ProposedFacilitiesPrioritizationMethodologyforFutureModernizationProjects

Budget,Facilities&AuditCommitteeThursday,December11,2014

BondProgramHistoryDecadesofUnmetSchoolNeeds

From1980to2002,EnrollmentGrewbyMoreThan200,000Students

For30+YearsThereWasNoBondFundingtoInvestinSchoolFacilities

OvercrowdingWasAddressedBy PlacingPortable(Bungalows)ClassroomsatSchools InstitutingMulti‐TrackCalendars– SomeSchoolsHad17LessDaysOfInstruction

InvoluntarilyBusingStudentsAcrossTheDistrict

AgingandDeterioratingSchoolInfrastructure

LAUSDLocalBondHistory

PropositionBB‐ 1997 $2.4BillionMeasureK‐ 2002 $3.35BillionMeasureR‐ 2004 $3.87BillionMeasureY‐2005 $3.985BillionMeasureQ‐ 2008 $7Billion

OverallSourcesofFundsforFacilitiesServicesDivisionBondProgramisApproximately$25.3Billion

ByLaw,BondDollarsCanOnlybeSpentonCapitalImprovements,i.e.notonSchoolOperationsorAdministration

PreviousGoalsandAccomplishments

InvestedNearly$19BillioninConstructingNewSchoolsandRepairingandModernizingLegacySchools

130of131NewK‐12SchoolProjectsCompleted

65of65NewK‐12AdditionProjectsCompleted

NoSchoolsOperatingonaThree‐TrackCalendar

Only1SchoolOperatingonaMulti‐TrackCalendar–99%DecreaseOvertheLast10Years

FullDayKindergartenImplementedDistrictwide

Approximately20,000Repair&ModernizationProjectsCompleted

There’sStillMoreWorkToBeDone

OurSchoolsAreAging,DeterioratingandCostlytoMaintain OperationalFundingDoesNotKeepUpWithCapitalNeed Overcrowding&Multi‐Track/YearRoundOperationsHaveSeverely

IncreasedWearAndTearOfBuildingsAndDecreasedTheirLifeExpectancy

FacilitiesDoNotAllAlignwithInstructionalProgramRequirements

ItisEstimatedthattheDistrictWouldNeedApproximately10TimesMoreFundingThanisAvailabletoAddressAlltheCapitalNeedsofAllofOurSchools

VisionistoProvideAllStudentswithaSchoolEnvironmentthatisUp‐to‐DateandPromotesandSupportsLearning

TheVastMajorityofStudentsAttend“Legacy”Schools

BoardApprovedGoalsforFutureProjects SchoolsShouldbePhysicallySafeandSecure SchoolBuildingSystemsShouldbeSoundandEfficient SchoolFacilitiesShouldAlignwithInstructionalRequirementsandVision

ProjectsWillModernize,BuildandRepairExistingSchoolFacilitiestoImproveStudentHealth,Safety,andEducationalQuality

TheNextPhaseoftheDistrict’sBondProgramTheSchoolUpgradeProgram

SchoolUpgradeProgramSpendingTargets

FACILITIES SERVICES DIVISION STRATEGIC EXECUTION PLAN $6,736,708,302 Major Renovations/Modernizations/Reconfigurations to School Campuses $4,293,396,567 Critical School Repair and Safety Improvements to School Building Components $938,841,200 Leverage Partnerships to Provide After School Activities & Programming and Community Use of Facilities $50,000,000

Specialized Client Programs $1,454,470,535 IT School Network Infrastructure Upgrades Executed by FSD $324,486,889 Modernize and Repair School Cafeterias to Make Nutritious Healthy Meals Available to More Students * $212,000,000 School Upgrades and Reconfigurations to Support Specialized Instructional Programs $193,973,646 Build New and Repair Aging Early Childhood Education Centers to Promote Learning for Youngest Students* $110,000,000 Provide/Upgrade Adult and Career Education Facilities Necessary to Provide Career Training and Adult Courses* $91,900,000 Renovate Special Education Centers for Career/Transition Programs & Increase Special Education Facilities on General Education Campuses $50,000,000 Districtwide Charter School Facilities - Provide Reasonably Equivalent New and Existing School Facilities* $402,110,000 Board Member Priority Projects $35,000,000 Educational Service Center Priority Projects $35,000,000

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION STRATEGIC EXECUTION PLAN $529,761,698 Technology Infrastructure and System Upgrades - ISIS, Core IT Network Upgrades, Disaster Recovery Systems $151,816,592 Upgrade and Equip Schools with 21st Century Technology - Common Core Technology Project $327,945,106 Upgrade Districtwide Emergency Radio System Servicing Schools $50,000,000

TRANSPORTATION SERVICES STRATEGIC EXECUTION PLAN $46,500,000 Replace Aging and Polluting School Buses * $46,500,000

