PRODUCTION. Design of New HIV-Protease Inhibitors and Ritonavir Synthesis.
PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PROTEASE BY …
Transcript of PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PROTEASE BY …
PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF
PROTEASE BY BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS ON SKIM
LATEX SERUM FORTIFIED MEDIA
BY
VIVI MARDINA
A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for
the degree of Master of Science
(Biotechnology Engineering)
Kulliyyah of Engineering
International Islamic University Malaysia
AUGUST 2015
ii
ABSTRACT
Protease from Bacillus licheniformis (ATCC 12759) can be produced using a readily
available agro-industrial residue as potential substrate. Skim latex serum effluent is an
abundant and inexpensive liquid waste from natural rubber industry that provides
various organic compounds for microbial growth. The present study utilized skim latex
effluent as a basal medium to cultivate B. liceniformis for extracellular protease
production. Statistical based experimental designs were adopted to optimize the
physicochemical factors for the maximization of protease production. Screening the
eleven factors such as lactose, galactose, casein, KH2PO4, MgSO4.7H2O, LB broth,
skim latex serum, inoculums size, agitation, initial pH, and temperature for protease
production was performed using Plackett-Burman design prior to optimization. Four
variables (galactose, skim latex serum, agitation and pH) were identified as the most
critical factors and selected for further optimization to enhance protease production
using Face Centered Central Composite Design (FCCCD) under Response Surface
Methodology (RSM). The protease production was found to increase from 2 U/ml to
19.35 U/ml approximately a nine fold increase as compare to the original medium. The
validation of developed model was established to verify the adequacy and accuracy of
the model, and the results showed that predicted value agreed well with experimental
value with error less than 20 %. ANOVA of the quadratic model showed a significant
of the model (p = 0.0002) with high determination coefficient (R2 = 0.9537) indicating
a satisfactory fit of the model with experimental data. Following the optimization
strategy, the sequential purification steps of the optimized media were conducted using
ammonium sulphate precipitation, dialysis and ion exchange chromatography. The
results revealed that the enzyme activity increase to 2.28 fold of purification compare
to the crude enzyme. Assessment of the purified protein by SDS PAGE showed a single
band with molecular mass of about 47 kDa. The enzyme was stable at temperature range
of 35 oC to 65 oC and also at pH 6.0 and 7.0 for 60 min. The stimulatory effects on
protease activity were observed in the presence of Mn2+and Ca2+ , while inhibitory
effects were found in the presence of Cu2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and EDTA. This indicated that
the produced protease might be a metallo protease. In the case of detergent application,
the enzyme exhibited the stability toward surfactants (Triton X100, Tween 20, SDS),
solvents (acetone, chloroform, hexane and toluene), oxidizing agent (H2O2) and Tesco
Everyday Value® detergent with the residual activity around 80 %. It also demonstrated
the removal activity of blood stain completely with supplementation of the 7 mg/ml
detergent solution. The characteristics of produced protease suggest that it may be used
as a potential additive for detergent formulation as well as laundry detergent and clinical
waste treatment.
iii
ملخص البحث
الم فات باستتتتتتن ا يمك أن يننج Bacillus licheniformis (ATCC 12759) الأنزيم البروتيني المستتتتتتن تجة رخيصتتة كنفايات ا فرة والالمن الستتاة ة النفايات إن صتتا المطاا المودتت د .كمادة ركيزة المناحة والصتتناعية الكا نة و الزراعية
الحالية استتتتتتن راستتتتتتةالنم الجراثيم. في المناستتتتتتبة ل المركبات العضتتتتتت ية التي تن فر فيها الع ي المطاا الطبيعي صتتتتتتناعة خارج الخ ية. لو الأنزيم البروتيني لإنناج B.liceniformisل تتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتتت قاع ي غذي ك سط ايات الساة ة ل مطاا المود دالنف
