1

President Trump Has Good Reason Not to Trust the COVID-19 “Experts” –

America was Lied to About the China Coronavirus and

We Still Are

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

2

President Trump rebuked Dr. Anthony Fauci’s assessment on the national response to the coronavirus in an interview two weeks ago and rightly so. The Epoch Times reported yesterday on recent discussions on the virus by medical experts and President Trump: President Donald Trump on July 7 rebuked Dr. Anthony Fauci‘s assessment of the national response to the CCP virus pandemic, saying the United States is in a “good place” in its fight against COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus. The president said he disagrees with remarks from Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), who said Monday that the status of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic in the country is “really not good” as cases continue to surge nationwide. “We are still knee deep in the first wave of COVID-19 infections,” Fauci said in a Facebook and Twitter livestream interview with National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins on Monday. “I think we are in a good place,” Trump said during an interview on the “Full Court Press” news show on Monday. “I disagree with him. Dr. Fauci said don’t wear masks, and now he says wear them.” He added that the nation’s top immunologist has “said numerous things” including disagreeing with Trump’s ban on travel from China, which was enforced at the end of January. “I didn’t listen to my experts, and I banned China,” the president said. “We would have been in much worse shape.” “So we’ve done a good job,” he added. “In two, three, four weeks, by the time we next speak, I think we’re going to be in very good shape.” President Trump and America have good reasons to not trust the medical community and Dr. Fauci. Americans and the President have been lied to for months about the coronavirus.

The CCP The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) lied to America and the world by not notifying anyone about the coronavirus when it first was released. The CCP never warned anyone when the coronavirus was first released and records now show that the Wuhan lab, where the coronavirus is suspected of having first been released, was shut down in October 2019, two months before the outbreak was first reported. The CCP claimed it came from a wet market in Wuhan when it was finally reported outside of China. The Wuhan wet market didn’t sell bat soup and never has, but the

3

CCP leaders argued for this because it protected their reputation and it protects them from any liabilities by claiming it occurred naturally. The CCP stuck to the bat soup narrative through February. But this was a farce. China had been researching and dabbling with this coronavirus for years. There are even pictures of the “Bat Lady” (Dr. Shi) in a lab in Wuhan working with live animals. But the CCP never told us this. They lied.

We also know that Dr. Shi’s research first started in the US but moved to China when it was determined it was too risky. Then we found out that the Wuhan lab was given $3.7 million by Dr. Fauci to continue its work but Dr. Fauci has never acknowledged this or been asked about it. We also know that a related Chines company, WUXI Pharmatech Caymen, Inc, was invested in heavily by a company is related to George Soros.

The WHO We now also know that Dr. Fauci is a good friend of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s Director General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. We also now know that Dr. Tedros is reportedly a ranking member of a known terrorist group running Ethiopia, where he originates, and that Ethiopia has close ties to China. Because of this, Tedros has been labeled a China puppet. At first Dr. Tedros and the WHO said the coronavirus was nothing to worry about: But soon after this, Dr. Tedros and the WHO went from the coronavirus being no big deal to projecting massive death from the coronavirus. We first reported on March 17, 2020, on the controversial Ethiopian politician and Director General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros, and his irresponsible and criminal fear mongering. Tedros claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus was 3.4% —

4

many multiples that of the fatality rate of the common flu which is estimated to be around 0.1%. This egregiously false premise led to the greatest global panic in world history. The Director General of the WHO spoke on March 3, 2020 and shared this related to the coronavirus: While many people globally have built up immunity to seasonal flu strains, COVID-19 is a new virus to which no one has immunity. That means more people are susceptible to infection, and some will suffer severe disease. Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far less than 1% of those infected. We uncovered that the WHO leader’s coronavirus death rate number of 3.4% was not comparable for the rate he used for the flu. It was not accurate! He was mixing apples and oranges. The Gateway Pundit reported that the coronavirus fatality rate reported by the liberal mainstream media was completely inaccurate and the actual rate was more like a typical seasonal flu – the media was lying again. A little more than a week ago we were confirmed right. The CDC stated that at minimum 20 million Americans have had the coronavirus that have not been tested resulting in the coronavirus mortality rates similar to the flu. President Trump eventually decided to break away from the WHO and stop funding them, but the US CDC responded to say they would keep working with the WHO anyways.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx We reported a month ago, in early June that Doctors Fauci and Birx, the Coronavirus Response Coordinator for the White House, also pushed the ridiculous and highly exaggerated mortality rates related to the coronavirus: ** Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx used the Imperial College Model to persuade President Trump to lock down the ENTIRE US ECONOMY. ** The fraudulent model predicted 2.2 million American deaths from the coronavirus pandemic ** The authors of the Imperial College Model shared their findings with the White House Coronavirus task force in early March ** Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx then met with President Trump privately and urged him to shut down the US economy and destroy the record Trump economy based on this model ** A new critique of the Imperial College Model finds the study is “completely unusable for scientific purposes” — The Imperial College study is a complete sham

5

** Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx pushed a garbage model on the White House and the American public and destroyed the US economy The numbers now show that if you are under 60, the China coronavirus mortality rate is similar or less than that of the flu. It looks like the coronavirus panic was a scam. Dr. Tedros, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, scared the hell out of the American people, created a panic and pushed for lockdowns and social distancing that saved little if any life but killed the US economy.

