Project Gnome is the Litmus Test for Nukes on 9-11

8/12/2019 Project Gnome is the Litmus Test for Nukes on 9-11

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/project-gnome-is-the-litmus-test-for-nukes-on-9-11 1/12

Project Gnome is the litmus test for nukes on 9-11Because Project gnome was unique in purpose, and was done for the purpose oftrapping a nuclear explosion underground to harvest the heat from it for generation ofelectricity, AND because Project Gnome was a detonation of a known size that actuallyhit it's calculated potential, AND because the cavern created by project Gnome wasentered afterwards for analysis, Project gnome stands by itself as the lone reference tothe size of the nukes used on 911.

You may wonder why I am harping on this topic. The answer is actually fairly importantfor this little bit of truth. Look at the cavern created by the five kiloton nuke used inProject Gnome in the photo to the left. There is a man standing in that cavern. The sizeof the cavern is similar to the holes below the basements on 911. This would indicatethat on 911, similar 5 KT nukes were used.

The next photo is the best perspective shot of the obviously nuked out holes below theWTC. There is a man standing in that photo also. If you compare what happened to thebedrock at the WTC, and what happened to the bedrock during Project Gnome, you canclearly see that the erosion patterns are similar for both. The WTC was obviously asimilar nuke, and sticking with this is important because there are many people out



there saying it was 150 KT, which would be far too large at 30 times larger than ProjectGnome and any expert would know that. Stating such a large size for the nukes whenthere are clearly known reference detonations out there will cause people who areaware of what nuclear weapon sizes are capable of to shun away from the nuke theoryentirely. And that would be bad, because we need their expertise working for the truth.

The nuke theory is the only thing that can explain the holes. It is also a greatexplanation for why the workers got sick. It is also a great explanation for why theworkers said they saw large pools of melted iron below the WTC, (and melted rocklooks the same, they probably did not know for sure it was iron). It is also a goodexplanation for why the public was not allowed access at the site for so long. It is also agood explanation for the horrible weird smell people reported after the collapses (nukes

would vaporize a lot of different materials and would likely make a smell no one everwitnessed before).

So that is my take on the nuke theory, I think it's real and they went conservative onthem to make sure nothing obvious happened on camera. And to those out there whohave mailed me saying the nukes would have appeared on the seismograms, they did,

just watch the WTC shake videos on Youtube, the cameras even captured the seismicevent that preceeded the smaller demolition detonations and the seismograms do exist.



Take a look at the seismograms for the WTC. These were recorded 34 km away fromthe WTC, and clearly show the huge spike a nuke would make to initiate a seismicevent. These seismographs also, in addition to the photos above, corroborate the nuketheory, it's pretty obviously nailed. Since the nukes were not sub surface enough tocapture their full potential on a seismograph, the magnitudes are showing lower thanwhat the net seismic yield would have been if they had been buried like Project Gnome.

These nukes were able to vent upwards into the parking garage which reduced theirseismic signature.



WTC Site - Project Gnome

5 Kiloton Mini-Nuke Crater



SEE THE NOW SOLID MOLTENBEDROCK BENEATH THE WTC SITE



WTC Site - Project Gnome 5 KilotonDebris-Free Mini-Nuke Craters

Emily wrote:

On 2014-06-06 07:38, emily wrote: I came across a recent article about John Leer, anex-CIA pilot, basically claiming that planes were not involved in the 9/11 attacks andthey used holograms instead.

http://projectcamelotportal.com/blog/31-kerrys-blog/2039-john-lear-holograms-used-in-911 [1]

And this video of one of the planes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6bk4dMjl4g [2]I don't know how I feel about John Leer's claims. Most of it makes sense, like not beingable to fly a plane that fast at that altitude. These videos show the planes going into abuilding without breaking apart or anything, they just slip right in. You would think thatthe wings would break off or something.



I just think the theory of no planes being involved makes a fair amount of sense. Thelack of plane wreckage at the pentagon and Shanksville only strengthen this theory.

And the fact that these flights didn't even exist in any flight manifest. We know therewere no planes involved with the pentagon or Shanksville so I am definitely interested inthe possibility that planes were not involved with the towers.

I would love to know how you feel about this subject.

Thanks, Emily

My response:

I saw the nose out video myself right after 911 and was amazed by how the nose of theplane went through the building intact, and came out the other side in one piece.Holograms would do that if they screwed up the set points in a CGI blue screen graphic.SO, I am undecided but your mail is going up.

Thanks!

James

June 7 2014

About the nukes at the WTC I am finally convinced, but they were not 150 KT devices, the holes match Project

Gnome, a 5 KT device. The reason why the craters are smaller than project gnome isbecause they were a lot closer to the surface and the explosion was able to travelupward rather than stay trapped, where in Project Gnome, which was buried deep theonly option was for the explosion to create a large cavern.

The appearance of the craters are consistent with nuclear devices, as proven by past American nuclear tests. The characteristics of the rock erosion in the craters exactlymatches that of Project Gnome. I don't know how I overlooked this, but it's all obviousnow. This would explain the massive amounts of dust that made everyone sick aroundthe WTC.



Here we haveboth towersshowing holesright in thecenter, where

the bottomsobviously fellout. The nukeswere for themost part afailure, withmost of thetowers falling tothe sides, butthe obviousholes where

there should berubble pilesinstead are adead giveaway.

There is simply no other explanation for why there would be holes dead centerother than a crater being made below the towers for the towers to fall into.