حصتتتتت ف كما .لبروتينياللانزيم إنناج الفيزي كيمياةية ل صتتتتت ى ع الع ا ا لنحستتتتتن الإحصتتتتتاةية النجريبية النصتتتتتا يم اعنم تو LB brothو O2.7H4MgSOو 4PO2KHو الكاستتتتتتتتتتتنو الجا كن زو اللاكن ز ثا ح عدتتتتتتتتتتترالأ الع ا ا
أمري و نيالأنزيم البروتي لإنناج ودرمة الحرارة الأوليةوستتتتترعة الرج ودرمة الحم تتتتتة ادة الن ويح حجمو صتتتتتا المطاا المودتتتتت د أربعة نغيرات وق تم تح ي الأ ثا. كمؤها لفح النحستتتتتتتتتتن Plackett-Burman باستتتتتتتتتتن ا تصتتتتتتتتتتميم هذا الفح
زي لم والتي اخنيرت حوا أهم الع ا ا الحاسمة بإعنبارها درمة الحم تتتتة و وستتتترعة الرج صتتتتا المطاا المودتتتت دالجا كن ز و ) نهجيةفي إطار (FCCCD)تصتتتميم وامهة الن ستتتط المركزي المرك باستتتن ا الأنزيم البروتيني إنناج لنعزيزالنحستتتن الأ ثا
وح ة/ ا مما يوارب 19.35 وح ة/ ا إلى 2إرتفع الأنزيم البروتيني إننامية ووم أن. (RSM)لستتتتطحيةا ا ستتتتنجابة ل نأك النصميم المط ر النحوق صحة أظهرت نناةج عم ية .ق رن بال سظ الغذاةي الأص ي أ عاف ا ننامية اذا تسعة
أظهر نم ذج و .٪20 أقا ع نستتتتتبة خطأ النجريبية الويمة مي ع بدتتتتتكا اتفو الويمة المن قعة أن النصتتتتتميم دقة كفاية و مما ي ى )2R = 0.9537 (عالي تح ي عا ا ع )P = 0.0002(بنستتبة النطبيق عالية ANOVAال رمة الثانية لأ ثا ا ال ستتتتط المغذي ننويةل ننابعة الخط ات النالية بإمراء البياات النجريبية. وكان الخط ة عنم ذج الموب ى ل ع النناستتتت ندتتتتتتتتاا ا نزيم النوي النناةج بإزدياد وكدتتتتتتتتف الكرو ات غرافي.النبادى الأي ني ال ياى و ل ترستتتتتتتتي الأ ني كبرينات باستتتتتتتتن ا
الكن ة الجزيئية واح ة ذات فرقة SDS PAGE ب اسطة البروتن النوي توييم وأظهر .الخا وارنة با نزيم أ عاف 2.28إلىدرمة أيضتتتتتتتتتتتتتتا و درمة ئ ية 65درمة ئ ية إلى 35درمة حرارة تتراوح بن ستتتتتتتتتتتتتتنور في نزيما كانو .كي دالن ن 47ح الي
نغنيز آي ات الم ب م د ندتتتتتتتتتاا الأنزيم البروتيني ع تندتتتتتتتتتيطية آثار وق ل حظ .دقيوة 60لم ة 7.0و 6.0الحم تتتتتتتتتة بن إلى يدير هذا. EDTA و آي ات النحاس والزنك والمغنيسي ب م د كا يرات ثبطةتأث تم العث ر ع في حن والكالسي
عالية ع ا ا الف نح استتتتتتتتتتتنورار ا نزيم أظهر المنظفات نطبيق ع ال في حالة ف زي. بروتينيأنزيم ق يك ن المننج الأنزيم البروتيني أن ا ا عالن ل ي و الو الأستتتتين ن والك روف ر وانكستتتتان ) والمذيباتTriton X100, Tween 20, SDS) الستتتتطحية ندتتااوبنن أيضتتا .٪80ح الي المنبويا نزيم ندتتاا ع ®Tesco Everyday Valueو نظف )2O2H (المؤكستت ة
بالإ كان أن يسن أنه المننج البروتيني خصاة ا نزيمو . المنظف الساةا غ/ ا 7بتت ع إكمانا تما ا ال بوعةإزالة .الإك ينيكية عالجة النفايات و نظفات الغسيا وكذلك المنظفات في إع اد كمادة إ افية
iv
APPROVAL PAGE
I certify that I have supervised and read this study and that in my opinion, it conforms
to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and
quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Master of Science (Biotechnology
Engineering).
Faridah Yusof
Supervisor
Md Zahangir Alam
Co-supervisor
I certify that I have read this study and that in my opinion it conforms to acceptable
standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as
dissertation for the degree of Master of Science (Biotechnology Engineering).
Parveen Jamal
Internal Examiner
Dzun Noraini Jimat
Internal Examiner
This dissertation was submitted to the Department of Biotechnology Engineering and
is accepted as a fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science
(Biotechnology Engineering).
Faridah Yusof
Head, Department of
Biotechnology Engineering
This dissertation was submitted to the Kulliyyah of Engineering and is accepted as a
fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science (Biotechnology
Engineering).
Md. Noor Salleh
Dean, Kulliyyah of Engineering
v
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own investigation, except where
otherwise stated. I also declare that it has not been previously or concurrently submitted
as a whole for any other degrees at IIUM or other institutions.
Vivi Mardina
Signature Date
vi
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
DECLARATION OF COPYRIGHT AN AFFIRMATION OF
FAIR USE OF UNPUBLISHED RESEARCH
Copyright © 2015 International Islamic University Malaysia. All rights reserved.
PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PROTEASE
BY BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS ON SKIM LATEX SERUM
FORTIFIED MEDIA
No part of this unpublished research may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the copyright holder
except as provided below:
1. Any material contained in or derived this unpublished research may only
be used by others in their writing with due acknowledgement.
2. IIUM or its library will have the right to make and transmit copies (print
or electronic) for institutional and academic purposes.
3. The IIUM library will have the right to make, store in retrieval system
and supply copies of this unpublished research if requested by other
universities and research libraries.
By signing this form, I acknowledged that I have read and understand the IIUM
Intellectual Property Right and Commercialization Policy.
Affirmed by Vivi Mardina
……………………… ……………………
Signature Date
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In the name of Allah, the most merciful and the most compassionate
Alhamdulillah, all praise and thanks to Allah for the successful completion of this
research work. He gave me the health, patience and strength to reach this far.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Faridah
Yusof for her supports, motivation, encouragement, advice, knowledge, guidance,
untiring assistance and patience throughout the course of this study. I would also like to
thank to my co-supervisor, Prof. Dr. Md. Zahangir Alam for his idea, guidance, sharing
the knowledge and encouragement through the period of the research. My appreciation
is expressed to Prof. Dr. Hamzah Mohd Salleh and Br. Aziz for the permission to excess
their labs and for the chemicals. I am also thankful to Mardec Industrial Latex Sdn. Bhd,
Tapah, Perak for supply of the raw material.
Sincere thanks to my colleague, Johan Ariff Mokhtar for his assistance, valuable
inputs and contribution during the project. My thanks to my lab mates: Nazira, Bala,
Mohd. Ezza Faiz, Nafeesah, Jannah, Jamil, Shima, Ainur, Shah, Safa, Omar, Emi,
Silvia, and Sofiya for their contributions and friendship. Thanks are also extended to
Department technical staff especially Br. Hafizul, Aslan, Haji Sukiman for their
laboratory support.
My deepest gratitude goes to my parents (Marlina and Chairruddin) and my
parent in laws (Sri Hayati and Thohirin) and family as well. Finally, I am grateful to my
husband (Kudam Yusof) for his endless support and unconditional love and also to my
children (Ahmad, Umaimah, Khalid and my baby, Bari) who promote my spirit to
complete my study as soon as possible.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract................................................................................................................. ii
Abstract in Arabic................................................................................................. iii
Approval Page....................................................................................................... iv
Declaration............................................................................................................ v
Copyright Page...................................................................................................... vi
Acknowledgements............................................................................................... vii
List of Tables........................................................................................................ xii
List of Figures....................................................................................................... xiv
List of Abbreviations............................................................................................ xvii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION............................................................... 1
1.1 Background........................................................................................
1.2 Problem Statement.............................................................................
1.3 Research Objectives...........................................................................
1.4 Scope of Research..............................................................................
1.5 Significant of Study...........................................................................
1.6 Research Methodology......................................................................
1.7 Dissertation Organization...................................................................
1
4
6
7
7
7
9
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................. 10
2.1 Introduction........................................................................................ 10
2.2 Natural Rubber Latex......................................................................... 10
2.2.1 General Properties of Natural Rubber Latex........................... 15
2.2.2 Composition of Latex.............................................................. 16
2.2.2.1 Rubber Matters.......................................................... 17
2.2.2.1.1 Rubber Particle.......................................... 17
2.2.2.1.2 Lipid.......................................................... 18
2.2.2.1.3 Protein....................................................... 19
2.2.2.2 Non Rubber Matters.................................................. 19
2.2.2.2.1 Latex Serum............................................. 20
2.2.2.2.2 Lutoid....................................................... 21
2.2.2.2.3 Frey-Wyssling......................................... 21
2.2.3 Utilization of Skim Latex Effluent.......................................... 22
2.2.3.1 Useful Biochemical Extraction................................ 22
2.2.3.2 Fertilizer................................................................... 23
2.2.3.3 A Medium for Culturing Fish.................................. 23
2.2.3.4 A Nutrient Media for Cultivating Microorganism... 24
2.3 Proteases: Overview.......................................................................... 25
2.3.1 Source of Proteases................................................................. 26
2.3.1.1 Plant proteases...................................................... 26
2.3.1.2 Animal Proteases.................................................. 26
2.3.1.3 Microbial Proteases.............................................. 27
2.3.1.3.1 Bacteria proteases..................................... 28
2.3.1.3.2 Fungi Proteases......................................... 28
ix
2.3.1.3.3 Viruses Proteases...................................... 29
2.3.2 Classification of Proteases...................................................... 29
