PROFORMA FOR PREPARATION OF ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 … · Tamil Nadu Agricultural University...

131
1 PROFORMA FOR PREPARATION OF ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 (April 2019-March 2020) APR SUMMARY Name of the KVK: Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kanyakumari 1. Technology Assessment Category No. of Technology Assessed & Refined No. of Trials No. of Farmers Technology Assessed Crops 6 30 30 Livestock - - - Various enterprises 1 5 5 Total 7 35 35 Technology Refined Crops - - - Livestock - - - Various enterprises - - - Total - - - Grand Total 7 35 35 2. Frontline demonstrations Details No. of Farmers/Locations Area (ha) Units/Animals Oilseeds 5 2 - Pulses 20 8 - Cereals - - - Fruits 30 10 - Vegetables 30 6 - Flowers 30 2.54 - Other crops 10 4.0 - Total 125 32.54 - Livestock & Fisheries - - - Other enterprises 10 - 10 Total 10 - 10 Grand Total 135 32.54 10 3. Training Programmes Clientele No. of Courses Male Female Total participants Farmers & farm women 74 1033 1054 2087 Rural youths 7 59 133 192 Extension functionaries 6 67 38 105 Sponsored Training 19 129 131 260 Vocational Training 3 34 28 62 Total 109 1322 1384 2706

Transcript of PROFORMA FOR PREPARATION OF ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 … · Tamil Nadu Agricultural University...

  • 1

    PROFORMA FOR PREPARATION OF ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20

    (April 2019-March 2020)

    APR SUMMARY

    Name of the KVK: Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kanyakumari

    1. Technology Assessment

    Category No. of Technology

    Assessed & Refined

    No. of Trials No. of Farmers

    Technology Assessed

    Crops 6 30 30

    Livestock - - -

    Various enterprises 1 5 5

    Total 7 35 35

    Technology Refined

    Crops - - -

    Livestock - - -

    Various enterprises - - -

    Total - - -

    Grand Total 7 35 35

    2. Frontline demonstrations

    Details No. of

    Farmers/Locations

    Area (ha) Units/Animals

    Oilseeds 5 2 -

    Pulses 20 8 -

    Cereals - - -

    Fruits 30 10 -

    Vegetables 30 6 -

    Flowers 30 2.54 -

    Other crops 10 4.0 -

    Total 125 32.54 -

    Livestock & Fisheries - - -

    Other enterprises 10 - 10

    Total 10 - 10

    Grand Total 135 32.54 10

    3. Training Programmes

    Clientele No. of Courses Male Female Total

    participants

    Farmers & farm women 74 1033 1054 2087

    Rural youths 7 59 133 192

    Extension functionaries 6 67 38 105

    Sponsored Training 19 129 131 260

    Vocational Training 3 34 28 62

    Total 109 1322 1384 2706

  • 2

    4. Extension Programmes

    Category No. of Programmes Total Participants

    Extension activities 67 883

    Other extension activities 32 32

    Total 99 915

    5. Mobile Advisory Services

    Message

    Type

    Crop Livestock Weather Marketing Awareness Other

    enterprise

    Total

    Text only 12 - 2 4 18

    Voice only

    Voice & Text

    Total 12 - 2 4 18

    6. Seed & Planting Material Production

    Quintal/Number Value Rs.

    Seed (q)-TPS5 42.46 48684

    Planting material (No.)- COBN5 4403 3967

    Bio-Products (kg) 433 68592

    Livestock Production (No.)-

    Gramapriya Eggs

    147 1470

    Fishery production (No.) - -

    7. Soil, water & plant Analysis

    Samples No. of Beneficiaries Value Rs.

    Soil 253 25250.00

    Water 5 250.00

    Plant -- --

    Total 258 25500.00

    8. HRD and Publications

    Sr. No. Category Number

    1 Workshops 6

    2 Conferences 4

    3 Meetings 1

    4 Trainings for KVK officials 4

    5 Visits of KVK officials 7 6 Book published 3

    7 Training Manual -

    8 Book chapters -

    9 Research papers 4

    10 Lead papers -

    11 Seminar papers 5

    12 Extension folder 8

    13 Proceedings -

    14 Award & recognition 1

    15 On going research projects -

  • 3

    DETAILED PROGRESS REPORT 2019-20

    1. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE KVK

    1.1. Name and address of KVK with phone, fax and e-mail

    a) Name of the KVK : Kanyakumari

    b) Address : ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra

    Tamil Nadu Agricultural University

    Thirupathisaram – 629 901

    Kanyakumari District

    Tamil Nadu

    c) Landline Phone No. : 04652 -275758, 04652 -275759

    d) Fax No. : -

    e) Official Mobile No. : -

    f) email ID : [email protected]

    1.2 .Name and address of host organization with phone, fax and e-mail

    a) Name of the Host Organization : Tamil Nadu Agricultural University

    b) Address : The Registrar

    Tamil Nadu Agricultural University

    Coimbatore-641 003.

    c) Landline Phone No. : 0422-2431222

    d) Fax No. : 0422-2431672

    e) Official mobile No. : -

    f) email ID : [email protected]

    1.3. Name of the Programme Coordinator with phone & mobile No.

    a) Name : Dr.P. Suthamathi

    b) Phone - residence : -

    c) Mobile : 9361309860

    d) email ID : [email protected]

    1.4. Year of sanction: 22.05.2004

  • 4

    1.5. Staff Position (as on 31th March, 2020)

    Sl.

    No.

    Sanctioned

    post

    Name of the

    incumbent

    Designation (eg.

    SMS)

    Discipline

    (eg.

    Agronomy)

    Edn. Qualification

    (eg.M.Sc.(Agri)

    Specializatio

    n (if

    applicable)

    eg.Agronomy

    Pay

    Scale

    (Rs.)

    Present

    basic

    (Rs.)

    Date of

    joining

    Permanent

    /Temporar

    y

    Category

    (SC/ST/

    OBC/

    Others)

    1 Programme

    Coordinator Dr. K.Thirukumaran SMS

    (Agronomy)

    Agronomy PhD. (Agronomy) Agronomy 79800-

    211500

    107200 14.03.19 Permanent OBC

    2 Subject Matter

    Specialist Dr. K. Kavitha SMS (Plant

    Pathology)

    Plant

    Pathology

    PhD. (Plant

    Pathology)

    Plant

    Pathology

    79800-

    211500

    98200 28.08.16

    Permanent OBC

    3 Subject Matter

    Specialist Dr. Cissie Theeblyn

    David SMS (PBG)

    PBG PhD. (Plant Breeding

    and Genetics)

    PBG 79800-

    211500

    98200 06.04.16 Permanent OBC

    4 Subject Matter

    Specialist Dr. R. Latha

    SMS (FSN)

    Food science

    and Nutrition

    PhD. (Food Science

    and Nutrition)

    Food science

    and Nutrition

    79800-

    211500

    98200 03.03.16 Permanent OBC

    5 Subject Matter

    Specialist Dr.S.Nazreen

    Hassan SMS (Extension)

    Agrl.

    Extension

    PhD. (Agrl.

    Extension)

    Agrl.

    Extension

    68900-

    205000

    92600 12.03.19 Permanent OBC

    6 Subject Matter

    Specialist Vacant

    7 Subject Matter

    Specialist Vacant

    8 Programme

    Assistant Tmt. K.R. Sudha Prog. Asst.

    (Tech.)

    Agrl.

    Extension

    M.Sc. (Agrl. Extn.) 35900-

    113500

    57500 04.06.07 Permanent OBC

    9 Computer

    Programmer Mr. V. Sivaraman Prog. Asst.

    (Comp.)

    Computer

    Science

    B.Sc. (Comp.

    Science)

    35900-

    113500

    55800 08.12.08 Permanent

    OBC

    10 Farm Manager Mr. R. Rajesh

    Kannan

    Farm Manager Horticulture M.Sc. (Hort.) 35900-

    113500

    57500 08.05.15 Permanent OBC

    11 Accountant /

    Superintendent Mr. T. Arulmuthu Jr. Asst. 19500-

    62000

    34200 30.07.14 Permanent OBC

    12 Stenographer Mrs. R. Sumathi Jr. Asst. cum

    typist

    19500-

    62000

    20700 22.01.18 Permanent SC

    13 Driver Mr. K. Rajan Driver - 15000 01.10.19 Temporary OBC

    14 Driver Mr.T.Chockalingam Tractor Driver - 15000 20.12.19 Temporary OBC

    15 Supporting staff Tmt. R. Parvathi PUSM 15700-

    50000

    18200 10.04.15 Permanent SC

    16 Supporting staff Tmt. M. Vimala Supporting staff 10000 4.10.19 Temporary SC

  • 5

    1.6. Total land with KVK (in ha) (Consolidated figure):

    S. No. Item Area (ha)

    1 Under Buildings 606 m2

    2. Under Demonstration Units 1.42

    3. Under Crops 7.25

    4. Orchard/Agro-forestry 0.4

    5. Others (specify) 7.01 - Building, Farm roads and pond

    1.7. Infrastructural Development:

    A) Buildings

    S.No. Name of building Source of

    funding

    Stage

    Complete Incomplete

    Completion

    Date

    Plinth

    area

    (Sq.m)

    Expenditure

    (Rs.)

    Starting

    Date

    Plinth

    area

    (Sq.m)

    Status of

    construction

    (Completed/ in

    progress/ to be

    initiated)

    1. Administrativ

    e Building

    ICAR 22.01.2014 606

    M2

    67,50,600 - - Completed

    2. Farmers

    Hostel

    Nil

    3. Staff Quarters

    (No.)

    Nil

    4. Demonstration

    Units (add

    rows if

    required)

    1. IFS

    Vermicomposting

    unit

    Azolla

    Fodder

    ICAR-

    RF

    2013-18 - - - - -

    2. Spawn

    Production

    and Bio

    control

    production

    unit

    ICAR-

    KVK

    2016-17 - 28783 - - -

    3. Honey Bee

    unit

    ICAR-

    ASCI

    2018-19 - 1500 - - -

    4. Mushroom

    unit

    ICAR-

    KVK-

    SCSP

    2019-20 10 M2 85438

    5. Poultry unit ICAR-

    KVK-

    SCSP

    2019-20 16700

    6. Slatted goat

    unit

    ICAR-

    KVK-

    SCSP

    2019-20 51823

  • 6

    7. Shade net ICAR-

    KVK-

    SCSP

    2019-20 10 M2 9033

    5 Fencing Nil - - - - - -

    6 Rain Water

    harvesting

    system

    Nil - - - - - -

    7 Threshing

    floor

    ICAR-

    KVK-

    SCSP

    2019-20 - 147000 - - Completed

    8 Farm godown Nil - - - - - -

    9 Vehicle Shed ICAR-

    KVK-

    SCSP

    2019-20 - 90000 - - Completed

    B) Vehicles

    Type of vehicle Year of

    purchase

    Cost

    (Rs.)

