PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not
-
Upload
zoe-mitchell -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
76 -
download
2
Transcript of PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not
![Page 1: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ron Dandurand, MD
Respiratory Effectiveness Group Summit
Lyon, France
April 15, 2016
![Page 2: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Objectives
![Page 3: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objectives Prove non-inferiority of spirometry
![Page 4: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Objectives Prove non-inferiority of spirometry
Raise reasonable doubt that spirometry ought to be abandoned at this point in time
![Page 5: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Objectives Prove non-inferiority of spirometry
Raise reasonable doubt that spirometry ought to be abandoned at this point in time
![Page 6: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Objectives Prove non-inferiority of spirometry
Raise reasonable doubt that spirometry ought to be abandoned at this point in time
Present a proof of concept of a novel approach to the analysis of spirometry
![Page 7: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Timeline of Spirometry and OS
![Page 8: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Timeline of Spirometry and OS
1846 Hutchison publishes paper on VC in first 2130 subjects
1947 Tiffineau proposes timed FVCs
![Page 9: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Timeline of Spirometry and OS
1846 Hutchison publishes paper on VC in first 2130 subjects
1947 Tiffineau proposes timed FVCs
1951 duBois presents first abstract on OS
1956 duBois publishes first paper on OS
![Page 10: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Timeline of Spirometry and OS
1846 Hutchison publishes paper on VC in first 2130 subjects
1947 Tiffineau proposes timed FVCs
1951 duBois presents first abstract on OS
1956 duBois publishes first paper on OS
1958 Hyatt describes F-V loop
1971 Menkes & Permitt introduce moment analysis
1978 Mead introduced slope ratio
1979 Mead proposes interrupted F-V loop
![Page 11: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Timeline of Spirometry and OS
1846 Hutchison publishes paper on VC in first 2130 subjects
1947 Tiffineau proposes timed FVCs
1951 duBois presents first abstract on OS
1956 duBois publishes first paper on OS
1958 Hyatt describes F-V loop
1971 Menkes & Permitt introduce moment analysis
1978 Mead introduced slope ratio
1979 Mead proposes interrupted F-V loop
1992 First commercial OS system marketed
![Page 12: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Timeline of Spirometry and OS
1846 Hutchison publishes paper on VC in first 2130 subjects
1947 Tiffineau proposes timed FVCs
1951 duBois presents first abstract on OS
1956 duBois publishes first paper on OS
1958 Hyatt describes F-V loop
1971 Menkes & Permitt introduce moment analysis
1978 Mead introduced slope ratio
1979 Mead proposes interrupted F-V loop
1992 First commercial OS system marketed
2016 Usmani - Dandurand debate
![Page 13: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Then and Now
Hutchinson, Med Chir Trans 1846;29:137 Grimby et al., JCI 1968;47:1455
![Page 14: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Spirometry vs. OS Advantages Spirometry OS
Cost € 1.4 K € 10-35 K
Availability Ubiquitous Rare
Portability Most 1/5
Longitudinal data 70 years 3 years
Treatment guidelines GINA/GOLD None
Intuitive concept Yes No
Disadvantages
inhomogeneities
![Page 15: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Spirometry vs. OS Advantages Spirometry OS
Cost € 1.4 K € 10-35 K
Availability Ubiquitous Rare
Portability Most 1/5
Longitudinal data 70 years 3 years
Treatment guidelines GINA/GOLD None
Intuitive concept Yes No
Disadvantages
Forced manoeuvre Yes No
Insensitive
Small airways disease
Ventilatory inhomogeneities
![Page 16: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Spirometry vs. OS Advantages Spirometry OS
Cost € 1.4 K € 10-35 K
Availability Ubiquitous Rare
Portability Most 1/5
Longitudinal data 70 years 3 years
Treatment guidelines GINA/GOLD None
Intuitive concept Yes No
Disadvantages
Forced manoeuvre Yes No
Insensitive
Small airways disease
Ventilatory inhomogeneities
![Page 17: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Spirometry vs. OS Advantages Spirometry OS
Cost € 1.4 K € 10-35 K
Availability Ubiquitous Rare
Portability Most 1/5
Longitudinal data 70 years 3 years
Treatment guidelines GINA/GOLD None
Intuitive concept Yes No
Disadvantages
Forced manoeuvre Yes No
Insensitive
Small airways disease
Ventilatory inhomogeneities
![Page 18: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Spirometry vs. OS Advantages Spirometry OS
Cost € 1.4 K € 10-35 K
Availability Ubiquitous Rare
Portability Most 1/5
Longitudinal data 70 years 3 years
Treatment guidelines GINA/GOLD None
Intuitive concept Yes No
Disadvantages
Forced manoeuvre Yes No
Insensitive
Small airways disease
Ventilatory inhomogeneities
![Page 19: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Spirometry vs. OS Advantages Spirometry OS
Cost € 1.4 K € 10-35 K
Availability Ubiquitous Rare
Portability Most 1/5
Longitudinal data 70 years 3 years
Treatment guidelines GINA/GOLD None
Intuitive concept Yes No
Disadvantages
Forced manoeuvre Yes No
Insensitive
Small airways disease
Ventilatory inhomogeneities ?