2.3.2.1 Nomenclature and Terminology.......................... 29
2.3.2.2 Enzyme Commission Classification.................... 30
2.3.2.3 Exopeptidases....................................................... 31
2.3.2.4 Endopeptidase...................................................... 32
2.3.2.4.1 Serine Proteases........................................ 32
2.3.2.4.2 Aspartic Proteases..................................... 33
2.3.2.4.3 Cysteine Proteases..................................... 33
2.3.2.4.4 Metallo Proteases...................................... 34
2.3.3 Mechanism of Action of Proteases......................................... 35
2.3.3.1 Serine Proteases................................................... 35
2.3.3.2 Aspartic Proteases................................................ 37
2.3.3.3 Cysteine Proteases................................................ 39
2.3.3.4 Metallo Proteases................................................. 40
2.4 Properties of Bacillus licheniformis................................................... 41
2.5 Physicochemical Formulation............................................................ 43
2.5.1 Effect of Nutritional Factors................................................... 44
2.5.1.1 Carbon Source...................................................... 44
2.5.1.2 Nitrogen Source................................................... 45
2.5.1.3 Metal Ions and Salts............................................. 46
2.5.2 Effect of Physicochemical Parameters.................................... 48
2.5.2.1 Temperature......................................................... 48
2.5.2.2 pH......................................................................... 49
2.5.2.3 Agitation and Aeration......................................... 50
2.5.2.4 Inoculums Percentage and Incubation Time........ 51
2.6 Physicochemical Optimization.......................................................... 52
2.6.1 Media Optimization................................................................ 54
2.6.1.1 Synthetic Medium................................................ 55
2.6.1.2 Agricultural Residue............................................ 57
2.7 Purification and Characterization....................................................... 58
2.7.1 Partial Purification Strategies.................................................. 59
2.7.1.1 Concentration of Protein............................................ 59
2.7.1.2 Precipitation............................................................... 59
2.7.1.3 Column Chromatography.......................................... 61
2.7.1.3.1 Ion Exchange Chromatography................ 62
2.7.1.3.2 Gel Filtration Chromatography................ 64
2.7.1.3.3 Hydrophobic Interaction
Chromatograph………………………......
64
2.7.2 Characterization of Proteases Enzyme.................................... 65
2.7.2.1 pH and Temperature............................................. 65
2.7.2.2 Activators and Inhibitors...................................... 66
2.8 Industrial Application of Bacterial Proteases..................................... 67
2.8.1 Detergent Additives................................................................ 67
2.8.2 Leather Industry...................................................................... 69
2.8.3 Food Industry.......................................................................... 70
2.8.4 Silver Recovery....................................................................... 71
2.8.5 Waste Treatment..................................................................... 71
2.8.6 Silk Industry............................................................................ 72
x
2.8.7 Pharmaceutical Industry.......................................................... 73
2.9 Summary............................................................................................ 74
CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS.................................. 75
3.1. Introduction....................................................................................... 75
3.2. Experimental Materials..................................................................... 75
3.2.1. Raw Material........................................................................ 75
3.2.2. Microorganism and Maintenance of Culture....................... 76
3.2.3. Experimental Apparatus....................................................... 77
3.3. Experimental Methods...................................................................... 77
3.3.1. Pretreatment Skim Latex Effluent........................................ 77
3.3.2. Inoculums Preparation......................................................... 77
3.3.3. Protease Production.............................................................. 78
3.3.4. Protease Activity Assay....................................................... 78
3.3.5. Standard Curve for L-Tyrosine............................................ 79
3.3.6. Estimation of Protein Concentration....................................
3.3.7. The Effect of Skim Latex Effluent on Bacillus licheniformis
Proteases Production......................................
79
80
3.3.8. Statistical Optimization Procedure....................................... 81
3.3.8.1. Plackett-Burman Experimental Design for
Parameter Screening............................................. 81
3.3.8.2. One Factor at a Time (OFAT) Study.................... 83
3.3.8.3. Response Surface Methodology............................ 83
3.3.8.4. Validation of Experimental Model....................... 85
3.3.9. Purification of Protease........................................................ 86
3.3.9.1. Ammonium Sulphate Precipitation....................... 86
3.3.9.2. Ion Exchange Chromatography............................ 86
3.3.10. Characterization of Purified Protease................................... 87
3.3.10.1. Molecular Mass Determination of Protease.......... 87
3.3.10.2. Effect of pH on the Protease Activity................... 88
3.3.10.3. Effect of Temperature on the Protease Activity.... 89
3.3.10.4. Effect of Metal ion on the Protease Activity......... 89
3.3.10.5. Effect of Enzyme Inhibitors on the Protease
Activity..................................................................
89
3.3.10.6. Determination of Enzyme Kinetics....................... 90
3.3.11. Application of Produced Protease in Detergent Industry..... 91
3.3.11.1. Effect of Surfactants on Protease Activity............ 91
3.3.11.2. Effect of Solvents on Protease Activity................ 91
3.3.11.3. Compatibility Study of the Produced Protease
with Commercial Detergent and Removal of
Blood Stain............................................................