The Democrats and the Deep State We know the Democrat and Deep State medical community reactions to the China coronavirus are a sham because the garbage data is hidden and because keeping the economy closed helps their chances in the 2020 Presidential election because it hurts the economy and President Trump and because it provides their failing candidate Joe Biden an excuse for not speaking outside of his basement. Deep State professionals in the US government have also shown their dishonesty. As noted above, these Deep State leaders claimed we needed to shut down the economy to prevent our hospitals from being overrun. So we shut down the economy but the hospitals were never close to being overrun. Makeshift hospitals created to prepare for the worst were never used. Next the Deep State said we should continue the lockdown and social distance but they never said for how long or until some milestone is reached. They said we didn’t need to wear masks but then changed their minds and said was did. They ignore the fact that wearing face masks actually pose serious risks to healthy adults and that deaf people can’t understand a word you are saying when you wear a mask. They also didn’t tell us that there is no empirical evidence face masks stop the spread of the China coronavirus. The CDC recommended death certificates include the China coronavirus if even presumed that it was related to the cause of death. This overstates the number of deaths related to the China coronavirus. Then we found out that the CDC is over counting the number of China coronavirus cases in an apparent effort to keep the country shut down throughout the summer. The CDC is now counting individuals tested as once having the coronavirus in with those who test positive for currently having the coronavirus. The CDC is now telling schools how to place students in their classrooms and how often to run buses and seating recommendations on buses. But the CDC is not telling schools that children are seven times less likely to die from the China coronavirus as they are from the common flu!

6

The more you know the more you know we are being lied to. Let’s stop the madness and demand we all are allowed to get back to work. President Trump Has Good Reason Not to Trust the COVID-19 “Experts” – America was Lied to About the China Coronavirus and We Still Are!

7

Here is the latest example showing that the President is correct. The above chart is from the State of Texas’ Health and Human Services Department. The official State numbers are for July 16, 2020, a few days ago from the date of this article [July 18, 2020]. Other states, i.e., Georgia and South Dakota have banned the face masks being advocated again by Dr. Fauci, Dr. Berx, and Dr. Redfield of the CDC. This lunacy is being perpetrated for global political reasons. The media has fanned the embers of fear so that they have contributed to the whirlwind of a pandemic which does not even meet the WHO’s own standards of what a pandemic is. As an example, I receive email news from the Pittsburgh NBC-affiliate Channel 11 WPXI as a way of staying informed of what is taking place in my home city. Here is the headline for Saturday, July 18th, 2020. “Pennsylvania passes 100k mark for COVID-19 cases”. I opened up the news headline and this is what they reported: By: WPXI.com News Staff Updated: July 18, 2020 - 12:00 PM PITTSBURGH — Confirmed cases of COVID-19 across Pennsylvania eclipsed 100,000 for the first time Saturday, according to the Department of Health. Have questions about the spread of the coronavirus? We have an entire section dedicated to coverage of the outbreak. CLICK HERE for more. Health officials said there were 763 additional positive cases, putting the state total at 100,241 cases. There were 15 new deaths attributed to the virus since Friday. In Allegheny County, officials reported 135 new cases of coronavirus, bringing the total there to 6,125 cases since the outbreak began. County officials said there were no new hospitalizations and one additional death. This is the July 18, 2020 COVID-19 Update. Today’s 6,125 cases include 135 new cases, no new hospitalizations & 1 additional death out of 1,661 test results. Newest cases range from 9 months-99 years old with 45 being the median age. Positive tests span July 3 through July 17. — Allegheny County Health Department (@HealthAllegheny) July 18, 2020 On Friday, a new order for Allegheny County went into effect allowing indoor dining at 25% capacity. The order, among other things, brings the county more in line with guidelines issued by the state. Nowhere in this TV report does it talk about the TOTAL number of deaths that have occurred or attributed to Covid-19. Not being satisfied with the report, I checked the official state figures put out to the press and media, Pennsylvania reported at 4pm, Saturday, July 19th, the state states 100,241 cases of

8

Covid-19. They report a total of 7,007 deaths, or 6.9901537295%. There is a familiar term used in statistics: “figures can lie, and liars can figure.” In addition to having taken 3 courses in statistics and probability in college and graduate school, I have a Certificate of completion from the United Air Lines management program in statistics and probability. I joke with my friend Jim Willie, publisher of the Golden Jackass Letter, who has a PhD from Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh. I understand the tactics of those seeking to manipulate the input to achieve the slogan: “garbage in, garbage out.” Here in Kentucky, there have been 22,184 cases, and 667 deaths, for a death rate of 3.0066714749%. This disparity My point is this: Given the history of the corruption at CDC, NIAD, and the WHO; not to mention of labeling almost every death to the Corona virus, like motorcycle fatalities in Florida two days ago to the Corona virus, and the medical reports of doctors being told to label all deaths as being a result of the Corona virus. Medicare payments to hospitals are increased fivefold if they report the death as a result of the Corona virus. Robert David Steele stated that YouTube will de-platform anyone questioning the data on the Corona virus. We are seeing a Big Pharma medical coup d'etat as Jim Willie called it in a recent interview. We are living in a world of iniquity of rioters and the heathen rage. Dr. Fauci and Dr. Redfield are Luciferian Jesuits, fulfilling their goal to steal, kill, and destroy. We are in a confluence of a spiritual war played out both in heaven and here on terra firma Earth. Unfortunately, they have peddled lies upon lies, and failing to get their story straight. To begin with, the tests currently in use do not test for the entire virus; rather they just test for various fragments of it. Many of the results are thus false, sometimes false positives and sometimes false negatives. This means one has to interpret their results with caution. Our medical authorities, to say nothing of our political ones, don’t seem to be able to do this. Numerous doctors working emergency departments and triage medicine have reported what I am sharing below. I have listened to well over a dozen ER doctors raising up the questions here, and this is important since the revered Dr. Fauci, Dr. Berx, and Dr. Redfield, are attacking the President on this issue. All medical students are taught the basics of screening in their introductory statistics course. The problem is that most of them either didn’t go or slept through the course. The rest immediately forgot what they had learned. When testing for anything, a medical professional needs to know the positive predicative value (PPV) of the test as well as the negative predictive value. I’ll focus on the former. In order to know the PPV — i.e., the percent likelihood that a positive test is a true positive — the sensitivity of the test must be known as well as prevalence of the disease, at least to an approximate degree.

9

According to a recent article in the ‘New England Journal of Medicine’, the sensitivity of the tests for COVID-19 is about 70 percent. The prevalence in any of the tested populations is not yet known, so we cannot calculate the PPV, although we can calculate what it would be at any prevalence level we want to assume. I’ll get back to this below. A test for COVID-19 that is 70 percent sensitive will only catch 70 percent of the tested subjects with the disease. Therefore, 30 percent will falsely test negative. Additionally, Bayes’s theorem, the mere mention of which defeats the numeracy of all but the most resolute of physicians, says that a 70 percent sensitive test will be positive in 30 percent of the tested population that doesn’t have the disease. (I am assuming a specificity that is also 70 percent. The specificity of the various tests used has not been given.) Consider testing for COVID-19 in 1 million subjects, none of whom harbors the virus. Three hundred thousand will test positive. This is the reason I doubt this report from Asturias, Spain, which tells us the region has gone fourteen days without recording a single new case of COVID-19. They have stopped testing — you can’t get zero positive tests on a sizable population with a 70 percent sensitive test — or they are not telling the truth. The Johns Hopkins COVID-19 tracker that is widely used and quoted considers a confirmed test to be equal to a positive test. This is an error of epic dimensions for the reasons just stated. The professional and college athletics departments are making the same error. They are testing their athletes daily or every other day using a test that is no better than 70 percent sensitive. Eventually all the players will test positive. They will be isolated for fourteen days, after which they may again test positive, ad infinitum. How does one estimate the PPV of a COVID-19 test? At 70 percent sensitive there’s no need to. Such a test is so contaminated with both false positives and negatives that its use is virtually without utility. Suppose we had a test that was 95 percent sensitive and specific. The PPV is the number of true positives divided by the sum of true and false positives. To make this calculation we must assume a prevalence of the virus in the sampled group.

10

Let’s start with a prevalence of 1 percent. If we test 10,000 subjects, 100 will carry the virus. Of these, 95 will test positive. Bayes’s theorem says 495 (5 percent of the 9,900 patients) without the virus will also have a positive result. That’s 495 false positive tests. The PPV in this hypothetical sample is 95/95+495, or about 16 percent. Now assume our population (again 10,000 subjects) has 50 percent true positives. Here our PPV is 95 percent (4700/ 4700+250). The relationship of PPV to prevalence is given in the figure below. Note that even with a 95 percent sensitive test we’ll be overwhelmed with false positive results if our tested population has a low prevalence for the virus. The more we test, the more false positives we’re likely to get if our testing is not focused.

It should be obvious from the data above that all the testing we have done and continue to do has likely confused more than enlightened.

11

The virus is real and in the wild. How should we effectively deal with it? The best indicator of our status is how many people are in the hospital because of a clinical diagnosis of viral pneumonia. More specifically, how many are in the ICU. Note that testing here is unnecessary as the assumption today is that any case of viral pneumonia is caused by the coronavirus. If our situation regarding the epidemic improves, widespread testing will have played no role in this improvement. Why any improvement? We recognized who the at-risk population was and they took shelter and continue to do so. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that mortality from COVID-19 in patients younger than 50 is 0.05 percent. Virtually all of this mortality in younger patients comes from those with comorbidity. We also have gotten better at treating patients with severe pneumonia caused by the coronavirus. The virus is likely to be with us for some time. Epidemics end either when those most susceptible to the pathogen have been exposed to it or when an effective and safe vaccine is available. We don’t have such a vaccine. It’s hard to know when or if one will be available. And the logistics of manufacturing and administering billions of doses are formidable. In the meanwhile, we have to coexist with it while not destroying society, socially and economically, in the process. But in the meantime, we will also have to admit that our current testing regime has alarmed the planet without contributing a health benefit. This insanity and madness from those professionals at the government agencies are either gas lighting the public, or deceiving the country, which in the long run will bring out anger and rage, something that we call ill-afford. It should be pointed out on behalf of the President there is more than a little evidence supporting his position on Covid-19 faked pandemic. A lot of professionals in the field of virology and epidemiology have been quick to point out the errors of Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, and Dr. Redfield. They include Dr. Nancy Mikovits, Dr. Rashid Bushard, Dr. Zack Bush, Dr. Richard Bartlett, and many others beginning to speak out against Drs. Fauci, Birx, and Redfield. A Nobel Laureate Luc Antoine Montagnier claims Covid-19 is manmade. The following points raise the questions of whom, when, why, and what fore:

Nobel Laureate Luc Antoine Montagnier said on French media that COVID-19 was manmade, contains elements of HIV and a parasite that causes malaria, and resulted from an industrial accident during HIV vaccine development

Montagnier says the Covid-19 virus pandemic will likely end from "interfering waves" because nature rejects molecular tampering

12

In a paper on Center for Open Science, Montagnier and his colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, say Covid-19 mutations suggest the virus is deleting the inserted, manmade elements

In the Quarterly Review of ‘Biophysics’, Norwegian scientist Birger Sørensen and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish also call Covid-19 manmade

An investigation by The ‘Times’ of London reveals many questions about COVID-19's origins and shocking cover-ups

The explanations of COVID-19's origins by mainstream media simply do not add up and scientists are increasingly speaking out about this. Many experts theorize that the virus is manmade and were synthesized in a laboratory because the peculiarities of the virus' genome that make it so transmittable could not have occurred in nature. Experts who suspect Covid have lab origins have strong evidence on their side. Research between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to increase the infectivity and deadliness of a SARS-like coronavirus has indeed been conducted.1

The coronavirus experimental collaborations, called "gain-of-function" (GOF) research, were curtailed by the U.S. between 2014 and 2018 because of their obvious risks, but in 2017 the NIH announced the research would be resumed.2

Scientists willing to challenge the mainstream explanations of Covid-19's origin face a backlash from their colleagues and scientific associations and have even been dismissed as "conspiracy theorists." However, a new voice has been added to the body of scientific dissenters that will likely add to the credibility of their Covid-19 viewpoints. French virologist Luc Antoine Montagnier, who was awarded a Nobel prize in Physiology in 2008 along with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Harald zur Hausen for discovering of the HIV virus,3 has now spoken out. Montagnier was a researcher at the prestigious Pasteur Institute in Paris.4

COVID-19 Was Manmade, Says Nobel Laureate

Many in the scientific community were shocked when the acclaimed Luc Antoine Montagnier appeared on the French cable TV show, CNews, on April 17, 20205 to say that the virus that causes Covid-19 is manmade and that elements of HIV and Plasmodium falciparum, a parasite that causes malaria, are found in the coronavirus's genome.6 Montagnier said:7

"We were not the first since a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study which showed that the complete genome of this coronavirus [has] sequences of another virus, which is HIV." The research that Montagnier refers to was posted on the science website Biorxiv January 31, 2020, and has since been withdrawn. The researchers wrote:8

13

"We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag ... The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature."

COVID-19 Derives From a Failed HIV Vaccine, Says Montagnier In a separate appearance on the French podcast Pourquoi Docteur, also April 17,9 Montagnier said the coronavirus had escaped in an "industrial accident" while Chinese scientists at the Wuhan city laboratory were trying to develop a vaccine against HIV.10

"In order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory," said Montagnier.11

Montagnier also said he believes that the pandemic will naturally extinguish itself because of its synthetic origins:12

"Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes and even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths." According to the website Corvelva, Montagnier said on the podcast that the pandemic would peter out because nature would override the synthetically inserted sequences that make COVID-19 so deadly:13

"With the help of interfering waves, we could eliminate these sequences ... and consequently stop the pandemic. But it would take many means available."

Montagnier Created His Theory With a Biomathematics Expert Montagnier says he reached his conclusions, "With my colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez," after they "carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus."14 Montagnier's partner, Perez, is a French interdisciplinary scientist and biomathematics expert.15

According to an online bio, Perez has proved that DNA coding for genes is structured by proportions related to Fibonacci numbers,16 which are formulas in mathematics that are sometimes called "nature's secret code."17 In a paper Montagnier and Perez published on the Center for Open Science in April 2020, they write:18

"Using our proprietary bio-mathematic approach we are able to evaluate the level of cohesion and organization of a genome; ... we then searched in this genome for possible traces of HIV or even SIV [related simian immunodeficiency virus]. A first publication reports the discovery of 6 HIV SIV RNA pieces."

14

The HIV and SIV elements that Montagnier and Perez detect, called Exogenous Informative Elements, or EIEs, provide the basis of their theory that COVID-19 is not a simple derivative of SARS and bat-related viruses. They write:19

"A major part of these 16 EIE already existed in the first SARS genomes as early as 2003. However, we demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV1 HIV2 Exogenous Informative Elements radically distinguishes all COVID-19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains ... ... a contiguous region representing 2.49% of the whole COVID-19 genome is 40.99% made up of 12 diverse EIE originating from various strains of HIV SIV retroviruses ... a novel long region of around 225 nucleotides, appears to us to be totally new: this region is completely absent in ALL SARS genomes, whereas it is present and 100% homologous for all COVID-19 genomes listed in NCBI or GISAID COVID-19 genomic databases."

More About Montagnier and Perez's Theory After in-depth sequencing of related genomes from many different countries, regions of countries and time periods using their proprietary bio-mathematic approach, Montagnier and Perez say their research enabled them to:20

"… demonstrate how and why a new region including 4 HIV/SIV EIE radically distinguishes all COVID- 19 strains from all SARS and Bat strains." They also find the presence of plasmodium yoelii in the Covid-19 genome, a parasite used in studies of "mice vaccine strategies." This is another EIE not originally in the SARS and bat-related viruses, say Montagnier and Perez.21

"An analysis of amino acid homologies confirms the very probable insertion of this EIE [plasmodium yoelii] in Covid-19." As they decode the genomes of myriad Covid-19 "relatives" in their research paper, Montagnier and Perez detect mutations in which the viruses seem to be trying to "rid" themselves of the exogenous EIEs, which the researchers believe were inserted deliberately.22

The virus mutations seem to verify Montagnier's Pourquoi Docteur podcast predictions about how nature will eliminate "unnatural changes" — the reason he is hopeful the pandemic will come to a natural ending.23

