PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE Kwantlen MEETING Review... · 2017-06-14 · 1 Minutes of November 28 2007...

O

KwantlenUNIVERSITY COLLEGE

Attached

1 Minutes of November 28 2007

PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE

MEETING

Jan 30 2008 300 500 pm

Room G 1140

Agenda

1 Approval of Agenda

2 Approval of Minutes of Nov 28 20073 Report of the Chair Carolyn Robertson

Overview of program review

4 Program Review Facilitator Updates

Updates on Pilot Reviews

5 Program Exemption Step Two6 External Committee Representation and Remuneration

Policy guidelines7 Next Meeting Feb 21 08 Room G 1140

8 Adjournment


Program Review Committee

Attendance Date Ja 3C0 F

t

NAME PRESENT ABSENT

1 Belter Wendy2 Bigsby Kathleen e3 Dale Denise

4 Fleming Rob 175 Hogan Melinda6 Klinkhamer Sooz

7 Lee Gordon

8 NicolsonChurch Jean

9 Robbins Peter b

10 Robertson Carolyn Chair11 Sato Takashi

12 Schultz Dianne

13 Wainman Kathy14

15

16

17

18

Guests

Baxter Danielle

Bray Cathy

McGoff Dean Colleen

Metzger Karen Recorder


Program Review Committee

Attendance Date Ja 3C0 F

t


Present

Kathleen BigsbyDenise Dale

Rob FlemingGordon Lee

Karen Metzger RecorderPeter Robbins

Carolyn Robertson ChairTakashi Sato

Cathy BraySooz Klinkhamer

vietirrda HoganJean NicolsonC

MINUTES

n McGoff Dean

PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE

MEETING

Nov 28 2007 300 500 pm

Room G 1140

Regrets

Wendy BellerDianne Schultz

Kathy Wainman

1 Approval of Agenda

Carolyn called the meeting to order at 305 pm

The agenda was approved by consensus as presented

2 Approval of Minutes of Oct 31 2007

Moved by Kathleen Rigsby seconded by Denise Dale to approve the minutes of the Oct31 2007 meeting as presented

MOTION CARRIED

3 Program Review Exemption

a Motion from last meeting

At the Oct 31 07 meeting the following motion was passed

Moved by Kathleen Rigsby seconded by Peter Robbins that the Interior Design programhas met the criteria for the selfstudy and external review portions of Kwantlensprogramreview process for this cycle

Before making a submission in this regard to Education Council the committee needs to beclear on what it is asking of Education Council According to policy B12 Program Review4 a Education Council will monitor the implementation of the recommendations asoutlined in the action plan Submitting the complete final report on the externalaccreditation of the Interior Design program to Education Council would be overwhelming

Program Review CommitteeMinutes of Meeting Nov 28 2007Page 2

Recommendations are not a discreet part of the final report so the action plan will have tobe created by identifying the recommendations that can be acted upon

The action plan would need w address key recommendations in the final report and if itdoes not a rationale would need to be included There was discussion about whether that

would be the same for programs undergoing Kwantlensprocess

There was also discussion about the potential impact of an external accreditation process notresulting in accreditation though that is not a criterion for Kwantlensprogram review

The committee considered changing the terminology exemption front the Kwantlenprocess to something that indicates that a program has undergone an equivalent process Itwill need to be defined in the manual under development

It needs to be determined who is responsible for the action plan and who will eventuallysign off on it on the departmentsdivisionsbehalf

b Step 2 action plan

ACTION Cathy 13ray will develop a draft re action plans and will consider whether theyreflect recommendations for the committeesreview at the next meeting She will includethe following

What is the action plan

Does it address key findingsrecommendations

Who is responsible

End date

Frame it so that one year followup is series of check marks

4 Report of the Chair Carolyn Robertson

Carolyn thanked the members who were able to participate in the AUCC site visit meetingGordon Lee added that he expects to receive a draft report from the site visit team soon andthat the final report is expected in April 2008

5 Updates on Pilot Reviews Colleen McGoff Dean and Cathy Bray

Cathy Bray reported that the Psychology program review is proceeding and thequestionnaires that are being developed are going through the Research Ethics Board forapproval in principle items and process They are planning to collect information fromfaculty and students and also from focus groups starting in late January or early FebruaryResources are still a challenge for the Office of Institutional Analysis and Planning OIAPthe processes must be streamlined in order to be sustainable

For the English Language Studies program review a point person still needs to beappointed

The Fashion department has given a person release time for the Spring semester for theprocess The template will need to be ready for that time

6 External Committee Representation and RemunerationRefer to Malaspina Policy 3115 distributed last meeting 3

Program Review CommitteeMinutes of Meeting Nov 28 2007Page 3

There was general consensus that Kwantlen should follow Malaspinasguidelines reremuneration for extemalexternal reviewers which covers expenses and that forinternalextemal reviewers it could be looked upon as PD and as service to the profession

The committee has Malaspinaspolicy as a resource for planning

A budget request has been submitted to Rob Fleming

ACTION Cathy and Danielle will look into how UBC handles remuneration for externalreviewers

ACTION Carolyn will draft a policy re remuneration for feedback at the January meeting

