report?
– Issuers in the exchange not required to report exchange
coverage
– Employer sponsored plans
• Fully insured-the Insurance carrier
• Self-insured—the “plan sponsor”
– 414 aggregation rules do NOT apply
» One member may assist the others (but others must sign)
– Governmental employers may use “designated person” to file
10/29/2013
4
Proposed 6055 Reporting
Regulations• What is required to be reported to IRS?
– Name, (last known) address and TIN (or date of birth) of
• “responsible person”—this is NOT limited to active employees; includes former employees and would appear to include guardians of QMCSO
“alternate recipients”
• Each individual covered
– Reasonable effort rule for collecting TIN of dependent
– Name, address and EIN of employer maintaining the plan
– The months the individuals had MEC during the calendar year
• 1 day in the month is a whole month
• Not based on plan year
• No reporting required for HRAs that supplement MEC
10/29/2013
5
Proposed 6055 Reporting
Regulations
• How to Report?
– Electronic filing required unless “small employer”(determined based on aggregate forms)
– Due February 28 (march 31, if electronic)
– Form 1095-B
10/29/2013
6
Proposed 6055 Reporting
Regulations
• What is required to be furnished to individuals?
– Same information reported to the IRS with respect to that
individual
– Due January 31 of each year
• How?
– Electronic delivery—requires advance consent
– One statement per address
• Not required to furnish a statement to someone who is not the
responsible individual
10/29/2013
7
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations
• Who is required to report to IRS?
– Each applicable large employer member!!!
• Administrator of multiple employer plan to which employer
contributions can file on behalf of employer
– One form for each employer
– Employer signs
• Third parties can assist (employer remains liable)
• ALE member can file for others
10/29/2013
8
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations• What is required to be reported?
– Name, address and EIN of employer
– Name, telephone number of contact
– Calendar year reported
– Certification whether MEC coverage was offered to full-time
employee (with dependent coverage available) for each month
– The full-time employee’s share of cost of lowest cost MEC that provides MV
– The number of full-time employees each month during the
year
– Name, address of each full-time employee during the calendar
year and the months covered
10/29/2013
9
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations
• How to report?
– Electronic
• Small employer exception
– Due February 28 (march 31 if electronic)
– 1094-C
10/29/2013
10
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations• Information expected to be requested using codes:
– Whether coverage is MV
– Whether coverage was affected by waiting period
– Total number of employees each month
– Whether the employer was not conducting business during a month
– Whether ALE member expects to be an ALE member in the subsequent
year
– If ALE member is part of controlled group
– Whether full time employee is treated as eligible to participate to MEP due
to employer’s contributions
– If MEP is reporting on behalf of employer, the address of MEP
administrator
10/29/2013
11
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations• Additional information with respect to each full-time expected to be requested
using codes for each month:
– MEC providing MEC was offered to:
• Employee only
• Employee and employee’s dependents only
• Employee and the employee’s spouse only
• Employee, spouse and dependents
– Coverage was not offered to employee and
• Employee was in a waiting period
• Employee was not full-time that month
• Employee not employed during that month
– Coverage was offered for the month but was not a full-time employee
– The ALE member satisfied one of the affordability standards
10/29/2013
12
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations
• What is required to be furnished to full-time employee?
– Same information with respect to full-time employee
– Name, address, EIN of employer
• When is it required to be furnished?
– January 31
• How?
– Electronic but only after consent
10/29/2013
13
Proposed 6056 Reporting
Regulations• Optional methods-employer could use one or more of these for full-time
employee:
– No 6056 employee offered the same coverage with static cost for all 12
months
• Report instead using W-2 code
• Code would indicate level of coverage (if MV), no coverage, or not
MV
– No need to identify full-time employees to IRS if employer certifies that all
of its employees to whom coverage was not offered were NOT full-time
• Certify that all employees not offered coverage were not full-time or were not required
to be offered
– Mandatory MV, self insured coverage to all family members with no
employee contribution—only satisfy 6055, put code on W-2, and summary
information on 6056 transmittal.
10/29/2013
14
2013-03/2013-54
They said what?