    Total kms.

    Run

    Present

    status

    Mahindra – Bol- ZLX 2017 7,40,478 40573 Good

    Two wheeler - Hero Honda

    splendor

    2009 46,193 41285 Good

    Two wheeler - Honda activa 2009 47,875 32631 Good

    Tractor-Massey Ferguson 1035 2002 2,66,527 997 hours Good

    Trailer-Two Wheel Tipping 2002 67,000 - Good

    C) Equipment & AV aids

    Name of the equipment Year of purchase Cost (Rs.) Present status

    CCTV Camera 2019 85,204.00 Good

    Mini Soil Testing Kit (2 Nos.) 2017 1,72,000.00 Good

    RO water purification system 2017 19,500.00 Good

    Horizontal Laminar air flow cabinet 2017 28,783.00 Good

    Electronic Weighing Balance 2017 4,750.00 Good

    1.5 KVA UPS 2017 14,500.00 Good

    UPS Batteries (12V x 26A) 16 Nos. 2017 47,981.00 Good

    Multi functional Digital Copier with Printer 2017 75,477.00 Good

    Biometric Attendance System 2017 11,800.00 Good

    LC D Projector 2017 34,000.00 Good

    Public Address System 2017 34,986.00 Good

    Digital Camera 2017 9,750.00 Good

    Soil Testing Kit 2016 75,000.00 Good

    Banana fibre extractor 2011 50,000.00 Good

    Paddy Power Weeder 2011 32,531.00 Good

    Fax machine 2009 15,000.00 Good

    Computer 2009 31,900.00 Good

  • 7

    LCD Projector 2006 61,230.00 Good

    Laptop 2006 38,700.00 Good

    Drum seeder 2006 4,700.00 Good

    Coconut climber 2006 2,500.00 Good

    Cono weeder 2006 2,360.00 Good

    Digital camera 2006 18,500.00 Good

    HP Scanner 2005 3,237.00 Not working

    Toshiba E-Studio 160 digital copier cum printer 2005 71,400.00 Not working

    Spectrophotometer 2004 75,072.00 Good

    Flame photometer 2004 36,720.00 Good

    Physical balance 2004 1,15,000.00 Good

    Water distillation Still 2004 26,118.00 Good

    Kjeldahl digestion and distillation 2004 24,589.00 Good

    Shaker 2004 44,077.00 Good

    Refrigerator 2004 15,750.00 Good

    Grinder 2004 11,582.00 Good

    Khelplus 2004 1,48,086.00 Good

    UPS 2004 10,250.00 Good

    Soil storage cabin 2004 37,496.00 Good

    1.8. A). Details SAC meeting(s) conducted in the year:

    Sl.No. Date No of

    Participants

    Salient Recommendations

    1. 08.03.2019 38 1. Undertake location specific intercropping system/ multitier

    cropping for Coconut and Rubber (Proposed by: Mr. Ashok

    Macrin, Deputy Director of Horticulture, Nagercoil)

    2. Popularize high yielding VBN6 Blackgram under Rice

    fallow condition in Kanaykumari district (Proposed by: Mr.

    G. Manoharan, Joint Director of Agriculture, Nagercoil)

    3. The newly released CTCRI varieties of tapioca viz., Sree

    Jaya, Sree Vijaya and Sree Pavithra shall be assessed for

    Kanyakumari district (Proposed by:

    Dr. H. Kesavakumar, Scientist, Nematology, ICAR-CTCRI,

    Thiruvanathapuram)

    4. Popularize the CTCRI bioformulations viz., Nanma, Menma

    and Shreya for pest management (Proposed by: Dr. H.

    Kesavakumar, Scientist, Nematology, ICAR-CTCRI,

    Thiruvanathapuram)

    5. Arrange an exposure visit to CTCRI, Thiruvanathapuram

  • 8

    incubation centre for the benefit of farmers interested in

    tapioca value addition (Proposed by:

    Dr. M. Jawaharlal, Director of Extension Education, TNAU,

    Coimbatore)

    6. Scientists of CTCRI, Thiruvananthapuram to be invited as

    resource person for trainings at KVK (Proposed by: Dr. M.

    Jawaharlal, Director of Extension Education, TNAU,

    Coimbatore).

    7. Provide short messages to All India Radio, Nagercoil

    regularly (Proposed by:

    Dr. M. Jawaharlal, Director of Extension Education, TNAU,

    Coimbatore)

    8. Establishment of model unit for the production of high

    value vegetables at KVK (Proposed by: Mr. P.S. Sailesh,

    DDM, NABARD)

    9. Establishment of IFS model unit at KVK. (Proposed by:

    Dr. S. Malmarugan, Professor and Head, VUTRC, Parakai,

    Nagercoil)

    10. Involve VUTRC scientists as resource person for trainings

    at KVK (Proposed by: Dr. M. Jawaharlal, Director of

    Extension Education, TNAU, Coimbatore).

    11. Organize awareness campaign on Sericulture twice a year at

    KVK (Proposed by: Dr. M. Jawaharlal, Director of

    Extension Education, TNAU, Coimbatore).

    12. Conduct joint diagnostic visit along with scientists of HRS,

    Pechiparai for disease incidence in pepper (Proposed by: Dr.

    M. Jawaharlal, Director of Extension Education, TNAU,

    Coimbatore).

    13. Training on pre harvest management to enhance the shelf

    life of banana variety Matti to be arranged involving the

    scientists of NRCB, Trichy (Proposed by:Dr. M. Jawaharlal,

    Director of Extension Education, TNAU, Coimbatore).

    14. Provide low cost production technology for biocontrol

    agents (Proposed by: Mr. C. Arumugam, Thingal Nagar)

    15. Arrange Mushroom value addition training and exposure

    visit for mushroom entrepreneurs at CSC& RI, Madurai

  • 9

    (Proposed by: Dr. M. Jawaharlal, Director of Extension

    Education, TNAU, Coimbatore).

    16. Establish a low cost Hydroponic unit at KVK (Proposed by:

    Dr. M. Jawaharlal, Director of Extension Education, TNAU,

    Coimbatore).

    17. In DFI village, coconut based IFS model to be established

    for doubling the farmer’s income (Proposed by: Dr. M.

    Jawaharlal, Director of Extension Education, TNAU,

    Coimbatore).

    18. Arrange training on farm mechanization by inviting

    scientists from Dept. of Farm Machinery, TNAU,

    Coimbatore (Proposed by: The Hon’ble Vice Chancellor,

    TNAU, Coimbatore)

    * Attach a copy of SAC proceedings along with list of participants

    2. DETAILS OF DISTRICT (2019-20)

    2.0. Operational jurisdiction of KVKs: Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu

    2.1. Major farming systems/enterprises (based on the analysis made by the KVK)

    S. No Farming system/enterprise

    1. Coconut based farming system

    2. Paddy based farming system

    3. Horticultural crops based mixed cropping system

    2.2. Description of Agro-climatic Zone & major agro ecological situations (based on soil and

    topography)

    S. No Agro-climatic Zone Characteristics

    1. West coast plains and Ghat

    region (High rainfall Zone)

    Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kanyakumari lies in 8o26’ N latitude,

    77o 19’E longitude, Altitude 76m above MSL. Average

    Maximum, Minimum temperature is 31.2 and 22.3o C

    respectively. Average rainfall ranges about 2186mm, RH

    83%.

    S. No Agro ecological situation Characteristics

    1. The uplands Comprising of hills and hill bases suitable for growing crops

    like Rubber, Cloves, Nutmeg, Pepper, Pineapple etc.

    2. The Middle Comprising of plains and valleys fit for growing crops like

    Paddy, Tapioca, Banana, Coconut etc.

    3. The low lands Comprising the coastal belt ideal for growing Coconut,

    Cashew etc.

  • 10

    2.3. Soil types in the jurisdiction

    S. No Soil type Characteristics Area in

    ha

    1. Lateritic soil Reddish brown sandy clay loam 20,033

    2. Red soils Red, yellowish red and yellowish brown sandy clay loam

    Brown, dark gray and grayish brown sandy clay

    Brown and dark brown sandy clay loam

    Yellowish red sandy loam

    Dark yellowish brown sandy clay loam and sandy loam

    Yellowish red gravelly sandy loam

    65,608

    3. Coastal alluvium Very pale brown sand 3,830

    4. Alluvium Brown sandy clay loam 1,590

    2.4. Area, Production and Productivity of major crops cultivated in the jurisdiction for 2019-20

    Kharif

    S. No Crop Area (ha) Production (Qtl) Productivity (Qtl /ha)

    1. Rice 5962 215880 36.21

    2. Maize 7 300 42.86

    3 Pulses (Redgram) 2 0.015 0.0075

    4. Groundnut 29 0.26 920

    5. Coconut 23917 2871laks nuts 12004 nuts

    6. Banana 5650.83 2165960 383.30

    7. Tapioca 1338 428440 320.20

    8. Cashew 1002.5 5010 5.00

    9. Mango 1310.5 327620 25000

    10. Jack 572 228680 400

    11. Pepper 288 260 0.9

    12. Rubber 27407 851170 31.1

    13. Arecanut 297 7420 25.0

    14. Cloves & Cinnamon 700 6160 8.8

    15. Ginger 16.505 2590 156.9

    16 Pineapple 63.945 21100 330.0

    17 Cucumber 92 6440 70.0

    18. Jasmine 115 8850 77.0

    Rabi

    S. No Crop Area (ha) Production (Qtl) Productivity (Qtl /ha)

    1. Rice 5993 256860 42.86

    Summer

    S. No Crop Area (ha) Production (Qtl) Productivity (Qtl /ha)

    1. Pulses (Black

    gram)

