Previous Lecture: Probability

Introduction to Biostatistics and Bioinformatics

Sequence Alignment Concepts

This Lecture

Sequence Alignment

Stuart M. Brown, Ph.D.Center for Health Informatics and Bioinformatics

NYU School of Medicine

Slides/images/text/examples borrowed liberally from:Torgeir R. Hvidsten,Michael Schatz,Bill Pearson, Fourie Joubert, others …

Learning Objectives

• Identity, similarity, homology• Analyze sequence similarity by

dotplots• window/stringency

• Alignment of text strings by edit distance

• Scoring of aligned amino acids• Gap penalties• Global vs. local alignment• Dynamic Programming (Smith

Waterman)• FASTA method

Why Compare Sequences?

• Identify sequences found in lab experiments• What is this thing I just found?

• Compare new genes to known ones• Compare genes from different species

• information about evolution

• Guess functions for entire genomes full of new gene sequences

• Map sequence reads to a Reference Genome

(ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, etc.)

Are there other sequences like this one?

1) Huge public databases - GenBank, Swissprot, etc.

2) “Sequence comparison is the most powerful and reliable method to determine evolutionary relationships between genes” -R. Pearson

3) Similarity searching is based on alignment

4) BLAST and FASTA provide rapid similarity searching

a. rapid = approximate (heuristic)

b. false + and - scores

Similarity ≠ Homology

1) 25% similarity ≥ 100 AAs is strong evidence for homology

2) Homology is an evolutionary statement which means “descent from a common ancestor” – common 3D structure– usually common function– homology is all or nothing, you cannot say

"50% homologous"

Similarity is Based on Dot Plots

1) two sequences on vertical and horizontal axes of graph

2) put dots wherever there is a match

3) diagonal line is region of identity (local alignment)

4) apply a window filter - look at a group of bases, must meet % identity to get a dot

Simple Dot PlotG A T C A A C T G A C G T A

G T T C A G C T G C G T A C

PTHPLASKTQILPEDLASEDLTI

PTHPLAGERAIGLARLAEEDFGM

Score = 7

PTHPLASKTQILPEDLASEDLTI

PTHPLAGERAIGLARLAEEDFGM

Score = 11

Window = 12

Stringency = 9

Filtering

PTHPLASKTQILPEDLASEDLTI

PTHPLAGERAIGLARLAEEDFGM

Score = 11

Window / Stringency

Dot plot filtered with 4 base window and 75% identity

G A T C A A C T G A C G T A

G T T C A G C T G C G T A C

Dot plot of real data

CVJB

Window Size = 8 Scoring Matrix: pam250 matrixMin. % Score = 30Hash Value = 2

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

Hemoglobin -chain

Hemoglobin-chain

Dotplot (Window = 130 / Stringency = 9)

Dotplot (Window = 18 / Stringency = 10)

Hemoglobin-chain

Hemoglobin -chain

• Manually line them up and count?• an alignment program can do it for you• or a just use a text editor

• Dot Plot – shows regions of similarity as diagonals

GATGCCATAGAGCTGTAGTCGTACCCT <—

—> CTAGAGAGC-GTAGTCAGAGTGTCTTTGAGTTCC

How to Align Sequences?

Percent Sequence Identity• The extent to which two nucleotide or amino

acid sequences are invariant

A C C T G A G – A G A C G T G – G C A G

70% identical

mismatchindel

Hamming Distance• The minimum number of base changes that will

convert one (ungapped) sequence into another

• The Hamming distance is named after Richard

Hamming, who introduced it in his fundamental paper on Hamming codes: “Error detecting and error correcting codes” (1950) Bell System Technical Journal 29 (2): 147–160.

Python function hamming_distance

def hamming_distance(s1, s2): #Return the Hamming distance between equal-length sequences if len(s1) != len(s2): raise ValueError("Undefined for sequences of unequal length") return sum(ch1 != ch2 for ch1, ch2 in zip(s1, s2))

Hamming Dist can be unrealistic

v: ATATATAT w: TATATATA

Hamming Dist = 8 (no gaps, no shifts)

• Levenshtein (1966) introduced edit distance

v = _ATATATAT w = TATATATA_ edit distance: d(v, w) = 2

Levenshtein, Vladimir I. (February 1966). "Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals". Soviet Physics Doklady 10 (8): 707–710.

