property description PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS - NOT … daps/metro central... · peg gone peg gone peg...

HWS

27

1516

1718

2324

2526

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1920

2122

3,05

7 po

st

3,74

6 po

st

3,46

5 po

st

3,57

8 po

st

2,70

0 om

p

3,00

0 w

all

6,090 omp

6,840 post

2,49

0 om

p

2,08

3 om

p

19,340 6,500 1,670 1,200

20,424 omp20,688 wall

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

5,400

6,500

5,400

5,400

2,40

02,

400

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

400

600

900

300

3600 900 900 900 450 2700 450 900 900 900 3600

1800

2100

750

900

300

1250 2700fenced bin store withwash down facilities withdrain (10m2)

rendered blockwork acoustic timber paling acoustic perspex

sign with max. protrusion of 100mm


rendered blockworkV

SS

SS

S

SS

S

SS

SS

SS

S

bikes

bins

DRIVEWAY

FOOTPATH

LANDSCAPE

PLAYSPACE

SITE COVER

SITE COVERAGE: 771.27sqm 34.35%HARDSTAND: 743.95sqm 33.14%GFA: 631.00sqm 28.10%LANDSCAPE (inc. playspace): 701.16sqm 31.23%

OUTDOOR SPACE:REQUIRED - 644.00sqmUNENCUMBERED - 645.46sqm(including covered - 140.27sqm)

CAR PARKING:REQUIRED - 27

VISITORS (2.7x5.4m min) - 10STAFF (2.4x5.4m min) - 8 tandem (2.4x5.4m min) - 8DISABLED (2.4x5.4m min) - 1

TOTAL SPACES - 27

proposedchildcare

playspace 1

S

playspace

Power pole(High tension)


26.17

90 °0 '0 "25.95

Sign Post

BitumenSpeed Bump

BitumenSpeed Bump

Traffic IslandSign Post Sign Post

TreeØ 0.1mHt 4m

Ope

n D

rain

(top&gl) (top&

gl)(t

op&g

l)(top&gl)

0.9m Timber LogFence (Fair Cond.)

TreeØ 0.4mHt 3m

TreeØ 0.3mHt 2m

TreeØ 0.3mHt 4m

Sewer M/H(4.04)

Ref Nail at base of kerb A.H.D.level 3.98m (Established fromS.S.M. BAYSWATER 14A usingdata supplied by the GeodeticSection of Landgate)

Medium Grass


Non-Mount Non-Mount Non-Mount

DrainageM/H

Sand & Limestone

Medium Grass

TreeØ 0.3mHt 4m

Sand & Limestone

Grass Sign Post

Damaged

Medium Grass

Non-Mount

4.54.0

N e w t o n S t r e e tBitumen

Closest Wire To Boundary(High Tension)


Bitumen

Newton Street

BrickRet. Wall

( Bottom of pipe 2.87 )( Bottom of pit 2.47 )

( Bottom ofpipe 2.91 )




( Bottom of pit 2.19 )

Drainage M/HUnable tolift grate

3 .2 1

3 .7 6

3 .7 5

3.7

5

3 .2 4

4 .9 6

4 .8 04 .6 24 .5 24 .3 7

3 .8 93 .8 1

5 .59

5 .15

4 .7 4

4 .90

4 .56

4 .60

4 .1 6

4 .3 1

4.2

5

4 .2 9

4 .25

4 .42

4 .11

4 .04

3 .85

3 .83

3 .6 2

3 .7 5

3.8

4

3 .8 4

3.8

2

3 .7 7

3 .87

3 .92

3 .94

3.8

73

.94

3 .99

3 .9 5

3 .96

3.9

3

3 .8 7

3 .91

3 .98

3 .893

.39

3.6

1

3 .7 5

4 .0 74 .2 8

4 .1 6

3.4

4

3.6

2

3 .7 3

3.7

5

4 .38

4 .31

4 .78

4 .88

4 .82

4 .65

4 .50

4 .38

4 .48

4 .58

4 .78

4 .73

4 .72

4 .56

4 .38

4 .23

4 .114 .0

64 .3

0

4 .32

4 .43

4 .61

4 .65

4 .56

4 .30

4 .19

4 .58

4 .66

4 .58

4 .65

4 .62

4 .56

4 .26

4 .18

4 .40

4 .64

4 .78

4 .48

4 .09

4 .10

4 .45

3 .92

4 .37

3 .81

4 .13

3 .88 3 .9

7

3 .99

3 .94

3 .84

4 .04

3 .94 3 .9

3 4 .14

3 .98

4 .18

4 .714 .0

3

4 .40

4 .80

4 .5 8

4 .7 3

5 .7 7

5 .8 9

5 .8 3

5 .8 6

5 .7 3

5 .8 4

5 .7 1

5 .6 2

5 .7 24 .6 3

4 .6 5

4 .7 0

4 .6 8

5 .7 2

5 .6 0

5 .5 9

5 .6 1

5 .7 4

4 .86 4 .8 9

5 .0 6

5 .7 9

5 .6 5

5 .7 45 .8 7

5 .1 5

5 .2 9

5 .9 3

5 .8 0

5 .9 06 .0 3

5 .6 3

6 .1 0

5 .9 7

5 .8 35 .9 7

5 .3 1

5 .04

5 .16

5 .36

4.74

4.674.59

4.534.49

4.404.15

4.084.09

3.96

3.96

3.82

3 .6 73 .8 1 3 .7 5

3 .6 7 3.87

3.74

3.90

3.80 3.90

4.01 4.07

4 .10

14.6

90 °0 '0 "25.95

24.9

9

27.96

111°48'50"

90 °0 '0 "

35.3

7

27.96

111°48'40"

90 °0 '0 "83 °29 '0 "

44.1

4

74 °42 '45 " 22.79

111°48'40"

Damaged

5 .9 5

TR[

]

5 .8 6

TR[

]

