Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris...
-
Upload
junior-ward -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
4
Transcript of Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris...
![Page 1: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries
Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-FisheriesActual work on the project done by ~100 collaborators
Brief Overview of ISEMP
![Page 2: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why this project exists:
• Current monitoring programs throughout the Columbia basin were not developed under a cohesive design
• Data from current monitoring programs in Columbia River Basin of unknown adequacy for ESA assessments & recovery planning
• Data collection not based on statistical samples, lacks standardized sampling, protocols, and data management strategy
![Page 3: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
How this project is addressing these issues:
• Creating a framework within which monitoring plans can be developed under a cohesive design
• Design monitoring programs to meet policy needs
• Identifying information gaps, developing standardized protocols to assess status of anadromous salmonids & their tributary habitat, creating data management strategy
![Page 4: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
This project’s true goals:• Mission
– BPA’s research and development test-bed for the generation of tools, guidance and best management practices for efficient status and effectiveness monitoring of salmonid populations and habitat status and restoration in the interior Columbia River basin.
• Operating principals – Design data management to support the full life-cycle
of data, from generation to analysis.– Foster the cultural change required to improve data
collection, management and analysis practices.– Develop answers come from quantitative assessments
of data and on-the-ground examples, not opinions.
![Page 5: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What ISEMP is actually doing for the F&WP
• Designing and implementing status and trends monitoring and data analysis that– can answer management questions– is cost effective– integrates existing programs to the maximum extent
• Designing effectiveness monitoring for tributary habitat restoration at the population scale that – can assess actions efficacy– serve as a general model for project selection, implementation, and
evaluation• Data management that
– makes data available, now and into the future– maximizes the information content of existing data– maximizes the potential to share/compile information across the F&WP
![Page 6: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Delivering RME guidance that integrates across scales and programs
• Delivering assessments of protocols and indicators for information content (relative to ESA fish population processes)
• Delivering sampling design assessment for robustness, efficiency, practicality
• Demonstrating and expand the community of practitioners’ willingness to try something different
• Delivering tools (data management and analysis) for general distribution and use
What ISEMP is actually doing for the F&WP
![Page 7: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Status and Trend
Effectiveness/IMW
3 Approaches
TraditionalExperimental
Modeling
3 Subbasins
Wenatchee/EntiatJohn DaySalmon
![Page 8: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Why three pilot basins?
• Why such different approaches?– Geographic differences may dictate indicators– Institutional differences
• Existing RME• Existing infrastructure/local management support
• Each pilot basin offers a unique set of opportunities and pathways– Data driven design (Wenatchee/Entiat)– Model driven design (Salmon River)– Mechanism driven design (John Day River)
• But end result will be single monitoring design guidance
![Page 9: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Wenatchee River Basin Pilot Project• 50 GRTS sites for physical and biological
stream reach habitat metrics and fish density stratified by stream order and gradient
• 60 headwater streams samples quarterly for organic matter input to fish bearing streams stratified by ecoregion and land use
• 25 miles of spawning ground index surveys done weekly
• 25 GRTS sites for spawning surveys outside of index areas samples monthly
• 5 smolt traps running “continuously”• 5 water quality monitors w/ 5 sensors
logging hourly, plus monthly water grabs for chemistry
Smolt trap and water quality sites
![Page 10: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Intensively Monitored Watersheds are a good idea: biology of fish-habitat relationships is
complex• Can best be understood by concentrating
monitoring and research efforts at a few locations
• Enables enough data on physical and biological attributes of a system to be collected
• Develop a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting salmon production in freshwater
![Page 11: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What will it really take to do watershed-scale restoration (with monitoring)?
• Are projects actually implemented to address watershed-scale response?
• Who is coordinating the implementation of actions at the scale of watersheds?– At smaller scales it is ok to separate effectiveness monitoring
from action implementation– There can be no separation between monitoring and actions at
watershed scale– Watershed scale restoration actions must be run by the
monitoring program
![Page 12: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Lemhi RiverEffectiveness
Monitoring Pilot
• Lemhi HCP• Hydrograph
normalization• Tributary
reconnection• Need to monitoring
overall program for “effectiveness”
![Page 13: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Habitat Quantity Habitat Quality
Channel Characteristics by Land Use Type:ARelating habitat availability to capacity, (ci) 13 and 14;
BCalibration using empirical and GIS data, 19-23;CHypothesis testing, 29 and 30 (cross-sectional), 33-37 (pre/post).
Survival/Productivity by Life History Stage:ARelating habitat quality to survival/productivity, (pi) 15 and 16;
BCalibration using empirical estimates of survival/productivity, 24-28;CHypothesis testing, 31 and 32 (cross-sectional), 33-37 (pre/post).
Fry1-3, (N3,t+1)
Parr1-3, (N4,t+1)
Presmolt1-3, (N5,t+1)
Smolt1-3, (N6,t+2)
Egg1-3, (N2,t)
Ocean Immature
Adult 8-10, (ot+x)
1-3, (N6,t+1)
Spawner1-3, (N1,t)
Mature (Yes)
8-10, (ot+x)
Harvest (T)11, (ot+x)
Survival (5-7), (Ot+x)
Mature (No)
Lemhi River Basin Pilot ProjectHabitat restoration effectiveness model
![Page 14: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Lower 25 rm is simplified, straightened, plane-bedded channel
• On-going, proposed and potential in-stream restoration projects
• 60 treatment sites
• 10 pre-existing treatment sites
• 25 untreated control sites
• Snorkel, habitat surveys, other on-going monitoring to evaluate overall program effect on salmonid productivity
Entiat River Effectiveness Monitoring Pilot
![Page 15: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Bridge Ck (JDB) Effectiveness Monitoring Pilot
![Page 16: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Bridge Ck (JDB) Effectiveness Monitoring Pilot
![Page 17: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Data management – our meta data model
![Page 18: Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081603/56649f265503460f94c3d252/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Rationale for project• Developing tools to integrate existing projects into
a programmatic approach to monitoring and evaluation.
• Developing tools to integrate data and information from existing projects into basin-wide data sets
• Good investment strategy for F&WP • increase the value of existing projects, • increase the efficiency of current work, • generate standards for assessment and evaluation of
projects and project proposals.