Progress in Evaluating Asphalt Mixture Polishing Skid Presentation.pdf · temps. • Distribute 2g...
Transcript of Progress in Evaluating Asphalt Mixture Polishing Skid Presentation.pdf · temps. • Distribute 2g...
Progress in Evaluating Asphalt Mixture Polishing
John Zaniewski,
Danielle Hoyer & Allison Givens
40th Paving Conference
Charleston WV
February 19, 2020
Objectives
1. Develop procedure for asphalt mixture polishing and friction evaluations
2. Provide evaluation of current approved WVDOH surface mixtures
3. Verify results
4. Experiment – varying skid aggregate amounts
Friction
• Interaction between tire and pavement surface
Texture
• Characteristics of the pavement surface that contributes to friction
Polishing
• Change in texture due to traffic or laboratory process
Texture
Pavement Surface Microtexture and
Macrotexture (Liang, 2013)
MacrotextureRepresents the
space b/w
aggregates in a
mixture
Microtexture
Represents the
texture of
aggregate
surface
High Speed Low Speed
Polishing Devices
MIWT
(Erukulla, 2011)NCSU CTPM
(ASTM E660)
NCAT TWPD
(NCAT, 2016)
Field Friction Evaluation
• High speed: locked wheel, fixed slip, variable slip, and side force
• WVDOH currently uses locked wheel (ASTM E274)
Locked Wheel Skid Trailer
(Kuttesch, 2004)
Laboratory Friction and Texture Measurements
Dynamic Friction Tester
(Haider and Sajedi, 2017)
British Pendulum
Tester (BPT)
Circular Track/Texture Meter
(Hanson and Prowell, 2004)
BPT Minimum
(Lu and Steven, 2006)
BPN = 47
Virginia min.
Materials
Polishing Equipment
• Modeled after NCSU machine
• Includes 12 sample housings
• Clamping and height adjustment Specimen removal openings
• 4 wheels rotating on central shaft
• Toe-In/Toe-out adjustments
• Tire size = 11x6x5 in.
• Variable rotation speed (~30 rpm for this project)
Specimen Preparation
• Compacted at 4% and 8% air void contents (VTM) and 90mm height
• Label top and bottom
Polishing Procedure• Allow specimens to fully dry before
polishing
• Place randomly in polisher
• Vertically aligned and flush with surface deck plate
• Record specimen and tire surface
temps.
• Distribute 2g Silicon Carbide
abrasive powder on surface
• Lower wheel assembly and add two
25-lb weights on each
Polishing Procedure
• Set drive to ~30 rpm (as marked)
• Start polisher
• Stop after 8000, 16000, 32000, and 48000 wheel passes
Friction Measurement
• Measure BPN after 8000, 16000, 32000, and 48000 wheel passes
BPT Field Procedure
• Procedures followed similar to lab (ASTM E303)
• 5-in slider contact path
• Wet surface
• 5 measurements (1st not recorded)
• Level equipment according to roadway surface
• Measurements recorded according to field extraction site (for comparison purposes)
Test variables
TiresToe angleSample orientationSample air voidsThree replicatesFour mix types
Friction vs Polishing Cycles
Average BPN Measurements for Asphalt Mixtures at 4% VTM Polished at Low Toe Angles
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 8000 16000 32000 48000
BP
N
Number of Wheel Passes
Mix 1 12.5mm Skid-RAP
Mix 2 W1-RAP
Mix 3 W1H
Mix 4 12.5mm Skid-RAP
BPN
47
Average BPN Measurements for Laboratory and Field Core Mix 12.5mm Skid-RAP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 8000 24000 48000
BP
N
Number of Wheel Passes
Mix 1 Laboratory Compacted
Mix 1 I-79 Field Core
BPN
47
Laboratory, Field Core, and Field Measurements for Mix 1 12.5mm Skid-RAP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
BP
N
Mix 1 Laboratory Compacted
Mix 1 I-79 Field Core
Mix 1 I-79 Field BPN Measurement
BPN
47
Polishing Prediction
• Trend plots reversed (x-axis = BPN; y-axis = number of wheel passes)
• Power function fitted to data
• Predicted number of wheel passes to reach BPN 47
Prediction of Required Wheel Passes at BPN Limits for Mix 3 W1H Specimens (Top Surfaces) at 8%
VTM After 48,000 Wheel Passes
y = 5E+34x-18.04
R² = 0.9769
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Nu
mb
er o
f W
hee
l P
asse
s
BPN
Specimen 13T
Specimen 14T
Specimen 15T
Mix Average
Power (Mix Average)
Predicted Number of Wheel Passes to Achieve BPN of 47
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
4% VTM Low Toe 8% VTM Low Toe 4% VTM High Toe 8% VTM High Toe
Nu
mb
er o
f W
hee
l P
asse
s
Testing Parameters
Mix 1 12.5mm Skid-RAP
Mix 2 W1-RAP
Mix 3 W1H
Mix 4 12.5mm Skid-RAP
Predicted Number of Wheel Passes at BPN of 47 for JFA Laboratory Compacted and Field Core Specimens
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Nu
mb
er o
f W
hee
l P
asse
s
JFA Laboratory Compacted I-79 Field Core
Statistical Analysis
• T-test
• 95% confidence (α = 0.05);
•Ho assuming equal means
• Compare BPN after 48,000 wheel passes
Statistical Comparisons
Conclusions – BPN Analysis
• Decreased BPN with increased polishing
• Asymptotic behavior after 48,000 wheel passes
• Generally higher BPN for Mix 2 W1-RAP and Mix 4 12.5mm Skid-RAP
• Higher initial BPN for field measurements
• High toe = lower BPN
Conclusions – Statistical Analysis
• Insignificant factors:
• VTM
• Contractor
• Lab vs. Field Core
• NMAS
• Significant factors:
• Tire toe angles
• Field Core vs. Field Measurements
Procedure Recommendations
• Hoosier R80 tires
• High toe → accelerated polishing
• 7% VTM
• 48,000 wheel passes• Asymptotic behavior shown
• Decrease friction measurement increments for efficiency
• Track top and bottom surfaces
Replicate Experiment
Verify two technicians obtain compatible results.
SKID Aggregate Experiment
Percent Skid Aggregates
AggregatesMashey
Gap Skid
8's
Elkins 9'sElkins
Sand
Bag House
Fines
Mix Type 40% 10% 49% 1%
Total %
Skid
All Skid Skid Skid Skid 99
Intermediate Skid Skid 59
Per Design Skid 40
No Skid 0
Gradation and binder content the same for all mixes
Average BPN Numbers for 9.5 mm SKID Studyat 7% VTM with High Toe
Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 8000 16000 32000 48000 80000
BP
N
Wheel Passes
0% 40% 59% 99%
Varying the amount of skid aggregate was NOT significant
Wow! We can stop using skid aggregate!
British pendulum only sensitive to microtexture
ORMixes are the same at LOW speeds
Good News Bad News
Polisher works
Should upgrade
Texture British Pendulum sensitive to microtextureFor mix evaluation need to
measure macrotexture
Measures texture
Measures friction
Standard test methods
State of the art
Used by leading researchers –NCAT
Thank you