5 .8 2

TR[

]

5 .7 4

TR[

]

Light Pole

5 .6 8

TR[

]

M/H(5.73)

5 .6 9

TR[

]

GullyPit

TR[

]5 .7 3

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Sem

i-Mou

nt

Steel Bollard Barrier Along Kerb




Sloping L/stone Rock Wall






Gu i l d f o rd RoadBitumen

VACANT

StakePut

StakePut

StakePut

Stake Found(Line Only)

Medium Grass

6.0

6.0

5.5

5.5

5.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

4.0

4.0

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

6 .0 7

5 .8 4

5 .7 9

6 .0 3

6 .0 2

6 .0 3

6 .0 4

6 .0 4

5 .9 5

6 .0 7

6 .1 5

6 .1 8

6 .21

6 .1 9

6 .2 0

6 .1 7 6 .2 6

6 .27

6 .2 2

6 .08

6 .1 3

6 .03

4 .51

4 .3 24 .2 0

4 .11

4 .25

4 .0 93 .98

4 .27

Semi-Mount

Traffic Island

Turning Lane

Turning Lane

Traffic Island

Traffic Island

4 .2 5

Valve(Metal)

Light Pole

Street Sign


Nil DamagedNon-Mount Non-Mount

Non-Mount( Bottom of

pipe 2.94 ) 4 .1 84 .0 34 .0 0

4 .2 1 3 .8 9 3 .8 1

3 .6 53 .6 5

3 .6 5

3 .7 3 3 .8 2 3 .9 3

4 .6 3 4 .8 84 .7 44 .5 24 .3 84 .2 6Non-Mount

Nil NilNil

( Bottom

of pit 2.48 )

VV

VV

V

VV

VV

FFL: 4.700

0.8

1.8m ACOUSTIC FENCE

1.5m POOL FENCE

0.2 INDICATIVE RETAINING HEIGHT

(AS PER ACOUSTIC REPORT)

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.6 0.4

0.6

ramp 1:14 (max)

ramp

1:14

(max

)

92 PLACES16 STAFF

ACTIVITY 1 10 PLACES 2 STAFFACTIVITY 2 12 PLACES 3 STAFFACTIVITY 3 20 PLACES 2 STAFFACTIVITY 4 20 PLACES 2 STAFFACTIVITY 5 10 PLACES 2 STAFFACTIVITY 6 20 PLACES 4 STAFF

FLOOD FRINGE

SIGN

Newton Street

0.6

PROPOSED ACOUSTIC FENCINGGuildford Road

SIGN

2.1m ACOUSTIC FENCE(AS PER ACOUSTIC REPORT)

N

Proposed Site PlanScale 1:200

PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.propertydescriptionsite: Lot 180, 181 & 182number: 7-11street: NEWTON STREETlocality: BAYSWATER WA 6053rp: P3405 area: 2245m²

I/ WE APPROVE THESE DRAWINGS TO BE CORRECT AS PERCONTRACT

rev. COULSTON GROUPdate description

client details:

N2SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

drawn:

-1 of 4

DATE

DATE

Sheet SizePROPOSED SITEPLAN 17078

designed:

A2

sheets in set

drawing scales

checked:

fasade typeorientation drawing job numberwind rating drawing title drawn date:

JM RT

Dimensions shall not be obtained by scaling.All dimensions are in millimeters unless notedotherwise. Setout dimensions shall be verifiedon site prior to any work being carried out. Anyproblems shall be directed to the builder forclarification & correction

as shown

CLIENT

15/08/2017

JODIE MARKe. [email protected]

p. 07 3393 91596/1631 WYNNUM ROAD, TINGALPA QLD 4173PH: (07) 3393 9159

ABN: 25 890 335 667BSA: 1142338

7-11 NEWTON STREETBAYSWATER WA 6053

RP: P3405

-local council: CITY OF BAYSWATER

D 04/07/17 Updated DA PlansE 26/07/17 Flood Plan Overlay AddedF 07/08/17 Minor Amendments to Site PlanG 15/08/17 Acoustic Fencing Updated

12-0

9FG

920

920

12-1

5FG

920

920

12-15FG

06-06AW 06-06AW06-06AW21-06DH21-06DH24-21 24-3624-36

09-12SW

920

21-0

6SW

920

820

920

12-1

2FG

920

920

12-2

4FG

12-24FG 12-15FG920920 920

12-24FG 12-24FG920 920

12-2

4FG

920

12-2

4FG

12-24FG 12-24FG 820820

21-1

8SW

24-2

4

820

820

12-0

9FG

920

920

820

820

12-12FG 12-15SW920

21-18SW21-18SW920 24-2124-36

12-1

2FG

12-0

6FG

12-0

5FG

920

920

12-12FG

12-0

9FG

1020

24-36

21-1

8SW

21-1

8SW

24-3

6

09-1

5SW

920

920

12-2

1FG

920

21-06DH 21-06DH 21-06DH24-21

09-1

8SW

12-1

8SW

09-1

8SW

21-18SW 24-36

24-3024-21

06-06FG 06-06FG 06-06FG

12-1

5FG

620

620

HWS

REF.

REF

.R

EF.

REF.