    215 1380 64.2

    2 Green gram 2 1.2 60.0

  • 11

    2.5. Weather data (April 2019 to March 2020)

    Month Rainfall (mm) Temperature 0 C Relative Humidity

    (%) Maximum Minimum

    April ’19 111.70 31.0 25.5 77.0

    May ’19 158.20 32.2 23.8 83.0

    June ’19 211.40 30.3 22.8 83.0

    July ’19 150.00 29.0 23.0 85.0

    August ’19 87.60 28.7 23.0 86.0

    September’19 102.70 29.5 22.5 84.0

    October ’19 246.80 29.0 24.0 85.0

    November ’19 206.20 28.8 22.5 79.0

    December ’19 70.30 31.0 22.0 78.0

    January ‘2020 13.7 25.0 18.0 74.0

    February ‘2020 28.6 29.0 21.0 68.0

    March ‘2020 39.8 29.0 22.0 71.0

    2.6. Production and productivity of livestock, Poultry, Fisheries etc. in the district (2019-20)

    Category Population Production Productivity

    Cattle

    Crossbred 70350

    - -

    Indigenous - -

    Buffalo 2848 - -

    Sheep - -

    Crossbred 310

    - -

    Indigenous - -

    Goats 104689 - -

    Pigs - -

    Crossbred 1551

    - -

    Indigenous - -

    Rabbits 2014 - -

    Poultry 488274 - -

    Hens - - -

    Desi(Backyard ) - - -

    Improved(Poultry in

    farm) 40818

    - -

    Ducks - - -

    Turkey and others - - -

    Category Area Production Productivity

    Fish - - -

    Marine - 42525.240 tonnes -

    Inland 6984.1 ha 4368.46 tonnes 1.25t/ha

    Prawn - 854.6 tonnes -

    Scampi - - -

    Shrimp - - -

    Source: Office of Joint Director of Agriculture ,Deputy Director Animal Husbandry and Dept. of

    Statistics ,Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

  • 12

    2.7. Details of Adopted Villages (2019-20)

    Sl.

    No.

    Taluk/

    mandal

    Name of

    the block

    Name of

    the village

    Year of

    adoptio

    n

    Major

    crops &

    enterprises

    Major

    problem

    identified

    Identified

    Thrust

    Areas

    KVK adopted villages

    1 Agasthe

    eswaram

    Agasthees

    waram

    Ramapuram 2014 Groundnut Low

    productivity

    and lack of

    high

    yielding

    varieties

    Varietal

    evaluation

    Vegetables Lack of

    Hybrids

    Low yield

    Varietal

    evaluation

    Rose Low yield Integrated

    crop

    management

    IFS Low income

    Pest and

    diseases

    Integrated

    Farming

    System

    Fodder Low income

    Pest and

    diseases

    Integrated

    crop

    management

    DFI villages

    1 Agasthe

    eswaram

    Agasthees

    waram Eraviputhoo

    r

    2019 Rice Low

    productivity

    High weed

    infestation

    Integrated

    Crop

    Management

    Vegetables

    Integrated

    crop

    management

    Integrated

    crop

    management

    IFS Low income

    Pest and

    diseases

    Integrated

    Farming

    System

    2.8. Priority/thrust areas

    Crop/Enterprise Thrust area

    Pulses/ Blackgram Varietal evaluation, Integrated Crop Management

    Pulses/ Greengram Varietal evaluation, Integrated Crop Management

    Groundnut Varietal evaluation, Integrated Crop Management

    Banana Integrated Nutrient Management, Integrated Pest and Disease

    Management, Intercropping

  • 13

    Tapioca Varietal Evaluation, Integrated Crop Management

    Ridge gourd Varietal Evaluation , Integrated Crop Management

    Snake gourd Varietal Evaluation , Integrated Crop Management

    Chilli Varietal Evaluation , Integrated Crop Management

    Coriander Varietal Evaluation , Integrated Crop Management

    Fodder Intercropping, Varietal evaluation, Livestock Production

    Tuberose Varietal Evaluation , Integrated Crop Management

    Flower- Alpinia(Cut Flower) Varietal Evaluation , Integrated Crop Management

    Mango Integrated Pest and Disease Management

    Mushroom Value addition, Convenience food from Mushroom

    Integrated Farming System Crop, Fodder and livestock Management

    Palmyrah Value addition as alternate sweetner

    Coconut Integrated Pest and Disease Management

    2.9. Salient Achievements of (April 2019-March, 2020) (Mandated activities/ Projects)

    S.No Activity Target Achievement

    1. Technologies Assessed (No.) 7 7

    2. On-farm trials conducted (No.) 35 35

    3. Frontline demonstrations conducted (No.) 15 15

    4. Farmers trained (in Lakh) 0.01280 0.02087

    5. Extension Personnel trained (No.) 150 105

    6. Participants in extension activities (in Lakh) 0.02237 0.03492

    7. Production of Seed (in Quintal) 60 42.46

    8. Planting material produced (in Lakh) 0.1 0.04403

    9. Live-stock strains and fingerlings produced (in Lakh) - -

    10. Soil, Water, plant, manures samples tested (in Lakh) 0.00250 0.00258

    11. Mobile agro-advisory provided to farmers (in Lakh) 0.5 0.63984

    12. No. of Soil Health Cards issued by Mini Soil Testing Kits (No.) 250 253

    13. No. of Soil Health Cards issued by Traditional Laboratory (No.) - -

    2.10. Salient Achievements by KVK during 2019-20 (bullet points)

    VBN6 Blackgram was found to be suitable for rice fallow in Kanyakumari district with high

    yield potential and resistant to YMV.

    COGN7 Groundnut was found to be suitable for Kanyakumari district as a rainfed crop

    during September –October.

  • 14

    Cultivation of Sree Pavithra variety of tapioca was found to be profitable and can be

    recommended for cultivation in Kanyakumari District.

    Integrated Nutrient Management with foliar sparay of IIHR Banana special on 5th, 6th and 7th

    month after planting increased the bunch weight and fruit quality.

    Sucker treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viridi in banana on 2nd, 4th and 6th MAP

    effectively reduced the wilt in banana.

    Pseudostem spraying of nanma in banana on 5th, 6th and 7th month after planting reduce the

    Pseudostem weevil incidence.

    Adoption of Integrated management Package in coconut reduce the coconut RSW incidence.

    Installation of Methyl Euginol fruit fly trap reduced the fruit damage caused by fruit fly in

    mango.

    Arka Kyathi hybrid chilli was found to be a high yielder than CO1 Chilli Hybrid but was

    found to be susceptible to root rot disease under Kanyakumari climatic conditions.

    Alpinia sp for cut flower production under open cultivation system can be suggested for

    Kanyakumari district.

    Arka Prajwal was found to perform well and can be popularized in Kanyakumari district and

    the yield, performance and preference of Arka vaibahv was found to be poor in the district.

    The application of bio pesticide formulations alternatively has shown a reduction of 80% of

    the incidence of sucking pests and thrips in Edward variety of Rose cultivation.

    Palmyrah palm sugar can be promoted as alternate sweetener for bakery products.

    COCR4 coriander variety was found to be a remunerative crop with high foliage yield and

    can be recommended as intercrop in banana, coconut.

    Poultry component of Integrated farming system is the most preferred and easily managed by

    farm women. It is followed by vermicomposting by rural youth.

    Button mushroom was found to be highly suitable for the production of convenience based

    food with better keeping quality and sensory scoring than oyster and milky mushroom.

    3. TECHNICAL ACHIEVEMENTS

    3.A. Details of target and achievements of mandatory activities by KVK during 2019-20

    i) OFT (Technology Assessment)

    Number of technologies Total no. of Trials

    Targets Achievement Targets Achievement

    7 7 35 35

    ii) FLD (crop/enterprise/CFLDs)

    No of Demonstrations Area in ha Number of Farmers

    Targets Achievement Targets Achievement Targets Achievement

    15 15 34.54 34.54 130 130

  • 15

    iii) Training (including sponsored, vocational and other trainings carried under Rainwater

    Harvesting Unit)

    Number of Courses Number of Participants

    Clientele Targets Achievement Targets Achievement

    Farmers 64 74 1280 2087

    Rural youth 18 29 317 514

    Extn. Functionaries 5 6 150 105

    87 109 1747 2706

    iv) Extension Activities

    Number of activities Number of participants

    Targets Achievement Targets Achievement

    277 440 2237 3492

    v) Seed Production (q)

    Target Achievement Distributed to no. of farmers

    60 42.46 31

    vi) Planting material (Nos.)

    Target Achievement Distributed to no. of farmers

    10000 4403 33

    vii) Livestock (Nos.)

    Target Achievement Distributed to no. of farmers

    - 147 eggs 33

    viii) Bio inputs (Nos.)

    Target Achievement Distributed to no. of farmers

    100 433 45

  • 16

    3.B. TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

    i) Summary of technologies assessed under various crops by KVKs (Add rows wherever

    required)

    Thematic areas Crop Name of the technology assessed

    Source of

    technology

    with year

    No. of

    trials

    No. of

    farmers

    Integrated Nutrient

    Management

    Varietal

    Evaluation

    Chilli Assessment of Chilli Hybrids

    suitable for Kanyakumari District

    IIHR 2016 &

    TNAU 2010

    5 5

    Cowpea Assessment of suitable Vegetable

    cowpea varieties for Kanyakumari

    District

    TNAU 2011&

    KAU 2015

    5 5

    Tapioca Assessment of suitable Tapioca

    varieties for Kanyakumari District

    CTCRI 2017 5 5

    Cut flower Assessment of suitable cut flower

    for open cultivation in

    Kanyakumari district

    TNAU 5 5

    Bhendi Assessment of suitable Bhendi

    hybrids for Kanyakumari District

    (2018-19)

    TNAU, IIHR

    2016

    5 5

    Blackgram Assessment of Blackgram

    varieties under Rice Fallow

    condition (2018-19)

    TNAU

    2016

    5 5

    Tapioca Assessment of suitable Tapioca

    varieties for Kanyakumari District

    (2018-19)

    TNAU,

    CTCRI 2016

    5 5

    Integrated Pest

    Management

    Coconut Assessment of management

    modules against Rugose Whitefly

    in Coconut

    TNAU &

    NIPHM, 2019

    5 5

    Integrated Crop

    Management

    Integrated Disease

    Management

    Banana Assessment of Fusarium wilt

    disease management in banana

    TNAU &

    NRCB, 2015

    5 5

    Small Scale

    Income

    Generation

    Enterprises

    Weed

    Management

    Resource

    Conservation

    Technology

    Farm Machineries

    Integrated

  • 17

    Farming System

    Seed / Plant

    production

    Post Harvest

    Technology /

    Value addition

    Drudgery

    Reduction

    Storage Technique

    Others (Pl.