91
3.4. Summary..................................................................................................... 92
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION................................. 93
4.1. Introduction...................................................................................
4.2. The Effect of Skim Latex Effluent on Bacillus licheniformis
Protease Production.......................................................................
93
94
4.3. Optimization of Skim Latex Serum Medium Using Statistical
Techniques....................................................................................
95
xi
4.3.1. Screening of Physicochemical Factors for Protease
Production Using Plackett-Burman Design......................
4.3.2. One Factor at a Time (OFAT) Study................................
4.3.2.1. Effect of pH on Protease Production.................
4.3.2.2. Effect of Agitation on Protease Production.......
4.3.2.3. Effect of Incubation Periods on Protease
Production..........................................................
4.3.3. Optimization of Physicochemical Factors by Response
Surface Methodology........................................................
4.3.4. Validation of the Experimental Model..............................
96
103
103
104
105
106
113
4.4. Purification of Produced Protease................................................. 114
4.5. Characterization of Produced Protease......................................... 117
4.5.1. Molecular Weight............................................................. 117
4.5.2. pH Optimum and pH Stability of Protease
Activity..............................................................................
118
4.5.3. Temperature Optimum and Thermal Stability of Protease
Activity……..…….…………………………...................
119
4.5.4. Effect of Metal Ions on Protease Activity......................... 122
4.5.5. Effect of Enzyme Inhibitors on Protease Activity............ 124
4.5.6. Kinetic Study of the Produced Protease............................ 126
4.6. Application of Protease in Detergent Industry…….…….............. 128
4.6.1. Effect of Surfactants and Solvents on Protease
Activity..............................................................................
128
4.6.2. Compatibility Study of the Protease with Commercial
Detergent and Removal of Blood Stain............................
130
4.7. Summary....................................................................................... 132
FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION.................................... 135
5.1. Conclusion................................................................................... 135
5.2. Recommendation......................................................................... 137
REFERENCES....................................................................................................
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS................................................................................
139
156
APPENDIX 1........................................................................................................ 157
APPENDIX 2........................................................................................................ 158
APPENDIX 3........................................................................................................ 159
APPENDIX 4........................................................................................................ 161
APPENDIX 5........................................................................................................ 163
APPENDIX 6........................................................................................................
APPENDIX 7........................................................................................................
165
166
APPENDIX 8........................................................................................................ 172
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Page No.
2.1 Composition of field NR latex 12
2.2 Average chemical composition of rubber processing effluent 15
2.3 Characteristic of process effluent from rubber processing with
tolerance limit based on Environmental protection act 1996
15
2.4 The elements of effluent from concentrated and RSS latex 25
2.5 Classification of proteases (peptidases) 31
2.6 Nutrition requirement and their function for growing bacteria 44
2.7 Ion-exchange resins 64
3.1 Mixture compositions of L-tyrosine standard curve 79
3.2 Preparation of BSA standard curve 80
3.3 Comparing study between present and absent of skim latex
serum component in the fermentation culture
81
3.4 Physicochemical components used in Plackett-Burman
design
82
3.5 Experimental Design using Face Centered Central Composite
Design of four independent variables with six center points
85
3.6 Validation of the Experimental Model 86
4.1 Plackett-Burman experimental design for evaluation of 11
factors with actual and coded values for protease production
98
4.2 Ranking of the variables investigated in the Plackett-Burman
design
100
4.3 Analysis of variance for protease production by Bacillus
licheniformis on skim latex serum as the basal media
102
4.4 Face centered central composite design of four independent
variables with their actual value showing the experimental
and predicted response
107
xiii
4.5 Analysis of variance for response surface quadratic model 108
4.6 Experimental and predicted value of protease activity for
FCCCD matrix (Second optimization)
111
4.7 Analysis of variance for response surface quadratic model
(second optimization)
112
4.8 Validation of the experimental model 114
4.9 Purification scheme for B.licheniformis protease 116
4.10 Effect of various metal ions on B.licheniformis protease 123
4.11 Effect of Detergents and Solvents on Protease Activity 129
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Page No.
1.1 The contribution of proteases in the total enzyme sale
2
1.2 Summary of some keys research methods and their
descriptions
8
2.1 Schematic diagram of raw rubber processing and products
manufacturing
12
2.2 The flow sheet of steps involved in concentration of NRL by
centrifugation
14
2.3 Ultracentrifugation of Hevea brasiliensis latex
16
2.4 Structure of Cis-1,4-polyisoprene
17
2.5 Schematic drawing of a ruber molecule
18
2.6 Structure of alpha-lechitin
19
2.7 Organic non-rubber constituents of latex
20
2.8 Acylation and deacylation of mechanism of action of
chymotrypsin proteases
37
2.9 Mechanism of aspartic proteases
38
2.10 A mechanism for the action of papain
40
2.11 A mechanism for peptide hydrolysis by carboxypeptidase A
41
2.12 Principle of anion exchange separation
63
3.1 An overview of experimental strategies
76
4.1 The comparison study between the present and absent skim
latex serum component on the fermentation culture at fixed
level of galactose, skim latex serum, LB broth, inoculums
size, temperature and incubation period.
