Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
-
Upload
weckardt2010 -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
0
Transcript of Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
1/16
Tools for Critical Thinking:The Structure of Probabilistic
Arguments
*Adapted from Elliot Sobers Core Questions in Philosophy (Prentice Hall: 2009)
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
2/16
If Deductively validarguments have perfect
strengthWhy bother with any other argument form?
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
3/16
Limitations of Deductively ValidArguments
1) The Duh factor. Many times DV arguments tell ussomething quite obvious.
2) Their scope limits us. While this form includes anabsolute guarantee of truth, many importantquestions do not have any guaranteed answers.
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
4/16
Types of Good Arguments
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
5/16
Form #2: Probabilistic Arguments
When we use induction and abduction, we aretaking a bit of a gamble, because we arerelying on probabilities.
Probabilistic argument forms enable us tomake predictions and generalizations.
Probabilistic Arguments are never perfectly
strong, but they can be very, very strong.
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
6/16
There is a whole range of strengths an
probabilistic argument can have Remember, deductive
validity (perfect strength)is an on/off concept.
By contrast, probabilisticstrength comes in manylevels. Just as someonecan be really loud, sort ofloud, or not at all loud, anprobabilistic argument can
be really strong, sort ofstrong, or not at all strong.
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
7/16
Inductive Argument #1Premise: The sun rose
this morning.
Premise: The sun roseyesterday morning.
Premise: The sun rose
two mornings ago.
Premise: The sun rosethree mornings ago.Conclusion: The sun will rise tomorrow.
(A prediction.)
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
8/16
The odds are incredibly high that our prediction will come true, but there is
a chance that the conclusion will turn out to be false.
But predicting that the sun will rise
tomorrow doesn
t seem like agamble
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
9/16
Despite the risk, we need to make some conclusion about whether the sun
will rise tomorrow, which is why we use inductive argument forms.
Question: What other possibilities are there besides
the sun rising tomorrow (no matter how improbable)?
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
10/16
Example #2: We use inductive
arguments constantlyPremise: I touchedthe hot stoveyesterday and it
burnt my hand.Premise: I touched
the hot stove twodays ago, and it
burnt my hand.
Conclusion: The stove will
always burn my hand.
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
11/16
We lack guarantees even about
matters we never question Suppose that you know a
woman who resemblesyou and has taken care of
your entire childhood. Shemay tell you that she isyour biological Mom.
Is there any way to becertain that the woman
who says she is yourbiological Mom truly isyour biological Mom?Why or why not?
Im yourMom!
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
12/16
Example #3: A final example of aninductive argument
Premise: This Coca-Cola beverage is caffeine-free.
Conclusion: All Coca-Cola beverages are caffeine-free. (A generalization.)
Question: Do you think there is a strong or a weak relationship between
the premise and the conclusion?
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
13/16
Deductive and ProbabilisticReasoning
When we call an argument inductively/abductively strongor deductively valid, this describes its structure and not itscontent.
All deductive arguments have perfect strength, but not alldeductive arguments are good.
Inductive arguments always have less than perfectstrength, but they can be very good arguments.
Even if you have never realized it before, these twomethods for building an argument are the building blockswe use whenever we think rationally.
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
14/16
Recognizing an InductiveArgument
The conclusion is NOT guaranteed to be true even if allthe evidence offered is true.
The conclusion answers a what question
Its conclusion is a generalization or a prediction
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
15/16
Evaluating an InductiveArgument
Is the sample given in the premises big enough?
Are the examples REPRESENTATIVE?
-
8/2/2019 Probablistic Arguments Ch.3 1.2012
16/16
Recognizing an AbductiveArgument
The conclusion is NOT guaranteed to be true even if allthe evidence offered is true.
The conclusion answers a why question
The conclusion gives an explanation of the evidence
Detectives, Auto Mechanics, Physicians