    specify)

    Total 45 45

    ii) Summary of technologies assessed under livestock by KVKs

    Thematic areas Name of the livestock

    enterprise

    Name of the

    technology

    assessed

    No. of

    trials

    No. of

    farmers

    Disease Management

    Evaluation of Breeds Assessment of suitable

    poultry bird for Backyard

    poultry (2018-19)

    Poultry Breeds-

    Grama priya and

    TNAUVAS Aseel

    3 3

    Feed and Fodder management

    Nutrition Management

    Production and Management

    Others (Pl. specify)

    Total 3 3

    iii) Summary of technologies assessed under various enterprises by KVKs

    Thematic

    areas Enterprise Name of the technology assessed

    Source of

    technology with

    year

    No. of

    trials

    No. of

    farmers

    Value

    Addition

    Palmyra Assessment of alternate natural

    sweetener for bakery products

    TNAU 2016 5 5

    Total 5 5

  • 18

    3.C. TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN DETAIL

    2019 – 20

    OFT 1

    1 Thematic area Varietal Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of Chilli varieties suitable for Kanyakumari

    district

    3 Scientists involved Dr.R.Latha, SMS (PBG)

    4 Details of farming

    situation: Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated), Soil type,

    fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500

    words)

    Describe the farming situation including Season, Farming

    situation (RF/Irrigated), Soil type, fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy days etc (about 500 words)

    Season : Rabi 2019

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Rainfed

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 14.7

    No. of rainy days : 2

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    Low Productivity

    Non adoption of High yielding varieties

    Only traditional varieties are being cultivated

    6 Technology Assessed: (give

    full details of technology as

    well as farmers practice)

    Farmers Practice – Traditional variety

    TO1: Arka Kyati

    TO2: TNAU Chilli Hybrid CO1

    7 Critical inputs given: (along

    with quantity as well as

    value)

    Critical inputs Quantity Cost/trial (Rs)

    Seeds- Arka Kyati 50 g 1000

    Seeds – TNAU Chilli

    Hybrid CO1 50 g 1000

    Trichoderma viride 1 kg 120

    Field Board 1 No. 100

    Total 2220

    8 Results: Performance of the technology

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Yield

    (q/ha)

    Net

    Returns

    (Rs. in

    lakh./ha)

    B:C

    ratio

    Data on Other performance

    indicators*

    DFF No. Of

    Fruits/plant

    PDI

    Farmers Practice –

    Local Variety

    5

    209 313500 3.34 52 130 1.2

    Technology 1(Arka

    Kyati)

    226 339000 3.50 55 163 8.3

    Technology 2(TNAU

    Chilli Hybrid CO1)

    211 316000 3.33 53 136 3.6

    Description of the results:

    (one page) in addition you

    can use graphs also

    :

    Among the Chilli varieties, the variety Arka Khyti recorded

    the highest fruit yield of 226 q/ha followed by TNAU Chilli

    hybrid Co1 (211 q/ha). The net return in the varieties was

    Rs.339000 and Rs.316000, respectively. Similarly the BCR

    was 3.5 and 3.33, respectively. Though the yield was low in

    farmers practice (209 q/ha) and net return of Rs.313500, they

    prefer local variety because it is tolerant to Root rot disease.

    The market price was also high for local variety rather the

    new hybrids.

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : Arka Khyati is more susceptible to root rot followed by

    TNAU CO 1 chilli hybrid. But local chilli variety is resistant

  • 19

    to Root rot and fetches more price than hybrids.

    10. Feed back to the scientist

    who developed the

    technology

    : Arka Khyati is susceptible to root rot.

    Fruit size is smaller in the new hybrids than the local variety.

    OFT 2

    1 Thematic area Varietal Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of suitable Vegetable cowpea varieties for

    Kanyakumari District

    3 Scientists involved Dr.R.Latha, SMS (PBG)

    4 Details of farming

    situation: Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated), Soil type,

    fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500

    words)

    Season : Rabi 2019

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Rainfed

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 44.7

    No. of rainy days : 12

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    Low productivity

    Lack of ideal variety

    6 Technology Assessed: (give

    full details of technology as

    well as farmers practice)

    Farmers Practice – Traditional variety

    TO1: Githika

    TO2: PKM17.

    7 Critical inputs given: (along

    with quantity as well as

    value)

    Critical inputs Quantity Cost/trial (Rs)

    Seed- Githika 1 kg 750

    Seed- PKM1 1 kg 400

    Phosphobacteria 1 kg 80

    Rhizobium 1 kg 80

    Trichoderma viride 1 kg 120

    Field Board 1 No. 100

    Total 1530

    8 Results: Performance of the technology

    Crop is in Vegetative stage Description of the results:

    (one page) in addition you

    can use graphs also

    :

    Constraints faced :

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    :

    10. Feed back to the scientist

    who developed the

    technology

    :

  • 20

    OFT 3

    1 Thematic area Varietal Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of suitable Tapioca varieties for Kanyakumari District

    3 Scientists involved Dr. S. Nazreen Hassan, SMS (Agrl. Extension)

    4 Details of farming

    situation:

    Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated),

    Soil type, fertility

    Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No.

    of rainy days etc

    (about 500 words)

    Thovalai block comes under the middle lands of Kanyakumari

    district comprising of plains and valleys suitable for growing crops

    like paddy, tapioca, banana and coconut. The soil type is brown

    sandy clay loam with slight acidic nature having pH (power of

    hydrogen) ranging from 5.6 to 6.0. Major source of irrigation is

    through tanks as this block consists of 272 tanks. This block has

    the unique advantage of enjoying abundant rainfalls during both

    the southwest (June-September) monsoon and northeast (October-

    December) monsoon. This block lies in the northern part of the

    district and the rainfall received is generally high. The average

    rainfall is 1300 mm. Paddy is the major crop and is grown in two

    seasons. First crop is sown in the months of April-June (Kannipoo)

    and the second crop is raised in the months of September-October

    (Kumbapoo). The next major crop in the block is tapioca. It is

    cultivated in the large rain fed dry land tract. It thrives best in

    laterite as well as sandy clay loamy soils and has become the poor

    man’s food par excellence. This crop is mostly grown under

    rainfed condition.

    5 Problem

    definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    This block is a predominant tapioca growing block. But during the

    recent years the yield has reduced due to the incidence of Cassava

    Mosaic disease and spiraling white fly. The farmers have shifted to

    other crops like banana. Lack of ideal variety which can overcome

    these problems is the need of the farmers in Kanyakumari district.

    6 Technology

    Assessed: (give full

    details of technology

    as well as farmers

    practice)

    Assessment of suitable tapioca varieties that can mitigate the loss due

    to incidence of YMV and white fly attack has been taken up.

    Sree Vijaya- Sree Vijaya is a high yielding variety of tapioca which

    is widely cultivated variety due to excellent cooking quality.

    Duration is 6 months. Recorded an yield of 25-28t/ha. Starch

    content is 27-30%. The tuber flesh colour is light yellow after

    cooking.

    Sree Jaya - I t is a high yielding variety of tapioca. Duration of 6

    months. It is a widely cultivated variety of cassava. Tuber yield:26-

    30t/ha with 24-27%starch.

    Sree Pavithra it is a High tuber yield (35-45 t/ha), Good cooking

    quality, Low cyanogenic glucoside (26 ppm) and High K use

    efficiency. It reduces the fertilizer costs and sustain under low-input

    conditions.

    Farmer’s Practice- Local variety Kariyilaiporian is low yielding and

    highly susceptible to YMV and white flies

    7 Critical inputs given:

    (along with quantity

    as well as value)

    Critical inputs Quantity Cost/trial (Rs)

    Setts-Sree Vijaya 1500 setts 3000

    Setts-Sree Jaya 1500 setts 3000

    Setts- Sree Pavithra 1500 setts 3000

    Farmers practice - -

    Field Board sticker 1 No. 100

    Total 9100

  • 21

    8 Results: Performance of the technology

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Yield

    (q/ha)

    Net

    Returns

    (Rs./ha)

    B:C

    ratio

    Data on Other performance indicators*

    Plant

    height

    (ft)

    No. of

    Tubers/Clump

    Weight of

    tubers/clump

    (Kg)

    Farmers Practice-

    Kariyilaiporiyan

    5

    215 297

    50

    2.24 5 2.1 1.4

    Technology 1(Sree

    Vijaya)

    277 442

    50

    2.77 5.7 2.3 1.85

    Technology 2(Sree

    Jaya)

    275 437

    50

    2.75 5.9 2.2 1.8

    Technology 3 (Sree

    Pavithra)

    347.8

    619

    50

    3.48

    5.6 3.1 2.3

    Description of the

    results: (one page) in

    addition you can use

    graphs also

    :

    On Farm Trials (OFT) conducted at Thovalai Block of Kanyakumari

    district, with tapioca varieties released by CTCRI,

    Thiruvananthapuram, (TO1) Sree Vijaya, (TO2) Sree Jaya and (TO3)

    Sree Pavithra , TO3 produced the highest yield (347.8 q ha-1),

    followed by Sree Vijaya (277 q ha-1) and Sree Jaya (275 q ha-1).

    The Local indigenous variety Kariyilaiporiyan was found to be

    highly susceptible to YMV and hence showed lesser yield. The yield

    of TO3 was found to be high. It is usually grown under rainfed

    condition and was found to have high K use efficiency and hence it

    reduces the fertilizer costs and sustain under low-input conditions.

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the

    farmers involved

    : Sree Pavithra produced the highest yield (347.8 q ha-1) compared to

    other varieties. It has good taste and sustains under low input

    conditions. Sree Jaya was found to be tolerant to YMV. Cultivation

    of Pavithra was found to be profitable.

    10. Feed back to the

    scientist who

    developed the

    technology

    : Sree Pavithra can be recommended for cultivation in Kanyakumari

    District.