94
4.2 Pareto graph showing the main effect result of the 11
components for protease production based on Plackett-
Burman experimental result
100
xv
4.3 Effect of different pH on protease production by B.
licheniformis (ATCC 12759) with constant for other
conditions
104
4.4 Effect of different agitation rate on protease production by
Bacillus licheniformis (ATCC 12759) with constant for other
conditions
105
4.5 Effect of different incubation time on protease activity by
B.licheniformis with constant for other conditions
106
4.6 3D response surface curves showing the effects of: (a) skim
latex serum and galactose, (b) pH and galactose and (c)
agitation and galactose on protease production by
B.licheniformis (ATCC 12759)
110
4.6 Three dimensional graphs showing the interaction between
pH and agitation on protease production by Bacillus
licheniformis (ATCC 12759) at fixed level of galactose, skim
latex serum, LB broth, inoculums and temperature
113
4.8 Chromatography of B.licheniformis protease on DEAE-
sepharose. The column (1.5x10 cm) was equilibrated with
1.5 M Tris-buffer (pH 8) loaded with enzyme preparation and
eluted with a linear gradient (0 up to 1M NaCl) at a flow rate
2 ml/min
116
4.9 SDS-PAGE analysis of collected fraction from ion exchange
chromatography. M: marker, F2-F10: inactive fraction in
first washing, F12-F30: fraction in elution phase, F20 – F26:
fraction with high protease activity
118
4.10 Effect of pH and stability on the enzyme activity. The
maximum activity at pH 7 was taken as a control (100 %),
(*value in figure represented as mean ± SD)
119
4.11 Effect of temperature on B. licheniformis protease activity,
the maximum activity of enzyme at 65 oC was taken as a
control (100 %) (*value in figure represented as mean ± SD)
120
4.12 Effect of temperature on the thermo stability of B.
licehniformis protease
121
4.13 Effect of various protease inhibitors on The protease activity
from B.licheniformis
124
xvi
4.14 Hyperbolic regression of Michaelis-Menten equation for
Bacillus licheniformis protease
126
4.15 Lineweaver-Burk plot for determining of KM and Vmax using
casein as substrate
127
4.16 Compatibility of protease from Bacillus licheniformis
(ATCC 12759) with Tesco Everyday Value® detergent
132
4.17 Application of the enzyme in removal of blood stain. (a) The
stained clothes after drying. (b) The stained clothes after 30
min incubation at 60 oC (1: control, 2: the stained cloth + the
detergent only, 3: the stained cloth + the detergent + the
protease, 4: the stained cloth +enzyme only).
132
xvii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
3D 3 Dimensions
ADS Air dried sheet
ANOVA Analysis of variance
ATCC American Type Culture Collection
BOD Biochemical oxygen demand
BSA Bovine serum albumin
C/N Carbon/Nitrogen
CCD Central composite design
COD Chemical oxygen demand
CV Coefficient variation
CV* Constant viscosity
DCL Dichloroisocoumarin
DEAE Diethylaminoethyl
DFP Diisopropyl fluoro phosphate
DGDG Digalactosyl diglyceride
DOE Department of environment
DPNR Deproteinised natural rubber
DRC Dried rubber content
DTT Dithiothreitol
EC Enzyme commission
EDTA Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
ENR Expoxidised natural rubber
ESEM Environmental scanning electron microscope
ESG Esterified sterylglycoside
FCCCD Face centered central composite design
FW Frey-Wyssling
GF Gel filtration
GLA (γ-linoleic acid)
GP General purpose
H2S Hydrogen sulphide
HIC Hydrophobic interaction chromatography
IAA Indole acetic acid
IEC Ion exchange chromatography
IIUM International Islamic University Malaysia
KM Michaelis constant
LB Luria bertani
LBHB Low-barrier hydrogen bond
LNR Liquefied natural rubber
MGDG Monogalactosyl diglyceride
NR Natural rubber
NRSL natural rubber skim latex
NRSP Natural rubber serum powder
OFAT One factor at a time
PBd Plackett-Burman design
xviii
PHA Polyhydroxyalkanoates
PLC Pale latex crepe
PMSF Phenyl methyl sulfonyl fluoride
RRIM Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia
RSM Response surface methodology
RSS Ribbed smoked sheet
SD Standard deviation
SDS Sodium dodecyl sulphate
SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulphate-Polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis
SmF Submerged fermentation
SMR Standard Malaysia rubber
SSF Solid state fermentation
STR Standard Thai rubber
TLCK Tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone
TSR Technically specified rubber
v/v Volume per volume
Vmax Maximum rate of reaction
w/v Weight per volume
1
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Proteases (hydrolyses endopeptidases, EC. 3.4.21-24), are enzyme that catalyze the
breakdown of protein. They represent about 2 % of the total proteins in all organisms
(Polgar, 2005). Principally, they hydrolyze protein via the addition of water across
peptide bonds and catalyze peptide synthesis in solvent or in organic solvent with
limited water content. The distinctive characteristics of proteases such as substrate
specificity, catalytic mechanism, pH and thermo stability, and solvent tolerant convey
them to a crucial position with respect to their applications in both technical and
physiological field (Rhao et al., 1998; Jisha et al., 2013).
