Presented to:Aviation and the Environment: Issues & Methods Workshop By: Dr. Lourdes Maurice,
description
Transcript of Presented to:Aviation and the Environment: Issues & Methods Workshop By: Dr. Lourdes Maurice,
Presented to: Aviation and the Environment:Issues & Methods Workshop
By: Dr. Lourdes Maurice,Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor for EnvironmentFAA Office of Environment & Energy
Date: September 27-28, 2007
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives2Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Outline
• The Challenges Ahead• Goals & Metrics• NextGen Solutions• Concluding Observations
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives3Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Community Noise Impacts
Global climateAir Quality
Aviation Environmental IssuesAviation Environmental Issues - 2003
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives4Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Community Noise Impacts
Global climate
Air Quality
Aviation Environmental Issues
Water Quality
Aviation Environmental Issues - 2005
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives5Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Energy: Evolving Strategic Concerns
Transportation continues to have the largest reliance on oil…
…while some are predicting that we are nearing the peak of oil supply.
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives6Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Energy: Shift in Airline Cost Equation
Source: Air Transport Association
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives7Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
• United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 1992– General commitment to reduce certain
greenhouse gas emissions
• Kyoto Protocol 1997 (2005)– Specific targets for reductions
– Developing countries exempt (for now)
– Coverage of domestic aviation up to each country
– International aviation subject to ICAO plan (per Article 2.2)
• ICAO Decision in 2004 – Limit or reduce the impact from aviation
greenhouse gas emissions on climate change
Climate: Evolving Concerns
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives8Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
– “Flying kills. We all know it, and we all do it. And we won't stop doing it until the Government reverses its policy and starts closing the runways.” London Guardian, February 28, 2006
– “Of all the things which an ordinary person does which damage the planet, flying is far the worst.” Fly Now, Grieve Later, Tyndall Climate Center
– “Aviation could be the next tobacco industry.” CANSO Official, ATAG Conference, 2006
– “…we should tax aviation so heavily…that in within 10 years there should be virtually no domestic flights.” Conservative MP Tim Yeo, January 2007
– every time someone dies as a result of floods in Bangladesh, an airline executive should be dragged out of his office and drowned. George Monibot, Guardian Newspaper, December 2006
Climate: A Growing Storm
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives9Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
• GHG Emissions vs. Other Environmental Issues
• Defining a Way Forward (Technology vs. Market-Based Measures)
• Shift in Aviation Center of Gravity
Climate: ICAO Assembly Debate
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives10Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Community Noise Impacts
Global Climate
Air Quality
Aviation Environmental Issues - Today
Water Quality
Energy
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives11Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
NextGen VisionProvide environmental protection that allowssustained aviation growth
Factors:• 2X increase in system by 2025 • Fundamental system changes• Increased importance of environment• Vision to grow aviation while reducing significant environmental impacts
The Way Forward for the US
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives12Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Source: NextGen Integrated Plan, 2004
Dem
and
Year
Shift to more passengers / flight
3X
1X
2X
2004 2014 2025
Shift to smaller aircraft, more airports
2% Shift to Micro Jets
Increase 10+ pax/flight
Flights 1.4-3X
Passengers 1.8-2.4X
… and this is coupled with environmental
capacity constraints.
50 Largest U.S. Airports
0
20
40
60
80
100
Ozone PM 2.5
Non-attainmentAttainment
Demand for aviation is growing …
HC
CO
NOx
SOx
+ 75%
+ 70%
+ 90%
+ 85%
Preliminary Emissions for NextGen 2X Growth Scenario
… as is the environmental
footprint…
2000199019800
150
300
450
Air
po
rts
wit
h R
es
tric
tio
ns
Compiled by Tam et al., 2007from Boeing data 9/13/05
% o
f a
irpo
rts
Environmental Issues Translate to Capacity Constraints
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives13Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
• By 2025, significant environmental impacts of noise and local air quality will be reduced in absolute terms, even with the anticipated growth in aviation.
• Uncertainties about aviation emissions are reduced to enable appropriate actions to address these effects.
• Communities will value airports as gateways to the national and international transportation network.
• U.S. aerospace will provide leadership in researching, developing, and implementing technological, operational and policy initiatives that address mobility and environmental needs.