  • 22

    OFT 4

    1 Thematic area Horticulture-Flower

    2 Title : Assessment of suitable cut flower for open cultivation in

    Kanyakumari district

    3 Scientists involved Dr. Cissie Theeblyn David and Dr. K.Thirukumaran

    4 Details of farming situation:

    Describe the farming situation

    including Season, Farming

    situation (RF/Irrigated), Soil

    type, fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500 words)

    Season : Kharif, 2019

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Irrigated

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, Medium P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 313.75

    No. of rainy days : 29

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one paragraph)

    Non adoption of diverse flowers

    6 Technology Assessed: (give full

    details of technology as well as

    farmers practice)

    TO1 : Heliconia

    TO2 : Bird of Paradise

    TO3 : Alpinia sp.

    7 Critical inputs given: (along with

    quantity as well as value)

    S. No. Name Quantity Total Cost

    (Rs.)

    1. Alpinia sp. 160 2400

    2. Bird of

    paradise

    50 5000

    8 Results:

    Plants in the vegetative stage

    Description of the results: (one

    page) in addition you can use

    graphs also

    :

    -

    Constraints faced : Plants in the vegetative stage (Alpinia sp.)

    Root rot disease incidence observed in Bird of Paradise during the early stage of crop establishment

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : Bird of Paradise found highly susceptible to root rot

    for its cultivation in Kanyakumari District

    10. Feed back to the scientist who

    developed the technology

    : Bird of Paradise was highly susceptible to root rot in

    sandy loam soil under open cultivation during kharif

    season for crop establishment in Kanyakumari

    District

  • 23

    OFT -5

    1 Thematic area Integrated Pest Management

    2 Title : Assessment of management modules against Rugose

    Whitefly in Coconut

    3 Scientists involved Dr. K.Kavitha, SMS (PL.Path)

    Dr.R.Latha, SMS (PBG)

    Dr.K.Thirukumaran, Programme Coordinator

    4 Details of farming situation:

    Describe the farming situation

    including Season, Farming

    situation (RF/Irrigated), Soil

    type, fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500 words)

    Season : Kharif

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Irrigated

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, Medium P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 452.43

    No. of rainy days :30

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one paragraph)

    • Invasive insect pests rugose whitefly

    • Reduction in yield

    • Development of sooty mold

    6 Technology Assessed: (give full

    details of technology as well as

    farmers practice)

    TO1- Release of Encarsia parasitoid @ 100nos/ac,

    Release of Chrysoperla Predator @ 400 nos/ac, Placing

    of yellow sticky trap at 6 -8 feet height (3 x 1 ft), Water

    spray

    Spraying of neem oil / Nimbicidine

    TO2-Farmers practice

    7 Critical inputs given: (along with

    quantity as well as value)

    Technology option

    Critical inputs Qty Value No.

    of

    trials

    TO1 Encarsia

    guadeloupae

    Parasitoid

    2 pkts 20.00 5

    chrysoperla

    zastrowi silemmi

    400

    nos/ac 150.00

    Yellow sticky

    traps(3 x1.5 ft)

    10

    nos/ac 1120.00

    Isaria

    fumosorosea

    1 kg 360.00

    TO2 Farmers practice Field Board sticker 1 No 100

    8 Results:

    Technology Option No.of trials

    Yield

    (No. of

    Nuts

    /ha)

    Net

    Returns

    (Rs. in

    lakh./ha)

    B:C

    ratio

    RSW

    infestation

    (%)

    Infestation

    Index

    Natural

    parasitization

    (%)

    Farmers Practice 5

    13760 120600 2.41 49.9 2.20 6.4

    TO1 14000 124200 2.45 33.9 1.20 26.86

    Description of the results: (one

    page) in addition you can use

    graphs also

    : The RSW infestation percentage has decreased from 49.9

    per cent in farmers practice and 33.9% in the Technology

    option1. Natural parasitisation percentage of predator and

    parasitioids has been increased in the TO1 option (26.86)

    with low level of infestation index (1.20) whereas

    farmers practice recorded low level of parasitaization (6.4

    %) with infestion index of 2.20. The category of

    infestation was low in TO1 and medium in Farmers

    practice

    Constraints faced : Nil

  • 24

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : Reduction in whitefly incidence was noticed in TO1, but

    no significant reduction in yield was recorded in TO1

    and farmers practice. The effect of management practice

    (TO1) on the yield will take atleast 10-12 months.

    Availability of parasitoid Encarsia and predator

    chrysoperla is a constraint for the farmers to adopt the

    technology in the large scale

    10. Feed back to the scientist who

    developed the technology

    : Large scale mass production of parasitoid Encarsia and

    predator chrysoperla is very essential for the benefit of

    farmers

    OFT 6

    1 Thematic area Integrated Disease Management

    2 Title : Assessment of Fusarium wilt disease management in

    banana

    3 Scientists involved Dr. K.Kavitha, SMS (PL.Path)

    Dr.R.Latha, SMS (PBG)

    Dr.K.Thirukumaran, Programme Coordinator

    4 Details of farming situation:

    Describe the farming situation

    including Season, Farming

    situation (RF/Irrigated), Soil

    type, fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500 words)

    Season : Kharif 2019

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Irrigated

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, Medium P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 710.13

    No. of rainy days :41

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one paragraph)

    Sudden Plant mortality

    Considerable yield reduction (50 q/ha)

    Lack of awareness on the use of bio-control agents in

    disease management

    6 Technology Assessed: (give full

    details of technology as well as

    farmers practice)

    TO1: P. fluorescens liquid formulation @ 4 lit /ha at

    planting, 2nd, 4th and 6th MAP.

    TO2: Soil application of T.viride @ 10 g/plant as basal + 2, 4, 6th MAP

    TO3: Farmers practice-Uprooting and cutting of infected

    mother plants and allowing side sucker to grow

    7 Critical inputs given: (along with

    quantity as well as value)

    Sl.No. Technology option

    Critical

    inputs

    Qty Value No.

    of

    trials

    1. TO1 P.fluorescens

    (Liquid)

    2.5 lit

    1000 5

    2. TO2 T.viride 10 kg 1500

    3. Farmers

    Practice

    - -

    Field Board

    sticker

    1 No 100

    8 Results:

    Technology Option No.of trials

    Yield

    (q/ha)

    Net Returns

    (Rs./ha)

    B:C ratio Wilt Incidence

    (%)

    Farmers Practice 5 389.0 275075 2.19 17.6

    Technology 1 P. fluorescens

    liquid formulation @ 4 lit /ha

    at planting, 2nd, 4th and 6th

    MAP (TNAU, 2013)

    441.6 331680 2.37 5.8

    Technology 2- Soil 450.0 342600 2.41 3.0

  • 25

    application of T.viride NRCB

    1 @ 10 g/plant as basal + 2, 4,

    6th MAP (NRCB 2015)

    Description of the results: (one

    page) in addition you can use

    graphs also

    :

    Soil application of talc formulation T.viride each 10

    g/plant basal + 2, 4, 6th month recorded the less incidence

    of wilt disease (3%) followed by soil application of P.

    fluorescens liquid formulation @ 4 lit ha at 2nd, 4th and 6th

    MAP (5.8% with higher yield of 450q/ha in TO2

    followed by 441.6 q/ha in TO2 and lowest in Framers

    practice 389q/ha.

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : Farmers expressed that prophylactic application of

    T.viride the decreased the disease incidence and

    increased the healthy number of plants with higher yield

    10. Feed back to the scientist who

    developed the technology

    : The low cost production technology needs to be

    formulated for mass multiplication by farmers in their

    own farm.

    OFT 7

    1 Thematic area Value addition

    2 Title : Assessment of alternate natural sweetener for bakery

    products

    3 Scientists involved Dr. Cissie Theeblyn David, SMS (FSN)

    4 Details of farming situation:

    Describe the farming situation

    including Season, Farming

    situation (RF/Irrigated), Soil

    type, fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500 words)

    -

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one paragraph)

    High incidence of non communicable diseases

    6 Technology Assessed: (give full

    details of technology as well as

    farmers practice)

    TO1 – Farmer practices (white sugar)

    TO2 – Palm sugar (TNAU, 2017)

    TO3 – Jaggery (TNAU, 2017)

    7 Critical inputs given: (along with

    quantity as well as value)

    S. No.

    Name Quantity Unit cost

    (Rs.)

    1. Raw materials

    Millets (250g)

    Shortenings (50g)

    Leavening agents (5 g)

    Sweeteners (120 g)

    Food additives (5 ml)

    5 Nos. 1000

    2. Packaging materials (100 g) 5 Nos. 500

    Total 7500

  • 26

    8 Results:

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Shelf life

    performance

    (Months)

    Sensory

    attributes

    (%)

    B:C ratio Data on

    Other

    performance

    indicators*

    Farmers Practice (White

    sugar) 5

    3 97.5 1.8 -

    Technology 1(Palm sugar) 2.5 91 1.55 -

    Technology 2(Jaggery) 1 82 1.13 -

    Description of the results: (one

    page) in addition you can use

    graphs also

    :

    Three different types of sweetener namely white sugar

    (Control) palm sugar (TO1) and Jaggery (TO2) was

    assessed for its suitability for bakery product

    development. The consumer preference test score and

    sensory scoring was maximum for white sugar (97.5 %)

    followed by palm sugar (91%) and least score for

    Jaggery ( 82 % ). The shelf life performance was

    maximum for the white sugar incorporated products (3

    months) followed by palm sugar (2.5 months) and

    minimum keeping quality for Jaggery ( 1 month )

    incorporated product due to poor eye appeal and textural

    properties with respect to all the three products tested

    namely biscuits, bread and bun. The BCR for the white

    sugar was 1.8 followed by palm sugar which was 1.55

    and 1.13 for Jaggery

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : Sensory scoring of the alternate natural unrefined

    sweeteners alter the eye appeal and textural properties of

    the baked products though nutritious when compared to

    the refined sugar

    10. Feed back to the scientist who

    developed the technology

    : High pricing for the trial based sweeteners namely palm

    sugar and jaggery compared to the control (white sugar)

    can be minimized by motivating farmers for larger scale

    production of sweeteners with reasonable pricing for

    better food security and thereby minimizing the

    incidence of non communicable diseases

  • 27

    (2018 – 19) On Farm Trails

    OFT 1

    1 Thematic area Varietal Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of Blackgram varieties under Rice Fallow

    condition

    3 Scientists involved Dr.R.Latha, SMS (PBG)

    4 Details of farming

    situation: Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated), Soil type,

    fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500

    words)

    Describe the farming situation including Season, Farming

    situation (RF/Irrigated), Soil type, fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy days etc (about 500 words)