7 Next Meeting Jan 30 2008 room G 1 1408 Adjournment Moved by Kathleen Bigsby to adjourn the meeting at 453 pm

Policy

Ic11Policy B12

Revues afterpora

Policy B 12aRola of

external inn

R ethics

EtarptioEqunaleeyImgoage

Role of Ede

Psych

RaeudhEmfaBoardDtattahmudad tool

TooelmaDyRsur

MachaawwdLlbydcey

EmendReeivw

RamosetamsFrmrsrmw2malRanarcuddlyother

1

Current

R

Fashion

Mari to

identify9amkat

ELST

1

Meiling 10identify

comma

Interior

Design

Program Review

Current

Pxempnom

rSchedule of Program

Role of leo Praxes of Rename Review Team

Reputing In drat form StaffingApproval of mznmg rent

go feedback fromDeana

Rotation of

ExemptionForm

Rnaew and

Approvalwith rec to

EdCo

School of

Business

ognnne

NursingBSN

FunilmAccreditationready for

exemptionprocw

Program ResteuOvcnew Q Update January 2008

EdeFuture

Planning

1

ProgramRainy Team

1Resources in

Place

Website

Guidebook

iInquiry

Framework

l

KwantlenUNOWISilv COLLEGE

1 PROGRAM NAME

Local

Application for Eaomptlon Nom Program Review Process

For use with pilot remotion applications 200720

1 NIU1 Ps 5 1N

2 APPLICANT on Behalf of Program

Elgnrhrol

ry

ProgramUnit a fSway ul

1Nf IGe L61Cl iR Et2At r1e Zw9

254

7611 rJ K rt1flt1 Eo

PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEEProgram Ravin Easmpion

Application Form

Entail

aZ KLI iCijEE ifury CA

Name Position

Sooz Klinkhamer Committee Lead Fulltime faculty

Lucie Gagne Fulltime faculty and cochair dept

Brenda Smith Fulltime faculty

Thor Pona Fulltime faculty

3 EXTERNAL ACCREDITING BODY

a the authority of the accrediting bodies and what powers they exercise including whether theycan grant rights to practice in a field and their legislative mandate

The Council for Interior Design Accreditation is an independent non profit accreditingorganization for interior design education programs at colleges and universities in the UnitedStates and Canada Kwantlen is the only Council accredited Interior Design baccalaureateprogram in British Columbia and is recognized by the Interior Designers Institute of BritishColumbia IDIBC for admission to the professional association

The Council for Interior Design Accreditation ensures a high level of quality in interior designeducation through three primary activities

Set standards for postsecondary interior design educationEvaluate and accredit college and university interior design programsFacilitate outreach and collaboration with all stakeholders in the interior designcommunity

b the accreditation process

The accreditation process involved a 45 day site visit The visitors reviewed many examples ofstudent work interviewed students and faculty and visited classrooms See pages 34 of theaccreditation report and the CIDA accreditation manual for a full description of procedures

c the authoritysrelationships with other institutions or governing bodies

The Council brings together representatives from professional organizations testing highereducation manufacturing publishing and others with an interest in the professionsgrowing bodyof knowledge A Program seeking accreditation must demonstrate that it is housed within aninstitution that is accredited by

An institutional accrediting body that is recognized by the US Department of Education orA provincial ministry of education in Canada

See htto wwwaccreditidorqwhathtml

4 DATE OF ACCREDITATION REVIEW CYCLEDate of most recent accreditation

2006

Date of accreditationspreviously granted2000

5 SELFSTUDY COMMITTEE

3

Name Position

Gunilla Finrow IDEC AIA CIDA visitor

Brent Shepherd Windley FIDER visitor

Morley Winnick LID IDC CIDA visitor

AIA American Institute of Architects

CIDA Council for Interior Design AccreditationFIDER Foundation for Interior Design Accreditation

IDEC Interior Design Educators CouncilIDC Interior Designers of CanadaLID Licensed Interior Designer Alberta

Date July 2006

Document Title Accreditation Report Kwantlen University College

Author Submitted by Council for Interior Design Accreditation after approval by the CIDAaccreditation commission

Recipient Barbara Duggan Dean and Lucie Gagne Chair of program

6 EXTERNAL ACCREDITATION TEAM

7 DATE OF SITE VISITS

Date April 2006 45 days

8 SUBMISSION OF FINAL REPORT of accreditation committee

9 RESPONSESTO RECOMMENDATIONSAction Plan Responses to Findings or recommendations from the review Briefly explain the majorelements of your programsresponse to the selfstudy and accreditation report identifying who will leadthese responses and a timeline for their completion This action plan can include specific onetimemeasures or ongoing continuous improvements

Do you have plans to modify any of the following Check all that apply

Critical factors in educational design eg teaching methods curriculum J

Program Completion and Success Rate fRelevance of Education to Further Studies

Relevance of Education to EmploymentSkills DevelopmentProgramsrelations with

other Kwantlen programs and unitsother institutions

the community J

J

In the Interior Design program continuous improvement happens within all of the above areas

Briefly explain specific plans Identify persons responsible for each plan and target andorcompletion dates if applicable

Standard 10c This indicator requires that Spaces are available for collaborative activitiessuch as exhibitions critique display and working in teams Program Facilities p26 Visiting TeamReport The Dean has been apprised of this need and the Deans office now has responsibilityfor this action

Standard 11d Administration p 28 visiting team report This indicator requires that thecoordinator is a fulltime faculty member qualified by education and experience to administer aninterior design program This action has been accomplished Lucie Gagne is now the chair ofdepartment

Standard 11i and j Administration p 28 visiting team report This indicator requires that theprogram provides clear consistent and reliable information to the public regarding academicquality and student achievement Currently the program holds two information sessions peracademic year and all of the program information is online including calendar information and aseparate information package Whenever our students achieve something noteworthy theprogram issues press releases through Kwantlensmarketing department CIDA FIDER counciloffice will be contacted to solicit further clarification regarding these two indicators and theirexpectations

Standard 12b Assessment P 29 Visiting team report This indicator requires that The programregularly monitors and evaluates professional placement of alumni Financial assistance wasrequested from the faculty professional development fund through the Office of Research andScholarship to help develop regular monitoring of alumni but funds were unavailable

10 EVIDENCE that the Accreditation Process has used a review process similarto Kwantlens

Standardized and evidencebased

The accreditation process involved the following primary stepso Request for Review from the interior design programo Determining Program Readiness both ID program and CIDAo Preparing the Program Analysis Report PAR a selfstudy by members of the

Interior Design Departmento Site Visit by CIDA visitorso Visiting Team Report CIDAo Accreditation Decision

The evidence submitted for the accreditation includes

Overview of the ProgramsSelfstudy ProcessAnalysis of the ProgramsSuccess in Meeting its GoalsAnalysis of the ProgramsCompliance with Council for Interior DesignAccreditation Standards

Conclusions

Future Program DevelopmentCurriculum Matrix

Faculty Data Forms

See page V3 of accreditation manual available athttpwwwaccreditidorqaccredmanualhtml

See Institutional and Program Data Form in accreditation manual

3

3

3

10 continued

Accountable to Kwantlen and is consistent with Kwantlensmissions and values

See Program goals in the selfstudy reportSee Future Program development community liaison in the selfstudy report whichreiterates the mission statement and assures that the interior design community at KUCbelieves that students and program should give back to the community

Iterative Reflects previous reviews and recommendations with attention to trends and patterns

The 2006 review built on the experience and knowledge of the 2000 review See selfstudy process description in the selfstudy report The KUC Interior design Programworks toward continuous improvement

Participatory Has engaged students employers program advisory committees staff faculty andadministration in the review

see above outline of the accreditation process

Strategic Facilitates long and shortterm planning andFormative Makes recommendations for continued program quality

See Future Program Development section of selfstudySee Concluding Analysis of Accreditation Report page 31 attached below

11 EVIDENCE that the Accreditation process has evaluated content similar toKwantlensreviews

The standards evaluated were as follows

Standard 1 Curriculum Structure The curriculum is structured to facilitate and advance student

learning

Standard 2 Professional Values The program leads students to develop the attitudes traits andvalues of professional responsibility accountability and effectiveness

Standard 3 Design Fundamentals Students have a foundation in the fundamentals of art anddesign theories of design green design and human behavior and discipline related history

Standard 4 Interior Design Students understand and apply the knowledge skills processes andtheories of interior design

Standard 5 Communication Students communicate effectively

Standard 6 Building Systems and Interior Materials Students design within the context of buildingsystems Students use appropriate materials and products

Standard 7 Regulations Students apply the laws codes regulations standards and practicesthat protect the health safety and welfare of the public

Standard 8 Business and Professional Practice Students have a foundation in business and

professional practice

Standard 9 Faculty members and other instructional personnel are qualified and adequate innumber to implement program objectives

Standard 10 Facilities Program facilities and resources provide an environment to stimulatethought motivate students and promote the exchange of ideas

Standard 11 Administration The administration of the program is clearly defined providesappropriate program leadership and supports the program The program demonstratesaccountability to the public through its published documents

Standard 12 Assessment Systematic and comprehensive selfstudy methods contribute to theprogramsongoing development and improvement

Insert an executive summary of the accreditation report here if available

See of Concluding Analysis accreditation report page 31 attached below

Attach the selfstudy and accreditation reports

These are available from the Program Review office

0

O

12 CORRELATION of accreditation report with Program Review Tool

a Indicate via a checkmark which of the following elements have been reviewed

b Provide a brief rationale for non evaluation of any of these categories andcomponents

1 Quality of Education Design

Program Purpose Intent 4

Curriculum Development and Review 4

Essential Skills 4

Teaching and Learning Methodologies 4

Program Delivery Modes 4

Faculty Qualifications and Currency 4

2 Quality of Educational Experience

Program Completion and Success Rate AI

Relevance of Education for Further Studies 4

Relevance of Education for Employment 4

Satisfaction with Skills Development 4

3 Quality of Services Resources and Facilities

Student Satisfaction with Services Resources and Facilities 4

Faculty and Staff Satisfaction with Services Resources and Facilities 4

4 Quality of Program Relationships and Connections

Articulation internal J and external 4 re employers

Support for Strategic Plan NA

Advisory Committee 4

Public information and marketing 4

5 Comparison with previous Program Review 4

Concluding Analysis

1 Based on the evaluation of the program s compliance with Council for InteriorDesign Accreditation Standards the following is an analysis of the success of theinterior design program at Kwantlen University College in achieving its declaredphilosophy and mission as stated in the introduction of the Program AnalysisReport

The interior design program at Kwantlen University College successfully delivers a welldeveloped professional education that prepares students for entry into the interior designprofession The program adheres to its philosophy and mission by offering anundergraduate education in interior design that is applied professional and career orientedThe program has few weaknesses and educates students who are highly sought after byemployers Many students are hired to work during their last year in the progratn Thecurriculum structure facilitates and advance student learning and students are exposed tothe professional community through critiques visits to firms and work experience Theprogram also instills necessary professional values in students

2 Based on the evaluation of the program s compliance with Council Standards thefollowing is an analysis of the success of the interior design program at KwantlenUniversity College in delivering a professional level education that preparesstudents for entry into the interior design profession including overall programstrengths and weaknesses

The visiting team observed many strengths during the site visit Learning experiencesprovided by the program foster critical analytical and strategic thinking 111 addition tocreative thinking Student understanding of human factors is also a program strength Thespace audit of a kitchen evidenced learning through an imaginative and systematic projectStudent work also demonstrated a strong ability to apply 3 dimensional design elements andprinciples to the development of the spatial envelope Students demonstrated strongschematic design skills through the development of clear and well articulated concepts andthe ability to rapidly visualize concepts through sketching Students have effective verbalcommunication skills and arc also able to communicate through paniculnrly strong mediaskills related to illustrative sketching Students understand how to design within the contextof building systems and apply laws codes and regulations Student work also demonstratedunderstanding of the impact that fire and life safety principles have on space planningStudents arc provided with a foundation in business and professional practice throughcomprehensive exposure

Program faculty are committed and hardworking and the facilities at Kwantlen UniversityCollege provide an effective learning environment The programsadministration is clearlydefined and supportive The program is also connected to a supportive professionalcommunity and maintains close connections with alumni The transition from a twoycarprogram to a fouryear program has bccn supported and applauded by area professionals

The visiting scam did observe some weaknesses For instance there is no permanent spacefor exhibitions critiques and displays Students also expressed frustration about the lack ofaccessibility to facilities which causes group work to suffer The building is open from 700am to 1000 pm MondayFriday and 800 am to 400 pm each Saturday The buildingis not open on Sundays Additionally the full time program coordinator is not an interiordesigner by education The program also does not publish infommtion related to academicquality and student achievement

Kwantlen university College 31 July 2006 Accreditation Report

Kwantlen

January 22 2008

Research Ethics Board

Office of Research and ScholarshipKwantlen University CollegeSurrey Campus

Dear Research Ethics Board

Attached is an application for Research Ethics Board approval of our ongoing program reviewprocess We understand that the approval of this request can be expedited and would very muchappreciate its being so

While the example used in this request is for the Psychology review we request that theResearch Ethics Board consider also approving this process and insn templaie for futurereviews We have attached the Fashion Design questionnaire to exemplify the sort of variationsthat we will make to the instrument to better examine individual programs The ethicalassurances for all procedures questionnaires interviews or focus groups will remain as outlinedin the documents attached to the current application in all cases

Sincerely

MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE

12666 72 Avenue 604599 2100

Surrey BC WEB SITE

Canada V3W 2M8 wwwkwantlenca

Kathleen BigsbyDirector Institutional Analysis Planning

Attachments

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyCover Letter

January 20081


RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD

APPLICATION FOR ETHICS REVIEW

Cover PageApplication

For REB use onlyPlease submit your application viaemail to researchokwantlenca

Title of project Kwantlen Program Review Psychology

Principal Investigator Program Review Facilitators and the Psychology Department

Position co Kathleen Bigsby Director

Department Institutional Analysis Planning

Contact telephone numbers 2928

Email KathleenBigsby@kwantlenca

Other contact methods optional

Fax 3128 Pager na

Preferred address to receive correspondence andor approval if other than emailna

CoinvestigatorsName Position Department Cathy Bray and Colleen McGoffDean Program Review Facilitators

Additional assistants and their roles Danielle Baxter Program ReviewAdministrative Assistant

4 key words Program Review Psychology

Proposed Start Date February 1 2008 Proposed End Date April 10 2008Expect a minimum of 6 8 weeks for a response from the Research Ethics Board

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review Psychology

Application Cover PageJanuary 2008

2

Signature

Principal Investigator

Date January 22 2008

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyApplication Cover Page

Director

January 20083

Full title of research Kwantlen Program Review Psychology

1 Describe the purpose of the research

Kwantlen University Collegeseducational offerings are reviewed regularly for their educational qualityThe university college has a systematic process by which educational quality and excellence can becontinually improved

Program reviews at the university college are intended to assist programs and the institution to determineand identify specific issues or concerns in order to build on the strengths and address any weaknessesof programs

Programs should not be viewed as isolated units within the institution the program review should besystemsfocused Reviews should examine a broad range of indicators including curriculum student andemployer satisfaction faculty and staff perspectives quality of programsrelationships within Kwantlenand with other institutions and the community and resources and facilities

2 Describe the research question or hypothesis to be tested if known

See above

3 Describe the methodology of the research studyproject

Information will be collected from students in classes selected to provide a representative sample ofPsychology students and programs A machine scannable questionnaire will be distributed and collectedby the Program Review staff andor Institutional Analysis Planning IABP staff Machine scannablequestionnaires or webbased questionnaires will be distributed to faculty and returned to IABP viaintercampus mail or responses will be automatically stored in a database on an in house server Shouldthe department under review decide it wishes to explore selected topics using focus groups of students orfaculty or individual interviews these will be conducted by Program Review andor IAP staff

The data collected through questionnaires and possibly focus groups or interviews will be analyzed byIABP staff for consideration by the Psychology department along with data from student outcomesurveys registration trend reports grade distribution reports and the provincial Student Mobility data basepart of the Student Transitions Project as the department under review determines the answers to thequestions posed in the Program Review guidelines

4 Describe the methodsof recruiting participants

Students in selected Psychology classes will be invited to complete a questionnaire their participation iscompletely voluntary The questionnaires will be anonymous Faculty will be sent a questionnaire in themail or via the web and asked to complete it anonymously Their participation is completely voluntary Ifthere are focus groups of either students or faculty they will be selected using purposive sampling from arandom number table

5 Describe the participant groups in this study

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyApplication

Excerpt Kwantlen University College Policy No B12

Students taking Psychology courses at Kwantlen faculty teaching those courses and possibly someKwantlen service providers eg librarians also external stakeholders such as employers and membersof external advisory committees

January 20084

6 Will the study involve any potential risks to the participants If so please describethe risks

As the student questionnaires are anonymous and are administered collected and analyzed by ProgramReview andor IAP staff any negative comments the students may make will not be attributable to aparticular student The administration and analysis of faculty questionnaires will similarly make theircontent completely anonymous Should there be interviews or focus groups of students faculty andorexternal stakeholders the names of participants will not be released to the Psychology department facultyor staff and no comments will be attributed to an individual See also attached sample questionnaires

Given that program chairs deans and some external stakeholders will be asked for particular informationand will have a unique perspective guaranteeing them anonymity may not be possible Such participantswill be informed of this and asked for their written consent to release their responses to the departmentunder review

7 Describe your informed consent procedures where applicable Where it is notapplicable explain why it is not eg where one is studying the public activities ofpoliticians who have agreed to publicity consent is already given Be sure toconsider all of the elements of the Requirement for Free and Informed Consent inthe guidelines

The introductory script see attached read to students in class will make it clear that their participation isvoluntary The introduction to the questionnaire instrument see attached will describe how the data is tobe analyzed and reported in order to protect individuals

The introduction to the faculty questionnaire instrument will describe how the data is to be analyzed andreported in order to protect individuals

Participants in the focus groups or interviews should these be held will be given a statement explaininghow their comments will be recorded analyzed and reported in order to protect individuals see attached

8 Where deception is used please include your rationale and debriefing procedures

Not applicable

9 What provisions are made for informing participants for followup with participants

The reports of questionnaire responses will in excerpt or in full form part of the departmentsProgramReview Self Study Report This report will be available to all members of the Psychology department andProgram Review committee and will be presented to the Education Council It may also be available onthe Program Review website Direct followup with participants is not applicable

10 How do you plan to handle the requirement of confidentiality andor anonymitywhere applicable

See 3 and 6 above

11 Describe any potential conflict of interest of anyone involved in the research

Not Applicable

12 Describe any provisions for compensation of participants if applicable

If focus groups are held with students they will be given 525 each and snacks


January 20085

13 To what purposes will this research be put Will it be published or presented to anaudience outside Kwantlen

This research is intended primarily for an internal audience as part of the departments program reviewWhile external reviewers will see it it is not intended for publication or presentation to a broad externalaudience However it may in future become accessible to an external audience via the KwantlenProgram Review website see response to question 9

14 Please notify the REB when your research is complete Please submit anannual succinct status report to let us know if there are any changes from what wasdescribed in this application

This form must be resubmitted after approval if there are major changes to your studySee part C of the Kwantlen University College policy on post approval monitoringMajor changes include changes in protocol consent risks participant groupsrecruitment compensation deception confidentiality anonymity researchers involvedor other ethically sensitive matters Please highlight changes on the resubmitted form

Date January 22 2008 Signature


January 20086

O

O

Program Review Student Questionnaire

Introductory script to be read in each classprior to the administration of the Program Review Questionnaire

to be administered by Program ReviewInstitutional Analysis Planning staff with faculty absent

Hello my name is and Im here as a member of the Program ReviewInstitutional AnalysisPlanning staff at Kwantlen University College to invite you to fill out a questionnaire The results of thisquestionnaire are used to improve students experiences at Kwantlen

This questionnaire which should take about 15 minutes to complete is in no way associated with theevaluation of your work in this class Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may skip anyquestion you do not wish to answer Your instructors will see only aggregated results of thesequestionnaires

Your responses are anonymous please do not write your name or student number anywhere on this formThis questionnaire will ask you about your experiences in the Kwantlen Psychology program and somebackground information to help us analyze survey responses When we analyze the responses and presentthe results all answers will be summarized Your own particular answers will NOT be identifiable

Thank you for your participation

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyIntroductory Script to Student Questionnaire

January 20087

Dear Student

This questionnaire will ask you about your experiences in the Kwantlen University CollegePsychology program The results of this questionnaire are used to improve students experiencesat Kwantlen

Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may skip any question you do not wish toanswer Your responses are anonymous please do not write your name or student numberanywhere on this form This ensures that your name cannot be associated with any results whenthe data is analyzed and reported

Please answer the following questions regarding your experience with the Psychologydepartment Please take a moment before answering each question to ensure your response is asaccurate as possible Your response on each question will be rated on a 5 point scale where 1 isvery satisfied and 5 is very dissatisfied If a question is not applicable to your situation pleaseindicate by marking the If you dont know please indicate by marking the A


Kwantlen University CollegeQuestionnaire Psychology Department

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with each of the following components of thePsychology program

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyStudent Questionnaire

very somewhat neutral somewhat very not dont

satisfied sal dissa t dissat applic know

Availability of courseslower level 10002000 1 2 3 4 5

upper level 30004000 1 2 3 4 5

Variety of course topics 1 2 3 4 5

Timing of courses availability across semesterslower level I 2 3 4 5

upper level 1 2 3 4 5

Timing of courses weekly schedulelower level I 2 3 4 5

upper level 1 2 3 4 5

Quality of instructionlower level 1 2 3 4 5

upper level I 2 3 4 5

Quality of textbooks 1 2 3 4 5

Preparation through prerequisites 1 2 3 4 5

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

January 20088

Range of course delivery optionseg online classroom etc

Breadth of information providedUnderstanding which you achieved

I 2 3 4 5

2 3 4 5

I 2 3 4 5

I 2 3 4 5

independent learning skills I 2 3 4 5

writing skills I 2 3 4 5

oral communication skills

classroom discussion I 2 3 4 5

presentations I 2 3 4 5

small group I 2 3 4 5

teamwork skills I 2 3 4 5

acquisition of information I 2 3 4 5

analysis of information I 2 3 4 5

synthesis of infomtation 1 2 3 4 5

critical evaluation of information I 2 3 4 5

problem solving 1 2 3 4 5

statistical analysis skills I 2 3 4 5

basic computer skillsword processing I 2 3 4 5

spreadsheet I 2 3 4 5

statistics programs 1 2 3 4 5

instrument development skillseg surveys 1 2 3 4 5

Electronic resources

computers on campus I 2 3 4 5

wireless access I 2 3 4 5


A

A

A

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following aspects of the Psychology laboratory

Resources

psych materials I 2 3 4 5

psych tests I 2 3 4 5

psych activities I 2 3 4 5

research pool I 2 3 4 5

study and work room I 2 3 4 5

hours of availability I 2 3 4 5

I low satisfied are you with the information provided regarding the Psychology lab servicesA

Please indicate your satisfaction with your own improvement in the following skills in your Psychologycourses

n

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

Please indicate your level of use of resources available at Kwantlen in support of your courses inPsychology

A

A

January 20089

access to emailmaterials 1 2 3 4 5

while off campusmvKwantlen I 2 3 4 5

cclassrooms I 2 3 4 5

Psych department webpage I 2 3 4 5

Library resources

librarian support I 2 3 4 5

books 1 2 3 4 5

journals inc on line 1 2 3 4 5

other materials eg AV 1 2 3 4 5

interlibrary loans I 2 3 4 5

Campus resourcesbookstore 1 2 3 4 5

photocopying I 2 3 4 5

places to study I 2 3 4 5

places to gather and talk 1 2 3 4 5

classroomlecture facilities I 2 3 4 5

Student supportwriting support 1 2 3 4 5

mathstats support 1 2 3 4 5

tutorial support 1 2 3 4 5

feedback on your work 1 2 3 4 5

research opportunities 1 2 3 4 5

educational advising I 2 3 4 5

counseling I 2 3 4 5

assessment services

eg English proficiency math assessmentI 2 3 4 5

registration I 2 3 4 5

student loans and awards I 2 3 4 5

international student services I 2 3 4 5

disability services I 2 3 4 5

First Nations services I 2 3 4 5

Electronic resources

computers on campus I 2 3 4 5

wireless access 1 2 3 4 5

access to email materials I 2 3 4 5

while off campusmyKwantlen I 2 3 4 5

eclassrooms 1 2 3 4 5

Psych department webpage I 2 3 4 5

Library resources

librarian support 1 2 3 4 5

books I 2 3 4 5


A

A

A

A

A

A

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with resources available at Kwantlen in support of yourcourses in Psychology

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

January 200810

journals inc on line 1 2 3 4 5

other materials eg AV I 2 3 4 5

interlibrary loans 1 2 3 4 5

Campus resourcesbookstore 1 2 3 4 5

photocopying 1 2 3 4 5

places to study I 2 3 4 5

places to gather and talk 1 2 3 4 5

classroom lecture facilities I 2 3 4 5

Student supportwriting support I 2 3 4 5

mathstats support I 2 3 4 5

tutorial support 1 2 3 4 5

feedback on your work I 2 3 4 5

research opportunities 1 2 3 4 5

educational advising I 2 3 4 5

counseling 1 2 3 4 5

assessment services

eg English proficiency math assessment1 2 3 4 5

registration 1 2 3 4 5

student loans and awards I 2 3 4 5

international student services I 2 3 4 5

disability services I 2 3 4 5

First Nations services 1 2 3 4 5

Flow satisfied are you with the information provided regarding available student services1 2 3 4 5

Professors please provide an average rating for all coursescurrency in the field 1 2 3 4

commitment to teaching I 2 3 4

availability egoffice hours email phone etcI 2 3 4

respond in a timely manner 1 2 3 4

demonstration of current research involvement1 2 3 4

respect for students I 2 3 4

lecture format 1 2 3 4 5

group work I 2 3 4 5

question and answer 1 2 3 4 5

extra class 1 2 3 4 5

seminar format I 2 3 4 5


A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

5 n

5 A

5 A

5

Teaching and learning methods used in your courses please provide an average rating for all coursesA

A

A

A

A

January 200811

I am satisfied that the financial investment in my education was worthwhile2 3 4 5

I am satisfied that the time investment in my education was worthwhileI 2 3 4 5

A

Miscellaneous

I made relationships with peers that I intend to maintain into the future2 3 4 5

I made relationships with professors that I intend to maintain into the future2 3 4 5

What unnecessary duplication if any do you see in the curriculum Please identify and explain

Identify those aspects of the program that you found the most useful and explain why

What changes would you make to the program and why

A

A

A

Are there any other comments that would help us understand your experience in the program

Please feel free to elaborate on any response you have made 011 any item on the questionnaire


January 200812

Dear Faculty member


Curriculum

Faculty Questions for Psychology Program Reviewdraft

As part of Kwantlensongoing efforts to improve its services and environments for all itsstakeholders the following information will be useful for us to evaluate the current state of ourprogram The information you provide will help us to identify ways in which we might alter theprogram to better meet the needs of students faculty staff and the community

In keeping with the norms of ethical research procedures your participation is entirely voluntaryand you may skip questions you do not wish to answer The information you supply will remainanonymous during data analysis and within the final report of the selfstudy committee

1 Are you satisfied that the program ensures that Psychology students have opportunities tolearn essential skills circle a number where I is very satisfied 5 is not at all satisfied

creative thinking and problem solving skills

oral skills

interpersonal skills

teamwork and leadership skills

personal management and entrepreneurial skills

writing skills

reading and information skills

visual literacy

mathematical skills

intercultural skills

technological skills

citizenship and global perspective

2 Is there any unnecessary duplication in the curriculum Please explain

3 Is the curriculum in need of revision Please explainTeaching and Learning Methodologies

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyFaculty Questions

12345

12345

12345

12345

12345

12345

12345

12345

12345

12345

I2345

12345

January 200813

I If you have used the following teaching methods in Psychbeen in achieving learning outcomes

o discussion groupso audio visual presentations eg film or slideso experimentso observation of current events

o lectures

o role playo group project worko debates

o field tripso question and answer

Program Delivery

2 In your experience employing the following assessmenteffective are they in assessing learning outcomes

o closed book exams

essay exams

multiple choice exams MCshort answer SAmixed SA essay andor MC

o open book examso research essayso reports on experiments

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3 Do you apply recent scholarship of teaching and learning SOIL to you methods If soplease provide examples

4 Please provide any additional pertinent information that you wish to include

What delivery modes have you used in Psychology Please choose all that apply classroommixed mode distance condensed courses coop clinical work terms simulated workexperiences practicum independent study lecture labs tutorials other

2 Do you have access to training and other resources necessary to support the delivery modesPlease explain

3 Which new delivery modes should be available for your courses

ology how effective have they

3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used3 4 5 not used

methods in Psychology how

12 3 4 5 not used1 2 3 4 5 not used1 2 3 4 5 not used1 2 3 4 5 not used1 2 3 4 5 not used1 2 3 4 5 not used1 2 3 4 5 not used

4 1 low does the course include teaming activities andor evaluation criteria which may supportaccess for a student with a physical mobility hearing visual emotional or learningdifference For instance are materials available in alternate formats such as audio recordinge text preferably html Braille etc

5 How do the delivery modes make optimum use of natural resources and protect the naturalenvironment For instance are materials reused reduced andor recycled If so offerexamples

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review Psychology January 2008Faculty Questions 14

6 Please provide any additional pertinent information that you wish to include

Communications and advertising about the Psychology program

I Flow satisfied are you with the quantity and quality of information provided to thecommunity about your program

Identify the organizations institutions and or community groups that should receiveinformation about your program

3 What changes would you like to see in information provided to the community about yourprogram

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyFaculty Questions

January 200815

This guided discussioninterview is intended to assist the program to complete a selfstudy as part of a Kwantlen University College program review

The discussionsinterview will be facilitated by who will outline questions and guidethe relatively free flowing discussioninterview The discussioninterview will take about onehour Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may skip discussion of questions you donot wish to answer

The information you offer will be recorded by a note taker andor posted on posters If anaudiorecorder is used you will be informed of this and will be asked to grant permission foryour voice to be recorded All written information and recordings will be safely stored and usedonly for the purposes of program review Names will not be recorded

This discussion will focus on your experiences in the Kwantlen program Duringanalysis of the responses and in the presentation results your own particular answers will NOTbe identifiable All responses will be summarized and any information which would allow anindividual to be identified will be removed from the final report

If you are a student your participation in this focus group will have no bearing on the evaluationof your work in any course in which you are enrolled


Kwantlen University CollegeInterview or Focus Group for Program Review

Introduction for Participants

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyIntroduction for Interview or Focus Group

January 200816

Interview Questions for Program Chairs and DeansCurriculum

What mechanisms does your program use to ensure that there is no unnecessary duplicationof learning objectives across courses within the program

o Ilow effective are these mechanisms

Articulation with other Kwantlen programs and other institutions

What are the minimum number of credits that must be completed at Kwantlen for successfulcompletion of your program What is the impact of this requirement

Does your program grant credit based on prior learning assessment If so what are thestrengths or weaknesses of your PLA process What are the strengths or weaknesses of thiscredit granting practice

If it is not currently in use has the program considered introducing PLA

Does the policy for granting transfer credit for equivalent courses andor programs completedat other institutions satisfy the requirements for this program Does the policy meet studentneeds

Are there future plans for establishing further articulation agreements so that transfer creditwill be granted for courses completed in this program toward meeting requirements forcredentials offered at other institutions

Please provide any additional pertinent information that you wish to include

Supportfor Strategic Plan

In what way does your program reflect and support the Coals and Strategies outlined inKwantlensCreating Our Future Strategic Plan 2007 2015 specifically to

a Promote all aspects of scholarship to inspire and support inquiry for the development anddelivery of educational programs and services within the learning environment

b Create Centres of Excellence that align existing strengths in our programs to innovationentrepreneurship and stewardship opportunities in our region

What kind of institutional support if any could assist your programs curriculum andprogram structure to reflect and support the strategic plan


REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyInterview Questions for Program Chairs and Deans Curriculum

January 200817

Interview Questions for Program Chairs and DeansExternal Relations

Advisory Committee

Does your program have an Advisory Committee If so please list the members and theirroles

1 low frequently has the committee met in the last three years Is this adequate to yourprogramsneeds

What recommendations if any did the Advisory Committee make in any of the last threemeetings 1lave they been acted upon Please elaborate

If there is no advisory committee please explain what processes your program uses in lieuor provide a rationale for not requiring one


Public Information and Communication

What information about the program is conveyed to the community

What means are used to convey information about your program to the communitybrochure newspaper ad newsletter forum information session etc

Identify the organizations institutions and or community groups that regularly receiveinformation about your program

What additional organizations institutions andor community groups would benefit fromlearning about your program potential students employers service groups etc

What other changes would you like to see in information provided to the community aboutyour program

In what ways can the institution assist you with informing the public about your programPlease be specific

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyInterview Questions for Program Chairs and Deans External Relations

January 200818

The Fashion Design and Technology department is undertaking a program review in order tocontinue developing in a relevant comprehensive and engaging manner We need your help inthis as you can provide us important information about ways we might better serve you as astudent We will ask you to consider the university college as a whole your Fashion programand your own personal experience

Please answer the following questions regarding your experience with the resources and supportat Kwantlen Please take a moment before answering each of the questions to ensure yourresponse is as accurate as possible Rate your response on a 5 point scale where 5 is verysatisfied and I is very dissatisfied

lithe question is not applicable regarding your situation please indicate by marking the If

you dont know please indicate by marking the

Please indicate your year and program

Year I Year 2

Kwantlen University CollegeFashion Design and Technology Department

Questionnaire Satisfaction with Kwantlen University College

Year 3 Year 4

Fashion Design and Technology Degree Diploma Certilicate

1low satisfied are you with the information Kwantlen provides regarding available student services andresources

5 4 3 2 1

Please indicate your level of USE of resources that are available at Kwantlen in support of your fashioneducation

VeryHigh

Electronic Resources

Computers on campus 5 4 3 2

Wireless access 5 4 3 2

Off campus access to email 5 4 3 2

myKwantlen 5 4 3 2 I

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyFashion Design Questionnaire Kwantlen Questions Student

Very Very Not Dont

Satisfied Dissatisfied Applicable Know

Very Not Dont

Low Applicable Know

January 200819

A

A

A

A

A

EclassroomsMoodlc 5 4 3 2 I

Fashion department webpaee 5 4 3 2 I

Library ResourcesLibrarian support 5 4 3 2 I

Books 5 4 3 2 1

Journals inc on line 5 4 3 2 1

Other materials egAV 5 4 3 2 1

Interlibrary loans 5 4 3 2 I

Campus ResourcesBookstore 5 4 3 2 I

Photocopying 5 4 3 2 I

Places to study 5 4 3 2 I

Places to gather and talk 5 4 3 2 I

Classroomlecture facilities 5 4 3 2 I


Please indicate your level of USE of the services that are available at Kwantlen in supportof your fashion education

January 200820

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

Vcry Vcry Not Dont

High Low Applicable Know

0Student SupportRegistration 5 4 3 2 I A

Admissions 5 4 3 2 I A

First Year Orientation 5 4 3 2 I A

Learning Center support 5 4 3 2 I A

Writing support 5 4 3 2 I A

Math support 5 4 3 2 I A

Educational Advising 5 4 3 2 I A

Counseling 5 4 3 2 I A

Student Loans and Awards 5 4 3 2 I A

International services 5 4 3 2 I A

Disability services 5 4 3 2 I A

Native services 5 4 3 2 I A

Student Association 5 4 3 2 I A

3

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with resources and support services that are availableat Kwantlen in support of your fashion education

Very Very Not Dont

Satisfied Dissatisfied Applicable Know

Electronic Resources

Computers on campus 5 4 3 2 I

Wireless access 5 4 3 2 I

Off campus access to email 5 4 3 2 I

myKwantlen 5 4 3 2 I

EclassroomsMoodle 5 4 3 2 I

Fashion department webpage 5 4 3 2 1

Library ResourcesLibrarian support 5 4 3 2 1

I3ooks 5 4 3 2 I

Journals inc on line 5 4 3 2 I

Other materials egAV 5 4 3 2 l

Interlibrary loans 5 4 3 2 t

Campus ResourcesBookstore 5 4 3 2 1

Photocopying 5 4 3 2 I

Places to study 5 4 3 2 1

Places to gather and talk 5 4 3 2 I

Classroomlecture facilities 5 4 3 2 I

Student SupportRegistration 5 4 3 2 I

Admissions 5 4 3 2 I

First Year Orientation 5 4 3 2 I

Learning Center support 5 4 3 2 I

Writing support 5 4 3 2 I

Math support 5 4 3 2 I

Educational Advising 5 4 3 2 1


A

A

k A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

k A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

January 200821

Counseling 5 4 3 2 I

Student Loans and Awards 5 4 3 2 I

International services 5 4 3 2 I

Disability services 5 4 3 2 I

Native services 5 4 3 2 I

Student Association 5 4 3 2 I

Thank you for your time and care The information you have provided will help us plan for the future


A

A

A

A

A

January 200822

Kwantlen University CollegeFashion Design and Technology Department

Questionnaire Satisfaction with Fashion Design and Technology Program


Please answer the following questions regarding your experience with the learning environmentin your Fashion program Please take a moment before answering each of the questions toensure your response is as accurate as possible Rate your response on a 5 point scale where 5 isvery satisfied and 1 is very dissatisfied

If the question is not applicable regarding your situation please indicate by marking the If

you dont know please indicate by marking the A


Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Fashion Design and Technology Degree Diploma Certificate

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with each of the following components of the Fashion program

Admission Procedures

Information sessions

Port folio workshop

Portfolio Review process

Acceptance Notice efficiency

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

Transfer of Post Secondary CreditsEfficiency 5 4 3

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyFashion Design Questionnaire Program Questions Student

Very Very Not dont

Satisfied dissatisfied Applicable know

January 200823

A

A

A

A

A

Class SchedulingTime tabling of courses availability across semesters

Year I Year 2 5 4 3 2 I

Year 3 Year 4 5 4 3 2 I

Scheduling of courses dayeveningYear I Year 2 5 4 3 2 I

Year 3 Year 4 5 4 3 2 I

Range of Course Delivery Optionseg online classroom etc 5 4 3 2 I

Program ResourcesClass room work space general 5 4 3 2 I

Drawer availability 5 4 3 2 I

Locker availability 5 4 3 2 1

Security of resources 5 4 3 2 1

Sewing room 5 4 3 2 I

Drafting room 5 4 3 2 I

Computer room 5 4 3 2 1

Design and marketing rooms 5 4 3 2 I

Pins and Needles Store 5 4 3 2 I

Access to computer lab out of class 5 4 3 2 I

Access to classrooms out of class 5 4 3 2 I

Curriculum

Linkage between courses in a semester5 4 3 2 I

Linkage of courses across years5 4 3 2 I

Linkage with industry 5 4 3 2 I

Internship in 3 year 5 4 3 2 I

Variety of course content 5 4 3 2 I

Manageable WorkloadYear I 5 4 3 2 1

Year 2 5 4 3 2 1

Year 3 5 4 3 2 1

Year 4 5 4 3 2 1


A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

Teaching and Learning Methods Used in Your Courses please provide an average rating for all coursesLecture format 5 4 3 2 I A

Group work 5 4 3 2 I A

Question and Answer 5 4 3 2 1 A

Demonstration 5 4 3 2 1 A

Industry speakers 5 4 3 2 1 A

Industrybased projects 5 4 3 2 1 A

The program provides flexibility with electives5 4 3 2 I A

January 200824

A 3

4

3

FacultyFaculty demonstrate

Punctuality 5 4 3 2 1

Organization 5 4 3 2 1

Enthusiasm 5 4 3 2 I

Commitment 5 4 3 2 I

Respect 5 4 3 2 I

Availability 5 4 3 2 1

Timely feedback 5 4 3 2 I

Currency 5 4 3 2 I

Linkages between courses 5 4 3 2 I

Linkages with industry 5 4 3 2 I

Summer Courses

Availability of fashion courses 5 4 3 2 I

Draping 5 4 3 2 I

Adobe Illustrator 5 4 3 2 I

Overall

I can meet with my instructor in a space that is private5 4 3 2 I A

I am satisfied that the financial investment in my education is worthwhile5 4 3 2 I A

Fashion scholarships are adequate in number5 4 3 2 1 A

The program provides opportunities to study abroad5 4 3 2 1 A

What I am learning is relevant to my goals5 4 3 2 I A

I am satisfied that completion of my fashion studies is increasing my ability to meet my career goals5 4 3 2 I A

One aspect of the program that works well is

One aspect of the program that needs improvement is


A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

January 200825

A

A

A


Please answer the following questions regarding your personal learning experience within yourFashion program Please take a moment before answering each of the questions to ensure yourresponse is as accurate as possible Rate your response on a 5 point scale where 5 is verysatisfied and I is very dissatisfied

If the question is not applicable regarding your situation please indicate by marking the If

you dont know please indicate by marking the


Year I Year 2

Kwantlen University CollegeFashion Design and Technology DepartmentQuestionnaire Personal Learning Satisfaction

Year 3 Year 4

Fashion Design and Technology Degree Diploma Cenilicate

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with each of the following components of the Fashion program

Quality of InstructionLower level

Upper level

Quality of textbooks 5 4 3 2 I

Breadth of information provided 5 4 3 2 I

Understanding which you achieved 5 4 3 2 I

REB Application for Ethics Review Program Review PsychologyFashion Design Questionnaire Personal Learning Experience

Very Very Not dont

Satisfied dissatisfied Applicable know

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2

i

January 200826

Please indicate your satisfaction with your own development in the following essential skills in your fashiondesign production and marketing courses Please answer separately for each area

Creative Thinking and Problem Solving SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I

Production courses 5 4 3 2 I

Marketing courses 5 4 3 2 I

Visual Literacy SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I


Marketing courses 5 4 3 2 1

Teamwork and Leadership SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I



Interpersonal SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I



Intercultural Skills

Design courses 5 4 3 2 I



Personal Management and Entrepreneurial SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I



Citizenship and Global Perspective SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I



Reading and Information SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I

Production courses 5 4 3 2 1


Writing SkillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I



Oral Skills

Design courses 5 4 3 2 I




A

A

A

A

A

A

n

A

i A

i A

i A

i A

i A

i A

A

i A

A

i A

i A

A

i A

A

A

A

i A

i A

i A

A

A

January 200827

Math Skills

Design courses 5 4 3 2 1



Technological Skills computer programs production specific skillsDesign courses 5 4 3 2 I



Analytical skillsDesign coursesProduction courses

Marketing coursesAbility to synthesize

Design coursesProduction courses

Marketing coursesIndependent learning skills


Marketing coursesBusiness skills


Marketing coursesNetworking skills


Marketing coursesComputer Skills


Marketing courses

Overall

am satisfied my studies promote the

I am satisfied my studies promote the

I am satisfied with opportunities to co

I am satisfied with opportunities to co

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 I

5 4 3 2 1

5 4 3 2 1

growth of my skills knowledge and ability5 4 3 2 I

growth of my self confidence5 4 3 2 I

nnect with fellow students

5 4 3 2

nnect with instructors

5 4 3 2 1

I am able through my studies to stay passionate about my love for fashion5 4 3 2 1

One key comment 1 want to add is


January 200828

A

A CO

A

A

A

A

A

3

3

PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE Kwantlen MEETING Review... · 2017-06-14 · 1 Minutes of November 28 2007...

Documents

Transcript of PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE Kwantlen MEETING Review... · 2017-06-14 · 1 Minutes of November 28 2007...