10/29/2013
15
Foundational Overview
• Health Insurance Reforms apply to all group health plans other than:
– Excepted benefits
– Stand alone retiree health plans
• 2 of the relevant health insurance reforms:
– Section 2711
• No annual or lifetime dollar limit on essential health benefits
• “Integrated” HRAs and Section 106(c)(2) arrangements exempted
– Section 2713
• Plans must cover preventive care without cost sharing in all instances
10/29/2013
16
Policy Concerns
• Employers providing/facilitating coverage for
employees with major medical plans issued in the
individual market
– Strain on individual market
• Employees receiving tax free subsidies from employer
for government subsidized coverage in the Exchange
• Employers using defined contribution arrangements as
primary medical coverage
10/29/2013
17
FAQ
• Agencies issued guidance in early summer 2013
indicating that:
– HRA could not be integrated with individual market coverage
– Since it could not be integrated, it violated Section 2711
– Employers had to stop making contributions after December
31, 2013
• Spend down allowed thereafter subject to certain limitations
10/29/2013
18
2013-03/2013-54
• Generally effective for plan years beginning on or after 1/1/2014
– See special effective date for 106(c)(2) exception from Section 2711
• No payments for major medical policies issued in the individual market that are
excluded from income under 106
– Includes pre-tax salary reductions under cafeteria plan
– After tax payments for such policies also prohibited if ERISA’s voluntary
plan safe harbor is not satisfied
• Non-integrated, defined contribution accounts that are not excepted
benefits/stand alone retiree health plans are not permissible
• Health FSAs offered through a cafeteria plan that are not excepted benefits are
impermissible
• Special integration rules for defined contribution arrangements arrangements
10/29/2013
19
How did they get there?
• Reiterate that HRAs and Health FSAs are group health plans
• Define a new type of defined contribution arrangement “employer payment plan”
– A Rev. Rul. 61-146 arrangement
– Includes cafeteria plans!!!!!
– Guidance treats employer payment plan as a group health plan
• Defined contribution coverage cannot be integrated with IM coverage
• Non-integrated defined contribution arrangement will violate Section 2711
– Premium for policy is an EHB (look through to underlying coverage)
– Promise to pay premium is an inherent annual dollar limit
– Effective 9/13/13, 106(c)(2) exemption in 2711 is limited to Health FSA offered
through cafeteria plan
• Non-integrated defined contribution arrangement will violate 2713
– Even if somehow exempt from 2711, cap on benefits will violate requirement to
pay all recommended preventive treatment without cost sharing in all instances
10/29/2013
20
How did they get there?
• Integrated defined contribution arrangement generally o.k.
• Integrated definition
– Must limit participation to defined-benefit, employer group health plan
• Any employer
– Must allow an opt out/waiver of future reimbursement once coverage under
employer’s health plan has ended
– If reimbursement under defined contribution account reimburses other than
the following, the employer’s group health plan must provide minimum
value
• Deductible under employer plan
• Coinsurance under employer plan
• Co-pays under employer plan
• Premiums under employer plan
• Non-essential health benefits
10/29/2013
21
How did they get there?
• Integration
– Spend down permitted with respect to amounts credited to
defined contribution arrangement while defined contribution
arrangement was “integrated”
– Can you pay IM coverage through an integrated arrangement?
• Likely not!!!!!!
• Even if you could, it would have to be integrated with an
employer’s plan that provides minimum value
10/29/2013
22
What is left?
• Tax free payment of excepted benefit coverage (see
HRA issue below)
• Defined contribution arrangements limited to former
employees
• Defined contribution arrangements that provide
excepted benefit coverage
– Note potential issue with dental/vision
– No reimbursement of indemnity policies through “HRA”
• Health FSA offered through a cafeteria plan that is an
excepted benefit
10/29/2013
23
What if I don’t comply?
• Violation of health insurance reforms are subject to
$100 per day/per affected beneficiary excise tax under
4980D
• Penalty under PHSA (state/local governmental plans)
• Suits under ERISA for specific performance
10/29/2013
24
When do I need to comply?
• General effective date is plan years beginning on or after
1/1/14
• 9/13/13 effective date for limitation on 106(c)(2)
exemption from Section 2711 confusing
– Virtually every defined contribution arrangement w/o a waiver
relied on this exception
– Could mean any impermissible arrangement without a waiver
must cease as of 9/13/13
– Could mean no new plan years start after 9/13/13
• What about spend down?