Presentation 1.3
Transcript of Presentation 1.3
The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions
March 25, 2013
Presenter:Radium Cheng
Instructor:Dr. Teresa Hsu
Citation
Swinyard, W. R. (1993). The Effects of Mood,
Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on
Shopping Intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (2), 271-280.
2
Contents
IntroductionI
Literature ReviewII
MethodologyIII
ResultsIV
Discussion & ConclusionV
ReflectionVI
3
Introduction
Background
Each of us has had unpleasant shopping experiences, sometimes
for no reality explained reason except that we were in a bad mood.
Although mood is largely beyond the marketer’s control (Gardner &
Vandersteel, 1984), it is still stimuli in unintended ways.
4
Introduction
The Purpose of this study
The purpose of this article is to examine the effects of
mood, involvement, and quality of store experience
on shopping intentions.
5
Introduction
Research Questions
1. What is the influence of mood on shopping intentions?
2. Do mood effects vary with different levels of consumer involvement?
3. Does mood interact with the quality of the shopping experience?
4. Does a bad shopping experience have an effect on consumer
mood?
6
Literature Review
Mood Concept and Effects
Cialdini’s negative state relief model of helping
asserts that people in a negative mood will behave
more charitably than others.
(Cialdini, Darby, & Vincent, 1973; Cialdini, 1979)
Consumer in a good mood will have more positive
shopping intentions than those in a bad mood.
:
7
Literature Review
The Role of Involvement
It is likely that mood will have a greater effect when
the shopping experience is personally relevant to
consumers or “self-related or in some way
instrumental in achieving their personal goals”.
(Petty & Cacioppo, 1983; Celsi & Olson, 1988)
The effects of mood on shopping intentions will be
greater in more involving shopping situations than
in less involving shopping situations.
:
8
Literature Review
Effects of the Quality of the Shopping Experience
Mood-Protection Mechanisms.
• People in good moods tends to sustain their mood.
1. Peripheral or associative effects.
2. Cognitive elaboration.
3. Biased evaluations.
The effects of mood on shopping intentions will be
greater during a good shopping experience than
during a bad shopping experience.
:The effects of the quality of the shopping
experience on shopping intentions will be greater
in a more involving shopping situation than in a
less involving one.
:
9
Literature Review
Mood as a Dependent Variable
Mood can also be a dependent variable , for it can be
influenced by external events such as bad shopping
experience.
The quality of the shopping experience will
influence mood; compared to people who have
had a bad shopping experience, those having a
good experience will be in a more positive mood.
:
10
Method
Participant
109 undergraduate business students randomly
received one of eight written treatments.
Research Site
A single large classroom
11
Method
• 2x2x2 Design
• Three-way-full-
factorial analysis
of variance
design
The Hypotheses
Independent
Variable
Mood (good vs. bad)
Shopping
involvement (higher
vs. lower)
Shopping experience
(good vs. bad)
12
Method
Mood
Involvement
Store Experience
Procedure
Three Treatments
Procedure
Anagram
Written Scenarios
Written Scenarios
13
Method
MoodInvolve-
ment
Shopping
Intention
Quantitative
Covariate
Seven-point scale
• Alpha=0.85
• sad/happy
• bad /good mood
• irritable/pleased
• depressed/
cheerful
Seven-point scale
• Alpha=0.82
Five-item
seven-point
likelihood model
• Alpha=0.94
Seven-point scale
How likely or
unlikely they
actually were to
return an item if it
is defective
Measures
(Peterson & Sauber, 1983) (Celsi & Olson, 1988)
14
Results
Findings
Both the mood and involvement treatments were
found to have significant effects.
15
Results
Findings
The quality of the shopping experience has a prominent effect
on shopping intentions. 16
Results
Findings
Consumer in a good mood will have more positive
shopping intentions than those in a bad mood.
:
• Hypothesis 1 was not supported.17
Results
Findings
The effects of mood on shopping intentions will be
greater in more involving shopping situations than
in less involving shopping situations.
:
• The interaction supports H2, which proposes that mood effects will
be greater during a more involving shopping experience. 18
Results
Findings
• The interaction of mood and store experience is not significant.
The effects of mood on shopping intentions will be
greater during a good shopping experience than
during a bad shopping experience.
:
19
Results
Findings
The effects of the quality of the shopping
experience on shopping intentions will be greater
in a more involving shopping situation than in a
less involving one.
:
• H4 proposed that store experience would interact with
involvement , and table 1 and figure 4 reveal support for
this expectation. 20
Results
Findings
The quality of the shopping experience will
influence mood; compared to people who have
had a bad shopping experience, those having a
good experience will be in a more positive mood.
:
• Table 3, shopping experience was found to have a
significant effect on mood. H5 was supported. 21
Discussion & Conclusion
Discussion & Conclusion
For involved shoppers, a good shopping experience is
even better, and a bad shopping experience is still worse.
This reinforces the notion that service vendors must train,
retrain, and monitor their customer-service personnel.
22
Discussion & Conclusion
Discussion & Conclusion
Involved consumers react more strongly to good and bad
shopping experiences: that direct interactions with
consumers carry both great potential and great hazard.
23
Reflection
Reflection
The mood is both a variable that has influence on
shopping and one that is influenced by shopping.
influence on
is influenced by
24