![Page 20: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Need for Better Biomarker Clear
Jones, Thorax 2001;56:880–887
![Page 21: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Need for Better Biomarker Clear
Dandurand et al, ERS Congress 2013
![Page 22: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Debate Not New
Chest 2015;148:1131-1139
![Page 23: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
But Is It Fare to Compare?
FEV1
vs.
OS
![Page 24: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Thank You
![Page 25: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
But Is It Fare to Compare?
FEV1
Single parameter
Typically 15-30 data points
OS
6 parameters (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres, AX, ΔX5)
Typically 12,228 data points
![Page 26: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Example Expiratory Spirogram
Index Base %Pred
FEV1 2.91 l 102%
FEV3 3.56 l
FVC 3.87 l 105%
PEF 498l/min 108%
FEV1/FVC 75% 100%
FEV3/FVC 91%
FEF75 5.87 l/s 86%
FEF50 2.66 l/s 67%
FEF25 0.91 l/s 68%
FEF25-75 2.23 l/s 73% 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
Flo
w (
L/s)
Volume (L)
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vo
lum
e (
L)
Time (s)
MP, 2015-12-04
![Page 27: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Example Expiratory Spirogram
Index Base %Pred
FEV1 2.91 l 102%
FEV3 3.56 l
FVC 3.87 l 105%
PEF 498l/min 108%
FEV1/FVC 75% 100%
FEV3/FVC 91%
FEF75 5.87 l/s 86%
FEF50 2.66 l/s 67%
FEF25 0.91 l/s 68%
FEF25-75 2.23 l/s 73% 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
Flo
w (
L/s)
Volume (L)
37 data points
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vo
lum
e (
L)
Time (s)
MP, 2015-12-04
22 data points
![Page 28: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Example OS Study
MP, 2015-12-04
![Page 29: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Example OS Study
MP, 2015-12-04
256 Hz X 16 sec = 4096 data points 12,288 data points
![Page 30: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
But Is It Fare to Compare?
FEV1
Single parameter
Typically 15-30 data points
OS
6 parameters (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres, AX, ΔX5)
Typically 12,228 data points
![Page 31: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
But Is It Fare to Compare?
FEV1
Single parameter
Typically 15-30 data points
OS
6 parameters (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres, AX, ΔX5)
Typically 12,228 data points
No, but’s time to level the playing field!
![Page 32: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
But Is It Fare to Compare?
FEV1
Single parameter
Typically 15-30 data points
OS
6 parameters (R5, R5-20, X5, Fres, AX, ΔX5)
Typically 12,228 data points
No, but’s time to level the playing field!
…but first
![Page 33: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve?
