Proposal of a validation method for automated...

13
Proposal of a validation method for automated nucleic acid extraction and RT-qPCR analysis : an example with Bluetongue virus Elise Vandemeulebroucke Kris De Clercq Frank Vandenbussche Yves Van Der Stede CODA-CERVA-VAR Department of Virology Molecular Platform

Transcript of Proposal of a validation method for automated...

  • Proposal of a validation method for automated nucleic acid extraction and RT-qPCR analysis : an example with Bluetongue virus

    Elise VandemeulebrouckeKris De ClercqFrank VandenbusscheYves Van Der Stede

    CODA-CERVA-VAR

    Department of Virology

    Molecular Platform

  • Molecular platformGeneral goal

    � Creation of a Molecular Platform for the ‘high-throughput’ RT-qPCR analysis of former list-A pathogens.

    � Automatisation

    JANUS Automated Workstation (Perkin Elmer)

    2

    JANUS Automated Workstation (Perkin Elmer)2 extraction robots1 RT-qPCR robot + 2 LightCyclers480 (Roche)

    � ExtractionNucleoSpin 96 Virus Core kit (Macherey-Nagel)Vacuum-based protocol

    � Real-time RT- PCRRNA Ultrasense kit (Invitrogen)

    One-step protocolMultiplexed : virus, internal and external control

  • � Creation of a Molecular Platform for the ‘high-throughput’ real-time PCR analysis of former list-A pathogens.

    � High-throughputExtraction : 12 plates / day 1116 samples / day

    Molecular platformGeneral goal

    3

    Extraction : 12 plates / day PCR : 12 PCR plates / day

    � Pathogens :BTV (Bluetongue Virus)

    FMDV (Foot and mouth disease Virus)3D

    5UTR

    CSFV (Classical Swine Fever Virus)AIV (Avian Influenza Virus)

    1116 samples / day

  • RT-qPCR assayQuality Control

    Triplex : Virus / Internal Control / External Control

    � Controling the sample

    Internal Control : endogeneous mRNA (GAPDH) SAMPLE QUALITY

    EXTRACTION

    4

    External Control : synthetic ssRNA (EC-EXTR)

    (added to the sample prior to extracion)

    � Controling the assay

    Negative extraction Control : H2O

    Negative PCR Control : H2O

    Positive PCR Control : Synthetic RNA

    (IC, EC, BTV, FMD 3D, FMD 5UTR, CSF, AI)

    EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY

    PCR INHIBITION

    PCR REACTION

    CONTAMINATION

  • ValidationIntroduction

    � Validation of extraction and RT-qPCR

    � BTV spiked blood samples

    � Based on OIE manual (chapters 1.1.3 and 1.1.5) , internal procedure

    � Parameters to be determined :

    5

    Linearity & Efficiency

    Analytical Sensitivity (Limit of Detection)

    Analytical Specificity

    Intra- and Interrun repeatability

    Position effect

    Comparison with manual extraction

    Cross-contamination

    � Vandemeulebroucke et al. Proposal of a validation method for automated nucleic acid

    extraction and RT-qPCR analysis: an example with Bluetongue virus (in revision)

    Automated extraction procedure

  • ValidationLinearity & Efficiency

    � 10-fold dilution series of BTV spiked blood (-3.14 to 4.86 log10 TCID50 / ml)

    5 repeats/dilutionlinear regression analysis

    PCR efficiency E (%) :

    6

    PCR efficiency E (%) :

    100 x (101/slope -1)

    Linear range :

    -1.14 to 4.86 log10 TCID50 / ml

  • � 2-fold dilution series of BTV spiked blood25 repeatsprobit analysis

    Limit Of Detection (95%)

    ValidationAnalytical sensitivity

    7

    Limit Of Detection (95%)

    -1.04 log10 TCID50 / ml

    Limit Of Detection (95%)

    -2.04 log10 TCID50 / sample

  • � Genetically and clinically related viruses(based on the Fact Sheets of the Center for Food Security & Public Health, College of Vet. Med., Iowa State Universisty)

    ValidationAnalytical specificity

    8

    All were negative for BTV with BTV RT-qPCR

  • � 2-fold dilution series of BTV spiked blood5 repeats/run Intrarun repeatability5 runs Interrun repeatability Total CV (%)

    ValidationIntrarun and interrun repeatability

    9

  • � Positive spiked blood sample96 repeats/plate2 plates/runANOVA analysis

    � Comparison of :

    ValidationPosition effect

    10

    � Comparison of :plate 1 versus plate 2 (2 plates simultaneously)row-to-row (pipetting accuracy)column-to-column (pipetting accuracy)inner-to-outer plate (vacuum strenght)

    � plates : no effectcolumns : no effectrows : no effectinner-to-outer plate : no effect

  • � correlation manual vs automated set-up :153 spiked samplesPassing Bablok regression analysis

    ValidationCorrelation with manual extraction

    11

    intercept95% CI: -0,64 to 1,78slope95% CI: 0,93 to 1,01

    � Procedures interchangeable

  • � 48 BTV spiked positive samples & 48 negative samplescheckerboard pattern

    ValidationCross contamination

    Positive samples

    12

    Negative samples

  • Acknowledgements

    • Frank Vandenbussche, Molecular Platform

    • Kris De Clercq, Development of diagnostic tools for epizootic diseases

    • Yves Van Der Stede, Coordination Centre for Veterinary

    13

    • Yves Van Der Stede, Coordination Centre for Veterinary Diagnostics

    • Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre (VAR)

    • Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain