PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

51
Prepared by Shwetang Panchal Sigma Institute of Management Studies PROJECT SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT

Transcript of PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Page 1: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Prepared byShwetang Panchal

Sigma Institute of Management Studies

PROJECT SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT

Page 2: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

PERT AND CPM NETWORKS

Page 3: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

HISTORY

Late 1950s– Program Evaluation and Review

Technique (PERT)• U.S. Navy, Booz-Allen Hamilton, and

Lockeheed Aircraft• Probabilistic activity durations

– Critical Path Method (CPM)• Dupont De Nemours Inc.• Deterministic activity durations

Page 4: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

THE LANGUAGE OF PERT/CPM Activity– task or set of tasks– use resources

Event– state resulting from completion of

one or more activities– consume no resources or time– predecessor activities must be

completed

Page 5: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

THE LANGUAGE OF PERT/CPM CONTINUED Milestones– events that mark significant

progress Network– diagram of nodes and arcs– used to illustrate technological

relationships Path– series of connected activities

between two events

Page 6: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

THE LANGUAGE OF PERT/CPM CONCLUDED Critical Path– set of activities on a path that if

delayed will delay completion of project

Critical Time– time required to complete all

activities on the critical path

Page 7: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

BUILDING THE NETWORK

AOA Network AON Network

Page 8: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Table 5-2 A Sample Set of Project Activities and Precedences

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 9: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

STAGE 1 OF A SAMPLE AON NETWORK

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 10: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

FIGURE 5-7 STAGE 2 OF A SAMPLE AON NETWORK

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 11: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

FIGURE 5-3 A COMPLETED SAMPLE AON NETWORK

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 12: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

FIGURE 5-4 STAGE 1 OF A SAMPLE AOA NETWORK

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 13: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

FIGURE 5-5 STAGE 2 OF A SAMPLE AOA NETWORK

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 14: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

FIGURE 5-6A A COMPLETED SAMPLE AOA NETWORK

Task Predecessor

a --

b --

c a

d b

e b

f c, d

g e

Page 15: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-6b A Completed Sample AOA Network Showing the Use of a Dummy Task

Page 16: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Table 5-2 A Sample Problem for Finding the Critical Path and Critical Time

Activity Predecessor Duration

a -- 5 days

b -- 4

c a 3

d a 4

e a 6

f b, c 4

g d 5

h d, e 6

i f 6

j g, h 4

Page 17: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-7 Stage 1 of a Sample Network

Page 18: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-8 A Complete Network

Page 19: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-9 Information Contents in an AON Node

Page 20: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-10 The Critical Path and Time for Sample Project

Page 21: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

CALCULATING ACTIVITY SLACK Slack or Float

LST - EST = LFT - EFT = Slack

Page 22: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-11 An MSP Version of PERT/CPM Network

Page 23: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-12 A Modified Version of MSP Network

Page 24: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

PROJECT UNCERTAINTY AND RISK MANAGEMENT

Page 25: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

CALCULATING PROBABILISTIC ACTIVITY TIMES Three Time Estimates– pessimistic (a)–most likely (m)– optimistic (b)

Page 26: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-13 The Statistical Distribution of all Possible Times for an Activity

Page 27: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

ACTIVITY EXPECTED TIME AND VARIANCE

22

E

6

)(Var

6

)(

6

)4(T

ab

ab

bma

Page 28: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

95 PERCENT LEVEL

Task will be a or lower 5 percent of the time

Task will be b or greater 5 percent of the time

3.3

)( ab

Page 29: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

90 PERCENT LEVEL

Task will be a or lower 10 percent of the time

Task will be b or greater 10 percent of the time

6.2

)( ab

Page 30: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

95 PERCENT LEVEL (ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION) Task will be between a and b 95

percent of the time

92.3

)( ab

Page 31: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

90 PERCENT LEVEL (ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION) Task will be between a and b 90

percent of the time

29.3

)( ab

Page 32: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-14 An AON Network

Page 33: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-15 An MSP Version of a Sample Problem Network

Page 34: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-16 A Pert/CPM Network for the Day Care Project

Page 35: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-17 An MSP Calendar for the Day Care Project, 4/16/00 to 5/27/00

Page 36: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

The Probability of Completing the Project on Time

2

)(

D

Z

=NORMDIST(D,,,TRUE)

Page 37: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-18 The Statistical Distribution of Completion Times of the Path a-b-d-g-h

Page 38: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Selecting Risk and Finding D

2 ZD

NORMINV(probability,,,TRUE)

Page 39: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

SIMULATION

Page 40: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

TRADITIONAL STATISTICS VERSUS SIMULATION Similarities–must enumerate alternate paths

Differences– simulation does not require

assumption of path independence

Page 41: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-20 The Distribution of Project Completion Times

Page 42: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

THE GANNT CHART

Page 43: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-21 A Gantt Chart of a Sample Project

Page 44: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-22 A Gantt Chart of Sample Project Showing Critical Path, Path Connections, Slack, EST, LST, EFT,

and LFT

Page 45: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-23 A Gantt Chart of a Day Care Project Showing Expected Durations, Critical Path,

Milestone, and Resource Requirements

Page 46: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-24 A Progress Report on a Day Care Project Showing Actual Progress Versus Baseline

Page 47: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

EXTENSIONS TO PERT/CPM

Page 48: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

PRECEDENCE DIAGRAMMING Finish-to-start linkage Start-to-start linkage Finish-to-finish linkage Start-to-finish linkage

Page 49: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

Figure 5-25 Precedence Diagramming Conventions

Page 50: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

OTHER METHODS

Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT)– combines flowgraphs, probabilistic

networks, and decision trees– allows loops back to earlier events

and probabilistic branching

Page 51: PROJECT SCHEDULING MANAGEMENT

QUESTIONS ? IF ANY ?

THANK YOU