T

1,200 5,470 7,560 6,760 17,800 7,550 2,850

2,570 4,100 24,140 4,140 11,390 2,850

1,05

09,

560

2,39

06,

610

620

2,05

5

49,190

22,4

80

1,54

03,

510

2,76

03,

860

7,76

095

02,

100

49,190

22,3

30

kitchen

bath 3

prep 3/store

HB

CM

HB

CM

S

reception

verandah

office

foyerentry

activity 620 PLACES 65.00sqm REQ.UNENCUMBERED 67.29sqm

bath 1

prep 1/store

HB

CMB

HBCM

S



staff/program

WMSPACE

CS

S

O/H

R/H

HB

DW

disabledPDR

FOLDINGSEAT

SHR

sleepUNENCUMBERED 23.05sqm



CM

HB

SHR

ambpdr

DESK

LOCK

ER

storestore

ldry

bath 2

verandah

verandah

vera

nd

ah

09-27AW

store

(24<36months)

(4 staff)

(over 36months)

(2 staff)

(0<24months)

(3 staff)

(24<36months)

(2 staff)

(over 36months)

(2 staff)

SCREEN

STOR

E

PTY


(24<36months)

(2 staff)

AREAID

CentreVerandah

Area631.00140.27

771.27 m²0 5 10

N

Proposed Floor PlanScale 1:100

PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.



client details:

N2SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

drawn:

-2 of 4

DATE

DATE

Sheet SizePROPOSED FLOORPLAN 17078

designed:

A2

sheets in set

drawing scales

checked:


JM RT


as shown

CLIENT

15/08/2017



ABN: 25 890 335 667BSA: 1142338


RP: P3405



2,74

0

u/s trusses

slab level

n.g.l

boundary

2,74

0

u/s trusses

slab level

boundary

2,74

0

u/s trusses

slab level

boundary

2,74

0

6,97

0

u/s trusses

slab level

o/a height

n.g.l

4 North ElevationScale 1:100

3 East ElevationScale 1:100

2 South ElevationScale 1:100

1 West ElevationScale 1:100

PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.



client details:

N2SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

drawn:

-3 of 4

DATE

DATE

Sheet SizePROPOSEDELEVATIONS 17078

designed:

A2

sheets in set

drawing scales

checked:


JM RT


as shown

CLIENT

15/08/2017



ABN: 25 890 335 667BSA: 1142338


RP: P3405



Midland Brick - Whitecliffe(DOUBLE HEIGHT BRICK)Midland Brick - Contempo Black

(STACK BOND)

Dulux - Winter Palace(RENDER)

Dulux - Pre School(RENDER)

Colorbond - Surfmist(ROOF)

Dulux - Pre School(TEXTURE COAT)

Dulux - Sundance(RENDER)

Colorbond - Basalt(FASCIA & GUTTER)

Colorbond - Monument(POSTS & POOL FENCING)

Dulux - YOUNG LEAF(RENDER)

Dulux - YOUNG LEAF(EXTERNAL PAINT)



client details:

N2SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

drawn:

-4 of 4

DATE

DATE

Sheet SizePERSPECTIVES 17078designed:

A2

sheets in set

drawing scales

checked:


JM RT


as shown

CLIENT

15/08/2017



ABN: 25 890 335 667BSA: 1142338


RP: P3405



Power pole

(High tension)


26.17 25.95

Sign Post

Tree

Ht 4m

Tree

Ht 5m

Open

Dra

in

Tree

Ht 2m

Tree

Ht 4m

Medium Grass

Non-MountNon-Mount

DrainageM/H

Sand & Limestone

Medium Grass

Tree

Ht 4mSand & Limestone

Grass Sign Post

Damaged

Medium Grass

Non-Mount

Bitumen

Closest Wire To Boundary

(High Tension)Closest Wire To Boundary

(High Tension)

Bitumen

BrickRet. Wall

Unable tolift grate

14.6

25.95

24

.99

27.9635.3

7

27.96

44.1

4

22.79

Damaged

Light Pole

M/H(5.73)

GullyPit

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Sem

i-M

ount

Thick Grass Cover

Thick Grass Cover

Thick Grass Cover











Bitumen

VACANT

StakePut

StakePut

StakePut


Medium Grass

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

Semi-Mount

Traffic Island

Turning Lane

Turning Lane

Traffic Island

Traffic Island

Valve(Metal)

Light Pole

Street Sign



Non-MountNon-Mount

Nil NilNil

proposedchildcareRL: 4.59 (tbc)

area:

PERTH OFFICEP: +61 8 6336 9299F: +61 8 6336 9288E: [email protected] GOODWOOD PARADEBURSWOOD WA 6100P.O. BOX 134BURSWOOD WA 6100

The location of underground cables are approximateonly and their exact position should be checked onsite. No guarantee is given that all existing cablesand services are shown. Locate all undergroundcables and services before commencement of work.Refer to Worksafe Regulation 3.21.

Stormwater Design Criteria

Design Storm Event 1 in 10 years

Storage requirement - 48.3 m3Infiltration Rate Applied - 2 m/dayStorage Provided - 50.5 m3

Ground Water Level from Atlas - 4-5m below NGL

Notes:

1. The location of gully pits and soakwellsis indicative only and subject to finalearthworks design and grading.2. Permeability rates and ground waterlevel are subject to confirmation byGeotechnical Engineers.

Development Application AC 18/07/17

HWS

27

1516

1718

2324

2526

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1920

2122

3,05

7 po

st

3,74

6 po

st

3,46

5 po

st

3,57

8 po

st

2,70

0 om

p

3,00

0 w

all

6,090 omp

6,840 post

2,49

0 om

p

2,08

3 om

p

19,340 6,500 1,670 1,200

20,424 omp20,688 wall

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

5,400

6,500

5,400

5,400

2,40

02,

400

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

400

600

900

300

3600 900 900 900 450 2700 450 900 900 900 3600

1800

fenced bin store withwash down facilities withdrain (10m2)



VS

SS

SS

SS

S

SS

SS

SS

S

bikes

bins

DRIVEWAY

FOOTPATH

LANDSCAPE

PLAYSPACE

SITE COVER





TOTAL SPACES - 27

proposedchildcare

playspace 1

Splayspace



26.17

90 °0 '0 "25.95

Sign Post

BitumenSpeed Bump

BitumenSpeed Bump


TreeØ 0.1mHt 4m

Ope

n D

rain

(top&gl) (top&

gl)(t

op&g

l)(top&gl)