![Page 34: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
![Page 35: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Dandurand et al, Chest 2015
![Page 36: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Dandurand et al, Chest 2015
![Page 37: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Dandurand et al, Chest 2015
![Page 38: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Dandurand et al, Chest 2015
![Page 39: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Detect therapeutic responses more reliably
![Page 40: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Detect therapeutic responses more reliably
Ideally, approximate small airways function test results
Multi-breath nitrogen washout
Frequency dependence of compliance
![Page 41: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Detect therapeutic responses more reliably
Ideally, approximate small airways function test results
Multi-breath nitrogen washout
Frequency dependence of compliance
Can this be done with spirometry?
![Page 42: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
What to We Wish to Achieve? Detect obstructive lung disease at an earlier stage
Detect therapeutic responses more reliably
Ideally, approximate small airways function test results
Multi-breath nitrogen washout
Frequency dependence of compliance
Can this be done with spirometry?
Certainly not as conventionally analyzed, but…
![Page 43: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Spirometric Indices Volume and Flow
FVC
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6
MMEF
![Page 44: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Spirometric Indices Volume and Flow
FVC
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6
MMEF
PEFR
V̇75, 50, 25, V̇75/V̇25, V̇50/V̇25
![Page 45: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Spirometric Indices Volume and Flow
FVC
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6
MMEF
PEFR
V̇75, 50, 25, V̇75/V̇25, V̇50/V̇25
Time
Moments about origin
α1 , α2 , α3 , α4
Moments about mean
μ2 , μ3 , μ4
![Page 46: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Spirometric Indices Volume and Flow
FVC
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6
MMEF
PEFR
V̇75, 50, 25, V̇75/V̇25, V̇50/V̇25
Time
Moments about origin
α1 , α2 , α3 , α4
Moments about mean
μ2 , μ3 , μ4
Nondementionalized Volume and Flow
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 / FVC
MMEF / FVC
PEFR / FVC
V̇75, 50, 25 / FVC
Nondementionalized Time
Moments about origin
α1/t, α2/t , α3/t, α4/t
Moments about mean
μ2/t , μ3/t , μ4/t
![Page 47: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Spirometric Indices Volume and Flow
FVC
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6
MMEF
PEFR
V̇75, 50, 25, V̇75/V̇25, V̇50/V̇25
Time
Moments about origin
α1 , α2 , α3 , α4
Moments about mean
μ2 , μ3 , μ4
Nondementionalized Volume and Flow
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 / FVC
MMEF / FVC
PEFR / FVC
V̇75, 50, 25 / FVC
Nondementionalized Time
Moments about origin
α1/t, α2/t , α3/t, α4/t
Moments about mean
μ2/t , μ3/t , μ4/t
![Page 48: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Spirometric Indices Volume and Flow
FVC
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6
MMEF
PEFR
V̇75, 50, 25, V̇75/V̇25, V̇50/V̇25
Time
Moments about origin
α1 , α2 , α3 , α4
Moments about mean
μ2 , μ3 , μ4
Nondementionalized Volume and Flow
FEV0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 / FVC
MMEF / FVC
PEFR / FVC
V̇75, 50, 25 / FVC
Nondementionalized Time
Moments about origin
α1/t, α2/t , α3/t, α4/t
Moments about mean
μ2/t , μ3/t , μ4/t
Others: Slope ratio of Mead, ΔV̇, V̇iso
![Page 49: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Example Expiratory Spirogram
Index Base %Pred
