Program Overview and Early Implementation …West Sacramento Levee Improvement Program Program...
Transcript of Program Overview and Early Implementation …West Sacramento Levee Improvement Program Program...
West Sacramento Levee Improvement Program
Program Overview andProgram Overview andEarly Implementation ProjectsEarly Implementation Projects
PresentationPresentation
West Sacramento Area Flood Control AgencyU.S. Army Corps of EngineersDepartment of Water Resources
Welcome and Meeting Purpose
• Michael Bessette, Flood Protection Manager
• Description and Overview of the West Sacramento Levee Improvement Program (WSLIP)
• Program Partners include: USACE, DWR, CVFPB, MBK Engineers, HDR Engineering, ICF, Kleinfelder, KSN Engineering, NHC, David Ford
• WSAFCA: City of West Sacramento, RD 900, and RD 537
Flood Risk Awareness• Communities throughout the Central Valley are at Risk to
Flooding
• National Flooding Events (2005 - present): New Orleans, Fargo ND, Midwest, Iowa, Tennessee, East Coast
• Flood issues have national attention (e.g., understanding risk, floodplain management, level of protection, insurance requirements, levee design criteria, climate change effects, flood protection responsibility)
• West Sacramento Takes Action on Flood Protection
City Actions
• City Council makes Flood Protection No. 1 Priority• City Management Focus on Flood Protection, Selects
and Contracts with Consultant Team• WSAFCA Successfully Passes Proposition 218
Election (70%) – assessment on property• City Council Passes Ordinance on New Development• City Approves Sales Tax Extension Targeted toward
Flood Protection• In Process of Establishing Planned Development
Overlay (levee protection zone)
Program Objectives
• Achieve a minimum of 200-year level of flood protection for the entire City (City Ordinance)
• Prioritize and select levee reaches for improvement• Construct levee improvements as quickly as possible
to reduce flood risk (State EIP Program)• Identify opportunities to work with local and regional
partners to complete work efficiently and economically
• Achieve Congressional Authorization for the WSLIP
Program History
• Recent Flood Protection Efforts– 1990-1993: $9 million in repairs to Southport levees
– 1999-2002: $32 million in repairs on Sacramento and Yolo Bypass levees
– 2006: 2 levee sites repaired by DWR
– 2007/08: WSAFCA and DWR Conduct levee evaluations
– 2008: I Street Levee Improvement Project Completed
– 2009: Slip Repair Completed on Yolo Bypass Levee
– 2009/10: Levee improvement designs underway
Study Area
• 50+ miles of levees protecting the City
• Levees divided into nine study reaches
• 17 miles along the Deep Water Ship Channel also being evaluated
• City divided by Deep Water Ship Channel
Planning Process
• Problem Identification – locating and scoping deficiencies (2007/08)
• Alternatives Analysis – matching potential improvements to address the deficiencies (2008/09)
• Environmental Documentation – evaluating possible environmental effects from the potential improvements (2009/10)
• Estimated Total Construction Cost = $460 million
Alternatives Analysis –Possible Improvement Measures
• Raising the existing levee• Constructing an adjacent or setback levee• Slope flattening• Seepage berms or stability berms• Cutoff walls• Levee drains and relief wells• Stone protection• Removing non-compliant vegetation
PROGRAM ACTIVITESPROGRAM ACTIVITES• General Re-Evaluation Report (2009 – 2013)• Early Implementation Program
– The Rivers– CHP Academy– Sac-River Setback
• Sac-Bank Setback Levee Project• Yolo Bypass Levee Slip Repair Projects• Delta Levee Stability Program
GRR Schedule & Work in Progress
• GRR Study Initiated – April, 2009• Technical Review Strategy Session – March 30, 2010• F3 Conference (Feasibility Scoping) – February 2011• F4 Conference (Alternative Review) – Nov 2011• F6 (Public Review of Draft GRR, EIR/S – July 2012• F7 Feasibility Review Conference – August 2012• GRR Chief’s Report – January 2013
Early Implementation• Sites are under evaluation for early implementation
projects (EIPs) to quickly reduce flood risk and are selected based on criteria including:– greatest improvement in public safety with least negative effects
– Env. concerns, permitting, real estate, and availability of funds
– integration of multipurpose objectives
