Production Function - Cambridge

download Production Function - Cambridge

of 3

Transcript of Production Function - Cambridge

  • 8/7/2019 Production Function - Cambridge

    1/3

    Joan Robinson, The production function and the theory of capital, Review of

    Economic Studies,Vol. 21, 1953-54, pp. 81-106.

    the production function has been a powerful instrument of miseducation. The student

    of economic theory is taught to write

    O = f(L,C)

    where L is a quantity of labour, C quantity of capital and O a rate of output of

    commodities.

    He is instructed to assume all workers are alike, and to measure L in man hours of labour;

    he is told something about the index-number problem involved in choosing a unit of

    output; and then he is hurried on to the next question, in the hope that he will forget to

    ask in what units C is measured. Before ever he does ask, he has become a professor, and

    so sloppy habits of thought are handed on from one generation to the next.

    Stock of capital and capital accumulation

    When we know the future expected rate of output associated with a certain capital good,

    and expected future prices and costs, then, if we are given a rate of interest, we can value

    the capital good as a discounted stream of future profit which it will earn. But to do so,

    we have to begin by taking the rate of interest as given, whereas the main purpose of the

    production function is to show how wages and the rate of interest are determined by

    technical conditions and factor ratio.

    Capital when it consists of as yet uninvested finance is a sum of money, and the net

    receipts of business are sums of money. But the two never co-exist in time. While the

    capital is a sum of money, the profits are not yet being earned. When the profits are being

    earned, the capital has ceased to be money and became a plant. All sorts of things may

    happen which cause the value of the plant to diverge from it original cost change in the

    value of money, fall in prices.

    Sen, Amartya , (1974). On some debates in capital theory, Economica, 328-335.

    It is well known that the Venerable Subhuti had a conversation with Buddha on

    transcendental wisdom which was immortalized as the Vajrachedikaprajn-dpdramitd, the

    so-called "Diamond Sutra", indeed this was the first printed book in the world.

    What has only very recently come to light is the fact that despite his virtuous life, Subhuti

    had some lapses, and was born again in this century. Since the lapses were moderately

    serious, Subhuti was reborn as an economist, and Subhuti was destined to specialize in

    capital theory.

  • 8/7/2019 Production Function - Cambridge

    2/3

  • 8/7/2019 Production Function - Cambridge

    3/3

    Buddha replied: Forsake fear, Subhuti. Venerable Solow may make peculiar assumptions,

    but he never makes a mistake. He not only assumed a homogeneous capital good but

    simply one good in the economy, which eliminates the problem of the relative price of

    capital and consumer goods, which must be unity.

    Subhuti asked: And Venerable Samuelson's model of surrogate production function? Thatdoes not assume one good in the economy, if I have followed it right.

    Buddha replied: No, that belongs to a higher tradition. It eliminates the problem by

    assuming that the sectors producing the different goods have the same factor-intensity,

    i.e. the same ratio of physical capital to labour. This is essentially another way of

    eliminating the relative price problem. However, you must note, Subhuti, that the model

    accommodates heterogeneous capital goods also, and the problem of relative prices is

    carefully eliminated by the equal factor-intensity assumption.