    Season : Summer 2019

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Rainfed

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 14.7

    No. of rainy days : 2

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    • Low productivity (4q /ha)

    • Lack of high yielding YMV resistant varieties suitable for Rice fallow condition in Kanyakumari district

    6 Technology Assessed: (give

    full details of technology as

    well as farmers practice)

    Farmers Practice – VBN 5

    TO1-VBN8

    TO2-ADT6

    TO3-KKM1

    7 Critical inputs given: (along

    with quantity as well as

    value)

    Critical inputs Quantity Cost/trial (Rs)

    Seeds- KKM 1 2.5 300

    Seeds –VBN (BG)8 2.5 300

    Seeds – ADT 6 2.5 300

    Pulse wonder 2 500

    Trichoderma viride 1 120

    Field Board 1 100

    Total 1620

    8 Results: Performance of the technology

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Yield (

    q/ha)

    Net Returns

    (Rs. in

    lakh./ha)

    B:C

    ratio

    Data on Other

    performance indicators*

    DFF No. Of

    Pods/plant

    PDI

    Farmers Practice –VBN 5

    5

    4.3 15800 1.79 38 48 72

    Technology 1(VBN 8 ) 4.9 21600 2.20 36 61 0

    Technology 2( ADT 6) 4.7 18700 2.04 35 56 6

    Technology 3( KKM 1) 4.3 15800 1.79 38 43 22

    * Other performance indicators: such as pest intensity, weed population, test weight, duration

    etc Description of the results:

    (one page) in addition you

    can use graphs also

    :

    Among the Blackgram varieties assessed, the highest yield of

    4.9 q/ha was recorded in VBN 8 with a net return of Rs.21600

    and BCR 2.2. It was found to be completely resistant to

    yellow mosaic virus. The variety ADT 6 recorded 4.7 q/ha of

    grain yield with net return of Rs.18700 and BCR 2.04. The

    variety KKM 1 and Farmers practice VBN 5 was found to be

    late flowering with indeterminate growth habit. Both are on

    par with yield potential of 4.3q/ha and are susceptible to

    yellow mosaic virus.

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : The variety VBN 8 matures uniformly and harvesting can be

    done in one picking. It is free of YMV incidence.

  • 28

    10. Feed back to the scientist

    who developed the

    technology

    : VBN 8 blackgram is completely resistant to yellow mosaic

    virus disease and with synchronized maturity.

    Both VBN 8 and ADT 6 perform well under rice fallow

    condition and can be recommended for Kanyakumari district.

    OFT 2

    1 Thematic area : Varietal Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of suitable Tapioca varieties for Kanyakumari

    District

    3 Scientists involved : Dr.P.Prasanna Kumar and Dr.R.Latha, SMS(PBG)

    4 Details of farming

    situation: Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated), Soil

    type, fertility Status,

    Seasonal rainfall (mm)

    No. of rainy days etc

    (about 500 words)

    : Season : Kharif 2019

    Soil Type : Sandy loam

    Farming situation : Rainfed

    Soil Fertility status : Low N, P and K

    Seasonal Rain fall (mm) : 48.2

    No. of rainy days : 9

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    : Low yield

    Low Starch Content

    Incidence of Cassava Mosaic disease

    Incidence of Cercospora Leaf spot Lack of ideal variety for

    Kanyakumari district

    6 Technology Assessed:

    (give full details of

    technology as well as

    farmers practice)

    : Farmers practice –Local Variety (Lakshmi vellai and kariyilai

    porian)

    TO1 – YTP1(TNAU -2014)

    TO2 – Sree Pavithra(CTCRI-2017)

    7 Critical inputs given:

    (along with quantity as

    well as value)

    : S. No. Name Quantity Total Cost (Rs.)

    1. Setts-YTP1 1700 1700

    2. Setts- Sree Pavithra 1700 1700

    3. Field Sticker 1 100

    Total 3500

    8 Results:

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Yield (

    q/ha)

    Net

    Returns

    (Rs. in

    lakh./ha)

    BCR Data on Other performance indicators*

    Duration

    (Months)

    No. Of

    Tubers/plant

    Yield/palnt

    Farmers Practice –

    Kariyialiporian

    5

    300 213200 3.46 11 6 4.8

    Technology 1(YTP1) 322 193340 3.23 10 7 5.2

    Technology 2(Sree

    Pavithra)

    354 222750 3.57 10 8 6.0

  • 29

    * Other performance indicators: such as pest intensity, weed population, test weight, duration

    etc

    The variety Sree Pavithra recorded the highest yield of 354 q/ha with net return of Rs.222750

    and BCR 3.57. The variety YTP 1 produced an yield of 322 q/ha with net return of Rs.193340

    and BCR 3.23. Though the yield in Farmers practice was 300 q/ha the net return was Rs.213200

    and BCR 3.46 which was more than YTP 1 because it fetches higher price because of good

    cooking quality and consumer preference.

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : The market price of YTP 1 is low. The cookng temperature is

    high. Cooking quality of Sree Pavithra is low as it requires long

    time for cooking. Kariyilai poriyan is the best as it cook at low

    temperature and duration.

    10. Feed back to the scientist

    who developed the

    technology

    : YTP 1 can not be recommended for Kanyakumari as it does not

    have desirable cooking qualities.

    Sree Pavithra also not preferred by Kanyakumar farmers

    OFT 3

    1 Thematic area : Breed Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of suitable poultry bird for Backyard poultry

    3 Scientists involved : Dr. K.avitha, SMS (Pl.Path)

    Dr.K.Thirukumaran, Programme Coordinator

    4 Details of farming

    situation: Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated), Soil type,

    fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of

    rainy days etc (about

    500 words)

    : -

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    : Higher production cost

    Low body weight gain

    Low egg production

    6 Technology Assessed:

    (give full details of

    technology as well as

    farmers practice)

    : Farmers practice –Local Breeds

    TO1 –TANUVAS Aseel (2017)

    TO2 – Grama priya (DPR, 2015)

    7 Critical inputs given:

    (along with quantity as

    well as value)

    : S. No. Name Quantity Total Cost (Rs.)

    1. Aseel Chicks 25 Nos 1000

    2. Chick feeds 7.5 kg 375

    3. Grama priya- Chicks 25 Nos 100

    4. Chick feeds 7.5 kg 375

    5. Field Board sticker 1 No 100

  • 30

    Total 2850

    8 Results:

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Egg

    production

    (Nos./year)

    Net

    Returns

    (Rs/bird

    /year)

    B:C

    ratio

    Body

    weight at

    20 th week

    (Kg)

    Average

    age at egg

    laying

    (Days)

    TO1 –TANUVAS Aseel 3 143 702.00 3.81 1.58 165

    TO2 – Grama priya 175 819.5 4.28 1.7 150

    Farmers practice-–Local

    Breeds

    75 351.8 3.35 1.35 190

    Description of the results:

    (one page) in addition you

    can use graphs also

    : Grama priya birds attained sexual maturity (age at 1st lay) at

    an average age of 150 days compared to 160days for

    TANUVAS Aseel and 190 days for local desi breeds. The

    body weight gain at 20th week was higher in Grama priya

    (1.70 kg) followed by 1.58kg in TANUVAS Aseel and 1.35 kg

    in local desi breed. Moreover, Grama priya breed proved to

    be a dual purpose bird with its superior egg laying capacity

    (175 eggs/bird/year) compared to the 143 for TANUVAS

    Aseel and 75 for local breeds. In this trail the B:C ratio with

    Grama priya was found to be 4.28 compared to 3.81 for

    TANUVAS Aseel and 3.35 for local desi breed

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved : The economics of rearing Gramapriya poultry is encouraging

    in terms of income generation as this breed achieved a better

    benefit-cost.

    10

    .

    Feed back to the scientist

    who developed the

    technology

    -

    OFT 4

    1 Thematic area Varietal Evaluation

    2 Title : Assessment of suitable Bhendi hybrids for Kanyakumari

    District (2018-19)

    3 Scientists involved Dr.K.Thirukumaran (Programme coordinator)

    4 Details of farming

    situation: Describe the

    farming situation

    including Season,

    Farming situation

    (RF/Irrigated), Soil type,

    fertility Status, Seasonal

    rainfall (mm) No. of rainy

    days etc (about 500

    words)

    Thovalai block comes under the middle lands of

    Kanyakumari district comprising of plains and valleys

    suitable for growing crops like paddy, Bhendi, banana and

    coconut. The soil type is brown sandy clay loam with

    slight acidic nature having pH (power of hydrogen)

    ranging from 5.6 to 6.0. Major source of irrigation is

    through tanks as this block consists of 272 tanks. This

    block has the unique advantage of enjoying abundant

    rainfalls during both the southwest (June-September)

    monsoon and northeast (October-December) monsoon.

    This block lies in the northern part of the district and the

    rainfall received is generally high. The average rainfall is

    1300 mm. Paddy is the major crop and is grown in two

    seasons. First crop is sown in the months of April-June

    (Kannipoo) and the second crop is raised in the months of

    September-October (Kumbapoo). The next major crop in

    the block is Bhendi. It is cultivated in the large rain fed dry

  • 31

    land tract. It thrives best in laterite as well as sandy clay

    loamy soils and has become the poor man’s food par

    excellence. This crop is mostly grown under rainfed

    condition.

    5 Problem definition /

    description: (one

    paragraph)

    This block is a predominant Bhendi growing block. But

    during the recent years the yield has reduced due to the

    incidence of Bhendi yellow Mosaic disease and shoot and

    fruit borer incidence. The farmers have shifted to other

    crops like banana. Lack of ideal variety which can

    overcome these problems is the need of the farmers in

    Kanyakumari district.

    6 Technology Assessed: (give

    full details of technology as

    well as farmers practice)

    Assessment of suitable Bhendi hybrids varieties that can

    mitigate the loss due to incidence of YMV attack has been

    taken up.