Other Researchers Agree With Montagnier and Perez

Since Montagnier's comments to French media, other researchers have agreed that Covid-19 appears manmade, with insertions that hint at lab construction. In June 2020, research published in the ‘Quarterly Review of Biophysics’ makes similar claims.24 Norwegian scientist Birger Sørensen and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish refer to COVID-19 as a "chimeric virus" and write:25

15

"We show the non-receptor dependent phagocytic general method of action to be specifically related to cumulative charge from inserted sections placed on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike surface in positions to bind efficiently by salt bridge formations; and from blasting the Spike we display the non-human-like epitopes from which Biovacc-19 has been down-selected." While conceding the ‘Quarterly Review of Biophysics’ assertions were controversial, the scientific website Minerva wrote that the science should be pursued.26

"Minerva has read a draft of the article, and has after an overall assessment decided that the findings and arguments do deserve public debate, and that this discussion cannot depend entirely on the publication process of scientific journals." Like Montagnier, Sørensen's background is HIV research work and he launched a new immunotherapy for HIV in 2008 that was acclaimed.27 In an interview with Minerva about his recent contentious research, he says:28

"We have examined which components of the virus are especially well suited to attach themselves to cells in humans. And we have done this by comparing the properties of the virus with human genetics. What we found was that this virus was exceptionally well adjusted to infect humans ... So well that it was suspicious."

The Sunday Times of London Weighs In Dr. Joseph Mercola previously interviewed virologist Jonathan Latham, and he expanded on his uncovering of this nondisclosed Wuhan virus. You can see more in the video below. Download Interview Transcript There are many unexplained circumstances surrounding the discovery and spread of Covid-19, which inspired The ‘Times of London’ to launch an in-depth investigation that was recently published.29 For example, the newspaper notes that a virus similar to Covid-19 appeared on the scene much earlier than was reported.30

"The world's closest known relative to the Covid-19 virus was found in 2013 by Chinese scientists in an abandoned mine where it was linked to deaths caused by a coronavirus-type respiratory illness." Among the many unanswered questions was why the deaths of six men in China in 2012, which had been exposed to a bat virus and quickly developed severe pneumonia, were covered up by Chinese authorities. According to The Times:31

"All the men were linked. They had been given the task of clearing out piles of bat feces in an abandoned copper mine in the hills south of the town of Tongguan ... Some had worked for two weeks before falling ill, and others just a few days ... while none had

16

tested positive for SARS, all four had antibodies against another, unknown Sars-like coronavirus." A research paper titled "Coexistence of Multiple Coronaviruses in Several Bat Colonies in an Abandoned Mineshaft," co-written by Shi Zhengli, a researcher known in China as the "Bat Woman," makes "no mention of why the study had been carried out: the miners, their pneumonia and the deaths," says the Times.32

The deaths from the apparently new bat-related respiratory virus were also blacked out by Chinese media, says The Times, and could only be gleaned from a "master's thesis by a young medic called Li Xu."33

Adding to the many questions about the virus' origins, wrote ‘The Times’, was the fact that "of the 41 patients who contracted Covid-19 in Wuhan only 27" had contact with the Huanan seafood market, which was officially named as the source. Moreover, a longtime bat researcher exposed to bat blood and urine that subsequently fell ill and might have been "patient zero" refused to talk to reporters.34

Thanks to the "gain-of-function" research that was conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, well-founded fears of escaped or leaked viruses preceded the acknowledgement of Covid-19 and were increased by China's lack of transparency. For example, wrote The ‘Times’, even the fact that Covid-19 could be spread between humans was hidden:35

"China would not admit there had been human-to-human transmission until January 20, despite sitting on evidence the virus had been passed to medics."

The True Nature of COVID-19 Remains Hidden According to The ‘Times’, a sample of the virus that killed six in 2012 was housed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was described in a scientific paper co-written by Shi that states it is a 96.2% match to the COVID-19 virus.36 The virus, called RaTG13, says The ‘Times’: "… was the biggest lead available as to the origin of Covid-19. It was therefore surprising that the paper gave only scant detail about the history of the virus sample, stating merely that it was taken from a Rhinolophus affinis bat in Yunnan province in 2013 — hence the "Ra" and the 13. Inquiries have established, however, that RaTG13 is almost certainly the coronavirus discovered in the abandoned mine in 2013, which had been named RaBtCoV/4991 in the institute's earlier scientific paper. For some reason, Shi and her team appear to have renamed it." According to The ‘Times’, the obfuscation about how long the virus has been known to exist and its origins continues. In an interview with ‘Scientific American’, says The ‘Times’, Shi:37

17

"… mentions the discovery of a coronavirus that 96% matches the Covid-19 virus, and has a reference to the miners dying in a cave she investigated. However, the two things are not linked and Shi downplays the significance of the miners' deaths by claiming they succumbed to a fungus."

Was COVID-19 Created in a Lab? With the many cover-ups and misleading information surrounding the coronavirus and resulting pandemic, is it possible Covid-19 came from a lab and was manmade? On this point, The ‘Times’ is agnostic.38

"The final and trickiest question for the WHO inspectors [who investigated the virus in China] is whether the virus might have escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan. Is it possible, for example that RaTG13 or a similar virus turned into Covid-19 and then leaked into the population after infecting one of the scientists at the Wuhan institute? This seriously divides the experts. The Australian virologist Edward Holmes has estimated that RaTG13 would take up to 50 years to evolve the extra 4% that would make it a 100% match with the Covid-19 virus." Most of the mainstream media as well as the scientific community continue to dismiss such ideas. But the addition of the voices of a Nobel Laureate and well-known Norwegian researcher give the theory greater credibility. There are other questions unexplored by media, too.