FEV1 2.91 l 102%
FEV3 3.56 l
FVC 3.87 l 105%
PEF 498l/min 108%
FEV1/FVC 75% 100%
FEV3/FVC 91%
FEF75 5.87 l/s 86%
FEF50 2.66 l/s 67%
FEF25 0.91 l/s 68%
FEF25-75 2.23 l/s 73% 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
Flo
w (
L/s)
Volume (L)
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vo
lum
e (
L)
Time (s)
MP, 2015-12-04
![Page 50: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Comparing Spirogram Volumes
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
Flo
w (
L/s)
Volume (L)
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vo
lum
e (
L)
Time (s)
MP, 2015-12-04 JT, 2016-02-05
MP JT
Age 68 78
Sex M F
Ht (cm) 170 152
Wt (kg) 80 56
BMI 28 24
![Page 51: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time (s)
Nondementionalized Spirograms
MP, 2015-12-04 JT, 2016-02-05
MP JT
Age 68 78
Sex M F
Ht (cm) 170 152
Wt (kg) 80 56
BMI 28 24
![Page 52: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Comparing Spirogram Times
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
JC CR
Age 62 62
Sex F F
Ht (cm) 158 154
Wt (kg) 45 70
BMI 18 30
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4
Flo
w (
L/s)
Volume (L)
0
1
2
3
4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Vo
lum
e (L
)
Time (s)
![Page 53: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Nondementionalized Spirograms
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
JC CR
Age 62 62
Sex F F
Ht (cm) 158 154
Wt (kg) 45 70
BMI 18 30
![Page 54: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 55: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 56: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 57: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 58: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 59: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 60: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 61: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 62: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 63: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 64: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 65: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 66: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 67: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 68: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 69: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 70: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 71: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 72: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 73: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 74: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 75: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 76: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 77: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 78: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 79: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 80: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 81: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 82: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 83: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 84: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 85: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 86: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 87: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 88: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 89: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 90: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 91: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 92: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 93: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 94: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 95: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 96: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 97: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 98: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
