Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 12 ECE 6341 1.
-
Upload
judith-hall -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
2
Transcript of Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Spring 2014 Notes 12 ECE 6341 1.
1
Prof. David R. JacksonECE Dept.
Spring 2014
Notes 12
ECE 6341
2
Tube of Surface Current
Top view:
An infinite hollow tube of surface current, flowing
in the z direction:
1 2
x
y
a ( )szJ
From superposition, we know we can solve the problem using
ˆA z (TMz)
y
x
z
( )szJ a
1 2
3
Tube of Current (cont.)
Represent Jsz(f) as a (complex exponential) Fourier series:
( ) jnsz n
n
J c e
2
0
1( )
2jn
n szc J e d
The coefficients cn are assumed to be known.
4
r < a 1 ( )jnn n
n
a e J k
(2)2 ( )jn
n nn
b e H k
Apply B.C.’s (at r = a) :
1 2
2 1 ( )z z
sz
E E
H H J
r > a
Tube of Current (cont.)
5
The first B.C. gives
1 2
2 11( )szJ
The second B.C. gives
Hence we have, from the first BC,
2( ) ( )n n n na J ka b H ka
Tube of Current (cont.)
1z H
TM Table :
6
From the second BC we have
Substituting for an from the first equation, we have
Next, look at the term
21( ) ( )n n n n nk b H ka a J ka c
2 ( )( ) ( )
( )
nn
n n n nn
H kab H ka J ka c
J ka k
2 2( ) ( ) ( ) ( )n n n nJ ka H ka J ka H ka
Tube of Current (cont.)
2 2( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )n n n n n n nb J ka H ka J ka H ka c J kak
7
This may be written as (using x = ka)
Hence,
( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
n n n n n n
n n n n
J x J x x jY x J x J x jY x
j J x Y x J x Y x
jx
2( )n n n
jb c J ka
ka k
(This follows from the Wronskian identity below.)
Tube of Current (cont.)
2( ) ( ) ( ) ( )n n n nJ x Y x J x Y x
x
8
or ( )2n n n
ab j c J ka
Using
(2) ( )2n n n
aa j c H ka
(2)( ) ( )n n n na J ka b H ka
we have
Tube of Current (cont.)
9
r < a 1 ( )zjk z jnn n
n
e a e J k
(2)2 ( )zjk z jn
n nn
e b e H k
r > a
Tube of Current (cont.)Generalization: a phased tube of current
( ) zjk z jnsz n
n
J e c e
(2) ( )2n n n
aa j c H k a
( )
2n n n
ab j c J k a
10
Inductive Post
Equivalence principle: remove coax aperture and probe metal
2a ,r r hI0
0
2sz
IJ
a
The magnetic-current frill is ignored in calculating the fields.
Coax feed
2b The probe current is assumed to be uniform
(no z or variation).
Parallel-plate waveguide
sM
I0
11
Inductive Post (cont.)
Tube problem:
I0 ˆ zE z E
0
0
E
E
For r a: 22 ( )jn
z n nn
A b e H k
( )2n n n
ab j c J ka
The probe problem is thus equivalent to an infinite tube of current in free space.
Tangential electric field is zero
where
(There is no z or variation of the fields.)
21E
j z
21E
j z
22
2
1zE k
j z
12
Hence
20 0 ( )zA b H k
and
Inductive Post (cont.)
0
0
1
2
1
2 2
, 020, 0
jnn sz
jn
c J e d
Ie d
a
In
an
0 0 0 ( )2
ab j c J ka
0
0 2
Ic
a
13
so
200 0 ( )
2 2z
IaA j J ka H k
a
22
2
1z z zE k A j A
j z
200 0( ) ( )
4z
IE J ka H k
Inductive Post (cont.)
We then have
14
Complex source power radiated by tube of current (height h):
*
*
1
21
22
ss s
sz z a
P E J dS
a h J E
or
*0
*20 0
0 0
1(2 )
2 2
1(2 ) ( ) ( )
2 2 4
s z a
IP a h E
a
I Ia h J ka H ka
a
Inductive Post (cont.)
15
or
or
2 20 0 0( ) ( )
8s
hP I J ka H ka
2 (2)0 0 0
( )( ) ( )
8s
khP I J ka H ka
0 0r
r rr
k k
where
Inductive Post (cont.)
16
2*0 0 0
1 1
2 2s inP V I Z I
2
0
2 s
in
PZ
I
so
Inductive Post (cont.)
Equivalent circuit seen by coax:
+I0
ZinCoaxV0
-
17
For ka << 1
20 0
( )( ) ( )
4in
khZ J ka H ka
( ) 21 ln
4 2in
kh kaZ j
Therefore
We thus have the “probe reactance”:
( ) 2ln
4 2p
kh kaX
Inductive Post (cont.)
0.5772156
Imp inX Z
18
or
2( ) ln
2pX khka
Xin
0.5772156
Inductive Post (cont.)
1 2( ) ln
2p
p
XL kh
ka
Probe inductance:
19
Summary
00
0
2( ) ln
2p r
r r
X k hk a
Inductive Post (cont.)
0
0
2ln
2p r
r r
hL
k a
Probe inductance:
Probe reactance:
20
Inductive Post (cont.)
Comments:
The probe inductance increases as the length of the probe increases.
The probe inductance increases as the radius of the probe decreases.
The probe inductance is usually positive since there is a net stored magnetic energy in the vicinity of the probe.
This problem provides a good approximation for the probe reactance of a microstrip antenna (as long as kh << 1).
21
Example
0
2.94
0.1524 [cm] 60mils
0.0635 [cm] 50[ ]
2.0 [GHz] 14.9896 [cm]
r
h
a
f
SMA Connector
12.3 [ ]pX
0.979 [nH]pL
Practical patch antenna case:
22
RLCpin ZjXZ
R L CZ0
Lp
resf
fpX
R
0f X
0resf f f
Microstrip Antenna Model
R Xor
inZ R jX
f0 = resonance frequency of RLC circuit
The frequency where R is maximum is different from the frequency where the reactance is zero, due to
the probe reactance.
23
Lossy Post
If the post has loss (finite conductivity), then we need to account for the skin effect, which accounts for the magnetic energy stored inside the post.
00
0
2( ) ln
2extp r
r r
X k hk a
2intp s
hX X
a
1
2s sX R
24
Example (Revisited)
0
2.94
0.1524 [cm] 60mils
0.0635 [cm] 50[ ]
2.0 [GHz] 14.9896 [cm]
r
h
a
f
SMA Connector
12.3 [ ]extpX
0.0062 [ ]intpX
Practical patch antenna case:
73.0 10 S / m Assume:
25
Accuracy of Probe Formula
2.2
2.0 GHz
0.635 mm (SMA connector)
2.188 mm (50 coax)
r
f
a
b
H. Xu, D. R. Jackson, and J. T. Williams, “Comparison of Models for the Probe Inductance for a Parallel Plate Waveguide and a Microstrip Patch,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, vol. 53, pp. 3229-3235, Oct. 2005.
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025
h (m)
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Xin
(
)
Uniform current modelFrill modelCosine current modelHFFS simulation
0/ 0.1h
HFSS