Was COVID-19 Intended as a Bioweapon? If Covid-19 was manmade and leaked from a laboratory, there is another pressing question. Was the synthesized virus intended as a bioweapon? In a published paper, Dr. Meryl Nass, a board-certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist,39 wrote that such genetic engineering techniques have "resulted in biological weapons that were tested, well-described and, in some cases, used."40

Many are unaware of just how many Biological Safety Levels (BSL) 3 and 4 labs there are in the world. They are found in the U.S., China, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, The Czech Republic, France, Gabon, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Russia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.41 People are also unaware of how often leaks occur. For example, in 2017 at the BSL 4 lab on Galveston Island, there were serious questions about what happened to pathogens housed there after it was hit by a massive storm and severe flooding.42 Only two years later, the BSL 4 lab in Fort Detrick, Maryland, was temporarily shut down after protocol violations.43

When Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005, the greater New Orleans area housed at least five BSL 3 labs that were studying anthrax, HIV, SARS, West Nile and genetically engineered mouse pox. According to The Daily Bruin:44

18

"The National Primate Research Center, located at Tulane, housed nearly 5,000 monkeys in outdoor cages for 'infectious disease, including biodefense-related work, gene therapy, reproductive biology and neuroscience,' according to an article in Tulane University Magazine."

The CDC Has Had Several BSL Safety Breaches and Accidents Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has had leaks in its home-based Atlanta facility. In June 2012, the agency made headline news when an inspector reported that a building housing anthrax, SARS and monkey pox in one of its bio-terror labs had a noticeable air leak. This was following similar reports in 2007 and 2008. Of the 2012 incident, ABC News said:45

"The documents suggest a breach in biosafety regulations, imposed nationwide by the CDC itself, that dictate labs housing the most dangerous inhalable infectious agents must be maintained under 'negative pressure.'" The CDC just seems to keep having accidents. For example, in June 2014, the CDC released a public statement46 stating "… approximately 75 Atlanta-based staff is being monitored after being exposed to live anthrax when … established safety practices were not followed." The CDC then pledged to do internal reviews of lab-safety policies and procedures. Six months later, in December 2014, Reuters47 reported that the CDC had created a new, high-level safety position to "identify problems, establish plans to solve them, and hold programs throughout CDC accountable for follow-up." But, in 2016, it happened again: Problems in an Atlanta BSL-4 lab working "with deadly Ebola and smallpox viruses and other pathogens that lack vaccines or reliable treatments" developed when safety seals and backup safety measures on its labs failed.48

In reporting on this incident, ‘USA Today’ obtained copies of reports from a 2009 incident, and learned that certain CDC officials tried to hide the problems. ‘USA Today’ asked Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University biosafety expert who has testified before Congress on these issues, to look at the reports and to give his opinion on the CDC's actions. Ebright said: "Overall, the incident shows that failures — even cascading, compounding, catastrophic failures of BSL-4 biocontainment labs occur … And the attempted cover-up within the CDC makes it clear that the CDC cannot be relied upon to police its own, much less other institutions." The CDC responded that "there was never any risk posed by the lab's equipment failures." What other accidents have we yet to hear about? If we are ever going to get a handle on this, we must listen to the experts on this topic, many whom I have

19

interviewed. Although there may have been some valid research taking place at one time, most of these bioweapon labs are dangerous and should be shut down.

Pirbright Institute & Bill Gates Shared Patent on Covid-19 We are still waiting for authorities to investigate the fact that the Rothschild-owned Pirbright Institute and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation own the Patent for the Covid-19 virus. More than four months ago, I shared the findings of the American Intelligence Media regarding the fact that this Corona virus was patented twice in the past decade, the most recent being in 2018, by the Rothschild-owned Pirbright Institute and the Gates Foundation.

The evidence written on a face mask above is found in U.S. Patent #10,130,701. A week or so ago, the WHO declined to investigate the Wuhan labs where the Covid-19 specimens were kept. That should be no surprise given the names of those involved. Keep in mind, holding a patent on the virus, means it is no longer a natural virus, but rather has been modified, and thus it means they already have a vaccine for which they can earn patent royalties on a vaccine that is sitting on a shelf or being produced for future injection into the arms of the public. Bill Gates own words are: “we are injecting them into the little kids arms, we just shoot right into the vein!!” The CIA (READ: Pilgrims Society-Rothschild’s-J.P Morgan) has directed the automation of the U.S. Patent Office since 1954. Serco is the Rothschild-owned company that has a management contract for the U.S. Patent Office, for about a decade. The CIA or (Catholic Intelligence Agency). They have over the years stole hundreds, perhaps thousands of patent applications for them to steal the creative works of others.

