Professionalism and the Early Childhood Studies Graduate Carolyn Silberfeld Research to Reality...
-
Upload
richard-mcdougall -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Professionalism and the Early Childhood Studies Graduate Carolyn Silberfeld Research to Reality...
Professionalism and the Early Childhood Studies Graduate
Carolyn SilberfeldResearch to Reality
ConferenceWoburn House 14th March
2006
Professionalism and the Early Childhood Studies Graduate
Development of ECS Degrees Aims of the Study Research Strategy Research Design Sample Ethical Considerations
Professionalism and the Early Childhood Studies Graduate
Data Collection Questionnaire Response The Interviews Data Analysis Discussion of findings
Development of ECS Degrees
better educated workforce, better equipped to provide quality experiences for children (Calder, 1999)
link between quality of provision & level of education (Whitebrook et al 1990)
Early Childhood Studies (ECS) degrees validated in the UK since 1993.
Issues
Rapid development ECS degrees Differences between programmes Graduate employment for those
without practice qualification Benchmarking of ECS degrees
Aims of Study
To explore perceptions about the preparation of ECS graduates for employment/further study.
To investigate the perceptions regarding the status of the ECS graduate.
Research Strategy
Flexible design to encompass qualitative and quantitative aspects.
Qualitative paradigm – narrative data, perceptions
Naturalism (critical realism or post-positivism) - deeper social reality, needs qualitative enquiry (Holliday, 2002).
Research Design
Exploratory Case Study
Can follow a naturalistic paradigm
Allows both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods
Sample ECS Degrees Network (past and
present)
Purposive sample to encompass range & diversity taken from those who volunteer
No need for generalisation
Ethical Considerations
Information to prospective sample Informed consent (informed refusal) Procedures of study Recording, storage and use of data Analysis and dissemination of data Confidentiality Anonymity as far as possible
Data Collection
Questionnaire to identify more detail about ECS programme and background of respondent. Semi-structured Open and closed questions
Interviews with selected sample Loosely structured interview
schedule
Questionnaire Response
Only 3 received by given deadline Email re-sent with new deadline 19 returned (16 institutions) –
45.7% 16 completed – all willing to
participate further in study
The Interviews
9 selected for telephone interview Geographical spread Range of professional backgrounds Active interviewing (Holstein &
Gubrium (1999) Problems with equipment during
pilot interview
Data Analysis
Questionnaires Matrix constructed to identify
commonalities and differences Interviews
Phenomenographic analysis - identifying conceptions, looking for underlying meanings and relationship between them (Entwistle & Entwistle, 1997)
Questionnaire Analysis
Questionnaires – limited usefulness, other than to clarify diversity of programmes, statistics of students and range of graduate destinations
Graduate Destinations PGCE – Primary/Early Years/GTP P/G – social work/law/midwifery/play
therapy/speech therapy Masters/PhD Management/employment in EY Setting Sure Start/other EY projects EYDCP Classroom Asst./support worker/social work asst. Lecturer HE/FE Special Needs Other – includes NGO, working/travelling
abroad/librarian/mentoring
Interview Analysis
Six themes emerged from data influence of the respondent’s
background preparation of students status of graduates within early years
‘world’ and within wider world graduate concerns role of early years practice graduate skills
Influence of Background 1- 10 years involvement in ECS Degrees Similarity in professional qualifications
of 7 respondents – five teachers and two social workers but teaching and employment histories dissimilar
Different reasons for involvement in ECS degree
All positive about multidisciplinary and multi-professional nature of degree programmes
Preparation of students
Influenced by type of applicant and background of interviewees Practitioners wanting to increase
knowledge & understanding Promotion prospects Entry on to professional courses Interest in widening EY field
Preparation of students
Preparation for life skills Preparation for graduate skills As advocates for children and families Understanding of what childhood is
about – historically, socially, in a health context, not just child development
Preparation for management
Teacher Training High % applicants wanted to do
teacher training but found other options - perceived early years as “a graduate type of specialism”
Teachers did not always encourage graduates to go into teaching - concerns regarding prescribed curriculum not thought to reflect or meet learning needs of children.
Status of Graduate ECS degree gave graduates higher
status within the early years world In wider world status was much the
same as majority of those who work with children
Status related to salary Awareness that childcare workers
were ‘at the bottom of the wage spectrum’
Graduate Concerns
Finding suitable employment without practice qualification
Recognition of degree within early childhood settings
Recognition of graduate skills and status of degree for employment in field of early childhood
Graduate Skills
Recurring theme in all interviews – reflective & critical thinkers; confident in knowledge and understanding of ECS; good communicators
“I want to make them powerful, thinking, reflective, honest……all sorts of traditional things you get from a good degree”