According to Li et al. (2012), currently almost 4000 enzymes have been reported
by researchers which are about 158 enzymes for nutritional industry, 64 enzymes for
technical application, 57 enzymes for feedstuff, and 24 enzymes have been applied in
three mentioned sectors. However, the industrial scale production has been satisfied by
only 20 enzymes with 75 % are hydrolytic enzymes. Proteases occupy the second
position after carbohydrases and before lipases in the world enzyme market with high
potential in technical application as well as tools for research and development.
At present, the total industrial enzymes market attained $3.3 billion in 2010 and
is predicted to attain a value of $4.4 billion by 2015. Of these, technical enzyme that is
used in huge amount as crude enzyme has been found its application in textile,
detergent, pulp and paper, and bio-fuels industries. Technical enzyme alone had
revenues approximately $1.2 billion in 2011 and estimated to increase up $1.5 billion
2
in 2015 and $1.7 billion in 2016 respectively (Adrio and Demain, 2014). Of the
industrial enzymes that are dominated by hydrolyses, proteases have been accounted
for 60 % of the global sale of enzymes (Figure 1.1) (Rhao et al., 1998).
Figure 1.1. The contribution of proteases in the total enzyme sale (Rhao et al., 1998).
Proteases have executed a large variety of functions from cell to organism level.
They mediate processes in human body such as coagulation, digestion, activation of
proenzyme and prohormones, apoptosis, and breakdown of intracellular proteins
(Chapman et al., 2001). Their applications against cancer and AIDS were reported by
researchers (Blankenvoorde et al., 2000; Rakashanda et al., 2012; Chanalia et al., 2011).
In addition, proteases have documented their history in food and detergent industries.
Protease from Bacillus licheniformis strain was recorded in the third edition of Food
Chemicals Codex as a source of enzyme involving in food processing (Salleh et al.,
2006). Proteases as detergent additives began in 1913 when Rohm and Hass marketed
‘Burnus’, then was followed by Bio-40, Biotex, Maxatase, Era plus®, Tide®, Dynamo®
and others (Kumar et al., 2008). The new development of proteases in leather industries
was suggested as early as 1910 for de-hairing and bating of hides for substituting toxic
3
chemicals (Gaur and Gupta, 2012). Thus, the vast diversity of proteases has attracted
researches attention in attempts to produce them with the excellent properties for a
specific application.
Among the available sources for proteases, microbial proteases that can be
easily manipulated to improve the desired properties are currently receiving more
attention due to technological and economic reasons. In the technical production,
microbes showed the outstanding properties such as fast growing, simple culturing for
large scale production, and metabolically vigorous to secrete large amount of protein
directly into the fermentation medium that help to simplify the purification steps
(Illanes, 2012). Moreover, in the economic perspective, micro and macro nutrients for
growth of microbial proteases can be provided easily by using low cost media to
enhance the yield (Nadeem et al., 2008). However, since there is no defined medium
established for the excellent protease production by different microbes (Bhunia et al.,
2012), identification of the optimized nutritional and physical parameters has been the
main goal of basic research and industrial application (Saravankumar et al., 2010).
Hence, this strategy is foreseen to reduce the budget of enzyme production by using
abundantly inexpensive raw material such as skim latex effluent.
Skim latex effluent, a liquid waste from rubber factory that is rich in various
organic compounds and potentially environment polluting has been proved to be an
important basal media for various fermentation process (Ishizaki and Fukuoka, 1991;
Mahat and MacRae, 1991; Tri-Panji et al., 1994; Tri-Panji and Suharyanto, 2001,
Kresnawati et al., 2008). The utilization of latex serum as a major component of
microbiological media could produce protease with an alternative low cost media as
well as increase the added value of the effluent. This is due to the fact that serum from
skim latex could replace nitrogen, carbohydrates and minerals (Mg, P, K, and Ca)
4
sources (Tri-Panji and Suharyanto, 2001; Siswanto, 1999). Besides, skim latex serum
has been found to have a remarkable growth-promoting effects for certain bacteria
including Bifidobacterium (Etoh et al., 1999), Spirulina platensis (Tri-Panji and
Suharyanto, 2001), and Rhizopus oligosporus (Nuradibah, 2012). Therefore, this
research effort utilized skim latex serum as a growth medium for Bacillus licheniformis
(ATCC 12759) in protease production by liquid state fermentation.
