Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

45
Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals

Transcript of Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Page 1: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Presentation 3.4:Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals

Page 2: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Outline• Introduction• How to involve stakeholders in land-use

decisions• Professionalism, making a statement• Getting involved in the policy, planning,

and zoning processes• Summary

Page 3: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Introduction

Natural resource professionals have much of the experience and knowledge necessary to understand and explain the risks and benefits associated with land-use changes in the wildland-urban interface (WUI).

Page 4: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Land-use decisions

Land-use decisions in the WUI influence social, environmental, and economic conditions.

Communities must consider all three factors in order to be sustainable

Page 5: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Involving stakeholders

Ideally, land-use decisions are made based on balancing the values, interests, and needs of stakeholders.

Resource professionals have a responsibility to ensure that decision makers have the most useful and reliable natural resource information.

Page 6: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

How can you help?

• Provide science-based information for decision makers• Articulate the natural resource consequences of various

land-use options.

You are not responsible for • making regulatory decisions• determining what the “right” decision is• aligning yourself with a particular interest group

Page 7: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Professional vs. personal opinions

Professional opinions should be based on fact and experience. Resource professionals should provide their professional and not personal opinions to decision makers.

Page 8: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Involvement vs. advocacy

There can be a fine line between responsible involvement and advocacy.

What’s an example of a situation where this might be difficult? When is it easier?

Page 9: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.3:Creating a Statement

Page 10: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.3 – map of proposed school site

Page 11: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.3 photos

Page 12: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.3 Stakeholders

Against using the location•Friend of Guana River State Park

•Division of State Lands, Department of Environmental Protection

•Florida Governor

•County residents

For using the location•Ponte Vedra High School Coalition

•St. Johns County School Board

•County residents

Page 13: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.3 Discussion Questions

• Which statements did the best job of presenting a professional opinion? How was this accomplished?

• Which statements, if any, made appeals to emotional views and personal opinions? How could it be improved?

• Which statements made the listener feel more knowledgeable about the subject? How was this accomplished?

• What did you learn?

Page 14: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Opportunities to get involved

• Policy development

• Zoning process

• Land-use planning process

Page 15: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Steps in the Policy Process

1.Problem identification2.Policy agenda setting3.Policy formulation4.Policy adoption5.Policy implementation6.Policy evaluation

Page 16: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Steps in the Policy Process

1. Problem identification

2. Policy agenda setting

3. Policy formulation

4. Policy adoption

5. Policy implementation

6. Policy evaluation

Page 17: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Problem Identification

Natural resource managers are …

•Aware of important issues and short- and long-term consequences

Help policy makers prioritize issues

•May be aware of potential solutions Share ideas about what worked for other communities

Providing consistent, reliable information Providing consistent, reliable information increases a resource professional’s increases a resource professional’s

credibility.credibility.

Page 18: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Agenda Setting

• Increase public awareness about the issue

• Encourage public involvement Distribute flyers Speak at community meetings

• Rally support Connect natural resource issues

with current community priorities

Page 19: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Policy Formulation

Using the best available science, resource professionals can articulate how each particular course of action might affect natural resources.

Page 20: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Policy Evaluation

•Assist decision makers in evaluating the affects of a policy on natural resources

•Example•Policy aims to protect gopher tortoise

•Provide data on tortoise populations and wildlife movement

•Decision makers can determine if the policy is effective

Page 21: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Case Study 6:Improving the Urban Forest

in Roanoke, Virginia

Page 22: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.2: Tracking the Policy Process

Page 23: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.7:Guiding Neighborhood

Policy

Page 24: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.7: Scenario 1

•Large, new residential development in the WUI• One fourth finished and lots are still selling• 286 houses total• Small river runs through the development • Deer, bear, and other wildlife • Human wildlife conflicts• Surrounded by an overgrown, fire-prone pine forest • You know that the developer has just begun creating the neighborhood covenants

Page 25: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.7: Scenario 2

• Five-year-old subdivision in the WUI• 286 houses total• Small river runs through the development• Deer, bear, and other wildlife • Human-wildlife conflicts• Surrounded by a thick, fire-prone pine forest• The neighborhood covenants fail to provide guidance for addressing these

challenges• Some residents are doing things to solve these problems but insist a

neighborhood-wide effort is necessary

Page 26: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.8:Role-Playing Development

Decisions

Page 27: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.8 Discussion Questions

• Who does the project benefit? Who is affected negatively? How are benefits distributed between newcomers and existing residents?