TreeØ 0.4mHt 3m

TreeØ 0.3mHt 2m

TreeØ 0.3mHt 4m

Sewer M/H(4.04)


Medium Grass



DrainageM/H

Sand & Limestone

Medium Grass

TreeØ 0.3mHt 4m

Sand & Limestone

Grass Sign Post

Damaged

Medium Grass

Non-Mount

4.54.0




Bitumen

Newton Street

BrickRet. Wall








3 .2 1

3 .7 6

3 .7 5

3.7

5

3 .2 4

4 .9 6

4 .8 04 .6 24 .5 24 .3 7

3 .8 93 .8 1

5 .59

5 .15

4 .7 4

4 .90

4 .56

4 .60

4 .1 6

4 .3 1

4.2

5

4 .2 9

4 .25

4 .42

4 .11

4 .04

3 .85

3 .83

3 .6 2

3 .7 5

3.8

4

3 .8 4

3.8

2

3 .7 7

3 .87

3 .92

3 .94

3.8

73

.94

3 .99

3 .9 5

3 .96

3.9

3

3 .8 7

3 .91

3 .98

3 .893

.39

3.6

1

3 .7 5

4 .0 74 .2 8

4 .1 6

3.4

4

3.6

2

3 .7 3

3.7

5

4 .38

4 .31

4 .78

4 .88

4 .82

4 .65

4 .50

4 .38

4 .48

4 .58

4 .78

4 .73

4 .72

4 .56

4 .38

4 .23

4 .114 .0

64 .3

0

4 .32

4 .43

4 .61

4 .65

4 .56

4 .30

4 .19

4 .58

4 .66

4 .58

4 .65

4 .62

4 .56

4 .26

4 .18

4 .40

4 .64

4 .78

4 .48

4 .09

4 .10

4 .45

3 .92

4 .37

3 .81

4 .13

3 .88 3 .9

7

3 .99

3 .94

3 .84

4 .04

3 .94 3 .9

3 4 .14

3 .98

4 .18

4 .714 .0

3

4 .40

4 .80

4 .5 8

4 .7 3

5 .7 7

5 .8 9

5 .8 3

5 .8 6

5 .7 3

5 .8 4

5 .7 1

5 .6 2

5 .7 24 .6 3

4 .6 5

4 .7 0

4 .6 8

5 .7 2

5 .6 0

5 .5 9

5 .6 1

5 .7 4

4 .86 4 .8 9

5 .0 6

5 .7 9

5 .6 5

5 .7 45 .8 7

5 .1 5

5 .2 9

5 .9 3

5 .8 0

5 .9 06 .0 3

5 .6 3

6 .1 0

5 .9 7

5 .8 35 .9 7

5 .3 1

5 .04

5 .16

5 .36

4.74

4.674.59

4.534.49

4.404.15

4.084.09

3.96

3.96

3.82

3 .6 73 .8 1 3 .7 5

3 .6 7 3.87

3.74

3.90

3.80 3.90

4.01 4.07

4 .10

14.6

90 °0 '0 "25.95

24.9

9

27.96

111°48'50"

90 °0 '0 "

35.3

7

27.96

111°48'40"

90 °0 '0 "83 °29 '0 "

44.1

4

74 °42 '45 " 22.79

111°48'40"

Damaged

5 .9 5

TR[

]

5 .8 6

TR[

]

5 .8 2

TR[

]

5 .7 4

TR[

]

Light Pole

5 .6 8

TR[

]

M/H(5.73)

5 .6 9

TR[

]

GullyPit

TR[

]5 .7 3

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Sem

i-Mou

nt












VACANT

StakePut

StakePut

StakePut


Medium Grass

6.0

6.0

5.5

5.5

5.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

4.0

4.0

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

6 .0 7

5 .9 8

5 .8 4

5 .7 9

6 .0 3

6 .0 2

6 .0 3

6 .0 4

6 .0 4

5 .9 5

6 .0 7

6 .1 5

6 .1 8

6 .21

6 .1 9

6 .2 0

6 .1 7 6 .2 6

6 .27

6 .2 2

6 .08

6 .1 3

6 .03

4 .51

4 .3 24 .2 0

4 .11

4 .25

4 .0 93 .98

4 .27

Semi-Mount

Traffic Island

Turning Lane

Turning Lane

Traffic Island

Traffic Island

4 .2 5

Valve(Metal)

Light Pole

Street Sign




pipe 2.94 ) 4 .1 84 .0 34 .0 0

4 .2 1 3 .8 9 3 .8 1

3 .6 53 .6 5

3 .6 5

3 .7 3 3 .8 2 3 .9 3

4 .6 3 4 .8 84 .7 44 .5 24 .3 84 .2 6Non-Mount

Nil NilNil

( Bottom

of pit 2.48 )

VV

VV

V

VV

VV

FFL: 4.700

0.8

ACOUSTIC FENCE

1.5m POOL FENCE



0.2

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.6 0.4

0.6

ramp 1:14 (max)

ramp

1:14

(max

)

92 PLACES16 STAFF


FLOOD FRINGE

SIGN

PROPOSED FENCING (Guildford Road and Newton Street)

0.6

N





client details:

N2SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

drawn:

-1 of 4

DATE

DATE


designed:

A2

sheets in set

drawing scales

checked:


JM RT


as shown

CLIENT

9/08/2017



ABN: 25 890 335 667BSA: 1142338


RP: P3405


C 29/06/17 DA PlansD 04/07/17 Updated DA PlansE 26/07/17 Flood Plan Overlay AddedF 07/08/17 Minor Amendments to Site Plan