α1 α21/2 α3
1/3 α41/4 μ2
1/2 μ31/3 μ4
1/4
CR 0.161 0.060 0.036 0.027 0.034 2.549 6.796
JC 0.243 0.130 0.090 0.070 0.072 1.310 0.633
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Vo
lum
e /
FV
C
Time / Total Time
Time Domain Analysis - Moments
JC, 2015-11-20 CR, 2015-11-20
![Page 99: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Novel Spirometric Analysis
![Page 100: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Novel Spirometric Analysis 30 asthmatics undergoing simultaneous OS and spirometry
![Page 101: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Novel Spirometric Analysis 30 asthmatics undergoing simultaneous OS and spirometry
Derive absolute and nondementionalized volume, flow and time domain indices
![Page 102: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Novel Spirometric Analysis 30 asthmatics undergoing simultaneous OS and spirometry
Derive absolute and nondementionalized volume, flow and time domain indices
Perform pairwise analysis of 46 of these indices vs. OS parameters
![Page 103: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Novel Spirometric Analysis 30 asthmatics undergoing simultaneous OS and spirometry
Derive absolute and nondementionalized volume, flow and time domain indices
Perform pairwise analysis of 46 of these indices vs. OS parameters
Chose a reasonable number of indices based on
Pearson’s r
Intuitive judgment
![Page 104: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Novel Spirometric Analysis 30 asthmatics undergoing simultaneous OS and spirometry
Derive absolute and nondementionalized volume, flow and time domain indices
Perform pairwise analysis of 46 of these indices vs. OS parameters
Chose a reasonable number of indices based on
Pearson’s r
Intuitive judgment
Build a model using multiple linear regression
![Page 105: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
30 Asthma Clinic Subjects Age (mean years±SD) 66 ± 15 Sex (M:F) 13 : 17
BMI (m/kg2) 29 ± 4 ACQ 5 ± 5
FEV1 (L) 2.06 ± 0.74 FEV1 (% predicted) 87 ± 23 FVC (L) 3.06 ± 0.92 FVC (% predicted) 104 ± 22 FEV1/FVC (%) 66 ± 12 MMEF (L/s) 1.29 ± 0.79 MMEF (% predicted) 43 ± 21
R5 (cmH2O/L/s) 4.33 ± 1.73 R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s) 1.09 ± 1.08 X5 (cmH2O/L/s) -2.23 ± 2.01 Fres (Hz) 21.85 ± 9.63 AX (cmH2O/L/s • Hz) 21.20 ± 21.61
![Page 106: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Pairwise Correlation for ln R5-19
Index r p Index r p Index r p FVC -0.25 0.18 α1 0.49 0.01 α1mode 0.50 0.01 FEV1 -0.46 0.01 α2
1/2 0.41 0.02 α2mode1/2 0.41 0.02
FEV1/FVC -0.53 0.00 α31/3 0.32 0.09 α3mode
1/3 0.32 0.09 FEV3 -0.41 0.02 α4
1/4 0.25 0.18 α4mode1/4 0.25 0.18
FEV3/FVC -0.55 0.00 μ21/2 0.39 0.03 μ2mode
1/2 0.35 0.05 PERF -0.26 0.17 μ3
1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode1/3 -0.54 0.00
PERF/FVC -0.11 0.57 μ41/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode
1/4 -0.53 0.00 MMEF -0.63 0.00 α1/t 0.17 0.36 α1mode/t 0.27 0.14 MMEF/FVC -0.58 0.00 α2/t
1/2 0.33 0.08 α2mode/t1/2 0.34 0.06
V̇75 -0.50 0.01 α3/t1/3 0.27 0.14 α3mode/t
1/3 0.32 0.09
V̇75/FVC -0.38 0.04 α4/t1/4 0.16 0.39 α4mode/t
1/4 0.21 0.27
V̇50 -0.59 0.00 μ2/t1/2 0.45 0.01 μ2mode/t
1/2 0.42 0.02
V̇50/FVC -0.58 0.00 μ3/t1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode/t
1/3 -0.54 0.00
V̇25 -0.63 0.00 μ4/t1/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode/t
1/4 -0.53 0.00
V̇25/FVC -0.59 0.00
V̇75/V̇25 0.27 0.15
V̇50/V̇25 0.20 0.30
![Page 107: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Pairwise Correlation for ln R5-19