20

We know that Michael McKibben and Leader Technology of Columbus, Ohio were the creators of the social platform known as “Face Book”. Under the Miller Act, Leader Technology has a $1-trillion legal suit against the U.S. government for theft of creative proprietary software technology by the CIA. Their ownership is confirmed and validated by the fact that Michael McKibben and Leader Technology have the original source code for their software. In a previous article months ago, I shared how the Rothschild-owned Perbright Institute used their satellite technology to hijack the Chinese 5G base and sub stations to “modulate” their new model city of Wuhan, China for 5G. By “modulating” the energy level to 60-gigahertz, they were able to kill an infinite number of Wuhan residents with

21

the simple click of a switch and volume-dial without anyone knowing what happened or who was responsible. When the 5G energy level was turned up to 60-gigahertz, the energy effect is to consume all the oxygen molecules in a person’s lungs, and instant death. The Chinese government vaccinated the entire population of China in September of 2019. The vaccine likely contained a receptor that created a hypoxic effect to individual’s lungs which deprived them of life-needed oxygen. The reason for this is related to the fact that the Rothschild’s need to get rid of the two largest economic engines in the world, namely, China and the USA. This was a cyber- attack to provoke a war between the Chinese Communist Party and the USA. Each country was being set up to blame the other, and fan the flames for a war between the two super powers. For the World Economic Forum and the New World Order to be implemented in 2021, these two nations have to be brought to their knees in an economic collapse, or an extinction level event. Since all of the confusion and distraction that followed the initial release of the so-called virus provides a cover and plausible denial, the flames of war rhetoric are being fanned in what will result in a nuclear conflict, or an EMP attack on the U.S. that is intended to achieve mutual annihilation. Currently President Trump, likely unaware of the true cause of this has been placing sanctions on China for its clamp down on Hong Kong, and China responds in kind. Access to the President is blocked by an inner circle of staff committed to block his efforts for re-election in November. There are individuals trying to get the President’s ‘ear’ about Drs. Fauci, Berx, and Redfield; the Gates Foundation and the ties with Perbright Institute, the Wellcome Trust, and the Rothschild’s. Former CIA operative Robert David Steele has stated that they have tried to share evidence regarding the Jesuits Drs. Fauci and Redfield; and Bill Gates. In a recent interview Robert David Steele had with Pam Popper, an expert in public health has suggested that August 1st, 2020 is the point of no return in saving the country from total collapse. There is so much more to this fake pandemic Corona virus scam. The Thursday, July 16th interview had all the overtones of an impending urgency to get the President’s attention. My reaction to their video conversation on Robert David Steele’s web page is that the destiny of the USA hangs in the balance unless they are able somehow to get the President’s attention. If we are to survive this crisis, the best thing one can do is resist in mass is said in the illustration below. Governors cannot create law, and even former Fox News legal consultant Judge Andrew Napolitano has stated on network television, any such requirement to wear a face mask is a violation of our civil rights. When large groups of people band together as organizations, churches, denominations, and begin to sue governors like Andrew Cuomo of New York and Gavin Newsom of California, such tyranny and persecution may be able to turn the tide against those elected to serve the people instead of acting like despots and kings. The emperors have no clothes. Sue the sons of bitches. It has nothing to do with public safety, it is all about psyops to see what they can get away with intimidation and fear mongering.

22

+ Sources and References

1 Nature November 9, 2015

2 The Lancet Volume 18, Issue 2, P148-149, February 01, 2018

3, 4 Nobel Prize 2020

5 CNews April 17, 2020

6, 7, 10 Science The Wire April 22, 2020

8 Biorxiv January 31, 2020

9 Pourquoi Docteur April 16, 2020

11, 12 The Palmer Foundation June 23, 2020

13 Corvelva April 20, 2020

14 Gilmore Health News April 16, 2020

15, 16 Creation Wiki

17 Live Science October 24, 2018

18, 19, 20, 21, 22 Center for Open Science April 24, 2020

23 Corvelva April 20, 2020

24, 25 Quarterly Review of Biophysics June 2020 pp. 1-17

26, 28 Minerva July 2, 2020

27 Dagensperspektiv August 5, 2008, 14:35

23

29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 The Sunday Times July 4, 2020

39 Justice Clearing House 2020

40 Anthrax Vaccine Blog Spot April 2, 2020

41 National Review April 16, 2020

42 Consortium News August 30, 2018

43 WJLA January 22, 2020

44 Sarah Martin October 10, 2005

45 ABC News June 13, 2012

46 CDC June 19, 2014

47 Reuters December 31, 2014

48 USA Today June 2, 2016

All of the previous information presented is essential vital information if you want to make sense of the world’s transformation in process, but it is like going to a major league baseball game without buying a program for the game. It’s hard to know who the players are, what inning it is, hits, runs, score, etc. In this case, the program is provided by the Rockefeller.

The Covid-Plan / Rockefeller Lockstep 2010 They hypothesize a simulated global outbreak required steps, various phases, overall timelines, and expected outcomes. This was posited in the Rockefeller Lockstep 2010:

Create a very contagious but super low mortality rate virus to fit the needed plan. Using SARS, HIV, and Hybrid Research Strain created at Fort Dietrich Class 4 lab from 2008 to 2013 as part of a research project to find out why corona viruses spread like wildfire in bats but have an extremely hard time infecting humans. To counteract that, they added 4 HIV inserts into the virus. The missing key to infect the human is the Ace-2-Receptor.

Create a weaponized version of the virus with a much higher mortality rate as a backup plan. Ready to be released in Phase 3, but only if needed. SARS, HIV, MERS, Weaponized Tribit Strain created at Fort Dietrich Class 4 lab in 2015.

Transport the Research Strain to different Class 4 lab, the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg Canada, and have it “stolen and smuggled out by China”, Xi Jang Lee, on purpose and taken to China’s only Class 4 lab which is Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan China. For added plausible deniability and to help cement the wanted backup public script as something to fall back on if needed. The primary script being its natural. Backup script being that China created it and released it by accident.

Fund all the talking heads: Fauci, Birx, Tedros and agencies, World Health Organization, NIAID, the CDC and also the UN, that would be involved with pandemic response prior to the planned release of the Research Strain to control the wanted script throughout the operation.