9-MS 02

9-BABSM21-LOM TAN

Mud kitchen

Sto

rage

Loos

epa

rts

EGG

CO

LLEC

TOR

Active play

Loos

epa

rts

RWT

16-SZBC

8-WSTF

24-LOM TAN

14-RSM5-TKRO

4-RSM

4-RSM5-WSTF

29-SZBC3-RSM

4-RSM

4-WSTF

1-TKRO

1-TKRO

1-TKRO

6-SZBC

12-SZBC

1-TKRO

9-RSM

10-RSM

6-RSM

4-DILCN7-DILCN

4-CIT

1-TKRO

11-PhorT

6-LOM TAN

11-LOM TAN

11-LOM TAN

4-LOM TAN

1-TKRO 1-TKRO4-RSM

7-SZBC

1-TKRO2-PhorT

3-BINTEG

2-BINTEG

1-ACDL 8-DRWN

6-DRWN

6-WSTF

3-SZBC

18-LOM TAN1-ACDL

10-LOM TAN

5-DILCN

2-SZBC

4-RSM

2-PhorT 3-PhorT

5-LOM TAN

5-LOM TAN

4-LOM TAN

2-TKRO

9-MS 02

1-TKRO

9-BABSM27-LOM TAN 21-LOM TAN

1-BINTEG

1-BINTEG

14-SZBC

1-ACDL

Drawing Name: Dwg No:

Sheet No:Scale:

Date:

Revision:

Drawn by:

Job No:

Notes:

Rev. Date Description By

Plot Date:Drawn to AS1100 Dimensions in Millimetres Do not ScaleProject Name:

Copyright

C

Northpoint Client:

File Name:

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

7

8

8

9

9

10

10

11

11

12

12

A A

B B

C C

D D

E E

F F

G G

H H

Sheet:

Licence number: 179707C. ABN: 19984073404www.growandco.com.au

Newton Street, BAYSWATER WA, Coulston Group.vwx

8/9/17

LPP01

16/3/15

Landscape Planting Plan

GA

1:200 @ A1

For Development Application Only

1 of 1BWTR01

Newton Street, Bayswater

A1

COULSTON GROUP

Plant List - Little Miracles, WamberalID Qty Latin Name Common Name Scheduled SizeACDL 3 Corymbia ficifolia Red flowering Gum 75LBABSM 18 Babingtonia virgata 'Howie's Sweet Midget'Heath MyrtleBINTEG 7 Banksia prionotes Acorn banksia 45LCIT 4 Citrus Assorted Citrus 25LDILCN 16 Dillwynia cinerascens Grey Parrot PeaDRWN 14 Darwinia citriodora Lemon-scented Myrtle 200mmLOM TAN 167 Lomandra Tanika Lomandra tubestockMS 02 18 Callistemon viminalis ‘Little John’ Weeping BottlebrushPhorT 18 Phormium tenax New Zealand Flax 300mmRSM 62 Rhaphiolepis snow maiden Snow Maiden 300mmSZBC 89 Syzygium australe ‘Bush Christmas’ Bush Christmas 25LTKRO 16 Cupaniopsis anacardioides Tuckeroo 100LWSTF 23 Westringia fruticosa 'Zena' Coastal Rosemary 300mm

Protect and Retain existing street tree




HWS

27

1516

1718

2324

2526

12

34

56

78

910

1112

1314

1920

2122

3,05

7 po

st

3,74

6 po

st

3,46

5 po

st

3,57

8 po

st

2,70

0 om

p

3,00

0 w

all

6,090 omp

6,840 post

2,49

0 om

p

2,08

3 om

p

19,340 6,500 1,670 1,200

20,424 omp20,688 wall

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

5,400

6,500

5,400

5,400

2,40

02,

400

2,70

02,

700

2,70

02,

700

2,40

02,

400

2,40

02,

400

400

600

900

300

3600 900 900 900 450 2700 450 900 900 900 3600

1800

fenced bin store withwash down facilities withdrain (10m2)



VS

SS

SS

SS

S

SS

SS

SS

S

bikes

bins

DRIVEWAY

FOOTPATH

LANDSCAPE

PLAYSPACE

SITE COVER





TOTAL SPACES - 27

proposedchildcare

playspace 1

S

playspace



26.1790 °0 '0 "25.95

Sign Post

BitumenSpeed Bump

BitumenSpeed Bump


TreeØ 0.1mHt 4m

Ope

n D

rain

(top&gl) (top&

gl)(t

op&g

l)(top&gl)


TreeØ 0.4mHt 3m

TreeØ 0.3mHt 2m

TreeØ 0.3mHt 4m

Sewer M/H(4.04)