Index r p Index r p Index r p FVC -0.25 0.18 α1 0.49 0.01 α1mode 0.50 0.01 FEV1 -0.46 0.01 α2
1/2 0.41 0.02 α2mode1/2 0.41 0.02
FEV1/FVC -0.53 0.00 α31/3 0.32 0.09 α3mode
1/3 0.32 0.09 FEV3 -0.41 0.02 α4
1/4 0.25 0.18 α4mode1/4 0.25 0.18
FEV3/FVC -0.55 0.00 μ21/2 0.39 0.03 μ2mode
1/2 0.35 0.05 PERF -0.26 0.17 μ3
1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode1/3 -0.54 0.00
PERF/FVC -0.11 0.57 μ41/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode
1/4 -0.53 0.00 MMEF -0.63 0.00 α1/t 0.17 0.36 α1mode/t 0.27 0.14 MMEF/FVC -0.58 0.00 α2/t
1/2 0.33 0.08 α2mode/t1/2 0.34 0.06
V̇75 -0.50 0.01 α3/t1/3 0.27 0.14 α3mode/t
1/3 0.32 0.09
V̇75/FVC -0.38 0.04 α4/t1/4 0.16 0.39 α4mode/t
1/4 0.21 0.27
V̇50 -0.59 0.00 μ2/t1/2 0.45 0.01 μ2mode/t
1/2 0.42 0.02
V̇50/FVC -0.58 0.00 μ3/t1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode/t
1/3 -0.54 0.00
V̇25 -0.63 0.00 μ4/t1/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode/t
1/4 -0.53 0.00
V̇25/FVC -0.59 0.00
V̇75/V̇25 0.27 0.15
V̇50/V̇25 0.20 0.30
![Page 108: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Pairwise Correlation for ln R5-19
Index r p Index r p Index r p FVC -0.25 0.18 α1 0.49 0.01 α1mode 0.50 0.01 FEV1 -0.46 0.01 α2
1/2 0.41 0.02 α2mode1/2 0.41 0.02
FEV1/FVC -0.53 0.00 α31/3 0.32 0.09 α3mode
1/3 0.32 0.09 FEV3 -0.41 0.02 α4
1/4 0.25 0.18 α4mode1/4 0.25 0.18
FEV3/FVC -0.55 0.00 μ21/2 0.39 0.03 μ2mode
1/2 0.35 0.05 PERF -0.26 0.17 μ3
1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode1/3 -0.54 0.00
PERF/FVC -0.11 0.57 μ41/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode
1/4 -0.53 0.00 MMEF -0.63 0.00 α1/t 0.17 0.36 α1mode/t 0.27 0.14 MMEF/FVC -0.58 0.00 α2/t
1/2 0.33 0.08 α2mode/t1/2 0.34 0.06
V̇75 -0.50 0.01 α3/t1/3 0.27 0.14 α3mode/t
1/3 0.32 0.09
V̇75/FVC -0.38 0.04 α4/t1/4 0.16 0.39 α4mode/t
1/4 0.21 0.27
V̇50 -0.59 0.00 μ2/t1/2 0.45 0.01 μ2mode/t
1/2 0.42 0.02
V̇50/FVC -0.58 0.00 μ3/t1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode/t
1/3 -0.54 0.00
V̇25 -0.63 0.00 μ4/t1/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode/t
1/4 -0.53 0.00
V̇25/FVC -0.59 0.00
V̇75/V̇25 0.27 0.15
V̇50/V̇25 0.20 0.30
![Page 109: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Pairwise Correlation for ln R5-19
Index r p Index r p Index r p FVC -0.25 0.18 α1 0.49 0.01 α1mode 0.50 0.01 FEV1 -0.46 0.01 α2
1/2 0.41 0.02 α2mode1/2 0.41 0.02
FEV1/FVC -0.53 0.00 α31/3 0.32 0.09 α3mode
1/3 0.32 0.09 FEV3 -0.41 0.02 α4
1/4 0.25 0.18 α4mode1/4 0.25 0.18
FEV3/FVC -0.55 0.00 μ21/2 0.39 0.03 μ2mode
1/2 0.35 0.05 PERF -0.26 0.17 μ3
1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode1/3 -0.54 0.00
PERF/FVC -0.11 0.57 μ41/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode
1/4 -0.53 0.00 MMEF -0.63 0.00 α1/t 0.17 0.36 α1mode/t 0.27 0.14 MMEF/FVC -0.58 0.00 α2/t
1/2 0.33 0.08 α2mode/t1/2 0.34 0.06
V̇75 -0.50 0.01 α3/t1/3 0.27 0.14 α3mode/t
1/3 0.32 0.09
V̇75/FVC -0.38 0.04 α4/t1/4 0.16 0.39 α4mode/t
1/4 0.21 0.27
V̇50 -0.59 0.00 μ2/t1/2 0.45 0.01 μ2mode/t
1/2 0.42 0.02
V̇50/FVC -0.58 0.00 μ3/t1/3 -0.44 0.01 μ3mode/t
1/3 -0.54 0.00
V̇25 -0.63 0.00 μ4/t1/4 -0.47 0.01 μ4mode/t
1/4 -0.53 0.00
V̇25/FVC -0.59 0.00
V̇75/V̇25 0.27 0.15
V̇50/V̇25 0.20 0.30
![Page 110: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
The R5-19 Model Using Spirometry
![Page 111: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
The R5-19 Model Using Spirometry
ln R5-19 =
![Page 112: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
The R5-19 Model Using Spirometry
ln R5-19 = - 2•FVC + 2•FEV1 + 44•MMEF/FVC
![Page 113: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
The R5-19 Model Using Spirometry
ln R5-19 = - 2•FVC + 2•FEV1 + 44•MMEF/FVC
- 2•V̇75/FVC - 22•V̇50/FVC - 4•V̇25/FVC
![Page 114: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
