Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

18
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR H. Huang, K. Engelhorn, K. Sequoia, K.J. Boehm, H.W. Xu, J.S. Jaquez, K.C. Chen, A.L. Greenwood, J.W. Crippen, C. Kong, N. Rice, C.T. Reed, L.C. Carlson, F. Elsner, M. Farrell General Atomics 22 st Target Fabrication Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada March 12-16, 2017 This work supported by U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-NA0001808 Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics IFT\P2017-019

Transcript of Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Page 1: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR

PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTIONH. Huang, K. Engelhorn, K. Sequoia, K.J. Boehm, H.W. Xu, J.S. Jaquez, K.C.

Chen, A.L. Greenwood, J.W. Crippen, C. Kong, N. Rice, C.T. Reed, L.C.

Carlson, F. Elsner, M. Farrell

General Atomics

22st Target Fabrication Meeting

Las Vegas, Nevada

March 12-16, 2017

This work supported by U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-NA0001808

Progress in Target Metrology

at General Atomics

IFT\P2017-019

Page 2: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Metrology is central to target delivery and performance

• What we can’t see hurts shot performance

– Oxidation: GDP, Microdots, LiH

• Tightening specs demands extraordinary verification

– 100GBar: 10x smaller defects

• What we can’t see hinders target fabrication

– Double shells: Too opaque to x-ray

Oxygen writing Vanishing Dots0.1um defects Plugged?

Mn

Page 3: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

100GBar defect specs 10x tighter than NIF in diameter &

500x in # density, requiring new metrology strategy

• Omega to NIF: Direct-drive platform development

• Allowing 10 particles between 0.1 and 0.5um per shell

– Particle size 4x < diffraction limit

• Paradigm shift:

Dark-field Imaging Laser Scatterometer

Low Vacuum SEM

Precise (4hrs per shell) Fast (5 min per shell)High throughput

Failure Analysis

Shrink wavelength: SEM resolves each defect, EDS performs root cause analysis

Use intensity: Scattering based techniques, not resolving defects

Page 4: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Use light scattering intensity as defect size indicator,

roughly scales as D3, -2

• Can be modeled

Bobbert-Vlieger Model

(exact solution)

Mie Scatterer

Near field image Rayleigh:D6, -4

Mie: D2, 0

• Can be verified

– Polystyrene Latex Sphere (PSL)

– Follow SEMI M53-1103 Standard

100Gbar size in-between

Page 5: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

PSL-on-glass slide proved 0.1um defects can be

detected by dark-field imaging at 100X Magnification

500nm 262nm

173nm 90nm

All four particles appear

similar sized as images

are diffraction limited

at ~0.4mm.

Page 6: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Four challenges solved for dark-field shell inspection

10 mm

• Image artifact removal

• Depth-of-focus stitching

• Background flattening

• Defect quantification

Each image covers ~1% shell surface

Page 7: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Located all the real defects after Z-focus stitching,

artifact removal, and background subtraction

10 mm

Each image covers ~1% shell surface

Also retain radial/depth distribution to inform target fab

Page 8: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

3D defect rendition to facilitate viewing

10 mm10 mm

Each image covers ~1% shell surface

Page 9: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Best GA polystyrene shell:

Fewer than eight hundred 0.1um defects per shell

Each image covers ~1% shell surface

10 mm

100GBar spec: 10 allowed

Page 10: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Plan to integrate multiple metrology tools onto common

4Pi shell-handling platform

• Dark-field & Laser scatterometer: Omega defects

• Wallmap: Omega GDP & NIF PAMS thickness profile

• Lyncee Tec: NIF GDP defects and Lasik (replace PSDI)

• Benefits

– Lower cost

• Share platform

– Reduce footprint

• Smaller cleanroom

– Reduce handling

• Less contamination

– Retain coordinates

• Correlate mapping

Lyncee Tec

Dark-field

Wallmapper

Leica Confocal

Lasik lens

f stage

q stage

x-y-z

stage

Shell flipper

Page 11: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Automation of x-ray systems:

Absorption edge measures elemental areal density

Mass Log (a/b)

Argon Absorption Edge

0

50

100

150

200

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Photon Energy (eV)

Inte

ns

ity

(a

.u.)

Measured

Calculateda

b

• Calibration standard not needed

Edge Absorption Spectra of Au-U T42-4-1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

8000 13000 18000 23000 28000

Photon Energy (eV)

X-r

ay I

nte

nsit

y (

a.u

.)

Calculated

Measured

AuU

• Applied to a variety of ICF and HED samples

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

4000 9000 14000 19000

Photon Energy (eV)

X-r

ay

Tra

ns

mis

sio

n

Measured

Calculated

Ta

Page 12: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Automated Edge system, under construction, increases

versatility and precision of areal density measurement

• Benefits

– Full automation

– Faster acquisition

– Batch operation

– Area mapping

– Better accuracy

– Less air exposure

– Fragile samples

Open-tube x-ray source needed to probe <2keV

• Hot topic: cold v. hot opacity

– Error bar on cold opacity?

– Can we constrain it?

Bailey, Nature 2015

Z => NIF

KeVFe opacity

Solar condition

Page 13: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Five common x-ray databases benchmarked to reveal

several % uncertainty in cold matter opacity (below K)

• Spectroscopy needs accurate cold material opacity

– 7-14Å wavelength translates to 900-1800 eV energy

• Common metal such as Fe are insufficiently known

– Can automated Edge system tighten error bar?

Page 14: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Fabricated & delivered Cr/W capsule assembly to

facilitate LANL double-shell platform development

shell

Leveraged target fab. knowledge to propose new capsule design

Coated

W: 26um

Cr: 12um

Glued

SEM cross-section of bilayer thkns

3D-printed inner-shell

assembly holder

Drilled

Laser hole verified by

x-ray tomography

Verified

New CFTAHe leak test

Delivered

10um OD Fill tube

Page 15: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

GA has overcome high-Z opacity-induced metrology

issues to enable target fabrication development

Problem: Too opaque for x-ray to see laser hole

Solution: X-ray tomography (slow), phase contrast imaging (fast)

Problem: Is fill tube plugged by glue?

Solution: Used Xe to optimize XRF detection

Opacity will also plague in-shot diagnosis => interim mid-Z shells for 2017

12 hours

tomography

15 minutes

imaging

Xe-K emissions measureable

Page 16: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

“UV-Vis”-style optical transmission measurement

can model thin metal thickness and test oxidation

• Micro-focus “Vis-IR” instrument

constructed for “micro-dot” shells

– Tracking oxidation-ind. transparency

• Metal coating <2000Å is translucent

– Precisely modelled (Rakic 1998)

beyond island-coalescence regime

Dots fade away over time

Page 17: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

Adapting commercial technology:

Nexiv VMZ automated measuring microscope

Old

GA is now capable of further analyzing

penumbral apertures by plotting out-of-round deviations

• 4X image res. Improvement

enables penumbral analysis

– Study NIF x-ray source

• Measure multiple randomly-

oriented pin-hole arrays

– Huge time saver

New

Page 18: Progress in Target Metrology at General Atomics

On-demand metrology development at GA meets

evolving needs of target fab community

• Recently completed or in the pipeline

– Xradia Versa x-ray microscope for general metrology

– XRF system with micro-focus and shell modeling

– Automated NEXIV microscope for pin-hole arrays

– Vis-IR optical transmission for microdots

– Automated x-ray edge system for dopant areal density

– New 4Pi shell handling station as a shared platform

– Full surface wall thickness mapping for Omega shells

– Dark-field defect mapper for LLE 100GBar

– Lyncee Tec DHM microscope for NIF GDP defects

– ……