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
The use of proteases was found in all aspects of human life from detergent to brewing
industries and the highest application of proteases has been scored in laundry detergent
formulation which was account for 25 % of the global enzyme sale (Andrio and Demain,
2014). However, the expansion of proteases in detergent industries was restricted in
supply to those only four major producers of protease in the world; they are Novo
Industries Dermark, Gist-Brocades Netherlands, Genecor International United State and
Miles Laboratories United State (Salleh et al., 2006) and small companies that come
from Japan and China (Li et al., 2012). Malaysia alone was reported as a major importer
of enzymes (protease, lipase, amylases and cellulases) and detergents with increased
consumption rapidly. The imported enzyme by this country causes the cost of detergent
products relatively expensive. Moreover, another obstacle hindering the expansion of
protease is the high production budget (Ibrahim, 2008) that around 40 % of the
production budget depends on the cost of composition medium (Nadeem et al., 2008).
Hence, it is relevant for any countries particularly Malaysia to consider cheap source
material for enzyme production (Ibrahim, 2008). One of them is skim latex that come
from natural rubber (NR) industries.
5
NR industry plays an important role in Malaysia by offering employment
opportunities for more than 68,700 people (Saidur and Mekhilef, 2010) and providing
important raw material for local rubber-based industries. At the same time, it has
produced large quantities of effluent since the production of rubber products from NR
requires huge amount of water for its operation (Smitha et al., 2012; Hien and Thao,
2012; Rosman et al., 2013). The main sources of the effluent in Malaysia have been
identified from latex skim, latex serum, uncoagulated latex and washing from the
various processing stages which generate 20 tons of rubber and 410 tons of the waste
daily (Mohammadi et al., 2010). In particular, it was reported by Atagana et al. (1999)
that Malaysia alone produces up to 205 tons of natural rubber waste serum per day.
Effluent from concentrated latex factory could render environmental impact that include
water and odour pollutions due to a high COD (32,690 mg/l), BOD (13,760 mg/l),
nitrogen (4.620 mg/l) and suspended solid (SS) (42,550 mg/ml) level with acidic pH
(4.8) (Tekasaful and Tekasaful, 1999; Krisnawaty et al., 2008; Arimoro, 2009; Hien and
Thao, 2012).
The effluent has also high level of concentration ammonia (540 mg/ml)
(Tekasaful and Tekasaful, 1999) and sulphate (1500 mg/ml) (Mohammadi et al., 2010)
that cause problem in the biological anaerobic treatment system. The ammonia and
sulphate from the natural rubber process discharge into water body and promote
acidification process as well as inhibit the digestion process by lowering organic
removal efficiency (Veerasamy et al., 2008; Mohammadi et al., 2010; Veerasamy and
Ismail, 2012). These processes are harmful for the life (Atagana et al., 1999; Arimoro,
2009). Another problem related to the ammonia and sulphate solution released into air
is the unpleasant odour especially near the centrifugation area. This has adverse effect
6
on worker’s health as well as the nearby community’s health that may develop the
respiratory system irritant (Tekasaful and Tekasaful, 1999).
Apart from odour and health problems, the cost for discharging the waste is also
expensive. This is because high quantity of water is needed to discharge the waste into
effluent treatment pond in order to meet the requirement that had been stated by
Department of Environment (DOE) on the biological treatment system (Mohammadi et
al., 2010). Besides, large amount of organic matter (95 %) including acetic acid, sugar,
protein, lipid and mineral salt that are present in skim latex, forcing rubber manufactures
to spend a lot of money in waste management and effluent treatment. This massive
waste production requires proper treatment that is efficient, rapid and low cost
technology (Werathirachot et al., 2008; Al Khidir and Zailani, 2009; Mohammadi et al.,
2010; Hien and Thao, 2012).
Therefore, with respect to natural rubber waste serum that contains various
organic compounds, utilization of this effluent as a basal media could be a promising
technology for culturing bacteria using alternative either nitrogen, carbohydrate, and
trace metal source from the liquid waste of latex concentrate as well as minimize
environmental problem by valorization of the effluent.
1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the research are:
i. To identify the optimized conditions for production of protease using skim
latex serum as a basal media by Response Surface Methodology.
ii. To purify and characterize the produced protease
iii. To apply the produced protease in removal of blood stain with and without
of the commercial detergent for enhancing cleaning process.