Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

5
Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

Transcript of Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

Page 1: Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

Strengths and weaknesses of multi

agency working

Page 2: Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

Question• Why is it that the supposed strengths of multi agency working are

consistently identified as a major weakness in serious case reviews and inspections?

Page 3: Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

Multi agency working• ‘…considering that multi agency resolutions are considered a way of

achieving best results, this report shows how this approach can be disastrous’

Steve and Lynette Williams

‘…at no time did all relevant agencies meet together’‘…each agency/staff (need to) fully understand the opportunities and procedures for inter and multi-agency information sharing, including MAPPA’.‘risk is fully assessed by each agency in the context of their own agency role and perpsective…’

Page 4: Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

• What should be the strengths of Mappa and other multi agency arrangements?• What are the likely barriers to effective working?• How might these be overcome?

Page 5: Professor Mike Nash: Strengths and weaknesses of multi agency working

Risk assessment and management• Issues we might consider:• Consistency• Link to resources and skill distribution• Conflicts between needs and risk• Why is risk so pervasively negative?