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL $40,000,000Conduct Ongoing Inspector General Independent Audits of Bond Projects to Ensure Transparency and Accountability $40,000,000

UNALLLOCATED $500,000,000Unallocated funds for to-be-determined needs $500,000,000

TOTAL SCHOOL UPGRADE PROGRAM $7,852,900,000

CATEGORIES OF NEEDGOALS DRIVING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

Spending Target

The Challenge

$7.8BillioninFundingSourcesforSchoolUpgradeProgram

ToAddressAlltheCapitalNeedsofAllofOurSchoolsitisEstimatedtheDistrictWouldNeedApproximately10TimesMoreFundingThanisAvailable

$4BillioninFundingforProjectsthatWillModernizeSchoolsintheMostCritical

PhysicalCondition

What is a Modernization?

ModernizationReferstoBringingAgingSchoolFacilitiesup‐toCurrentStandards BuildingCodes LAUSDDesignStandards CurrentEducationalStandardsforFacilities

SystemsareRenewedandUpdated

ComprehensiveApproach– AddressanEntireAgingFacilityRatherThanaSingleComponentWithinaBuilding

AssesstheConditionsofOurSchoolFacilities CompletedCapitalNeedsAssessmentandMasterPlanningEffort EngagedStakeholdersatIndividualSchoolSites UndertookaFacilitiesConditionAssessment

CollectandAnalyzeData

EngageExpertsandStakeholders ConvenedInternalCommitteestoProvideStrategicGuidance ConvenedExternalTechnicalCommitteetoValidateProcess SolicitedFeedbackfromVariousStakeholdersinCommunityMeetings Convened/ConveningRoundtabletoProvideFocusedFeedback

Principals,Parents,Students,andTeachers

CompletePrioritizationProposalforConsiderationbytheBoardofEducation

PrioritizingforMajorModernizationProjects

PrioritizingforMajorModernizationProjectsInternalandExternalCommittees

InternalCommitteeProvidedStrategicGuidance MaureenDiekmann,ExecutiveDirector,EarlyChildhoodEducation MarkHovatter,ChiefFacilitiesExecutive MichelleKing,ChiefDeputySuperintendent,SchoolOperations RowenaLagrossa,ExecutiveDirector,ParentCommunityStudentServicesBranch ByronMaltez,InstructionalAreaSuperintendent,ESCNorth MeganReilly,ChiefFinancialOfficer BruceTakeguma,DirectorofSchoolManagementServices EdgarZazueta,DirectorofGovernmentRelations

ExternalTechnicalCommitteeValidatedProcess RonniEphraim‐‐ 2U/LAUSD(Retired) MaryFilardo‐‐ 21stCenturySchoolFund GaryLeeMoore‐‐ L.A.DepartmentPublicWorks,BureauofEngineering ConnieRice‐‐ AdvancementProject MiguelSantana‐‐ LACityAdministrativeOfficer RichardSlawson‐‐ LA/OCBuilding&ConstructionTradesCouncil(Retired) ChesterWidom‐‐ DivisionoftheStateArchitect

PrioritizingforMajorModernizationProjectsRoundtableDiscussions

RoundtableDiscussionswithPrincipals,Teachers,StudentsandParents

1st SessionHeld11/20;2nd SessionScheduledforToday,12/11

SchoolsRepresented:

CoeurD’AleneAvenueES FairfaxHS WashingtonPreparatoryHS EmersonMS ThomasJeffersonHS WalterReedMS CesarE.ChavezHS GatesES CanogaParkHS BancroftMS TolandWayES BellHS DorseyHS GardenaHS BurroughsMS SolanoES

VanNuysHS MarshallHS MarltonSpecialEd. BartonHillES GageMS HuntingtonParkHS CortinesHS LawrenceMS GridleyES WestchesterHS GardenaHS BurroughsMS SolanoES VanNuysHS MarshallHS

HarryBridgesSpan SanFernandoHS LincolnHS HollywoodHS CarsonHS FrostMS RooseveltHS NorthHollywoodHS 32Street/USCPerformingArts GrandviewES EvansCommunityAdultSchool PacificBlvd.ES CharlesWhiteES FranklinHS

OurProposal:

PrioritizeSchoolSitesforModernizationsbyIdentifyingThosewithGreatestPhysicalNeedAcrosstheDistrict;and

DevelopComprehensiveModernizationProjectsthatAddresstheMostCriticalPhysicalConditionsWhileAlsoImprovingtheLearningEnvironment.