• First EIP completed in 2008 (I Street Bridge Site)
• Three EIPs for 2011/2012 construction– CHP Academy site (2011)
– The Rivers site (2011)
– Sac Bank Extension site (2012)
CHP Early Implementation Project
• 6,300 feet of Sacramento Bypass South Levee
• Install cutoff wall under levee crown
• Correct waterside levee slope
• Install access road with pavement and access
controls for bicyclists and pedestrians
Rivers Early Implementation Project
• 3,100 feet of Sacramento River levee adjacent to Bryte Park
• Install cutoff wall under levee crown• Install access ramps and road with pavement for
bicyclists and pedestrians, turnstile at River Crest Dr.• Install paved pathway along south edge of riparian
vegetation, connecting Rivers trail and river overlook• Continuing study of extension of levee improvements
through Rivers subdivision
CHP Academy and The RiversCHP Academy and The RiversImplementation TimelineImplementation Timeline
• Project Design• Environmental Review and Project Permitting• DWR Funding• CVFPB Submittals and Actions• Federal Approvals (104) and Permissions
(408)• Real Estate
Project DesignFeb. 2010
Mar. 2010 • Complete CHP 90% plans and specs • Complete Rivers 90% plans and specs
Apr. 2010
May 2010
Jun. 2010
Jul. 2010 • Complete CHP 100% plans and specs• Complete Rivers 100% plans and specs
Aug. 2010
Sep. 2010
Oct. 2010 • Approve CHP and the Rivers contract documents & authorize advertisement (WSAFCA Board)
Nov. 2010
Dec. 2010
Jan. 2011
Feb. 2011 • Award CHP Construction Contract (WSAFCA Board)• Award The Rivers Construction Contract (WSAFCA Board)
Environmental Review and Project PermittingFeb. 2010 • Corps Verifies Wetland DelineationMar. 2010
Apr. 2010• Submit USFWS/NMFS Letters Requesting No Effect Concurrence• Submit Streambed Alteration Agreements to CDFG• Submit 106 Concurrence Request
May 2010 • Release of Public Draft EIS/EIR for Review
Jun. 2010
• Conduct Public Meeting on Draft EIS/R • Draft EIS/R Public Review Period Closes • USFWS/NMFS issue No Effect Letters• SHPO issues 106 letter of concurrence
Jul. 2010
Aug. 2010 • CAR PreparedSep. 2010 • WSAFCA Board Certifies Final EIR (CEQA) Oct. 2010 • Release of Final EIS/R for Public review (NEPA)Nov. 2010 • Completion of Public Review of Final EIS/EIR (NEPA)Dec. 2010 • USACE Issue 408 Permission and Record of Decision on Final EIS (NEPA)Jan. 2011Feb. 2011
DWR FundingFeb. 2010
Mar. 2010
Apr. 2010
May 2010 • WSAFCA submits Draft Economic Analysis to DWR.Jun. 2010
Jul. 2010 • WSAFCA submits all required information to execute funding agreement.Aug. 2010
Sep. 2010
Oct. 2010
• DWR finalizes and signs decision memo • Execute Construction Funding Agreement • WSAFCA Submits First Work Plan• WSAFCA Submits Real Estate Plan to DWR
Nov. 2010 • DWR/DGS approval of RE Plan and appraisalsDec. 2010 • DWR makes first non-real estate paymentJan. 2011 • DWR makes real estate paymentsFeb. 2011
CVFPB Submittals and ActionsFeb. 2010
Mar. 2010• Submit Encroachment Permit application for CHP Academy & The
Rivers• Submit 104 Credit Request letter
Apr. 2010 • WSAFCA Submit Draft 408 PackageMay 2010
Jun. 2010 • CVFPB issues 408 request to USACE• CVFPB issues Federal credit request letter to USACE
Jul. 2010
Aug. 2010
Sep. 2010
Oct. 2010
Nov. 2010
Dec. 2010
Jan. 2011 • CVFPB issues CHP Academy & The Rivers Encroachment Permits• CVFPB makes CEQA findings
Feb. 2011
Federal Approvals and PermissionsFeb. 2010
Mar. 2010
Apr. 2010
May 2010
Jun. 2010
Jul. 2010
Aug. 2010
Sep. 2010
Oct. 2010
Nov. 2010 • 408 approval released to Division and Head QuartersDec. 2010 • Division and Head Quarters approves 408 requestJan. 2011
Feb. 2011 • Assistant Secretary of the Army Issues Federal Credit Approval
Multi-objective Benefits
• Recreation– trails along the river corridor for biking and walking
– river access for fishing and water play
– wildlife viewing and picnicking
• Open Space and Habitat– restore areas to mitigate project effects
– enhancement of fish and aquatic habitat along the river’s edge and wetland and upland areas on and near levees
• Satisfy State/Fed Desire for Multi-benefit Projects
Additional Program Components
• Development Review and Floodplain Management
• FEMA Remapping and Flood Insurance
• Flood Season Preparedness
• Emergency Preparedness and Coordination (EOC)
• Public Outreach and Education
Program Q & A