Prince George’s County Public Schools Principal Evaluation System Reform CCSSO Conference, June...
-
Upload
emory-norris -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Prince George’s County Public Schools Principal Evaluation System Reform CCSSO Conference, June...
Prince George’s County Public Schools
Principal Evaluation System Reform
CCSSO Conference, June 27, 2012
Dr. Michael Brooks, Office of Talent Development
Specialist
AgendaSetting the Stage
PGCPS Human Capital WorkState Education Reform /RTTPMaryland Educator Effectiveness Committee: States Default
ToolStrategic Importance of Principal Evaluation Reform for
PGCPSPhase 1
PGCPS Leadership StandardsPGCPS Evaluation Reform Steering CommitteeUnion Perspective
Next StepsPGCPS Evaluation Reform Timeline
Setting the StagePGCPS Human Capital Work
Superintendent’s VisionLever of Change #1 Teacher- Student
Interaction/RelationshipLever of Change #2 Building Leadership
State Evaluation Reform (RTTP)MCEE Steering CommitteeStates Default Tool
50% Professional Practice: ISLLC Standards/Maryland Standards
o Evaluator and Principal choose percentage rating for each indicator
50% Student Growth Measureso State Tests and Student Learning Objectives
Strategic Importance of Principal Evaluation Reform for PGCPS
PGCPS Received RTTP Funds
Principal & Teacher Evaluation ReformCorrelation
Wallace 12 million dollar Grant: Principal PipelineImprove Principal Leadership CapacityImprove Aspiring Principal Leadership CapacityLinked to New PGCPS Leadership Standards
Highly Effective Leadership
Principals must demonstrate Highly Effective Leadership by the following standards:
Six Leadership Standards that Principals in Prince George’s County Public Schools are expected to know and do:Set high expectations for achievement
based on tailoring of instruction, rigorous data analysis, and evaluation of effective instructional practices
Build a shared vision, foster shared goals, and communicate high performance expectations
Demonstrate a commitment to excellence, equity and innovation
Demonstrate human resource leadershipDemonstrate managerial leadershipDemonstrate strong community and
external leadership
Collaboration on PGCPS Evaluation: Principal
Evaluation Work Group Stakeholder Involvement: Principal PD Work Group
Executive Leadership (Supt, Deputy, Assoc. Supt s, Chief HR, Dir. Human Capital)
Unions: PGCEA & ASASP Principals HR Staff
PGCPS Principal Evaluation Steering Committee Results
50% Professional Practice: o PGCPS Leadership Standards/ISLLC Standards/Aligns
with Teacher Evaluation Tool
50% Student Growth Measureso Reviewed various district modelso SLOs
Principal Evaluation-Student Growth MEASURES FORMS OF DATA WEIGHT
SLO: School-wide E: Classroom data, projects, portfolios, performancesM: Classroom data, projects, portfolios, performancesH: Classroom data, projects, portfolios, performances
E: 25%M: 25%H: 25%
Attendance E: defineM: defineH: define
E: 5%M: 5%H: 2%
State Assessments E: MSAM: MSAH: HSA
E: 8%M: 8%H: 5%
Retention E: defineM: defineH: define
E: 2%M: 2%H: 3%
College & Career Ready E: defineM: defineH: PSAT, AP, IB, SAT, ACT, Graduation Rate, etc.
E: 3%M: 3%H: 10%
District Assessments E: SRI, FAST, DRAM: defineH: define
E: 7%M: 7%H: 5%
TOTAL
E: 50%M: 50%H: 50%
Union PerspectiveMember of Principal Evaluation Work
GroupAdvocates Teacher Voice Ensure that we choose student growth
measures that principals can controlSupport Tool: Ensure growth for all
county employees
Next Steps: Time Line Pilot Val-Ed instrument
Define Val-Ed pilot plan
Train and discuss Val-Ed with Superintendent, Asst. Superintendents, IDs, Principals, union and APs
Revise process as necessary based on feedback and implementation
Select pilot schools
APs, Principals and Teachers take assessment
Analyze data
May-June 2012
Discussion/Design Ideas of new principal evaluation tool
Discussion with senior leaders and union
Central Office stakeholders/PD workgroup
Begin discussion on the design of the new principal evaluation tool with principals and assistant principals
April 2012
Incorporation of design ideas Early June 2012 Final Input on Design Ideas
Senior leadership, IDs, union and PD workgroup
Development of new Evaluation tool
Final Evaluation Tool to stakeholders for review
By June 31 2012
By Mid-July, 2012
By July 30 2012
Next Steps
Principal Leadership Standards & Manual
Work with PD Workgroup to further discuss implementation standards to be included in the binders
July-August 2012
Phase 3: Roll-Out/Implementation Communications to Various Stakeholders
Senior Leadership
Instructional Directors
Principals and APs (Final Evaluation tool delivered by (date))
Central Office staff
Union
August 2012
Training Design and Facilitation for Pilot Principals and Assistant Principals
Identify all target audiences (Supts, Principals, APs, Central Office staff, etc.) who need to be trained
Develop customized training materials for different audiences
Conduct training sessions with OTD
August-October (and more throughout 2012-13 school year)