PROGRAM REVIEW An Overview

2016-2017

Res

ourc

es

Program Review Officers • James Marshall – Graduate Programs

• Aide Navarro ainavarro@csufresno.edu 278-2448

• Xuanning Fu – Undergraduate Programs • Aide Navarro ainavarro@csufresno.edu 278-2448

Office of Institutional Effectiveness (OIE)• Angel Sanchez

Program Review Websitehttp://www.fresnostate.edu/academics/policies-forms/prog-review/

Pro

cess

Tim

elin

e TASK DESCRIPTION Y E A R 1 Y E A R 2

S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M

Program notified of upcoming review

Identify self-study coordinatorX

Orientation meeting with chairs/coordinatorsX

OIE provides program with data setX

Prepare self-studyX X X X X

Draft of self-study to College/School DeanX X

Submit self-study to university level X

University level responds to draft self-study X X

Final self-study to university level X

Identify review team membersX X X X

Schedule review team visitX X

Review team visitX

Report from review team to programX

Program response to review team reportX X

School/College Dean's response to review team reportX

University committee review team response X X X X X

Univ. Comm. letter to Dept./Univ.X

Schedule Action Plan meetingX X

Action Plan by departmentX X

Action Plan response from the deanX X

Action Plan meetingX X

*University Level refers to Program Review Officer(s)

Acc

redi

tatio

n

MAJOR TASKS

Program is notified of upcoming review

Program notifies DGS of national accreditation date

Accreditation review team site-visit

Findings from the national accreditation review team’s visit are submitted to DGS

Program’s response to accreditation findings is submitted to DGS

School/College Dean’s response to accreditation findings is submitted to DGS

University committee reviews responses and accreditation documentation and a copy of the report is submitted to DGS

Action Plan meeting is scheduled

Action Plan is submitted to review officer(s)

Action Plan meeting is held

Final Action Plan is signed and distributed

Abbreviated Program Review for Nationally Accredited Programs

• Still required that expectations of APM 220 be met

• In addition, the program will also provide: • Student Outcomes assessment Plan (SOAP)• Findings of the site-visit • Final accreditation decision

Ele

men

ts o

f Sel

f-S

tudy

• Self-Study Coordinator

• Previous Review Team Report and Action Plan

• OIE Dataset

• Current Vision and Mission Statement

• Information about your program

• Faculty vitae

• Self-Study Template

Note that a separate self-study must be prepared for each degree program.

Vis

iting

Tea

mConsists of three people

• A discipline expert from another campus

• A faculty member from your college/school

• A faculty member from outside your college/school

Qualifications

Nominated by the program and approved by the college/school Dean• Outside expert – please nominate three people using the

Review Panel Nomination Form

• Campus team members – emailed to James Marshall and/or Xuanning Fu

Thank you