Affine Gap Penalties

Gap Penalites• With unlimited gaps (no penalty), unrelated

sequences can align (especially DNA)• Gap should cost much more than a mismatch• Multi-base gap should cost only a little bit more

than a single base gap• Adding an additional gap near another gap

should cost more (not implemented in most algorithms)

• Score for a gap of length x is: -(p + σx)• p is gap open penalty• σ is gap extend penalty

Global vs Local similarity1) Global similarity uses complete aligned

sequences - total % matches - Needleman & Wunch algorithm

2) Local similarity looks for best internal matching region between 2 sequences

- find a diagonal region on the dotplot– Smith-Waterman algorithm– BLAST and FASTA

3) dynamic programming – optimal computer solution, not approximate

Global vs. Local Alignments

[Essentially finding the diagonals on the dotplot]

• Basic principles of dynamic programming

- Creation of an alignment path matrix

- Stepwise calculation of score values

- Backtracking (evaluation of the optimal path)

Smith-Waterman Method

Creation of an alignment path matrix

Idea: Build up an optimal alignment using previous solutions for optimal alignments of smaller subsequences

• Construct matrix F indexed by i and j (one index for each sequence)

• F(i,j) is the score of the best alignment between the initial segment x1...i of x up to xi and the initial segment y1...j of y up to yj

• Build F(i,j) recursively beginning with F(0,0) = 0

Michael Schatz

• If F(i-1,j-1), F(i-1,j) and F(i,j-1) are known we can calculate F(i,j)

• Three possibilities:

• xi and yj are aligned, F(i,j) = F(i-1,j-1) + s(xi ,yj)

• xi is aligned to a gap, F(i,j) = F(i-1,j) - d

• yj is aligned to a gap, F(i,j) = F(i,j-1) - d

• The best score up to (i,j) will be the smallest of the three options

Creation of an alignment path matrix

Michael SchatzMichael Schatz

Michael Schatz

Smith-Waterman is OPTIMAL but computationally slow

• SW search requires computing of matrix of scores at every possible alignment position with every possible gap.

• Compute task increases with the product of the lengths of two sequence to be compared (N2)

• Difficult for comparison of one small sequence to a much larger one, very difficult for two large sequences, essentially impossible to search very large databases.

Scoring Similarity1) Can only score aligned sequences

2) DNA is usually scored as identical or not

3) modified scoring for gaps - single vs. multiple base gaps (gap extension)

4) Protein AAs have varying degrees of similarity– a. # of mutations to convert one to another– b. chemical similarity– c. observed mutation frequencies

5) PAM matrix calculated from observed mutations in protein families

• Amino acids have different biochemical and physical properties that influence their relative replaceability in evolution.

CP

GGAVI

L

MF

Y

W HK

RE Q

DN

S

T

CSH

S+S

positive

chargedpolar

aliphatic

aromatic

small

tiny

hydrophobic

Protein Scoring Systems

The PAM 250 scoring matrix

PAM Vs. BLOSUM PAM100 = BLOSUM90 PAM120 = BLOSUM80 PAM160 = BLOSUM60 PAM200 = BLOSUM52 PAM250 = BLOSUM45

More distant sequences

BLOSUM62 for general use BLOSUM80 for close relations BLOSUM45 for distant relations

PAM120 for general use PAM60 for close relations PAM250 for distant relations

Search with Protein, not DNA Sequences

1) 4 DNA bases vs. 20 amino acids - less chance similarity

2) can have varying degrees of similarity between different AAs- # of mutations, chemical similarity, PAM matrix

3) protein databanks are much smaller than DNA databanks

FASTA

1) A faster method to find similarities and make alignments – capable of searching many sequences (an entire database)

2) Only searches near the diagonal of the alignment matrix

3) Produces a statistic for each alignment (more on this in the next lecture)

FASTA1) Derived from logic of the dot plot

– compute best diagonals from all frames of alignment

2) Word method looks for exact matches between words in query and test sequence– hash tables (fast computer technique)– Only matches exactly identical words– DNA words are usually 6 bases– protein words are 1 or 2 amino acids– only searches for diagonals in region of word

matches = faster searching

FASTA Format

• simple format used by almost all programs• >header line with a [return] at end• Sequence (no specific requirements for line

length, characters, etc)