Our VisionEnvironmental Protection that Allows
Sustained Aviation Growth
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives14Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Outline
• The Challenges Ahead• Goals & Metrics• NextGen Solutions• Concluding Observations
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives15Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Noise• NextGen analyses done against goal to reduce noise exposure (65, 55 DNL) 1%/year
measured from base of 2000-2002 average (FAA goal)• FAA goal is now 4%/year (65 DNL) through Flight Plan (2008-2012)
Local Air quality• NextGen analyses compute lbs emissions• Engine emissions standards limit lbs emissions; ≠ significance• National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) establish significance for all sources
combined• Establishing aircraft contribution challenging
Climate• NextGen analyses done against goal to improve aviation fuel efficiency per revenue plane-
mile by 1%/year measured from base of 2000-2002 average (FAA goal)• Historical average ~2.2%; goal may become more stringent• Fuel burn can be translated to lbs pollutants; ≠ significance• Establishing metrics/aviation contribution challenging
Quantifying Goals
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives16Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Noise• “Significance” established as exposure to 65 DNL per Federal Policy;
significant legal precedent• Other views but no consensus exist
Local Air quality• Lbs emissions (not appropriate for impacts)• Need to quantify impacts (e.g., health impacts) – to do so requires putting
aviation contribution in context of other sources
Fuel Burn (Surrogate for Climate)• Using fuel burn per revenue passenger mile• Other metrics capture other types of performance (e.g., fuel burn per payload)• Working to establish metric; composite metric probably best – but difficult
from a policy perspective
Metrics Gaps
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives17Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
APMT PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM BLOCK
NOISE IMPACTS
LOCAL AIR QUALITY IMPACTS
CLIMATE IMPACTS
APMT COSTS & BENEFITS
New Aircraft
Emissions
Noise
APMT BENEFITS VALUATION BLOCK
Monetized Benefits
CollectedCosts
Emissions
Emissions & Noise
Policy and Scenarios
AEDT
Fares
DEMAND (Consumers)
SUPPLY (Carriers)
Operations
Schedule &
Fleet
EDS
What are the noise and emission
characteristics?
What are the environmental
implications & costs associated with a vehicle design?
A New Way of Modeling Impacts
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives18Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Climate Local Air Quality Noise
US
$B20
05
3% discount rate
Preliminary Results Only--Do not citeUS emissionsYearly cost
$16B/yr
US emissionsYearly cost
$2.8B/yr
89 US airports$0.5B/yr
(when annualized on a 30 year basis=
$10B “one-time”cost)
Example: Interdependencies - (for one particular set of scenarios and assumptions)
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives19Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Outline
• The Challenges Ahead• Goals & Metrics• NextGen Solutions• Concluding Observations
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives20Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
The Best Ultimate Solution: New Aircraft Technologies
Opportunities
• Historically new technologies account for 90% of environmental footprint reduction
• New concepts offer promise for improvement
• Collaborative demonstrations with industry can stimulate technology transition
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives21Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
CAAFI - Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative
Opportunities• Alternative Fuels may be Environmentally Friendly
• Helps Manage Interdependencies
• Enhances Energy Security/Diversity
• Aviation’s Potential as First Adapter
• Sustained High Costs Keep Alternatives Viable
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives22Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Near Term Solutions: Flight operations
Opportunities• New technologies to improve air traffic management will help reduce emissions.
An example is RVSM – Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums. Full worldwide implementation of RVSM may reduce fuel use by ~500 million gallons each year.
• Other operational approaches, such as continuous descent arrivals, can reduce fuel burn as well as noise
• Reducing congestion, and optimizing airport ground and terminal air space operations offer great promise for future reductions of noise and emissions
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives23Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
• Demonstrate and enable new aviation fuels derived from domestic resources to ensure a secure stable fuel supply
• Demonstrate technologies and operations to enable significant increases in the fuel efficiency of the aviation system
• Demonstrate technologies and operations to decrease the environmental impact of the aviation system
• Advance scientific knowledge/reduce uncertainties
NextGen R&D
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives24Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
• Research Consortium for Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise Technology Partnership “CLEEN”
• Airport Cooperative Research Program• Environmental Mitigation Demonstration Pilot
Program• Grant Eligibility for Assessment of Flight Procedures
(Sec. 605)• Airport Funding of Special Studies or Reviews
Reauthorization Provisions focused on NextGen
http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/reauthorization/
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives25Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
Outline
• The Challenges Ahead• Goals & Metrics• NextGen Solutions• Concluding Observations
Scientific & Regulatory Perspectives26Federal Aviation
AdministrationSeptember 27-28, 2007
• Environmental constraints to aviation growth real and looming
• We do not know quantitatively what our goals are – but likely to be more stringent
• We need metrics to quantify impacts
• We need to inform policy makers to enable defining significant
• We need robust cost-benefit analyses to inform defining appropriate
• NextGen Reform Act of 2007 offers historic environmental provisions to deal with these challenges
Summary