Propofol vs midazolam
-
Upload
sule-akin -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
237 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Propofol vs midazolam
Sule AkinSule Akin, Pinar Ergenoglu, Perran Poyraz, Anis Aribogan, Pinar Ergenoglu, Perran Poyraz, Anis Aribogan
Baskent University School of MedicineAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department Adana - TURKEY
Acute and fluctuating change in mental status
Inattention
Altered levels of consciousness
Incidence in orthopedic patients: 5.1% - 61%
May be before or after surgery
To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of IV propofol vs midazolam infusions for postoperative agitation/delirium
Epidural infusions for postoperative analgesia
High-risk patients with CRF
Major hip or knee operations
82 high-risk CRF patients
(ASA III, BUN>40 mg/dl, Serum Cr > 2)
Postoperatively agitation/delirium
Sedation/orientation levels; RASS / CAM-ICU
Sessler et al. AJRCCM 2002; 166: 1338-1344Ely, et al. JAMA 2003; 289: 2983-2991
The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale: The RASSScore
Term Description
+4 Combative Overtly combative, violent, immediate danger to staff
+3 Very agitated Pulls or removes tube(s) or catheter(s); aggressive
+2 Agitated Frequent non-purposeful movent, fights ventilator
+1 Restless Anxious but movements not aggressive vigorous
0 Alert and calm
-1 Drowsy Not fully alert, but has sustained awakening(eye-opening/eye contact) to voice (10 seconds)
-2 Light sedation Briefly awakens with eye contact to voice (<10 seconds)
-3 Moderate sedation
Movement or eye opening to voice (but no eye contact)
-4 Deep sedation No response to voice, but movement or eye openingto physical stimulation
-5 Unarousable No response to voice or physical stimulation
VerbalStimulation
Physical Stimulation
If RASS is -4 or -5, then Stop na Reassess patient at later timeIf RASS is above -4 (-3 through +4) then Proceed to Step 2
Confusion Assessment Method in the ICU (CAM – ICU)
1. Acute onset of change in mentalstatus or a fluctuating course
AND2. Inattention
3. Disorganised thinking 4. Altered level of consciousness
DELIRIUM
OR
Combined lumbar spinal/epidural anesthesia for surgery
Epidurally administered drugs in postoperative period;
Loading dose: 0.25% Bupivacaine 25 mg
Continuous dose: 0.125% bupivacaine 2-4 ml/h
Meperidin with PCA 2mg/bolus, if needed
GROUP P (n=40) GROUP M (n=42)
PROPOFOL MIDAZOLAM
Loading dose: 1-2 mg/kg IV bolus
Loading dose: 0.05-0.2 mg/kg IV bolus
Continuous dose: 1-3 mg/kg/h IV infusion
Continuous dose: 0.05-0.3 mg/kg/h IV infusion
RASS TARGET = +1 and -1
Hemodynamic parameters (HR, SABP, DABP)
SpO2
Sedation/agitation scales
Adverse events
p <0.05 values statistically significant
Groups were demographically comparable (p>0.05)
Group P reached target RASS scores earlier than Group M (p<0.05)
Hemodynamic values were significantly higher in Group M (p<0.05)
Epidural bupivacaine consumption was significantly lower in Group P (p<0.05)
No treatment required adverse events was seen in Group P (p>0.05)
GROUP P(n=40)
GROUP M(n=42)
Sex(F: female M: male)
F:16 (40%)M:24 (60%)
F:17 (40%)M:25 (60%)
Age (years old) 5816 5617
BUN (mg/dl) 5610 5414
Cr (mg/dl) 5.52 52
Hip surgery 21 (52.5%) 22 (52%)
Knee surgery 19 (47.5%) 20 (48%)
RASS SCORES
TIME (min)
IV propofol infusion may be an effective and safe
approach adjunct to epidural analgesia
for possible postoperative agitation/delirium
treatment after major orthopedic surgeries
in high-risk patients with CRF
THANK YOUTHANK YOU