>URO1 uro1.seq Length: 2018 November 9, 2000 11:50 Type: N Check: 3854 ..CGCAGAAAGAGGAGGCGCTTGCCTTCAGCTTGTGGGAAATCCCGAAGATGGCCAAAGACAACTCAACTGTTCGTTGCTTCCAGGGCCTGCTGATTTTTGGAAATGTGATTATTGGTTGTTGCGGCATTGCCCTGACTGCGGAGTGCATCTTCTTTGTATCTGACCAACACAGCCTCTACCCACTGCTTGAAGCCACCGACAACGATGACATCTATGGGGCTGCCTGGATCGGCATATTTGTGGGCATCTGCCTCTTCTGCCTGTCTGTTCTAGGCATTGTAGGCATCATGAAGTCCAGCAGGAAAATTCTTCTGGCGTATTTCATTCTGATGTTTATAGTATATGCCTTTGAAGTGGCATCTTGTATCACAGCAGCAACACAACAAGACTTTTTCACACCCAACCTCTTCCTGAAGCAGATGCTAGAGAGGTACCAAAACAACAGCCCTCCAAACAATGATGACCAGTGGAAAAACAATGGAGTCACCAAAACCTGGGACAGGCTCATGCTCCAGGACAATTGCTGTGGCGTAAATGGTCCATCAGACTGGCAAAAATACACATCTGCCTTCCGGACTGAGAATAATGATGCTGACTATCCCTGGCCTCGTCAATGCTGTGTTATGAACAATCTTAAAGAACCTCTCAACCTGGAGGCTT

FASTA Algorithm

Makes Longest Diagonal

3) after all diagonals found, tries to join diagonals by adding gaps

4) computes alignments in regions of best diagonals

FASTA Alignments

FASTA Results - AlignmentSCORES Init1: 1515 Initn: 1565 Opt: 1687 z-score: 1158.1 E(): 2.3e-58>>GB_IN3:DMU09374 (2038 nt) initn: 1565 init1: 1515 opt: 1687 Z-score: 1158.1 expect(): 2.3e-58 66.2% identity in 875 nt overlap (83-957:151-1022)

60 70 80 90 100 110 u39412.gb_pr CCCTTTGTGGCCGCCATGGACAATTCCGGGAAGGAAGCGGAGGCGATGGCGCTGTTGGCC || ||| | ||||| | ||| |||||DMU09374 AGGCGGACATAAATCCTCGACATGGGTGACAACGAACAGAAGGCGCTCCAACTGATGGCC 130 140 150 160 170 180

120 130 140 150 160 170 u39412.gb_pr GAGGCGGAGCGCAAAGTGAAGAACTCGCAGTCCTTCTTCTCTGGCCTCTTTGGAGGCTCA ||||||||| || ||| | | || ||| | || || ||||| || DMU09374 GAGGCGGAGAAGAAGTTGACCCAGCAGAAGGGCTTTCTGGGATCGCTGTTCGGAGGGTCC 190 200 210 220 230 240

180 190 200 210 220 230 u39412.gb_pr TCCAAAATAGAGGAAGCATGCGAAATCTACGCCAGAGCAGCAAACATGTTCAAAATGGCC ||| | ||||| || ||| |||| | || | |||||||| || ||| ||DMU09374 AACAAGGTGGAGGACGCCATCGAGTGCTACCAGCGGGCGGGCAACATGTTTAAGATGTCC 250 260 270 280 290 300

240 250 260 270 280 290 u39412.gb_pr AAAAACTGGAGTGCTGCTGGAAACGCGTTCTGCCAGGCTGCACAGCTGCACCTGCAGCTC |||||||||| ||||| | |||||| |||| ||| || ||| || | DMU09374 AAAAACTGGACAAAGGCTGGGGAGTGCTTCTGCGAGGCGGCAACTCTACACGCGCGGGCT 310 320 330 340 350 360

Summary

• Identity, similarity, homology• Analyze sequence similarity by

dotplots• window/stringency

• Alignment of text strings by edit distance

• Scoring of aligned amino acids• Gap penalties• Global vs. local alignment• Dynamic Programming (Smith

Waterman)• FASTA method

Next Lecture: Searching Sequence Databases