    Farmers practice –Local Varitey

    TO1 –COBH4 (TNAU, 2016)

    TO2 – Arka nikita (IIHR,2017 ) 7 Critical inputs given: (along

    with quantity as well as

    value)

    Critical inputs Quantity Cost/trial (Rs)

    COBH4 & Arka nikita seeds 500 g 1500

    IIHR Special 2 kg 400

    Field Board sticker 1 No. 100

    Total 2000

    8 Results: Performance of the technology

    Technology Option No.of

    trials

    Yield

    (q/ha)

    Net

    Returns

    (Rs./ha)

    B:C

    ratio

    Data on Other performance indicators*

    Fruit/

    Pod

    length

    Plan Hight No.of

    fruits/plant

    Farmers Practice-

    Local variety

    5

    135 87000 2.16

    Technology

    1(COBH4)

    210 140200 2.47 17 192 18

    Technology 2(Arka

    nikitan)

    200 135000 2.42

    Description of the results:

    (one page) in addition you

    can use graphs also

    :

    OFT conducted at Thovalai Block of Kanyakumari district,

    (TO1) COBH4, (TO2) Arka nikita and (TO3) Farmer

    practice, TO1 produced the highest yield (210 q ha-1),

    followed by Arka nikita (200 q ha-1) and Local variety (135 q

    ha-1).

    Constraints faced : Nil

    9. Feed back of the farmers

    involved

    : COBH4 produced the highest yield (210 q ha-1) compared to

    other varieties. COBH4 was to be tolerant to YMV and shoot

    and fruit borer incidence. Cultivation of COBH4 was found to

    be profitable.

    10. Feed back to the scientist

    who developed the

    technology

    : COBH4 can be recommended for cultivation in Kanyakumari

    District.

  • 32

    3.D. FRONTLINE DEMONSTRATION

    a. Follow-up of FLDs implemented during previous years

    S.

    No

    Crop/Enterprise Thematic

    Area

    Technology

    demonstrated

    Details of popularization methods suggested

    to the Extension system

    Horizontal spread of technology

    No. of

    villages

    No. of

    farmers

    Area in

    ha

    Nil

    b. Details of FLDs (Information is to be furnished in the following tables category wise i.e. cereals, horticultural crops, oilseeds, pulses, cotton and

    commercial crops.)

    Sl.

    No.

    Crop Thematic area Technology

    Demonstrated

    Season

    and year

    Source of

    funds

    Area (ha) No. of

    farmers/demonstration

    Reasons for

    shortfall in

    achievement Proposed Actual SC/ST Others Total

    1 Blackgram Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration

    of VBN(BG) 6

    Blackgram

    under Rice

    Fallow

    condition

    Summer

    2020

    ICAR 4.0 4.0 2 8 10

    2 Green gram Integrated Crop

    management

    Demonstration of

    Greengram variety

    VBN(GG) 4

    Summer

    2020

    ICAR 4 4 2 8 10 -

    3 Groundnut Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration

    of CO(GN) 7

    Groundnut for

    rainfed

    condition

    Rabi

    2019

    ICAR 2.0 2 2 3 5 -

    4 Banana INM Integrated

    Nutrient

    Management in

    Banana

    Kharif

    2019

    ICAR 4.0 4.0 2 8 10 -

  • 33

    5 Banana Integrated disease

    management

    Demonstrations of

    Bioformulation for

    Pseudo stem weevil

    management in

    banana

    Rabi 2019 ICAR 4 4 1 9 10 -

    6 Mango Integrated pest

    management

    Demonstration of

    Ecofriendly

    management

    practices for fruit fly

    in Mango

    Rabi 2019 ICAR 2 2 2 8 10 -

    7 Ridge

    gourd

    Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration of

    ridge gourd

    Hybrids suitable

    for Kanyakumari

    District

    Rabi 2019 ICAR 2 2 4 6 10 -

    8 Snake

    gourd

    Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration of

    snake gourd

    Hybrids suitable

    for Kanyakumari

    District

    Rabi 2019 ICAR 2 2 2 8 10 -

    9 Coriander Integrated Crop

    management

    Demonstration of

    leafy coriander

    variety suitable for

    Kanyakumari

    district

    Rabi

    2019

    ICAR 2 2 2 8 10 -

    10 Rose Integrated

    Pest

    Management

    ICM practices in

    rose

    Rabi

    2019

    ICAR 2 2 1 10 10 -

    11 Tuberose

    (Prajwal)

    Integrated

    Crop

    Management

    ICM in

    Tuberose

    Rabi

    2019

    ICAR 0.5

    0.5 - 5 5 -

    12 Tuberose

    (Arkha

    vaibhav)

    Integrated

    Crop

    Management

    ICM in

    Tuberose

    Rabi

    2019

    ICAR 0.04 0.04 - 10 10 -

    13 IFS Integrated Doubling farmers Rabi ICAR KVK 2 2 - 5 5

  • 34

    Farming

    System

    income through IFS 2019

    14 Mushroom Value

    addition

    Demonstration on

    mushroom based

    convenience food

    - TNAU - - 2 3 5 -

    15 Fodder Green fodder

    crops as

    intercrop in

    coconut garden

    Demonstration of

    Mixed fodder

    cultivation under

    Coconut garden

    Rabi 2019 ICAR 0.4 0.4 2 8 10 -

    c. Details of farming situation

    Crop Season Farming

    situation

    (RF/Irrigated)

    Soil type Status of soil Previous

    crop

    Sowing

    date

    Harvest

    date

    Seasonal

    rainfall

    (mm)

    No. of

    rainy

    days N P K

    Blackgram Summer Rainfed Sandy loam 146 –180 09 – 20 100 - 117 Rice 19.3.2020 10.6.2020 120 5

    Green gram Summer Rainfed Clay loam 184.5 –

    220.5

    6.34 –

    9.83

    86.54 –

    143.3

    Rice 20.03.2020 07.6.2020 130 5

    Groundnut Rabi Rainfed Sandy loam 161 - 304 08 - 13 67 – 203 Blackgram 25.11.2019 20.04.2020 112.6

    Banana Kharif Irrigated Sandy loam 119- 138 13 – 16 63 – 88 Banana 20.05.2019 21.02.2020 1004.7 46

    Banana Rabi Irrigated Sandy loam 119- 138 13 – 16 63 – 88 Banana 27.7.2019 27.04.2020 1100 65

    Mango Rabi Rainfed Sandy loam 150 – 217 5.6 –

    8.2 87 - 109

    Mango - 25.04.2020 850 45

    Ridge

    Gourd

    Rabi Irrigated Sandy clay loam

    120 –140 5.82-

    8.4 98 - 115

    Bhendi 25.10.2019 18.12.2020 750 38

    Snake

    Guard

    Rabi Irrigated Sandy clay loam

    117 – 135 5.5 –

    8.0 95-115

    Bhendi 30.10.2019 23.12.2020 750 37

    Coriander Rabi Irrigated Sansy loam 136-153 9-13 74-83 Pulses 18.11.2019 07.12.2019 631.54 31

    Rose Kharif Irrigated Brown sandy

    clay loam

    219 – 258 10 – 14 90 - 130 Rice 28.05.2019 - 612.74 28

    Tuberose Rabi Irrigated Sandy loam 123 - 192 07 - 16 67 – 231 Rice 10.07.2019 29.11.2019 641.54 34

    Tuberose Rabi Irrigated Sandy loam 123 - 192 07 - 16 67 – 231 Rice 17.09.2019 03.02.2020 461.05 27

    IFS - Irrigated Sandy loam 176 – 319 10 - 14 96 - 137 - 19.08.2019 31.03.2020 228.80 31

  • 35

    Mushroom - - - - - - - - -

    Fodder

    crops

    Rabi Irrigated Sandy Clay

    loam

    186.3-

    210.4

    7.8-10.3 117.4-134.1 Coconut

    Garden

    08.02.2020 7.5.2020 250 10

    d. Technical Feedback on the demonstrated technologies

    S.

    No

    Crop Feed Back

    1. Blackgram VBN6 black gram variety recorded yield of 4.9q/ha. No incidence of Yellow mosaic was observed. because of synchronized

    maturity, the crop was harvested in single picking.

    2. Green gram

    Flowering at 30 days after sowing. No incidence of Yellow mosaic was observed. Pod filling was very poor and yield was less

    when compared to farmers practice of cultivating blackgram

    3 Groundnut Demonstration of COGN 7 recorded a yield of 19.6 q/ha with a net return of Rs.48000 and BCR of 2.86

    The local variety produced 17.2 q/ha with a net return of Rs.39000 and BCR 2.57

    Seed Treatment with Trichoderma viride @ 4 g/kg of seed improved germination and vigour of the seedlings. As a prophylactic

    measure it reduced the disease incidence.

    Foliar application of TNAU Groundnut rich enhanced pod setting and kernel weight

    4 Banana Demonstration of split application of fertilizers improved the vigour of the plantation

    Foliar application of IIHR Banana special on 5th, 6th and 7th month after planting increased the bunch weight

    The sigatoka leaf spot disease was controlled by foliar spray of propiconazole @ 1ml/lit

    The yield recorded in demonstration was 408.6 q/ha with a net return of Rs.646500 and BCR 2.72

    5 Banana Pseudostem spraying with Nanma recorded 4.5 percent pseudo stem weevil incidence in demo whereas the farmers practice

    recorded 16.9 percent weevil incidence.

    The yield of demo plots was 357.5q/ha whereas the farmers practice was 305 q/ha

    6 Mango Fruits fly damage has been drastically reduced in demo plots (4.1%) when compared to check (33.6 %)

    7 Ridge Gourd Fruits fly damage has been reduced 15%

    8 Snake Guard Fruits fly damage has been reduced 11%

    9 Coriander Leafy coriander variety Cr Co 4 had yield potential of 3125q/ha and BCR of 1.885 when compared to the check which was

    1.14

    10 Rose Incidence of sucking pest is reduced to 80% compared to conventional practices

    11 Tuberose Tuberose variety Arka Prajwal had yield potential of 38.5 q/ha and BCR of 2.94 when compared to the check which was 2.02

    12 Tuberose The application of bio pesticide formulations alternatively has shown a reduction of 80% of the incidence of sucking pests and

    thrips in Edward variety of Rose cultivation

  • 36

    13 IFS Poultry component of Integrated farming system is the most preferred and easily managed by farm women. It is followed by

    vermicomposting by rural youth. the Gross income generated from one hectare through IFS was Rs 306760 with neet returns RS

    160660. There is an improvement of 15.32% in the income through the various components during the first year. BCR from IFS

    was found to be 2.1 compared to sole cropping which has BCR 1.19.