This next imageis the smokinggun. If you lookat how therocks appear tobe eroded bywater, that ishow it looksafter a nuke andproject gnome, where theywent inside thechambercreated by thenuke afterwardsproves it. Thereis no doubt thatnuclearweapons did

this, and that would explain why all the firefighters got sick afterwards - they

http://www.toxipedia.org/display/wanmec/Nuclear+Bomb+Test+in+Carlsbad,+NM





suffered radiation poisoning. There are many more images of this in Googleimages, it is beyond all doubt at the WTC. There is no faking this. It's real.

New info on first WTC bombing At least for me, take a look at this.

R wrote

Speaking of the W.T.C. demolition -- the one where the five dancing Israelis gave themselves a hearty mazal tov --, there were some perplexing observations made -- JoeVialls being among those who made them -- about the first failed attempt on them by"Muslims": the Ryder truck bomb blasted downward through 4 floors of the undergroundparking garage, to a total debth of 100 feet, when surface blasts cannot producecraters, always taking the course of least resistance, up and out to atmosphere; the only

part of the Ryder truck ever recovered was supposedly "its" rear diff. with "its" VehicleI.D. Number stamped on it, a number that appears on no other part, save the engineblock (And what ever became of the rest of the Ryder truck? Never there in the firstplace at the time of detonation? Or vaporized by an on-board nuke?) -- exactly thesame M.O. of what happened at the O.K.C. crime scene (Or was the Ryder truck neverthere in the first place at the time of the blast, as it may also not have been at O.K.C.,having been driven away from its parking space just before a diversionary blast wasdetonated just below the street, leaving a shallow crater; the rear diff. with the fakeVehicle I.D. Number just being a fabricated plant? Lazy, sloppy cunts, couldn't even bebothered to plant the proper engine block for a Ryder truck.).

Actually, I thought that the plan to use the Ryder truck bomb to dislodge the mainsupport column in the underground parking facility, sending the tower crashing down onto its twin, and in turn, collapsing it like a domino, was overly optimistic, wishful thinking.But would it have been wishful thinking if it had been a nuke placed 4 floors belowwhere the Ryder truck was said to have been parked? Assuming that was the case,what went wrong? Why didn't things go as planned? Was the nuke not powerful enoughfor the job and/or placed too far from the targeted column? Obviously this time aroundthey left nothing to chance, using layer-upon-layer of fail-safe back-ups.

Anyway, those are just my theories based on my understanding of certain unconfirmedreports. Maybe you'll have better luck filling in the blanks?

My comment

There are details here I did not know. But I do know that you cannot crater concretefrom 4 floors up. That means it was not the ryder truck. And to prove it, (I can't find theshort video which explains it,) but the German dam busting documentaries give verygood explanations for the mechanics of explosives and explain why you can't just put anexplosive next to something solid and have it be destroyed, the explosive will need

https://www.google.com.mx/search?q=world+trade+center+basement+holes&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=ibiQU5jJCsidqAb-vYCwDA&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=667#q=wtc+crater&tbm=isch







If the nuke theory is the correct theory, the device HAD TO have been bigger thanProject Gnome, which can serve as a reference, because we know what happened withthat nuclear test. Project gnome was 5KT and did not leave a big enough hole in theground to fit the scenario Gordon Duff uses in his nuke theory, and he says the deviceswere 2 KT. I don't entirely buy the nuke theory though I cannot discount it entirely either,

my biggest suspicion is the fact that when all was said and done, and all the debris wascleared, there was only the basement well and not a giant cavern below. But I alsoknow that they kept it sectioned off and allowed no access, so any cavern could havebeen filled in secretly with no one noticing.

The main problem with an y story regarding the WTC is that it was an act of war,and those who did it are not going to tell the truth about what happened, all thewhile they try to spin confusion in the alternative press and everywhere elseregarding what went on. So when dealing with what you know is a lie that waswell cleaned up after, all you can really do is guess and the key thing toremember is that it was not Arabs that put those demolition charges in, or

explosives in the basement, or made the core support columns miraculously turnto dust when they remained standing. Arabs did not do that, WHO DID?

There is another side to the nuke story on 911, so if you are among those who arelooking for answers regarding nukes being used, I suggest you look at Dmitri Khalezov'stake on this topic. Dmitri pegs the nukes at 150KT which I think is too large, my guess isthat if nukes really were used they would have been 10 - 20 KT. See at least a part ofDmitri's view here

Monumental productions wrote:

Duff should get off his duff

Whether the info in Duff's report is mostly correct or not, still makes it suspect as acover for the use of D.E.W.s to do the job. The "spire" caught on camera disintegratinginto a cloud of dust says it all. (Any sign of nukes going off while that was happening?).They'd rather have us think it was nukes; anything but D.E.W.s.

My comment: DEW's are directed energy weapons for those who do not know.And yes, there is plenty of evidence for this at the WTC, at least as much as thereis for nukes. They probably used the entire bag of tricks.

Gordon Duff's take on this follows

I am not a huge fan of Gordon Duff,HOWEVER He obviously let more truth slide out here than usual

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPcUrbOhghM








I have independently confirmed before hand that Duff is at least 90 percent correct withthis report. Duff himself admitted to publishing 40 percent disinfo to "stay alive" and notget censored too much, but with this particular report I think he pushed the envelope abit, and I will link it. Read it on his site http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/ and PRESS TV, EAT MY

HEART OUT, my stuff is probably more accurate overall but I can't entirely flush theDuff all the time like I DID HERE MAKE SURE YOU READ THE SLAM DUNK AT THEEND, where he quotes Pons and Fleischman without reference and uses quotesfrom cold fusion for hot nukes. THAT one was a zinger.

But at the end of the day, Duff is on our side, so I will let him slide on an awful lot andwill certainly link his better stuff.

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/




http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/micro_nukes.html









Project Gnome is the Litmus Test for Nukes on 9-11

Documents

Transcript of Project Gnome is the Litmus Test for Nukes on 9-11