PrioritizingforMajorModernizationProjects

SchoolSitestobeIdentifiedBasedontheFollowingCharacteristics,withtheHealthandSafetyofOurSchoolFacilitiesBeingtheTopPriority:

ASchool’sBuildings&OutdoorAreasareinCriticalCondition–FailingBuildingSystemsandComponentsarePrevalentThroughouttheEntireSite

ASchoolSiteIncludesBuildingsWhichMayRequireImprovementstoEnsureEarthquakeSafety

ASchoolSiteHasaHighProportionofClassroomsinPortableBuildings

ASchoolSiteDoesNotHaveanAdequateControlledPublicAccessPoint

ASchoolSiteHasInadequatelySizedCoreFacilitiesSuchasFoodServices,PlaySpace,Multi‐PurposeRooms,andLibraries

ASchoolSiteisDense – LotsofStudentsonaSmallSite

Proposal for Evaluating SitesFutureModernizationProjects

BuildingsinCriticalCondition(26%)

BuildingsWhichMayRequireImprovementstoEnsureEarthquakeSafety(21%)

OutdoorAreasinCriticalCondition (13%)

InadequatelySizedCoreFacilities FoodServicesFacilities(6%) Library(6%) MPR/Auditorium(6%) PlaySpace(6%)

HighProportionofClassroomsinPortableBuildings(5%)

InadequateControlledPublicAccessPoint(5%)

SiteDensity(5%)

Determining “Greatest Need” School SitesData Driven Ind icators of Need

ModernizationProjectsWillAddresstheBuildingsandGroundsintheMostCriticalPhysicalConditionsataSchoolSite CriticalBuildingsandGroundsWillBeAddressedandBroughtUp

toCurrentEducationalandBuildingStandardswithComprehensiveModernizationProjects

EnablesDistricttoAddressCriticalConditionsatMoreSchools ScopeandBudgetWillReflectScaleofCriticalNeeds

ProjectScopingProposalWillLimittheInclusionofNon‐CriticalItems AgingbutOperationalBuildingsMayNotbeAddressed

Project Scoping Proposal Strateg ic , Focused Investments

ModernizationProjectsWillAddresstheMostCriticalPhysicalConditionsataSchoolSite

WhenUndertakingaModernization,ImprovementsMay Include: ReplacingBrokenandOut‐of‐DateBuildingEquipment– LikeAirConditioning

Systems,Roofs,andPlumbing

UpgradingCampusSecurityFeaturestoMakeSureSchoolsareSafeandSecure

ReplacingPortableswithNewPermanentBuildings

BuildingScienceLabs&OtherSpecializedClassroomsRequiredforEducationalPrograms

UpgradingEarthquakeSafety

UpdatingFireSafetyEquipment

UpgradingtoMeetCurrentBuildingCodes

ImprovingAccessibility

BuildNewClassroomSpacetoMeetEnrollmentDemands

ProjectScopingProposalPotent ia l Improvements at Schools

Foodservices&MultipurposeBuilding• IdentifiedforSeismicEvaluation• CriticalCondition• Undersized

Scoping Challenge

BuildingsinCriticalCondition

High%ofPortables

New Buildings

Extensive Modernization

Medium Modernization

Light Modernization

Legend

IfWeHadAlltheMoney…Conceptual Master Plan

ProjectScope:1. RemovePortable

ClassroomsandReplacewithNewClassroom/Admin.BuildingandParkingArea

2. ReplaceSeismicallyVulnerableandInadequateFoodServicesandMPRBuildingwithNewSafeandFunctionalBuildings

3. ReplaceClassroomBuildinginCriticalConditionwithNewBuilding

4. ModernizeExistingClassroomBuildinginCriticalCondition

32

2

1

4

WithLimitedMoney…Modernizat ion of Most Cr i t ica l Condi t ions

AddressingMostCriticalConditions: SolvedforBuildingsIdentifiedinCriticalConditionsbyConstructingNewandRenovatingOldClassroomBuildingsandImprovedLearningEnvironment

SolvedforEarthquakeSafetybyReplacingtheFoodServicesandMPR

RemovedPortables

1

Summary

TheNeedsofourSchoolFacilitiesAreGreat– ThereisNotEnoughFundingAvailabletoModernizeAllofOurSchools

ItisEstimatedthattheDistrictWouldNeedApproximately10TimesMoreFundingThanisAvailabletoAddressAlltheCapitalNeedsofAllofOurSchools

PrioritizationApproachStartswithSchoolSiteswiththeMostCriticalPhysicalConditionsandWillModernizeThemSoTheyAreSafe,Healthy,andFunctionalPlacestoLearn

ModernizationProjectsWillAddresstheMostCriticalPhysicalConditionsataSchoolSite

AllofOurStudentsShouldHavetheOpportunitytoAttendaSchoolthatisSafeandUp‐to‐Date,andHaveAnEqualOpportunityforSuccess

TheProposalisaStepTowardsProvidingEquityBetweenOurOlderandNewerSchools

Questions?