Medium Grass



DrainageM/H

Sand & Limestone

Medium Grass

TreeØ 0.3mHt 4m

Sand & Limestone

Grass Sign Post

Damaged

Medium Grass

Non-Mount

4.54.0




Bitumen

Newton Street

BrickRet. Wall








3 .2 1

3 .7 6

3 .7 5

3.7

5

3 .2 4

4 .9 6

4 .8 04 .6 24 .5 24 .3 7

3 .8 93 .8 1

5 .59

5 .15

4 .7 4

4 .90

4 .56

4 .60

4 .1 6

4 .3 1

4.2

5

4 .2 9

4 .25

4 .42

4 .11

4 .04

3 .85

3 .83

3 .6 2

3 .7 5

3.8

4

3 .8 4

3.8

2

3 .7 7

3 .87

3 .92

3 .94

3.8

73

.94

3 .99

3 .9 5

3 .96

3.9

3

3 .8 7

3 .91

3 .98

3 .893

.39

3.6

1

3 .7 5

4 .0 74 .2 8

4 .1 6

3.4

4

3.6

2

3 .7 3

3.7

5

4 .38

4 .31

4 .78

4 .88

4 .82

4 .65

4 .50

4 .38

4 .48

4 .58

4 .78

4 .73

4 .72

4 .56

4 .38

4 .23

4 .114 .0

64 .3

0

4 .32

4 .43

4 .61

4 .65

4 .56

4 .30

4 .19

4 .58

4 .66

4 .58

4 .65

4 .62

4 .56

4 .26

4 .18

4 .40

4 .64

4 .78

4 .48

4 .09

4 .10

4 .45

3 .92

4 .37

3 .81

4 .13

3 .88 3 .9

7

3 .99

3 .94

3 .84

4 .04

3 .94 3 .9

3 4 .14

3 .98

4 .18

4 .714 .0

3

4 .40

4 .80

4 .5 8

4 .7 3

5 .7 7

5 .8 9

5 .8 3

5 .8 6

5 .7 3

5 .8 4

5 .7 1

5 .6 2

5 .7 24 .6 3

4 .6 5

4 .7 0

4 .6 8

5 .7 2

5 .6 0

5 .5 9

5 .6 1

5 .7 4

4 .86 4 .8 9

5 .0 6

5 .7 9

5 .6 5

5 .7 45 .8 7

5 .1 5

5 .2 9

5 .9 3

5 .8 0

5 .9 06 .0 3

5 .6 3

6 .1 0

5 .9 7

5 .8 35 .9 7

5 .3 1

5 .04

5 .16

5 .36

4.74

4.674.59

4.534.49

4.404.15

4.084.09

3.96

3.96

3.82

3 .6 73 .8 1 3 .7 5

3 .6 7 3.87

3.74

3.90

3.80 3.90

4.01 4.07

4 .10

14.6

90 °0 '0 "25.9524

.99

27.96

111°48'50"

90 °0 '0 "

35.3

7

27.96

111°48'40"

90 °0 '0 "83 °29 '0 "

44.1

4

74 °42 '45 " 22.79

111°48'40"

Damaged

5 .9 5

TR[

]

5 .8 6

TR[

]

5 .8 2

TR[

]

5 .7 4

TR[

]

Light Pole

5 .6 8

TR[

]

M/H(5.73)

5 .6 9

TR[

]

GullyPit

TR[

]5 .7 3

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Concrete Bollard

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Semi-Mount

Sem

i-Mou

nt












VACANT

StakePut

StakePut

StakePut


Medium Grass

6.0

6.0

5.5

5.5

5.0

4.5

4.5

5.0

4.0

4.0

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

PEGGONE

6 .0 7

5 .9 8

5 .8 4

5 .7 9

6 .0 3

6 .0 2

6 .0 3

6 .0 4

6 .0 4

5 .9 5

6 .0 7

6 .1 5

6 .1 8

6 .21

6 .1 9

6 .2 0

6 .1 7 6 .2 6

6 .27

6 .2 2

6 .08

6 .1 3

6 .03

4 .51

4 .3 24 .2 0

4 .11

4 .25

4 .0 93 .98

4 .27

Semi-Mount

Traffic Island

Turning Lane

Turning Lane

Traffic Island

Traffic Island

4 .2 5

Valve(Metal)

Light Pole

Street Sign




pipe 2.94 ) 4 .1 84 .0 34 .0 0

4 .2 1 3 .8 9 3 .8 1

3 .6 53 .6 5

3 .6 5

3 .7 3 3 .8 2 3 .9 3

4 .6 3 4 .8 84 .7 44 .5 24 .3 84 .2 6Non-Mount

Nil NilNil

( Bottom

of pit 2.48 )

VV

VV

V

VV

VV

FFL: 4.700

0.8

ACOUSTIC FENCE

1.5m POOL FENCE



0.2

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.6 0.4

0.6

ramp 1:14 (max)

ramp

1:14

(max

)

92 PLACES16 STAFF


FLOOD FRINGE

SIGN

PROPOSED FENCING (Guildford Road and Newton Street)

0.6

N





client details:

N2SIGNATURE

SIGNATURE

drawn:

-1 of 4

DATE

DATE


designed:

A2

sheets in set

drawing scales

checked:


JM RT


as shown

CLIENT

9/08/2017



ABN: 25 890 335 667BSA: 1142338


RP: P3405


C 29/06/17 DA PlansD 04/07/17 Updated DA PlansE 26/07/17 Flood Plan Overlay AddedF 07/08/17 Minor Amendments to Site Plan

Mud kitchen

Sto

rage

Loos

epa

rts

EGG

CO

LLEC

TOR

Active play

Loos

epa

rts

RWT

Drawing Name: Dwg No:

Sheet No:Scale:

Date:

Revision:

Drawn by:

Job No:

Notes:

Rev. Date Description By

Plot Date:Drawn to AS1100 Dimensions in Millimetres Do not ScaleProject Name:

Copyright

C

Northpoint Client:

File Name:

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

7

8

8

9

9

10

10

11

11

12

12

A A

B B

C C

D D

E E

F F

G G

H H

Sheet:

Licence number: 179707C. ABN: 19984073404www.growandco.com.au

Newton Street, BAYSWATER WA, Coulston Group.vwx

27/10/16

LMCP01

23/10/16

Playspace Concept Plan

GA

1:100 @ A1

For Development Application Only

1 of 1BWTR01

Newton Street, Bayswater

A1

COULSTON GROUP0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Raised deck with stepped access for grossmotor development

Raised planter box

Synthetic grass including low mounds

Raised planter box

Grab handles to totter wall

Raised planter box

Small deck for tummy and back play

Loose parts play zone

'Secret' garden space

Sandpit with cantileveredshade umbrella over

Sandpit storage

'Secret Garden' Passive nook

1200h flat top pool fencing (black)

Loose parts play zone- hardwood timber seat enclosed area for buiding, sorting & stacking

Active play zone

Long pile synthetic grass to active play zone (running, ball games, etc)