Create and fund the vaccination development and roll out plan so it’s capable of being rolled out on a global scale. Gates: A Decade of Vaccines and the Global Action Vaccine action plan, 2010 to 2020.

24

Create and fund the vaccination, verification and certification protocols, Digital ID, to enforce/confirm the vaccination program after the mandatory roll out is enacted. Gates: ID2020.

Simulate the lockstep hypothesis just prior to the planned Research Strain release using a real-world exercise as a final war game to determine expected response, timelines, and outcomes, Event 201 in Oct 2019.

Release the Research Strain at the Wuhan Institute of Virology itself and then blame its release on a natural scapegoat as the wanted primary script. Wuhan wet market, Nov 2019. Exactly the same as the simulation.

Downplay the human-to-human transmission for as long as possible to allow the Research Strain to spread on a global scale before any country can lock down respond to avoid initial infection.

Once a country has seen infection in place, lock down incoming/outgoing travel. Keeps the transmission within the country spreading for as long as possible.

Once enough people in a country/ region are infected, enact forced quarantines/isolation for that area and expand the lockdown regions slowly over time

Overhype the mortality rate by tying the Research Strain to deaths that have little to nothing to do with the actual virus to keep the fear and compliance at a maximum. If anyone dies for any reason and is found to have Covid, consider it a Covid death. And if anyone is thought to of maybe had symptoms of Covid, assume they have Covid, and consider it as a Covid death.

Keep the public quarantines for as long as possible to destroy the region’s economy, create civil unrest, break down the supply chain, and cause the start of mass food shortages. As well as cause people’s immune system to weaken due to a lack of interaction with other people’s bacteria, the outside world, aka the things that keep our immune systems alert and active.

Downplay and attack any potential treatments and continue to echo that the only cure that is viable to fight this virus is the vaccine.

Continue to drag out the quarantine over and over again in “two-week intervals” [There is that two weeks spell casting again. It is a CIA program.] causing more and more people to eventually stand up and protest. Defy them.

[And here is the key part to now:] Eventually end Phase 1 quarantine once they get enough public push back, expected June 2020, and publicly state that they think it’s “too early to end the isolation, but I’m going to do it anyways.”

Once the public go back to normal, wait a few weeks and continue to overhype the Research Strain mortality rate, Aug to Sept 2020, and combine it with the increase in deaths due to people dying from standard illnesses at a higher rate than normal due to having highly weakened immune systems from months of being in isolation [Which backs up what I said: you should social-distance people who wear masks regular. That’s what they’ve just told you. They have highly weakened immune systems.] to help further pad the mortality rate and also hype the up and coming Phase 2 lockdown.

Eventually, enact Phase 2 quarantines, Oct through Nov 2020, on an even more extreme level and blame the protesters, mostly people who don’t trust their governments already, as the cause of the largest second wave whereby the

25

media will say ‘we told you so. It was too early. It’s all your own fault because you needed a haircut. Your freedoms have consequences.’ [Should this all unfold in this manner, the U.S. election will be cancelled delayed or suspended. My opinion. How can you vote with Phase 2 quarantines? You can’t.]

Enforce the Phase 2 quarantines at a much more extreme level increasing the penalty for defiance. Replace fines with jail time. Deem all travel as non-essential. Increase checkpoints, including military assistance. Increase tracking/tracing after population via mandatory app. Take over control of food, gas, and create large scale shortages so that people can only get access to essential products or services if they are first given permission.

Keep the Phase 2 lockdown in place for a much longer period of time than the Phase 1 lockdown, continuing to destroy the global economy. Further degrade the supply chain and further amplify the food shortages and the like. Quell any public outrage using extreme actions or force and make anyone who defies them appear as public enemy #1 to those who are willing to submit.

After a rather long Phase 2 lockdown of 6 months plus, roll out the vaccination program and the vaccine certification and make it mandatory for everyone, giving priority access to those that submitted from the start and have those that are for it attack those that are against it, saying ‘they are a threat and the cause of all the problems’ by using words like “We can’t go back to normal until everyone takes the vaccine.” And people defying them are “hurting our way of life and therefore is the enemy.” [In other words they are going to turn the people against each other.]

If the majority of people go along with the agenda, then let those people enter the new system, the new normal, while limiting the minority that defied the agenda’s ability to work, travel and live.

If the majority of people go against the agenda, then release the Weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS Tribit Strain as a Phase 3 operation. A virus with a 30+% mortality rate as a final scare to punish the minority to quickly become the majority and give a final “We told you so” to those that didn’t listen.

Enact the new economy model. Microsoft patent 060606 crypto currency system using body activity data which is based on human behavior and willingness to submit. It is a tweaked version of the black mirrors 15 million merits program using food, water, shelter, and other essentials as a weapon of enforcement of the new economic system. Basically, do what we want and get rewarded. Gain credits score and gain more access to things you need to survive. Or go against what we want and get penalized. Lose credits score and lose access to things you need to survive.

And that is your New World Order: technology on steroids where you have no option but to comply. And if anyone thinks that this isn’t true, then go and check out some parts of China because they’ve already started some of the crypto currencies system in place in certain areas. So, this is the outline of their plan. And what we have to stop by outing it in as many places as possible. And also calling out Q and Trump and asking them: Are you going to stop this? Mass arrests are irrelevant. This is essential and this has to be blocked.

26

Blessings, Pastor Bob, EvanTeachr@aol.com www.pastorbobreid.com