• What financial effect will the project have on the local government in comparison to the previously operating local farm? Does it exert upward pressure on taxes?

• What are the long-term implications for the community of the increasing presence of commuters to Techdale?

• What are the implications for Gilead’s school system of this and other similar projects to come? How would you pay for a new or expanded school(s) in this case?

Page 28: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.8 Discussion Questions (cont.)

• How would you protect water quality in this project?• Given the lack of public transportation in small

towns like Gilead, how should it deal with quickly growing traffic throughout the town and its outskirts over the next 10 years?

• What planning could be done to keep housing affordable as the area booms? As the private market focuses on middle class housing (both ownership and rental) and affluent housing, how could Gilead ensure that less advantaged and lower-waged citizens will be housed? What could be done with this project?

Page 29: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Case Study 12:Mediating for Change in Martin County, Florida

Page 30: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Case Study 18:Stakeholders in the Planning and Zoning

Process

Page 31: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.9:Background and Discussion Questions for Case Study

18

Page 32: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Zoning

Regulations that define appropriate land uses, acceptable building height and setback, minimum lot sizes.

Page 33: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Zoning

• Divides communities into:• Agricultural• Commercial• Industrial• Residential land uses

• Intended to promote compatibility of land uses

Page 34: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Zoning can:

• Promote successful land-use regulation

• Promote natural resource protection

• Promote the goals of the local comprehensive plan

Page 35: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Zoning Success

Zoning ordinances have historically led to development that exacerbated interface issues. They need to be created with care.

Zoning needs your input!

Page 36: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

The Zoning Process1. Data Gathering

2. Public Notification

3. Commission Review

4. Commission Vote

5. Public Comment

6. Review for Compatibility with Plan

Page 37: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

The Zoning Process1. Data Gathering

2. Public Notification

3. Commission Review

4. Commission Vote

5. Public Comment

6. Review for Compatibility with Plan

Page 38: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Case Study 23: Zoning to Conserve

Greenspace in Davidson, North Carolina

Page 39: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Potential Roles for Resource Professionals

• Serve on the zoning commission

• Provide reliable data about resource conditions and land use impacts for local decision makers

Your chance to help shape development and reduce interface

issues!

Page 40: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Elements of the Planning Process

1. Data gathering

2. Goal formation

3. Land-use decision

4. Public input

5. Action plan

6. Evaluation

Page 41: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Case Study 17:Smart Growth Blossoms in

Flower Mound, Texas

Page 42: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.4: Practicing Land-Use Planning

Page 43: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Exercise 3.4 - Land Conservation Tools & Policies

• Urban growth boundary• Eminent domain• Land acquisition program for public lands• Conservation easement (land preservation agreement)• Agriculture reserve program• Zoning • Conservation subdivision• Floodplain restrictions• Wetlands protection policy• Slope ordinance/mountain ridge protection ordinances• Viewshed preservation

Page 44: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Summary

There are many opportunities to natural resource professionals to get involved in land-use decision making. They bring important information and experience to the table.

Page 45: Presentation 3.4: Opportunities for Natural Resource Professionals.

Credits

Photos:Slides 6,19,33: Larry KorhnakSlide 10,11: Ponte Vedra High School Coalition, Inc.Slide 20: Krasemann/Peter Arnold, Inc.Slides 40,41: Brett Billings, U.S. FWS, NCTCLiterature:Slides 15-16: Anderson, Brady, Bullock, and Stewart 1984.Slides 40-41: Kelly and Becker 2000.