Hardwood timber seat

Concrete stepping stones

350mm high hardwood timber deck/ performance stage

Concrete sweeping edge to sand pit

400mm of sand to in-ground sand pit

Channels in concrete surround to direct water flow to sand pit

Water pump on 300mm high hardwood timber deck

Timber ballance beams to max 400mm high

Easy clean paving to Arts & Craft area

Secret garden room


Long pile synthetic grass to active play zone


Log seat/ divider

Trellis/ outdoor learning

Composting

Egg collector

Chicken coop

Chicken run

Citrus grove

Raised vegetable planters

Colourbond rainwater tank harvesting roofwaterfor vegetable garden

Sustainability zone"Bug motel" habitat sculpture

Stingless native bee hive on fence

Gated access for supervised interaction

Paving to verandah areas

Gated access to car park

Arts & Craft

SCALE BAR:

0-2's yard

3-5's yard

Shade sails over

Shade sail over- attach to eaves (subject to engineering confirmation)

Sandstone boulders

Shade sail over- attach to eaves (subject to engineering confirmation)

Active play zone

Balance beam Planting to street frontage

APPENDIX B TRANSPORT STATEMENT

PO Box Z5578

Perth WA 6831

0413 607 779 Mobile

Issued on 15 August 2017 Amendments

V2 Plan amended Version V2

Reference 930

COULSTON GROUP

PROPOSED CHILDCARE CENTRE

7 NEWTON STREET, BAYSWATER

PARKING AND TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT

August 2017

Newton Street Child Care Centre

2

T rafficandT ransportationConsultants

CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 THE SITE AND SURROUNDING ROAD NETWORK

3.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT

5.0 PARKING AND MANAGEMENT

5.0 PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT


3


1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Riley Consulting has been commissioned by Coulston Group to prepare a traffic and

parking statement for a proposed child care centre at 7 Newton Street, Bayswater. The

findings of this report are:

• The proposed childcare centre is forecast to generate about 358 vehicle movements

per day. Assessment of the traffic demands indicates the development would have

no material impact to the operation of the local road network.

• Traffic increases to the local road network are shown to have no material impact to

intersection operation during the busiest morning peak period. During the evening

peak the traffic demands are lower and more spread.

• Parking in accordance with the requirements of the City of Bayswater’s TPS is

provided.


4


2.0 THE SITE AND SURROUNDING ROAD NETWORK

The site is located to the south eastern side of Newton Street and to the north of Guildford

Road in Bayswater. The location of the site is shown in Figure 1. Roads of significance to

the development site are considered below.

Figure 1 Site Location

Newton Street

Newton Street is classified as a local distributor road in the Main Roads Functional Road

Hierarchy. It provides for a single lane of traffic in each direction and has a pavement width

of approximately 7.2 metres. The street is residential in nature, but has been developed with

higher density dwellings. Newton Street provides the connection between the major links of

Whatley Crescent and Guildford Road. However, the connection is circuitous and not

considered as a major traffic route.

Its intersection with Guildford Road is priority controlled with Newton Street traffic required

to yield to Guildford Road. All movements are permitted and a right turn pocket is provided

on Guildford Road.


5


No traffic data is available for Newton Street. A morning peak hour traffic count of the

Guildford Road / Newton Street intersection has been undertaken and recorded 86 two-way

movements. The data is attached at Appendix A. Based on the morning peak equating to

10% of the daily volume, it is calculated that Newton Street would pass about 900 vehicles

per day (vpd). Reference to Appendix B indicates that a single carriageway road would have

capacity to pass 13,500vpd at Level of Service D. Based on the road hierarchy, Newton

Street would be appropriate to carry up to 7,000vpd.

MRWA crash data indicates 2 crashes in the past 5 years at the intersection of Newton

Street and Guildford Road.. One crash resulted in casualty, considered to be a right turn

crash at night. The level of crashes recorded is not considered significant.

Guildford Road

Guildford Road is classified as a primary distributor in the Main Roads Functional Road

Hierarchy. Its care and control fall to Main Roads. It is constructed with two lanes in each

direction a central median and a right turn pocket in the vicinity of the subject site. Grade

separated access is provided to the Tonkin Highway approximately 200 metres east of

Newton Street.

Traffic data available on the Main Roads website shows 37,378vpd to the west of Tonkin

Highway (adjacent to the subject site). The data is attached at Appendix A. Reference to

Appendix B indicates that a 4 lane road would have capacity to pass 40,500vpd at Level of

Service D. However, as a major arterial route higher traffic demands can be accommodated,

but would result in additional delays being experienced in peak periods.

The Proposed Development

It is proposed to develop the site to provide a childcare centre accommodating up to 92

children. 16 staff will work on the site. A concept layout for the proposed development is

shown in Figure 2.


6


Figure 2 Concept Development Plan (refer to DA plans)


7


3.0 TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION

The existing site is vacant and generates no traffic movements. The proposed development

is for a childcare centre catering for up to 92 children.

Surveys of five child care centres have been undertaken in the Perth metropolitan region.

Table 1 provides a summary of the forecast traffic generation based on the surveys.

Table 1 Forecast Traffic Generation Landuse VehicleTrips

8am–9am 5pm–6pm Daily

Existing 0 0 0

ChildCare 77(40in) 44(20in) 358

ChangetoLocalTraffic +77 +44 +358

The survey data indicates that in the morning peak 52% of traffic arrives (includes staff

arrivals) and in the evening peak 55% of traffic departs (includes staff departures).

Reference to the RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments (NSW) indicates a 92

place child care centre would be expected to generate 77 trips over the two hour period

7am and 9am. It can be seen that the Perth data is reflective of local conditions.

Distribution

Traffic attracted to the childcare centre will be drawn from the surrounding residential areas,

with many parents dropping children off on their way to work. During the morning peak

period survey, the major traffic movements were the right turn into Newton Street and the

left turn out. Reference to Google Maps indicates that there are existing facilities to the west

of the subject site, on the south side of Guildford Road (easier drop-off). However, there are

few facilities for traffic heading east. It is considered therefore that the attraction to access

the Tonkin Highway can be expected to be the main drop-off route for the proposed facility.