    14 Mushroom Consumer preference was maximum for button mushroom based convenience food (93.2%) owing to its suitability for

    processing of mushroom soup (92.9%), mushroom nuggets (87.4%) and mushroom sauce (79.1%) followed by oyster mushroom

    (91%) and least preference for milky mushroom (68.7%) due to the poor textural and mouth feel parameters, poor rehydration

    per cent and higher particulate size owing to its high fiber content.

    Keeping quality of milky mushroom based products was comparatively less (3 months) compared to oyster and button

    mushroom (5 months) which were on par with each other. Cost efficiency ratio was highest with milky mushroom based

    convenience food (2.54) followed by oyster based products (2.0) and least in button mushroom based products (1.14)

    15 Fodder Intercropping reduced weed growth in coconut garden

    Effective utilization of the available land holdings

    Mixed fodder crops supplied balanced diet to the cattle which enhances increased milk yield.

    e. Farmers’ reactions on specific technologies

    S.

    No

    Crop Feed Back

    1. Blackgram VBN 6 Blackgram is tolerant to Yellow Mosaic Virus disease with high yield

    2 Green gram

    Yellow mosaic virus incidence free in demo when compared to local variety. Yield was very low when compared to farmers

    practice

    3 Groundnut The yield recorded in COGN 7 Groundnut was more than local variety.

    The variety COGN 7 is tolerant to root rot disease and leafspot disease

    Application of TNAU Groundnut rich increased pod set and yield

    4 Banana Bunch weight and finger quality was improved by foliar application of IIHR Banana special

    Sigatoka leaf spot disease was effectively managed by spraying of Propiconazole@ 1 ml/lit

    5 Banana The incidence of pseudo stem weevil incidence is very meager and hence no insecticides were sprayed.

    6 Mango The number of fruit fly captures were high which reduced the fruit damage

    7 Ridge Gourd Yield increased 51% in Arka vikram variety than local variety and it has excellent cooking quality

    8 Snake Guard The fruit fly incidence is very low and the yield increased 25% was more than local variety

    9 Coriander Cr Co 4 green foliage yield was good with pest resistance of 50 % and net yield potential of Rs. 66,250/-/ hectare

    10 Rose Application of Bio pesticides was found to be effective against thrips.

    11 Tuberose Arka Prajwal was found to perform well and can be popularized in Kanyakumari district.

    12 Tuberose The yield, performance and preference of Arka vaibahv was found to be poor in the district.

  • 37

    13 IFS Poultry component of Integrated farming system is the most preferred and easily managed unit of IFS in the district.

    14 Mushroom Need for consumer awareness and popularisation on ready to use mushroom based convenience food for betterment of health

    and nutritional benefit to mankind for better nutritional security

    15 Fodder Intercropping in coconut garden was preferred by the famers since the possibility of sole fodder cultivation is less in Kanyakumari District because of fragmented holdings.

    Mixed green fodder to cattle led to high milk yield

    f. Extension and Training activities under FLD

    Sl.No. Activity

    No. of

    activities

    organised

    Date Number of

    participants

    Remarks

    1) Demonstration of VBN(BG) 6 Blackgram under Rice Fallow condition

    1 Field day - - - -

    2 Farmers Training 2 14.03.2020

    21.11.2019

    13

    15

    Off Campus

    On Campus

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries 1 18.11.2019 16 -

    2) Demonstration of Greengram variety VBN(GG) 4

    1 Field Day - - - -

    2 Farmers Training - - - -

    3 Media coverage 1 25.02.2020 -

    4 Training for extension functionaries - - - -

    3) Demonstration of CO(GN) 7 Groundnut for rainfed condition

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 2 14.03.2020

    21.11.2019

    13

    15

    Off Campus

    On Campus

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries 1 18.11.2019 16 -

    4) Integrated Nutrient Management in Banana

    1 Field days -

  • 38

    2 Farmers Training 3 3.09.2019

    12.07.2019

    13.08.2019

    34

    26

    15

    On Campus

    Off Campus

    Off Campus

    3 Media coverage 1 04.05.2019 573 AIR- Integrated Weed Management in banana

    4 Training for extension functionaries -

    5) Demonstrations of Bioformulation for Pseudo stem weevil management in banana

    1 Field days 1 27.1.2020 16 Field day

    2 Farmers Training 3 25.07.2019

    29.08.2019

    29.10.2019

    13

    52

    24

    Off campus-Integrated crop management in banana

    On campus- Integrated crop management in banana

    Off campus -Integrated pest and disease management

    in Banana

    3 Media coverage - - - -

    4 Training for extension functionaries - - - -

    6) Demonstration of Ecofriendly management practices for fruit fly in Mango

    1 Field days -

    2 Farmers Training 3 21.08.2019

    07.11.2019

    13.01.2020

    20

    36

    20

    Off campus-Mango fruitfly Management

    Off campus-Mango fruit fly Management

    On campus -Integrated crop Management in Mango

    3 Media coverage - - - -

    4 Training for extension functionaries - - - -

    7) Demonstration of Ridge gourd

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 2 10.07.2019

    05.09.2019

    13

    10

    Off campus-Ridge gourd hybrids suitable for

    cultivation

    Off Campus-Ridge gourd hybrid suitable for

    cultivation in Kanyakumari District

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    8) Demonstration of Snake gourd

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 1 15.11.2019 15 Off campus-Hi tech production techgy in Snake groud

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    9) Demonstration of leafy coriander variety suitable for Kanyakumari district

  • 39

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 3 19.11.2019

    22.01.2020

    23.01.2020

    14

    25

    28

    On Campus-Coriander cultivation

    Cultivation of leafy coriander CO 4

    Cultivation of leafy coriander CO 4

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    10) Demonstration of pesticide formulation in rose

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 3 27.08.2019

    27.02.2020

    28.02.2020

    12

    16

    18

    Off campus- ICM in rose

    Off campus- Integrated plant protection techniques

    On campus- INM in Rose

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    11) Demonstration of Tuberose variety Arka Parjwal in Kanyakumari district

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 3 08.11.2019

    23.01.2020

    02.03.2020

    12

    18

    15

    Off campus- ICM in Tuberose

    On campus-ICM in Tuberose (Arkaprajwal)

    Off campus- IPM in Tuberose

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    12) Demonstration of cut flower variety Arka vaibhav in Kanyakumari district

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 2 30.01.2020

    08.01.2020

    25

    17

    On campus -ICM in Tuberose (Arkavaibhaw)

    Off campus -ICM in Tuberose (Arkavaibhaw)

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    13) Doubling farmers income through IFS

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 3 27.11.2019

    26.12.2019

    3.03.2020

    22

    22

    17

    Off campus- Doubling the income through IFS

    Off campus- Hygiene and maintenance of milch

    animals On campus -Integrated Farming system

  • 40

    3 Media coverage 1 28.01.2020 624 AIR Live-Integrated farming System

    4 Training for extension functionaries 1 11.02.2020 17 On campus- Improved techniques in Integrated

    Farming System

    14) Demonstration on mushroom based convenience food

    1 Field days -- -- --

    2 Farmers Training 3 10.02.2020

    11.07.2019

    04.09.2019

    16

    20

    20

    On Campus-Convenience food from mushroom

    Off Convenience food from mushroom

    Convenience food from mushroom

    3 Media coverage

    4 Training for extension functionaries

    15) Demonstration of Mixed fodder cultivation under Coconut garden

    1 Field days

    2 Farmers Training 2 12.11.2019, 15.11.2019

    21

    30

    Off campus training- Improved fodder production

    On campus training- Fodder production & feeding

    management livestock

    3 Media coverage 1 25.05.2019 Mass coverage Radio programme on mixed fodder cultivation under coconut garden

    4 Training for extension functionaries --

  • 41

    g. Performance of Frontline demonstrations

    i) Frontline demonstrations on crops

    Crop Thematic

    Area

    technology

    demonstrated

    Name of the

    Variety/ Hybrid No.

    of

    Far

    mers

    Are

    a

    (ha)

    Yield (q/ha) %

    Incre

    ase

    in

    yield

    Economics of demonstration

    (Rs./ha)

    Economics of check

    (Rs./ha)

    Demo Check Demo Chec

    k

    Gross

    Cost

    Gross

    Return

    Net

    Return

    BCR

    (R/C

    )

    Gross

    Cost

    Gross

    Return

    Net

    Return

    BCR

    (R/C

    ) Hig

    h

    Low Aver

    age

    Pulses Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration

    of VBN(BG) 6

    Blackgram

    under Rice

    Fallow

    condition

    VBN

    (BG) 6

    VBN 5 10 4 5.2 4.0 4.9 4.0 22.5 16000 39200 23000 2.45 16000 32000 16000 2.00

    Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration

    of Greengram

    variety

    VBN(GG) 4

    VBN

    (GG) 4

    Local 10 4 1.50 0.80 1.0 2.38 -58 5500 7007 1507.0 1.28 6600 19040 12440 2.88

    Oilseeds Varietal

    Evaluation

    Demonstration

    of CO(GN) 7

    Groundnut for

    rainfed

    condition

    CO(GN)

    7

    Local

    variety

    5 2.0 21.4 17.8 19.6 17.2 14 25750

    73750 48000

    2.86 24800

    63800 39000

    2.57

    Cereals

    Commerci

    al crops

    Millets

  • 42

    Crop Thematic

    Area

    technology

    demonstrated

    Name of the

    Variety/ Hybrid No.

    of

    Far

    mers

    Are

    a

    (ha)

    Yield (q/ha) %

    Incre

    ase

    in

    yield

    Economics of demonstration

    (Rs./ha)

    Economics of check

    (Rs./ha)

    Demo Check Demo Chec

    k

    Gross

    Cost

    Gross

    Return

    Net

    Return

    BCR

    (R/C

    )

    Gross

    Cost

    Gross

    Return

    Net

    Return

    BCR

    (R/C

    ) Hig

    h

    Low Aver

    age

    Vegetables

    Varietal

    Evaluatio

    Demonstration

    of leafy

    coriander

    varieties

    suitable for

    Kanyakumari

    District

    Cr Co-4 Local

    variety

    10 4 125 110 117.5 80 46.87 26500 50000 23500 1.885 34000 40800 6800 1.2

    Varietal

    Evaluatio

    Snake Gourd COSG

    H1

    Local

    variety

    10 2 218 198 202 161 25 69500 202000 132500 2.91 65500

    161000 95500

    2.46

    Varietal

    Evaluatio

    Ridge Guord Arka

    vikram

    Local

    variety