Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussion A Randomized Controlled Trial
1
INFORMATION FOR CATEGORY 1 CME CREDIT Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussion A Randomized Controlled Trial Shannon M. Christy, MA, Susan M. Perkins, PhD, Yan Tong, PhD, Connie Krier, BS, Victoria L. Champion, PhD, RN, FAAN, Celette Sugg Skinner, PhD, Jeffrey K. Springston, PhD, Thomas F. Imperiale, MD, Susan M. Rawl, PhD, RN, FAAN (see page 325) This article has been chosen to participate in the AJPM CME program. Please read and follow the instructions below: Educational objectives After reading this article, the learner should be able to: 1. Recognize the value of computer-delivered tailored interventions as useful adjuncts to prepare patients for a primary care visit. 2. Describe the effects of a computer-delivered tailored intervention, compared to a nontailored screening brochure, on patient–provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening. 3. Describe the effects of a computer-delivered tailored intervention, compared to a nontailored screening brochure, on provider orders for colorectal cancer screening tests. 4. Identify predictors of having a patient–provider discussion about colorectal cancer screening during a primary care visit. Disclosures In accordance with the disclosure policy of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine (AJPM) and the American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM), as well as the stan- dards set forth by the Accreditation Council of Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), authors and any individuals in a position to control the content of a CME activity are required to disclose relevant fınancial relationships with commercial interests (within the past 12 months). Disclosures of this ac- tivity’s authors have been reviewed and all identifıed conflicts of interest, if applicable, have been resolved. The intervention trial was funded by a National Cancer Institute grant awarded to SMR (R01 CA115983; PI: Rawl). The work of SMC was funded by the Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control Program—R25 (R25 CA117865-06; PI: Cham- pion). SMP, YT, CK, VLC, CSS, and JKS were funded by a National Cancer Institute grant awarded to SMR (R01 CA115983; PI: Rawl). The work of TFI and SMR on this project was funded by a National Cancer Institute grant awarded to SMR (R01 CA115983; PI: Rawl). No other fınancial disclosures or competing interests were reported by the authors, editors, ACPM CME council members, or peer reviewers of this paper. Accreditation statement This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the ACCME. ACPM is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. ACPM designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 Category 1 credits toward the American Medical Association (AMA) Physician’s Recognition Award (PRA)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Term of approval April 2, 2013–April 2, 2014 Estimated time to complete this activity is 1 hour. Instructions to receive CME credit Once you have read the CME article, please visit: www.ajpmonline. org to complete the CME post-test exam (with a score of at least 70%) and the CME evaluation survey. Your CME certifıcate will be sent to you via email. Privacy policy ACPM collects personal information from participants in this online activity for purposes of assigning CME credit only. We will not share or sell your contact information, and your answers to quizzes and feedback forms will be kept confıdential. Copyright information The copyright for this material is held by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF Preventive Medicine A3
Transcript of Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussion A Randomized Controlled Trial
INFORMATION FOR CATEGORY 1 CME CREDIT
Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening DiscussionA Randomized Controlled Trial
Shannon M. Christy, MA, Susan M. Perkins, PhD, Yan Tong, PhD, Connie Krier, BS,Victoria L. Champion, PhD, RN, FAAN, Celette Sugg Skinner, PhD, Jeffrey K. Springston, PhD,
Thomas F. Imperiale, MD, Susan M. Rawl, PhD, RN, FAAN(see page 325)
This article has been chosen to participate in the AJPM CMEprogram. Please read and follow the instructions below:
Educational objectivesAfter reading this article, the learner should be able to:1. Recognize the value of computer-delivered tailored interventionsas useful adjuncts to prepare patients for a primary care visit.2.Describe the effects of a computer-delivered tailored intervention,compared to a nontailored screening brochure, on patient–providerdiscussions about colorectal cancer screening.3.Describe the effects of a computer-delivered tailored intervention,compared to a nontailored screening brochure, on provider ordersfor colorectal cancer screening tests.4. Identify predictors of having a patient–provider discussion aboutcolorectal cancer screening during a primary care visit.
DisclosuresIn accordance with the disclosure policy of the AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine (AJPM) and the AmericanCollege of Preventive Medicine (ACPM), as well as the stan-dards set forth by the Accreditation Council of ContinuingMedical Education (ACCME), authors and any individuals ina position to control the content of a CME activity are requiredto disclose relevant fınancial relationships with commercialinterests (within the past 12 months). Disclosures of this ac-tivity’s authors have been reviewed and all identifıed conflictsof interest, if applicable, have been resolved.
The intervention trial was funded by a National Cancer Institutegrant awarded toSMR(R01CA115983; PI:Rawl). Theworkof SMCwas funded by the Training in Research for Behavioral Oncologyand Cancer Control Program—R25 (R25 CA117865-06; PI: Cham-pion). SMP, YT, CK, VLC, CSS, and JKS were funded by aNational
Cancer Institute grant awarded to SMR (R01 CA115983; PI: Rawl).The work of TFI and SMR on this project was funded by a NationalCancer Institute grant awarded to SMR (R01 CA115983; PI: Rawl).No other fınancial disclosures or competing interests were reportedby the authors, editors, ACPM CME council members, or peerreviewers of this paper.
Accreditation statement
ThisactivityhasbeenplannedandimplementedinaccordancewiththeEssentialAreas andpolicies of theACCME.ACPMis accreditedby theACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.ACPM designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of1.0Category1credits towardtheAmericanMedicalAssociation(AMA)Physician’s Recognition Award (PRA)™. Physicians should only claimcreditcommensuratewiththeextentoftheirparticipationintheactivity.
Term of approval
April 2, 2013–April 2, 2014Estimated time to complete this activity is 1 hour.
Instructions to receive CME credit
OnceyouhavereadtheCMEarticle,pleasevisit:www.ajpmonline.org to complete the CME post-test exam (with a score of at least70%) and the CME evaluation survey. Your CME certifıcate willbe sent to you via email.
Privacy policy
ACPM collects personal information from participants in thisonline activity for purposes of assigningCMEcredit only.Wewillnot share or sell your contact information, and your answers toquizzes and feedback forms will be kept confıdential.
Copyright information
The copyright for thismaterial is held by the American Journal ofPreventive Medicine.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF
Preventive Medicine
A3