For the purpose of this report, the following morning peak distribution is estimated:

Whatley Crescent 20% arrive 10% depart

Guildford Road east 30% arrive 60% depart

Guildford Road west 50% arrive 30% depart

The daily and peak hour movements anticipated are shown in Appendix B.


8


4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT

Reference to the WAPC Transport Assessment Guidelines for Developments (Volume 4)

states that:

“where a traffic increase as a result of a proposed development is less than 10% of

current road capacity, it would not normally have a material impact”.

The WAPC guidelines further state that:

“For ease of assessment, an increase of 100 vehicles per hour for any lane can be

considered as equating to around 10% of capacity. Therefore any section of road where

traffic would increase flows by more than 100 vehicles per hour for any lane should be

included in the analysis”.

Based on the forecast traffic generation of the proposed childcare centres, it can be seen

that the peak traffic demand is 77 vehicles, occurring during the morning peak period 8am

to 9am. It can be seen that the development will generate less than 100 vehicles to any

traffic lane in any hour. The WAPC guidelines would therefore deem that the proposed

development would have no material impact.

The proposed childcare centre will have no material impact under WAPC guidelines.

Table 2 shows the daily attraction and the anticipated impact that could occur to the

surrounding road network.

Table 2 Increases to Local Road Network

Road DailyFlow Development Capacity %

NewtonStreetN 900vpd +58vpd 13,500 <1%

NewtonStreetS 900vpd +300vpd 13,500 2.2%

GuildfordRoadeast 36,872vpd +154vpd 40,500 <1%

GuildfordRoadwest 36,872vpd +146vpd 40,500 <1%

It can be seen from Table 2 that the increases to the surrounding road network are low.

The increase to Guildford Road is less than 1% of capacity and under the WAPC guidelines

would be deemed to have no material impact.


9


The increase to Newton Street north of the subject site is also shown to have no material

impact with an increase of less than 1% of capacity. However, the impact is greater at 6%

when considered in regard to the current daily traffic flow of 900vpd. Newton Street will

continue to operate with daily traffic flows in the order of 1,000vpd and residential amenity

would not be adversely affected.

Between the site and Guildford Road the majority of the traffic increase is forecast. The

increase of about 300vpd is an increase of over 30% of the current daily demand. Although

proportionately high, the resultant volume is well below 7,000vpd, being the acceptable

volume for the road classification, Indeed the resultant volume is below 1,500vpd and under

Liveable Neighbourhoods would be considered to have excellent residential amenity.

Peak Hour Impacts

Although the proposal is shown to have no material impact in regard to the daily traffic flow

changes, Sidra analysis is undertaken of the Newton Street / Guildford Road intersection to

determine the future operation with the proposed development.

Table 3 shows the morning peak hour assessment of the existing situation (the Sidra model

is calibrated to reflect existing queues and delays) and the expected impacts of the

proposed development.

Table 3 Newton Street / Guildford Road AM Peak Hour Approach Existing Future

V/C Delay LoS V/C Delay LoS

GuildfordRoadwest

Left

Though

0.472

0.472

5.9s

0s

A

A

0.480

0.480

6s

0s

A

A

NewtonStreet

Left

Right

0.061

0.061

11s

15s

B

B

0.124

0.124

11s

15s

B

B

GuildfordRoadEast

Right

Though

0.120

0.240

6.7s

0s

A

A

0.154

0.240

7.1s

0s

A

A


10


Table 3 indicates that the existing intersection has capacity to accommodate the forecast

traffic increases associated with the proposed development. No changes to the current

Levels of Service are forecast and delays currently experienced are shown to marginally

change. It is concluded that the proposed development will have no material impact to the

operation of the Newton Street / Guildford Road intersection.

In the longer term it is anticipated that traffic demands may increase on Guildford Road and

additional delays at Newton Street will occur. This situation will occur regardless of any

development. The traffic associated with the child care facility may change as children grow

and leave and other children take their place. The land use is therefore flexible in traffic

terms, to accommodate road network changes without significant impact to trade.


11


5.0 PARKING AND MANAGEMENT

The City of Bayswater’s Town Planning Scheme (TPS) identifies a parking requirement for

childcare centres of 1 parking bay for every 5 children plus 1 bay per staff member1.

It is proposed to accommodate 92 children in the centre and this will require 18.4 bays. 16

staff are expected to operate the centre and thus will require 16 bays. In total (18 + 16) 34

bays will be required to meet the car parking requirements of the Town Planning Scheme.

The site plan indicates that 27 car bays can be provided on-site, indicating a shortfall of 7

bays to the TPS requirement. With a provision of 16 staff bays, 11 bays would be available

for child drop-offs and pick-ups.

Although the level of parking is less than required by the TPS, it is considered that the level

of car parking provided for the proposed centre is adequate. The following considers the car

parking needs of the proposed centre.

Staff Parking Demands

There are 16 staff expected to be employed by the childcare centre and it is unlikely that all

staff will drive to work. Indeed, childcare workers are recognised as being low paid and

therefore there will be a higher demand for walking and cycling to work.

Reference to the Metropolitan Transport Strategy (1995-2029) indicates that car drivers

account for about 70% of all trips. Applying the MTS data of 70% car driver, the staff car

attraction to the proposed centre could be (16 x 70%) 11 cars.

Further, motorcycles comprise of over 8% of all vehicles registered in WA2, which given

their significantly lower purchase and running costs is not surprising. Younger workers can

be expected to utilise alternative transport modes to the private car, particularly in low paid

environments.

It can be seen therefore that the provision of 1 bay per staff member is likely to be an over-

supply and further, does not promote alternative transport modes.

1 Scheme 23 for Morley requires 1 parking bay for every 8 children plus 1 bay per 2 staff members. Given the car based land use the significant variation in requirements is strange. 2 Up from 4% in 2005.

property description PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS - NOT … daps/metro central... · peg gone peg gone peg...

Documents

Transcript of property description PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS - NOT … daps/metro central... · peg gone peg gone peg...