The R5-19 Model Using Spirometry
ln R5-19 = - 2•FVC + 2•FEV1 + 44•MMEF/FVC
- 2•V̇75/FVC - 22•V̇50/FVC - 4•V̇25/FVC
-286•α1mode/t + 956• α2mode/t1/2
-416• α3mode/t1/3 - 10•α4mode/t
1/4 + 34
![Page 115: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
The R5-19 Model Using Spirometry
ln R5-19 = - 2•FVC + 2•FEV1 + 44•MMEF/FVC
- 2•V̇75/FVC - 22•V̇50/FVC - 4•V̇25/FVC
-286•α1mode/t + 956• α2mode/t1/2
-416• α3mode/t1/3 - 10•α4mode/t
1/4 + 34
r = 0.86
![Page 116: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Conclusions
![Page 117: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Conclusions Spirometry is cheap, widely available, well understood and
has almost 70 years of longitudinal validation
![Page 118: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Conclusions Spirometry is cheap, widely available, well understood and
has almost 70 years of longitudinal validation
Multiple regression of selected spirometric indices seems to approximate frequency dependence of resistance and hence, small airway disease
![Page 119: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Conclusions Spirometry is cheap, widely available, well understood and
has almost 70 years of longitudinal validation
Multiple regression of selected spirometric indices seems to approximate frequency dependence of resistance and hence, small airway disease
If so, it is premature to recommend abandoning spirometry in favour of OS
![Page 120: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Conclusions Spirometry is cheap, widely available, well understood and
has almost 70 years of longitudinal validation
Multiple regression of selected spirometric indices seems to approximate frequency dependence of resistance and hence, small airway disease
If so, it is premature to recommend abandoning spirometry in favour of OS
Further work is necessary to validate and improve upon this novel approach to the spirometric analysis of lung mechanics
![Page 121: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
![Page 122: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
To FEV1 or Not…Rebuttal
“The proof [of concept]
is in the pudding”
![Page 123: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort
n=30 n=14 Age (mean years ± SE) 66 ± 3 68 ± 3 Sex (M:F) 13 : 17 5 : 9 BMI (Kg/m2) 29 ± 1 28 ± 1 ACQ 5 ± 1 2 ± 1
FEV1 (L) 2.06 ± 0.13 2.02 ± 0.14 FEV1 (% predicted) 87 ± 4 87 ± 4 FVC (L) 3.06 ± 0.17 2.93 ± 0 FVC (% predicted) 104 ± 4 102 ± 4.16 FEV1/FVC (%) 66 ± 2 70 ± 3 MMEF (L/s) 1.29 ± 0.14 1.27 ± 0.12 MMEF (% predicted) 43 ± 4 45 ± 3
R5 (cmH2O/L/s) 4.33 ± 0.32 4.03 ± 0.29 R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s) 1.09 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.21 X5 (cmH2O/L/s) -2.23 ± 0.37 -1.67 ± 0.28 Fres (Hz) 21.85 ± 1.76 22.70 ± 1.85 AX (cmH2O/L/s • Hz) 21.20 ± 3.95 17.18 ± 3.47
![Page 124: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort
n=30 n=14 Age (mean years ± SE) 66 ± 3 68 ± 3 Sex (M:F) 13 : 17 5 : 9 BMI (Kg/m2) 29 ± 1 28 ± 1 ACQ 5 ± 1 2 ± 1
FEV1 (L) 2.06 ± 0.13 2.02 ± 0.14 FEV1 (% predicted) 87 ± 4 87 ± 4 FVC (L) 3.06 ± 0.17 2.93 ± 0 FVC (% predicted) 104 ± 4 102 ± 4.16 FEV1/FVC (%) 66 ± 2 70 ± 3 MMEF (L/s) 1.29 ± 0.14 1.27 ± 0.12 MMEF (% predicted) 43 ± 4 45 ± 3
R5 (cmH2O/L/s) 4.33 ± 0.32 4.03 ± 0.29 R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s) 1.09 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.21 X5 (cmH2O/L/s) -2.23 ± 0.37 -1.67 ± 0.28 Fres (Hz) 21.85 ± 1.76 22.70 ± 1.85 AX (cmH2O/L/s • Hz) 21.20 ± 3.95 17.18 ± 3.47
![Page 125: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort
n=30 n=14 Age (mean years ± SE) 66 ± 3 68 ± 3 Sex (M:F) 13 : 17 5 : 9 BMI (Kg/m2) 29 ± 1 28 ± 1 ACQ 5 ± 1 2 ± 1
FEV1 (L) 2.06 ± 0.13 2.02 ± 0.14 FEV1 (% predicted) 87 ± 4 87 ± 4 FVC (L) 3.06 ± 0.17 2.93 ± 0 FVC (% predicted) 104 ± 4 102 ± 4.16 FEV1/FVC (%) 66 ± 2 70 ± 3 MMEF (L/s) 1.29 ± 0.14 1.27 ± 0.12 MMEF (% predicted) 43 ± 4 45 ± 3
R5 (cmH2O/L/s) 4.33 ± 0.32 4.03 ± 0.29 R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s) 1.09 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.21 X5 (cmH2O/L/s) -2.23 ± 0.37 -1.67 ± 0.28 Fres (Hz) 21.85 ± 1.76 22.70 ± 1.85 AX (cmH2O/L/s • Hz) 21.20 ± 3.95 17.18 ± 3.47
![Page 126: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort
n=30 n=14 Age (mean years ± SE) 66 ± 3 68 ± 3 Sex (M:F) 13 : 17 5 : 9 BMI (Kg/m2) 29 ± 1 28 ± 1 ACQ 5 ± 1 2 ± 1
FEV1 (L) 2.06 ± 0.13 2.02 ± 0.14 FEV1 (% predicted) 87 ± 4 87 ± 4 FVC (L) 3.06 ± 0.17 2.93 ± 0 FVC (% predicted) 104 ± 4 102 ± 4.16 FEV1/FVC (%) 66 ± 2 70 ± 3 MMEF (L/s) 1.29 ± 0.14 1.27 ± 0.12 MMEF (% predicted) 43 ± 4 45 ± 3
R5 (cmH2O/L/s) 4.33 ± 0.32 4.03 ± 0.29 R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s) 1.09 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.21 X5 (cmH2O/L/s) -2.23 ± 0.37 -1.67 ± 0.28 Fres (Hz) 21.85 ± 1.76 22.70 ± 1.85 AX (cmH2O/L/s • Hz) 21.20 ± 3.95 17.18 ± 3.47
![Page 127: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort
n=30 n=14 Age (mean years ± SE) 66 ± 3 68 ± 3 Sex (M:F) 13 : 17 5 : 9 BMI (Kg/m2) 29 ± 1 28 ± 1 ACQ 5 ± 1 2 ± 1
FEV1 (L) 2.06 ± 0.13 2.02 ± 0.14 FEV1 (% predicted) 87 ± 4 87 ± 4 FVC (L) 3.06 ± 0.17 2.93 ± 0 FVC (% predicted) 104 ± 4 102 ± 4.16 FEV1/FVC (%) 66 ± 2 70 ± 3 MMEF (L/s) 1.29 ± 0.14 1.27 ± 0.12 MMEF (% predicted) 43 ± 4 45 ± 3
R5 (cmH2O/L/s) 4.33 ± 0.32 4.03 ± 0.29 R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s) 1.09 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.21 X5 (cmH2O/L/s) -2.23 ± 0.37 -1.67 ± 0.28 Fres (Hz) 21.85 ± 1.76 22.70 ± 1.85 AX (cmH2O/L/s • Hz) 21.20 ± 3.95 17.18 ± 3.47
![Page 128: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19 (
cmH
2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
![Page 129: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
![Page 130: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 131: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 132: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 133: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 134: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 135: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 136: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 137: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 138: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 139: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 140: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 141: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 142: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 143: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 144: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 145: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
r=0.83
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
![Page 146: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
Proof of Concept: R5-19 Modeling
r=0.83
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Mo
de
lled
R5
-19
(cm
H2O
/L/s
)
OS R5-19 (cmH2O/L/s)
Correct: 13/14 93%
![Page 147: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
Summary Spirometry may be comparable to OS for the detection
of small airway disease
There is reasonable doubt that spirometry ought to be abandoned at this point in time
Further work is warranted on novel approaches to the analysis of spirometry
![Page 148: PRO/CON DEBATE: PRO To FEV1 or Not](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042706/587e7ba41a28abd6038b51f5/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
“Don’t throw spirometry out with the bath water!”